SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS + Intel Arc A570M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

90 Score

Top 10% Ranking

90 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 10% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

84%

GPU

97%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS

19,047 Benchmark Score

Top 16% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A570M

58,239 Benchmark Score

Top 3% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS and Intel Arc A570M form a laptop pairing that targets the upper-middle tier of mobile computing. The CPU, a 6-core Zen 3+ part on TSMC’s 6 nm process, anchors the system with strong multi-threaded throughput, while the GPU, an Intel Alchemist mobile part, provides a significant portion of the graphics capability. With a combined percentile of 81, this build sits above the majority of registered systems. The data shows a balanced partnership where the CPU’s 73rd percentile standing and the GPU’s 88th percentile ranking allow for a versatile laptop experience, though the absence of measured frame rates means performance expectations must be derived from synthetic benchmarks.

CPU Analysis

The Ryzen 5 7535HS is a 6-core, 12-thread processor built on the Zen 3+ architecture, known by the codename Rembrandt-R. It operates with a base clock of 3.30 GHz and a boost clock of 4.55 GHz, housed in the AMD Socket FP7. Fabricated on a 6 nm process at TSMC with a die size of 208 mm², it maintains a 35 W TDP, which is characteristic of an efficient mobile part. The cache hierarchy consists of 64 KB of L1 per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and a shared 16 MB of L3 cache.

Benchmark results indicate a processor that scales well with thread count. The 3dmark suite shows progression from a single-thread score of 872 to a 2-thread score of 1684, 4-thread at 3164, 8-thread at 4537, and max-thread at 5285. The 16-thread score of 5292 is nearly identical to the max-thread result, suggesting that the 12 threads are fully utilized and that additional virtual threads yield diminishing returns. In Cinebench R23, the multicore score of 8613 versus a single-core score of 1445 highlights a solid multi-threaded uplift of roughly 6x, which is strong for a 6-core mobile chip. Geekbench scores of 7354 multicore and 1654 single-core corroborate this position.

The data places this CPU in the 73rd percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 19047. Its nearest rivals include the Intel Core i5-12400F at 19039 (deltaPct 0), the Intel Core 3 201E at 19056 (deltaPct 0), the Intel Core i5-1335U at 18982 (deltaPct 0.3), and the AMD EPYC 7773X at 18979 (deltaPct 0.4). This means the Ryzen 5 7535HS is effectively tied with a desktop i5-12400F in aggregate performance, which is notable for a 35 W mobile processor. The Passmark scores reinforce this: a multithread score of 17914 and a single-thread score of 3123 indicate capable sustained performance for productivity tasks. The floating-point math score of 35540 and integer math of 62372 suggest strong computational throughput for workloads that leverage these units.

For real workloads, this CPU is a versatile performer. The 12 threads handle modern multitasking and heavily threaded applications like video encoding or 3D rendering (as evidenced by the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 8613) with relative ease. The single-thread performance, while not class-leading, is sufficient for everyday responsiveness and lightly threaded games, as shown by the Geekbench single-core score of 1654. The Passmark data compression score of 221668 and encryption score of 13656 indicate that archival and security tasks are well within its capabilities. It is a balanced core configuration that avoids the extremes of either very high core counts or extremely high clocks.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A570M is a mobile graphics processor based on the Xe-HPG architecture, specifically the DG2-256 chip, and belongs to the Alchemist generation (Arc 5 Mobile). It is fabricated on a 6 nm process at TSMC with 11,500 million transistors on a 269 mm² die. The GPU operates with a base clock of 900 MHz and a boost clock of 1300 MHz. Memory is provided via 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, delivering a bandwidth of 224.0 GB/s with an effective memory clock of 14 Gbps.

The compute configuration includes 2048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, and 64 raster output units. It also features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores. The pixel rate is 83.20 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 166.4 GTexel/s. The FP32 performance is rated at 5.325 TFLOPS, with FP16 at 10.65 TFLOPS (2:1). The TDP for this GPU is 75 W, and it connects via a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface. It supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring modern API compatibility.

The only available benchmark, Geekbench OpenCL, yields a score of 58239. This places the GPU in the 88th percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 58239. Its nearest rivals present a fascinating comparison. The AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT scores 58392 with a deltaPct of -0.3, meaning the Arc A570M is effectively on par with that high-end desktop card in this specific OpenCL test. Similarly, the NVIDIA P102-100 scores 58528 (deltaPct -0.5), and the AMD Radeon PRO V710 scores 58657 (deltaPct -0.7). The only rival below it in score is the AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM at 58085 (deltaPct 0.3). This suggests that in raw compute throughput, the A570M is a formidable mobile part, though the Geekbench OpenCL test does not fully represent gaming or rendering workloads.

For rendering, the 224.0 GB/s bandwidth and 8 GB VRAM provide sufficient capacity for high-resolution textures and complex scenes, though the 128-bit bus may limit extreme bandwidth-demanding tasks. The 16 RT cores enable hardware-accelerated ray tracing, a feature that is increasingly relevant in modern games. The FP32 throughput of 5.325 TFLOPS is adequate for rasterized rendering, and the inclusion of DirectX 12 Ultimate support means it can handle the latest graphics features. The 64 ROPs ensure solid pixel fill rates for high resolutions.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming, this pairing is competitive. The CPU’s single-thread score of 1445 in Cinebench R23 and the GPU’s 88th percentile ranking suggest the system can drive frame rates well above 60 FPS in many titles, though the lack of measured FPS data means these are estimates. The GPU’s performance parity with the RX 6950 XT in OpenCL indicates strong rasterization potential, but the mobile TDP of 75 W may limit sustained boost clocks.

Streaming benefits from the CPU’s 12 threads. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 8613 provides ample headroom for encoding video while maintaining game performance. The Passmark multithread score of 17914 reinforces that simultaneous tasks, such as playing and encoding, will not overwhelm the processor.

Video editing is a strong suit. The CPU’s Geekbench multicore score of 7354 and the GPU’s compute capabilities work in tandem for timeline playback and export. The 8 GB VRAM on the GPU assists with GPU-accelerated effects, and the 224.0 GB/s bandwidth helps with high-resolution footage.

3D rendering workloads will leverage all 6 cores and 12 threads. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 8613 indicates a capable CPU for CPU-based rendering, while the GPU’s 5.325 TFLOPS FP32 performance provides a secondary path for GPU-accelerated renders. The 16 RT cores are a bonus for ray-traced previews.

Software development benefits from the CPU’s compilation speed. The Passmark integer math score of 62372 and data compression score of 221668 suggest efficient code compilation and asset packaging. The 12 threads allow for parallel builds, and the single-thread performance of 3123 in Passmark ensures responsive IDE interactions.

Student and office work are well within this system’s capabilities. The CPU’s 73rd percentile standing and the GPU’s compute power are overkill for document editing and web browsing, but they provide future-proofing for more demanding academic software, such as CAD or data analysis tools.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is based on AMD Socket FP7, which is a mobile-specific socket, meaning the CPU is not user-upgradeable in a traditional sense. The memory support is dual-channel DDR5 with a bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s, which is the standard for this generation. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes, while the GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface, leaving adequate bandwidth for other devices like NVMe SSDs.

The CPU’s TDP is 35 W, and the GPU’s TDP is 75 W, totaling 110 W for the primary components. The suggested PSU field is null, so a specific PSU recommendation cannot be made, but the combined 110 W TDP indicates a modest overall system draw, which is typical for a laptop. The GPU is listed as "IGP" for slot width, suggesting it is integrated into the motherboard design, not a discrete MXM module.

A sensible next upgrade for this laptop platform would be increasing the RAM capacity or speed, as the memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s is a fixed platform attribute that can be leveraged more with higher capacity modules. Storage upgrades via the PCIe Gen 4 lanes are also viable, as the 20 available lanes from the CPU allow for multiple high-speed drives. The GPU, being a mobile part, is not upgradeable in most laptop chassis.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data suggests a well-balanced system with a slight GPU bias. The CPU’s percentile of 73 is lower than the GPU’s 88, indicating that the GPU is the stronger component relative to its peers. In gaming scenarios, the GPU is likely the primary determinant of frame rates, especially at higher resolutions where the 5.325 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 224.0 GB/s bandwidth are pushed harder.

However, the CPU’s single-thread performance, with a 3dmark single-thread score of 872, could be a limiting factor in very lightly threaded games that rely on high clocks. The CPU’s boost clock of 4.55 GHz is respectable, but it does not match the highest-end desktop parts. In multi-threaded workloads like rendering or video encoding, the CPU is more of a partner to the GPU, with the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 8613 handling the CPU-side tasks while the GPU accelerates specific operations.

The FPS scaling, though not measured, can be inferred from the benchmark scores. The GPU’s 88th percentile ranking suggests it can push high frame rates at 1080p, while the CPU’s 73rd percentile ensures it will not hold back the GPU in most titles. The bottleneck is likely to appear in CPU-intensive simulations or strategy games, where the 6-core/12-thread configuration may be taxed.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU+GPU combination; the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data. Consequently, all frame rate discussions are estimates derived from the synthetic benchmark scores and the percentile positions. The GPU’s Geekbench OpenCL score of 58239, which places it in the 88th percentile, indicates that it has the raw compute power to deliver high frame rates in modern titles. The CPU’s 3dmark 8-thread score of 4537 and single-thread score of 872 suggest it can supply the GPU with adequate data.

At 1080p, the system is estimated to handle most AAA games at high to ultra settings with frame rates in the 60-100 FPS range, depending on the title’s optimization. The 8 GB VRAM is sufficient for 1080p textures, and the 224.0 GB/s bandwidth prevents memory starvation in most cases. At 1440p, frame rates are expected to drop, but the GPU’s performance parity with the RX 6950 XT in OpenCL suggests it can still manage 60 FPS in many games. At 4K, the 128-bit bus and 5.325 TFLOPS FP32 may struggle, with frame rates likely falling below 60 FPS in demanding titles. These figures are estimates only, as the data does not include actual game benchmarks.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 19047, placing it in the 73rd percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rival, the Intel Core i5-12400F, scores 19039 with a deltaPct of 0, meaning the two are statistically identical. The AMD EPYC 7773X is also close at 18979 (deltaPct 0.4), which is remarkable given the EPYC is a server-class chip. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 8613 and single-core of 1445 are the key metrics for productivity, while the Geekbench multicore of 7354 provides a cross-platform comparison.

The GPU’s average benchmark score is 58239, placing it in the 88th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rival, the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT, scores 58392 with a deltaPct of -0.3, indicating the A570M is slightly slower but within a negligible margin. The NVIDIA P102-100 is 0.5% faster, and the AMD Radeon PRO V710 is 0.7% faster. The only rival with a lower score is the AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM at 58085 (deltaPct 0.3), which the A570M beats by a small margin.

The combined picture shows a system where the GPU is the standout performer relative to its peers, with a percentile 15 points higher than the CPU. This suggests that the graphics capabilities are the primary driver of the system’s overall 81st percentile ranking. The CPU is no slouch, but it is closer to the median for high-end mobile parts.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s core and thread count?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS has 6 cores and 12 threads.

Q: How does the GPU compare to the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT in benchmarks?

A: The Intel Arc A570M scores 58239 in Geekbench OpenCL, while the RX 6950 XT scores 58392, a deltaPct of -0.3, meaning the two are nearly identical in this test.

Q: What is the combined percentile ranking of this build?

A: The combined percentile is 81, indicating the system outperforms 81% of registered configurations.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the GPU?

A: The Intel Arc A570M has a memory bandwidth of 224.0 GB/s via its 128-bit GDDR6 bus.

Q: What is the CPU’s boost clock speed?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS boosts up to 4.55 GHz.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: No, the Ryzen 5 7535HS does not support ECC memory; it uses dual-channel DDR5.

Q: Which component has a higher percentile ranking?

A: The Intel Arc A570M is in the 88th percentile of all GPUs, while the CPU is in the 73rd percentile of all CPUs.

Who Should Build It

This laptop build is suited for gamers targeting high-refresh 1080p or entry-level 1440p gameplay. The GPU’s 88th percentile ranking, evidenced by its Geekbench OpenCL score of 58239, ensures it can handle modern titles, and the CPU’s 12 threads support background tasks like Discord or streaming overlays. Content creators working with video editing will benefit from the CPU’s Cinebench R23 multicore score of 8613, which accelerates export times, while the GPU’s 8 GB VRAM handles effects and previews. Software developers will find the CPU’s Passmark integer math score of 62372 useful for compilation, and the 12 threads allow for parallel builds. Students and small business workstations will find this overkill for basic tasks but valuable for specialized software like CAD or data analysis, where the CPU’s Geekbench multicore score of 7354 and the GPU’s compute power provide a smooth experience. It is not ideal for those seeking maximum battery life, as the 35 W CPU and 75 W GPU TDPs are moderate for a laptop.

Build Overview

The AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS and Intel Arc A570M is a laptop-class build (buildClass: "laptop") that pairs a 6-core Zen 3+ processor with an Alchemist-generation mobile GPU. The CPU is a 7000-series part on the 6 nm TSMC node, offering 12 threads with a 35 W TDP. The GPU is an Intel Arc 5 Mobile part with 8 GB GDDR6 and 16 RT cores. The combined percentile of 81 places this system in the upper echelon of the database, with the GPU’s 88th percentile being the primary contributor. The CPU’s 73rd percentile is respectable, and the aggregate benchmark scores indicate a system that is well-suited for a wide range of tasks, from gaming to productivity. The lack of measured FPS data means that gaming performance is estimated from the synthetic scores, but the data strongly suggests a capable and balanced mobile platform.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS + Intel Arc A570M

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS

Intel Arc A570M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

GPU Analysis

Usage Scenarios

Upgrade Path and Platform

Balance and Bottleneck

Gaming Performance

Benchmark Performance

FAQ

Who Should Build It

Build Overview

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds