SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 7535U + Intel Arc A350M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

89 Score

Top 11% Ranking

89 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 11% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

86%

GPU

92%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 5 7535U

22,791 Benchmark Score

Top 14% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A350M

24,647 Benchmark Score

Top 8% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# AMD Ryzen 5 7535U + Intel Arc A350M

This pairing combines AMD's 6-core Zen 3+ mobile processor with Intel's entry-level Arc 3 discrete GPU in a laptop configuration. The CPU sits at the 76th percentile among all processors, while the GPU lands at the 70th percentile among all GPUs, placing the overall combination at the 73rd combined percentile. Benchmark data shows this is a balanced mid-range mobile platform, with the CPU trading blows with desktop Ryzen 5 parts and the GPU competing with older desktop cards, though no measured FPS data exists for this exact combination.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 5 7535U is a 6-core, 12-thread processor built on the Zen 3+ architecture, codenamed Rembrandt-R. It operates from a 2.90 GHz base clock up to a 4.55 GHz boost clock within a 28 W TDP envelope. Fabricated on TSMC's 6 nm process with a 208 mm² die size, this chip represents a mature iteration of AMD's mobile lineup in the 7000 series.

Cache configuration consists of 64 KB L1 per core, 512 KB L2 per core, and 16 MB of shared L3 cache. This is a standard arrangement for a 6-core mobile part, providing adequate data locality for multi-threaded workloads. The processor supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with 76.8 GB/s bandwidth and includes ECC memory support, a feature not always present in mobile processors.

Benchmark scores paint a picture of solid mid-range performance. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 8591 and single-core score of 1414 indicate strong sustained multi-threaded capability for a 28 W part. Geekbench results show 6466 multi-core and 1602 single-core, reinforcing the CPU's position as a capable all-rounder. PassMark scores further break down performance: integer math at 62109, floating point at 33971, and data compression at 200252. The extended instructions score of 13187 suggests reasonable AVX/AVX2 throughput, while the physics score of 839 is modest but typical for a mobile chip.

The average benchmark score of 22791 places this CPU at the 76th percentile, meaning it outperforms roughly three-quarters of all processors in the database. Its nearest rival is the AMD Ryzen 5 2600X with an average score of 22823, a delta of only -0.1%, making these two effectively identical in overall performance. The Ryzen 5 6600U scores 22897 (+0.5% relative to the 7535U), the Intel Core i5-12500H scores 22625 (-0.7%), and the Intel Core Ultra 5 135U scores 22618 (-0.8%). This clustering shows the 7535U sits in a tight performance band where rival chips from both AMD and Intel deliver nearly interchangeable results.

For real workloads, this CPU handles everyday productivity with ease, manages moderate content creation tasks competently, and provides sufficient single-thread performance for responsive system interaction. The 6-core/12-thread configuration is well-suited for parallel compilation, video encoding, and multi-tab browsing, though it will not match higher-core-count workstation parts.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Ryzen 5 7535U uses AMD Socket FP7, a mobile-only socket that is not upgradeable in the traditional sense. This is a BGA (ball-grid array) package, meaning the processor is soldered to the motherboard. Consequently, the CPU itself is not a future upgrade target; the platform's longevity depends entirely on the laptop's other components.

Memory support includes dual-channel DDR5 with 76.8 GB/s bandwidth and ECC capability. The integrated Radeon 660M graphics provide a fallback display output if the discrete GPU is disabled or fails. PCIe connectivity is Gen 4 with 20 lanes from the CPU, providing ample bandwidth for the primary GPU and one or two NVMe SSDs.

The Intel Arc A350M connects via PCIe 4.0 x8, which is more than sufficient for its 112.0 GB/s memory bandwidth and 3.379 TFLOPS of FP32 compute. The GPU has a 25 W TDP, and the CPU draws 28 W, creating a combined thermal envelope that is modest for a discrete GPU laptop. The suggested PSU field is null, but the combined TDP of 53 W plus system components indicates a relatively compact power adapter is sufficient. Users should not expect to upgrade the GPU either, as it is soldered or module-based in most implementations.

A sensible "upgrade" for this platform would be increasing memory capacity and storage speed, as these are the only user-serviceable components in most laptops. The PCIe Gen 4 support ensures modern NVMe drives operate at full speed, and the dual-channel DDR5 controller benefits from matched memory modules.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score of 22791 places it in the 76th percentile, while the GPU's average of 24647 places it in the 70th percentile. The combined percentile for this pairing is 73, indicating that the overall system outperforms nearly three-quarters of all tested configurations.

Looking at specific CPU benchmarks, the single-thread PassMark score of 3203 is competitive for a mobile part at this tier. The multi-thread PassMark score of 17039 reflects the 6-core/12-thread design. Cinebench R23 multi-core at 8591 is a strong result for a 28 W chip, and the single-core score of 1414 is respectable. Geekbench multi-core at 6466 and single-core at 1602 round out the synthetic picture. The PassMark data encryption score of 12706 and random string sorting score of 21267 indicate solid integer performance, while the find prime numbers score of 50 is low, suggesting this workload is not a strength of the architecture.

The GPU benchmarks show Geekbench OpenCL at 24546 and Vulkan at 24747. The average of 24647 places the Arc A350M at the 70th percentile. Its nearest rival is the AMD Radeon RX 590 with an average score of 24744, a delta of -0.4%, making these two statistically equivalent. The NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile scores 24763 (-0.5%), the AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT scores 24442 (+0.8%), and the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 scores 24277 (+1.5%). The tight clustering around the A350M means this GPU delivers performance comparable to a desktop RX 590 or GTX 1630, which is impressive for a 25 W mobile part.

The combined picture is a system where both CPU and GPU are mid-pack performers. Neither component is a bottleneck in the traditional sense; they are well-matched for 1080p gaming and moderate productivity workloads.

Balance and Bottleneck

Benchmark percentiles indicate the CPU at 76th percentile and GPU at 70th percentile are closely aligned, suggesting a balanced platform where neither component dramatically outclasses the other. The 0.6 percentage point difference in percentiles is negligible in real-world terms.

In CPU-bound workloads like data compression (200252 PassMark score), integer math (62109), and floating point math (33971), the Ryzen 5 7535U performs well above the GPU's relative standing. Conversely, the GPU's Geekbench Vulkan score of 24747 shows it handles graphics compute tasks competently, but it will be the limiting factor in graphically intensive applications.

For gaming, the balance tips toward the GPU being the primary constraint at higher resolutions and detail settings. The CPU's single-thread score of 1414 in Cinebench R23 is adequate for most game engines, but the GPU's 3.379 TFLOPS of FP32 compute and 112.0 GB/s bandwidth will cap frame rates in modern titles. At lower resolutions and settings, the CPU becomes relatively more important, and the 6-core/12-thread configuration provides enough headroom to avoid significant CPU bottlenecks.

For productivity tasks like video editing or 3D rendering, the CPU will be the limiting factor in multi-threaded workloads, while the GPU accelerates effects and preview rendering. The 25 W GPU TDP and 28 W CPU TDP create a combined thermal load that is manageable in a laptop chassis, but sustained all-core CPU loads may cause boost clocks to settle below the 4.55 GHz maximum.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFps entries, so all frame rate expectations are estimates derived from the benchmark scores.

Based on the GPU's average benchmark score of 24647, which places it in the 70th percentile and comparable to an AMD Radeon RX 590, this system should handle 1080p gaming at medium to high settings in most titles. The 4 GB GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus with 112.0 GB/s bandwidth is a limiting factor for modern games with large texture requirements, so ultra settings with high-resolution texture packs may exceed available VRAM.

The CPU's single-thread performance (Cinebench R23 1414, Geekbench 1602) is sufficient for maintaining frame rates above 60 FPS in most games, though esports titles at high refresh rates may see CPU limitations in scenes with many objects. The 6-core/12-thread configuration provides adequate multi-threading for modern game engines that leverage multiple cores.

For competitive titles like CS:GO or Valorant, estimated frame rates at 1080p low settings could exceed 100 FPS, though this is speculative without measured data. For AAA titles like Cyberpunk 2077 or Elden Ring, expectations should be 30-60 FPS at 1080p medium settings, with drops below 30 FPS in demanding scenes. The lack of measured FPS data means these are estimates, and actual performance may vary based on driver maturity and game optimization.

Who Should Build It

This laptop combination targets users who need a balanced mobile platform for mixed workloads without extreme performance demands. The CPU's 76th percentile ranking suits students and office workers who multitask heavily, run virtual machines, or compile code. The 12 threads handle parallel workloads efficiently, and the 16 MB L3 cache provides responsive performance for typical productivity applications.

Content creators working with 1080p video or moderate-resolution images will find the CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 8591 adequate for export tasks, while the GPU accelerates effects in applications that support OpenCL or Vulkan. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 24546 indicates the GPU can offload compute tasks effectively.

Developers will appreciate the 6-core/12-thread configuration for parallel builds, and the ECC memory support adds reliability for long-running processes. The PassMark data compression score of 200252 suggests solid performance for database operations and file archiving.

Small business workstations that run accounting software, customer relationship management tools, or data analysis applications will find this combination sufficient. The GPU's 70th percentile ranking ensures smooth display rendering and hardware acceleration for browser-based applications.

Gamers at 1080p who accept medium settings will find the system playable, though the 4 GB VRAM is a constraint for newer titles. The 73rd combined percentile indicates this is not a high-end gaming machine but a competent all-rounder.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A350M is built on the Xe-HPG architecture, generation Alchemist (Arc 3 Mobile), using the DG2-128 chip. It contains 7,200 million transistors on a 157 mm² die, fabricated on TSMC's 6 nm process with a transistor density of 45.9M per mm². The GPU operates at a base clock of 1150 MHz with a boost clock of 2200 MHz.

Memory configuration is 4 GB of GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus, running at 1750 MHz with 14 Gbps effective speed, providing 112.0 GB/s bandwidth. This is a narrow memory interface that limits performance in bandwidth-sensitive workloads, but it is sufficient for the GPU's compute capabilities. The 768 shading units, 48 texture mapping units, and 24 raster operation units deliver a pixel rate of 52.80 GPixel/s and texture rate of 105.6 GTexel/s. Compute performance is 3.379 TFLOPS FP32 and 6.758 TFLOPS FP16 (2:1 ratio).

The GPU includes 6 ray tracing cores, supporting DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. This provides hardware-accelerated ray tracing, though the modest compute performance will limit ray tracing to lighter scenes or lower resolutions. The 25 W TDP is remarkably low for a discrete GPU, making this an efficient option for thin-and-light laptops.

Benchmark results show Geekbench OpenCL at 24546 and Vulkan at 24747, with an average score of 24647 placing it at the 70th percentile. This is comparable to the AMD Radeon RX 590 (24744, -0.4%) and NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile (24763, -0.5%), while slightly ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT (24442, +0.8%) and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 (24277, +1.5%). For rendering workloads, this GPU can accelerate OpenCL-based tasks and Vulkan compute, but the 4 GB VRAM limits scene complexity. The 6.758 TFLOPS FP16 performance is useful for AI inference tasks that leverage half precision.

FAQ

Q: How does the Ryzen 5 7535U compare to the Intel Core i5-12500H?

A: The Ryzen 5 7535U has an average benchmark score of 22791, while the Intel Core i5-12500H scores 22625. The Ryzen 5 7535U is 0.7% faster, making the difference negligible in real-world use.

Q: Is the Intel Arc A350M faster than the AMD Radeon RX 590?

A: The Arc A350M scores 24647 on average, while the RX 590 scores 24744. The RX 590 is 0.4% faster, which is within margin of error, so they perform equivalently.

Q: Can this system handle ray tracing?

A: The GPU has 6 ray tracing cores and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), so it can run ray-traced workloads. However, with only 3.379 TFLOPS FP32 compute, ray tracing performance will be limited to lighter scenes.

Q: What memory type does the CPU support?

A: The Ryzen 5 7535U supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with 76.8 GB/s bandwidth and includes ECC memory support.

Q: Is this CPU better than the AMD Ryzen 5 6600U?

A: The Ryzen 5 7535U scores 22791, while the Ryzen 5 6600U scores 22897. The 6600U is 0.5% faster, making them essentially equal in performance.

Q: How much VRAM does the GPU have?

A: The Intel Arc A350M has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus with 112.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 73, meaning this system outperforms 73% of all tested configurations in the database.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The GPU's 70th percentile and CPU's 76th percentile suggest this system can push high frame rates in esports titles at 1080p low-medium settings, though the 4 GB VRAM may limit texture quality. Without measured FPS data, expect 60-100+ FPS in competitive shooters based on the GPU's RX 590-equivalent performance.

Streaming: The 6-core/12-thread CPU with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 8591 can handle encoding overhead, while the GPU's Vulkan score of 24747 supports hardware acceleration. Streaming at 1080p60 with x264 medium preset is feasible, though game settings may need adjustment.

Video editing: The CPU's multi-thread score of 17039 in PassMark handles timeline editing, while the GPU's OpenCL score of 24546 accelerates effects and rendering. The 4 GB VRAM limits working with high-resolution footage or complex compositions.

3D rendering: The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 8591 provides solid CPU rendering performance, while the GPU's 3.379 TFLOPS FP32 enables GPU-accelerated rendering in OpenCL-compatible applications. Scene complexity will be limited by 4 GB VRAM.

Software development: The 12 threads and 16 MB L3 cache handle parallel builds efficiently, and the ECC memory support adds reliability. The PassMark integer math score of 62109 indicates strong performance for compilation and data processing.

Student and office work: The 76th percentile CPU ranking ensures responsive productivity, and the integrated Radeon 660M graphics provide a backup display output. The 73rd combined percentile makes this a capable all-rounder for documents, spreadsheets, and web browsing.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class configuration pairing the AMD Ryzen 5 7535U (6 cores, 12 threads, Zen 3+ architecture) with the Intel Arc A350M (4 GB GDDR6, Xe-HPG architecture). The CPU ranks at the 76th percentile among all processors with an average benchmark score of 22791, while the GPU ranks at the 70th percentile with an average score of 24647. The combined system percentile is 73, placing it in the upper-midrange of all tested configurations.

The platform supports DDR5 memory, PCIe Gen 4, and includes a Radeon 660M iGPU as fallback. The 28 W CPU TDP and 25 W GPU TDP make this an efficient mobile solution suitable for thin-and-light laptops. This is not a high-end gaming machine, but it is a balanced, competent performer for mixed productivity, development, and moderate gaming workloads.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 7535U + Intel Arc A350M

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 5 7535U

Intel Arc A350M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Upgrade Path and Platform

Benchmark Performance

Balance and Bottleneck

Gaming Performance

Who Should Build It

GPU Analysis

FAQ

Usage Scenarios

Build Overview

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds