SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 7535U + Intel Arc A370M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

89 Score

Top 11% Ranking

89 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 11% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

86%

GPU

93%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 5 7535U

22,791 Benchmark Score

Top 14% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A370M

29,175 Benchmark Score

Top 7% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# AMD Ryzen 5 7535U + Intel Arc A370M: A Mobile Pairing Analysis

This build pairs AMD's six-core Ryzen 5 7535U mobile processor with Intel's Arc A370M discrete graphics in a laptop configuration. The combination sits at the 75th percentile among all system pairings, with the CPU at the 76th percentile and the GPU at the 74th percentile. The data shows a balanced mid-range mobile platform capable of handling a wide range of productivity and creative tasks, though its gaming potential is constrained by the GPU's 4 GB memory capacity and the absence of measured frame-rate data for this specific configuration.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The GPU's benchmark scores place it near the AMD Radeon RX 470 (0.6% ahead) and the Radeon RX 6800M (1% behind), suggesting acceptable performance for esports and lighter titles at moderate settings. However, the 4 GB GDDR6 memory and 64-bit bus are limiting factors for modern AAA games at high resolutions.

Streaming: The CPU's 6 cores and 12 threads deliver a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 8591, which is sufficient for software encoding at 1080p while gaming. The Arc A370M's Xe-HPG architecture includes dedicated hardware acceleration for encoding tasks, though the data does not specify encoder capabilities.

Video editing: The CPU's PassMark multi-thread score of 17039 and floating-point math score of 33971 indicate competent handling of timeline scrubbing and effect rendering. The GPU's 4.198 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 8.397 TFLOPS FP16 (2:1) performance provide hardware acceleration for effects and color grading.

3D rendering: Cinebench R23 multi-core at 8591 places this CPU within 0.1% of the Ryzen 5 2600X and 0.5% behind the Ryzen 5 6600U, indicating rendering times competitive with older desktop six-core parts. The GPU's 8 ray-tracing cores suggest some RT acceleration, but the 4 GB VRAM will limit scene complexity.

Software development: The CPU's Geekbench single-core score of 1602 and multi-core score of 6466 provide smooth compilation and IDE responsiveness. The PassMark integer math score of 62109 and data compression score of 200252 point to efficient handling of build tools and version control operations.

Student and office work: The Ryzen 5 7535U's single-thread PassMark score of 3203 and the integrated Radeon 660M graphics provide ample performance for document processing, spreadsheets, and web browsing. The laptop class form factor and 28 W CPU TDP support all-day battery operation in typical productivity workloads.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A370M uses the DG2-128 chip built on TSMC's 6 nm process with 7,200 million transistors on a 157 mm² die. The GPU operates at a base clock of 1550 MHz and boosts to 2050 MHz, with memory running at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective). The 4 GB GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus yields 112.0 GB/s of bandwidth, which is modest by modern standards but sufficient for 1080p gaming at medium settings.

The shading complex includes 1024 shading units, 64 texture mapping units, and 32 render output units, producing pixel and texture rates of 65.60 GPixel/s and 131.2 GTexel/s respectively. The 8 dedicated ray-tracing cores provide entry-level RT capability, while the absence of tensor cores means AI-accelerated features rely on the Xe-HPG architecture's general-purpose compute.

Benchmark results show a Geekbench OpenCL score of 29676 and a Vulkan score of 28673. These figures place the GPU at the 74th percentile among all GPUs, with nearest rivals including the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH (0.1% behind) and the Radeon RX 470 (0.6% behind). The GPU's 4.198 TFLOPS FP32 compute aligns with these scores, indicating performance roughly equivalent to a mid-range desktop GPU from several generations ago.

The Arc A370M's 35 W TDP and IGP slot width make it suitable for thin-and-light laptops. The PCIe 4.0 x8 interface provides adequate bandwidth for the 4 GB frame buffer, and the DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4 API support ensures compatibility with modern graphics software.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score is 22791, placing it at the 76th percentile among all processors. Its nearest rival is the AMD Ryzen 5 2600X with an average score of 22823, a negligible 0.1% difference. The Ryzen 5 6600U scores 22897 (0.5% higher), while the Intel Core i5-12500H scores 22625 (0.7% lower) and the Core Ultra 5 135U scores 22618 (0.8% lower).

In Cinebench R23, the CPU achieves 8591 multi-core and 1414 single-core. The R15 results show 1330 multi-core and 225 single-core. Geekbench scores are 6466 multi-core and 1602 single-core. These figures indicate a processor that trades blows with desktop six-core chips from the same era.

The GPU's average benchmark score is 29175, placing it at the 74th percentile. Its nearest rival is the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH at 29197 (0.1% higher), followed by the AMD FirePro W8000 at 29211 (0.1% higher), the Radeon RX 470 at 28996 (0.6% lower), and the Radeon RX 6800M at 28874 (1% lower). The Geekbench OpenCL score of 29676 and Vulkan score of 28673 bracket the average.

The combined system percentile of 75 indicates that this pairing outperforms roughly three-quarters of all tested CPU+GPU combinations. The CPU and GPU percentiles are within two points of each other, suggesting a well-matched pairing where neither component dramatically outclasses the other.

Balance and Bottleneck

The CPU's 76th percentile and GPU's 74th percentile are closely aligned, indicating a balanced pairing for general-purpose computing. In CPU-bound workloads like data compression (PassMark score 200252) and integer math (62109), the processor leads, while the GPU handles graphics acceleration. The 0.8% advantage over the Core Ultra 5 135U in CPU average score shows the Ryzen 5 7535U holds its own against newer competition.

For gaming, the GPU becomes the limiting factor due to its 4 GB VRAM and 112.0 GB/s bandwidth. The CPU's single-thread performance (Geekbench 1602, R23 1414) is sufficient to feed the GPU in most scenarios, so frame rates will be constrained by the Arc A370M's compute and memory throughput rather than processor capabilities.

In productivity tasks, the CPU's 6 cores and 12 threads with 16 MB shared L3 cache provide strong multi-threaded performance, as evidenced by the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 8591. The GPU's FP32 compute of 4.198 TFLOPS accelerates rendering tasks, but the 4 GB memory capacity will limit scene complexity in GPU-accelerated workflows.

The absence of measured FPS data for this combination means bottleneck analysis relies on benchmark scores. The close percentiles suggest that neither component will consistently bottleneck the other in mixed workloads, with the CPU leading in compute and the GPU leading in graphics-specific tasks.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this build?

A: The combined system percentile is 75, with the CPU at the 76th percentile and the GPU at the 74th percentile among all tested components.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival?

A: The Ryzen 5 7535U scores 22791 average, which is 0.1% lower than the AMD Ryzen 5 2600X (22823) and 0.5% lower than the Ryzen 5 6600U (22897), but 0.7% higher than the Intel Core i5-12500H (22625).

Q: What is the GPU's closest competitor in benchmark scores?

A: The Intel Arc A370M's average score of 29175 is 0.1% lower than the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH (29197) and 0.1% lower than the AMD FirePro W8000 (29211), while being 0.6% higher than the Radeon RX 470 (28996).

Q: How much VRAM does the Arc A370M have?

A: The GPU has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, providing 112.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth.

Q: What is the CPU's socket and memory support?

A: The Ryzen 5 7535U uses AMD Socket FP7, supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with 76.8 GB/s bandwidth, and includes ECC memory support.

Q: Does the CPU have integrated graphics?

A: Yes, the Ryzen 5 7535U includes Radeon 660M integrated graphics, which can serve as a fallback for the discrete Arc A370M.

Q: What PCIe interface does the GPU use?

A: The Intel Arc A370M uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 bus interface, while the CPU provides PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes.

Who Should Build It

This laptop configuration targets gamers who play at 1080p with medium settings, where the Arc A370M's performance relative to the Radeon RX 470 (0.6% ahead) suggests playable frame rates in most titles. The 4 GB VRAM is adequate for esports and older games but will require texture quality reductions in newer releases.

Content creators working with 1080p video will benefit from the CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 8591 and the GPU's hardware acceleration for effects. The 8 ray-tracing cores provide entry-level RT capability for visualization tasks, while the 4.198 TFLOPS FP32 compute assists in rendering workloads.

Software developers will appreciate the CPU's Geekbench multi-core score of 6466 and the PassMark integer math score of 62109, which translate to efficient compilation and test execution. The 16 MB L3 cache and 12 threads handle parallel build processes effectively.

Students and office workers in need of a portable system with occasional GPU acceleration for presentations or light creative work will find the integrated Radeon 660M sufficient for daily tasks, with the Arc A370M available for more demanding graphics workloads. Small business workstations requiring ECC memory support and reliable multi-threaded performance for spreadsheets, databases, and financial modeling will benefit from the CPU's 76th percentile ranking.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU+GPU combination. All frame rate expectations are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and should be treated as approximations rather than measured results.

Based on the GPU's Geekbench OpenCL score of 29676 and Vulkan score of 28673, and its position relative to the Radeon RX 470 (0.6% ahead), the Arc A370M should handle 1080p gaming at medium settings in most titles. Esports games like Counter-Strike and Valorant should achieve high frame rates due to their low graphical demands.

For AAA titles, the 4 GB VRAM and 112.0 GB/s bandwidth will be limiting factors at higher settings. The GPU's 65.60 GPixel/s pixel rate and 131.2 GTexel/s texture rate suggest capable fill rates, but texture-heavy scenes may exceed memory capacity. The 8 RT cores enable ray-traced effects at reduced resolutions or with performance compromises.

The CPU's single-thread performance (Geekbench 1602, R23 1414) should not bottleneck the GPU in most gaming scenarios. The 6 cores and 12 threads provide sufficient headroom for background tasks while gaming, and the 28 W TDP keeps thermals manageable in laptop chassis.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build combining AMD's Ryzen 5 7535U mobile processor with Intel's Arc A370M discrete GPU. The CPU, part of the 7000 series, uses the Zen 3+ architecture (Rembrandt-R codename) built on TSMC's 6 nm process with a 208 mm² die size. The GPU, based on the Xe-HPG architecture (Alchemist generation), is in its end-of-life production status.

The combined system sits at the 75th percentile, with the CPU at 76th and GPU at 74th. This places the pairing in the upper-midrange of tested configurations, suitable for mainstream gaming at 1080p and productive multitasking. The CPU's 6 cores and 12 threads, combined with the GPU's 1024 shading units, provide a balanced foundation for a wide range of applications.

The 28 W CPU TDP and 35 W GPU TDP make this an efficient pairing suitable for thin-and-light laptops. The PCIe 4.0 x8 GPU interface and CPU's 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes provide modern connectivity, while the dual-channel DDR5 memory support ensures adequate bandwidth for both CPU and GPU workloads.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 5 7535U is a 6-core, 12-thread mobile processor based on the Zen 3+ architecture. It operates at a base clock of 2.90 GHz with a boost clock of 4.55 GHz, delivering a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 8591 and single-core score of 1414. The Geekbench scores are 6466 multi-core and 1602 single-core, placing the CPU at the 76th percentile among all processors.

The cache hierarchy includes 64 KB L1 per core, 512 KB L2 per core, and 16 MB shared L3 cache. This configuration supports efficient multi-threaded workloads, as evidenced by the PassMark multi-thread score of 17039 and floating-point math score of 33971. The data compression score of 200252 and integer math score of 62109 indicate strong general-purpose compute.

The CPU supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with 76.8 GB/s bandwidth and includes ECC memory support, a feature typically found in workstation-class processors. The integrated Radeon 660M graphics provide a fallback display output and basic 3D acceleration when the discrete GPU is idle or unavailable.

Built on TSMC's 6 nm process with a 208 mm² die, the Ryzen 5 7535U is efficient enough for the 28 W TDP envelope. The 7000 series positioning places it alongside competitors like the Intel Core i5-12500H (0.7% lower average score) and Core Ultra 5 135U (0.8% lower), while remaining competitive with the older Ryzen 5 2600X (0.1% difference).

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses AMD Socket FP7, which is a mobile-specific socket with no desktop upgrade path. The Ryzen 5 7535U supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with ECC capability, and the 76.8 GB/s memory bandwidth is fixed by the memory controller. The CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes, which accommodate the Arc A370M's PCIe 4.0 x8 interface with room for additional devices.

The GPU, being end-of-life, has no direct successor within the Arc 3 Mobile lineup. The 35 W TDP and IGP slot width mean upgrades would require a laptop redesign, as the socket and thermal solution are specific to this configuration. The absence of a suggested PSU rating reflects the laptop form factor, where power delivery is handled by the system's power adapter.

A sensible next upgrade for this platform would be a laptop with a newer CPU generation and a GPU with more VRAM, as the 4 GB capacity is the primary limitation for gaming and rendering. The CPU's 28 W TDP leaves thermal headroom for higher-end mobile processors in the same chassis class, but the FP7 socket limits options to the 7000 series. For users needing more performance, the 74th-percentile GPU ranking suggests that a system with a GPU at the 90th percentile or higher would provide a more substantial upgrade in graphics-bound workloads.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 7535U + Intel Arc A370M

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 5 7535U

Intel Arc A370M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Usage Scenarios

GPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

Balance and Bottleneck

FAQ

Who Should Build It

Gaming Performance

Build Overview

CPU Analysis

Upgrade Path and Platform

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds