SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS + Intel Arc A550M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

90 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 10% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
84%
VS
GPU
96%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS

19,047 Benchmark Score
Top 16% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A550M

49,737 Benchmark Score
Top 4% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS + Intel Arc A550M

This pairing combines AMD's 6-core Zen 3+ mobile processor with Intel's Arc A550M discrete GPU in a laptop configuration. The CPU sits at the 73rd percentile among all processors, while the GPU ranks at the 86th percentile among all graphics cards, placing the combined system at the 80th percentile overall. No measured FPS data exists for this exact combination in the database, so all frame rate discussions below are estimated from the benchmark scores rather than direct gameplay measurements.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The Intel Arc A550M delivers an average benchmark score of 49,737, placing it just 0.4% behind the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti and 2.6% ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT in aggregate GPU benchmarks. This level of performance suggests the GPU can drive 1080p high-refresh displays in most titles, though the CPU's single-thread score of 872 in 3DMark single-thread testing may limit frame pacing in esports titles that rely heavily on one or two cores.

Streaming: The CPU's 12 threads from 6 cores provide a reasonable foundation for encoding while gaming. The Ryzen 5 7535HS scores 5,292 in 3DMark 16-thread tests and 5,285 at maximum threads, indicating consistent multi-threaded throughput. The GPU's 16 ray tracing cores and support for DirectX 12 Ultimate add hardware-accelerated features that can offload certain streaming effects, though the 60W GPU TDP suggests power is shared between encoding and rendering tasks.

Video editing: The combination of a 73rd-percentile CPU and 86th-percentile GPU creates a capable laptop for timeline editing and effects work. The CPU's PassMark multi-thread score of 17,914 and Geekbench multi-core score of 7,354 indicate solid export performance for 1080p and light 4K projects. The GPU's 8 GB of GDDR6 memory with 224.0 GB/s bandwidth provides sufficient capacity for GPU-accelerated effects and color grading.

3D rendering: The GPU's FP32 throughput of 8.397 TFLOPS and FP16 performance of 16.79 TFLOPS (2:1) make it a competent entry-level renderer. Its 2,048 shading units and 128 texture mapping units process geometry and textures efficiently. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 8,613 supports CPU-based rendering fallbacks, though render times will be longer than dedicated desktop workstations.

Software development: The CPU's balanced architecture—6 cores, 12 threads, 16 MB of shared L3 cache—handles compilation and testing workloads competently. PassMark data compression score of 221,668 and integer math score of 62,372 indicate strong performance for code compilation and data processing. The 73rd-percentile CPU ranking places it above typical entry-level development laptops.

Student and office work: This system far exceeds the requirements for document processing, spreadsheet work, and web browsing. The CPU's single-thread performance (3DMark single-thread score of 872, Cinebench R23 single-core of 1,445) ensures responsive everyday use, while the GPU's capabilities remain largely untapped in these workloads. The 35W CPU TDP contributes to portable operation suitable for campus use.

Gaming Performance

Since no measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination, all frame rate figures below are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and relative GPU positioning. The Arc A550M's average benchmark score of 49,737 places it roughly on par with the RTX 5070 Ti (within 0.4%) and 2.6% ahead of an RX 6800 XT, though these comparisons reflect synthetic workloads rather than direct gaming measurements.

At 1080p ultra settings, the estimated performance should handle most modern titles at 60+ FPS, given the GPU's 86th-percentile ranking. The 8 GB VRAM capacity is adequate for 1080p ultra textures in most games, though some titles with very large texture packs may approach capacity limits. At 1440p, the estimated frame rates would drop, likely settling in the 40-60 FPS range for demanding AAA games, with lighter esports titles maintaining higher frame rates.

The CPU's gaming headroom appears sufficient for the GPU. The Ryzen 5 7535HS scores 1,684 in 3DMark 2-thread tests and 3,164 in 4-thread tests, which suggest adequate performance for games optimized around 4-6 threads. The boost clock of 4.55 GHz helps maintain responsiveness in CPU-bound scenarios. However, the 872 single-thread 3DMark score may create a bottleneck in games that are heavily single-thread dependent, potentially limiting maximum frame rates below what the GPU alone could deliver.

At 4K resolution, this pairing would likely struggle to maintain playable frame rates at ultra settings in AAA titles, given the GPU's mobile power envelope and the resolution's extreme demand on both GPU throughput and VRAM bandwidth. The 224.0 GB/s bandwidth becomes a limiting factor at higher resolutions, as texture streaming requires more data per frame.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU achieves an average benchmark score of 19,047, placing it at the 73rd percentile among all processors. Its closest rivals include the Intel Core i5-12400F at 19,039 (0% delta), the Intel Core 3 201E at 19,056 (0% delta), and the Intel Core i5-1335U at 18,982 (0.3% ahead). The 0-0.4% deltas against these rivals indicate the Ryzen 5 7535HS delivers essentially identical aggregate performance to a range of desktop and mobile processors from Intel.

The GPU posts an average benchmark score of 49,737, ranking at the 86th percentile among all graphics cards. Its nearest rivals show tight competition: the RTX 5070 Ti scores 49,957 (0.4% ahead), the RX Vega 64 scores 50,001 (0.5% ahead), the RX 6900 XT scores 50,951 (2.4% ahead), and the RX 6800 XT scores 48,477 (2.6% behind). This places the Arc A550M squarely in the upper-midrange GPU tier, competitive with several well-known desktop cards.

In specific GPU workloads, the Arc A550M scores 49,894 in Geekbench OpenCL and 49,580 in Geekbench Vulkan, showing consistent performance across compute APIs. The CPU's individual benchmarks reveal its strengths: Cinebench R23 multi-core of 8,613, Geekbench multi-core of 7,354, and PassMark multi-thread of 17,914 all indicate robust multi-threaded capability for a 35W mobile processor.

The combined picture shows a system where the GPU outperforms the CPU in percentile terms (86 vs 73), suggesting the graphics card is the stronger component relative to its peers. The combined 80th percentile reflects a balanced pairing where neither component drastically underperforms the other.

Who Should Build It

Gamers targeting 1080p high-refresh displays represent the primary audience. The GPU's 86th-percentile ranking and 8 GB VRAM provide the necessary headroom for modern titles, while the CPU's 12 threads handle contemporary game engines. Users at 1440p will find playable but not consistently high-refresh performance, based on the benchmark-derived estimates.

Content creators working with video editing and photo manipulation benefit from the CPU's strong multi-threaded scores (Cinebench R23 multi-core 8,613, Geekbench multi-core 7,354) paired with GPU acceleration from the Arc A550M's 2,048 shading units. The 8 GB VRAM accommodates GPU-accelerated effects and renders for moderate projects.

Software developers gain from the CPU's balanced performance profile. PassMark integer math score of 62,372 and data compression score of 221,668 indicate strong compilation throughput. The 12 threads handle parallel builds efficiently, while the 35W TDP suits developer laptops that must balance performance with battery life.

Students and office workers will find this system vastly more capable than required for typical academic and administrative tasks. The CPU's single-thread performance (Cinebench R23 single-core 1,445, Geekbench single-core 1,654) ensures snappy application responsiveness, while the discrete GPU offers headroom for any graphics-intensive coursework.

Small business workstations that occasionally handle GPU-accelerated tasks benefit from this pairing's versatility. The system handles standard productivity applications effortlessly while providing 3D rendering and video processing capabilities when needed, without the power requirements of a desktop workstation.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance data reveals a system where the GPU holds the advantage in relative standing. The GPU's 86th percentile versus the CPU's 73rd percentile means the CPU is more likely to become the limiting factor in graphics-intensive workloads. Games that require high single-thread performance may see the CPU's 872 3DMark single-thread score constrain frame rates.

Multi-threaded workloads show better balance. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 8,613 and the GPU's compute scores (Geekbench OpenCL 49,894) suggest that applications leveraging both components—such as video encoding with GPU acceleration—can distribute work effectively. The CPU's PassMark multi-thread score of 17,914 indicates it can feed the GPU adequately in most gaming scenarios.

The FPS scaling evidence, though estimated, suggests the CPU becomes a bottleneck primarily at lower resolutions where frame rates are high enough to expose single-thread limitations. At 1080p with a powerful GPU, the CPU's 4.55 GHz boost clock helps, but the Zen 3+ architecture's single-thread performance may not match the GPU's capabilities in esports titles. At higher resolutions, the GPU becomes the limiting factor as rendering demands increase.

Memory bandwidth presents another consideration. The CPU's 76.8 GB/s dual-channel DDR5 bandwidth is adequate for its 6-core configuration, while the GPU's 224.0 GB/s GDDR6 bandwidth serves its 2,048 shading units. Neither component appears starved of memory bandwidth relative to its compute capabilities.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A550M features 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, delivering 224.0 GB/s bandwidth. This capacity and throughput support 1080p gaming with high texture settings and moderate 1440p workloads. The memory clock runs at 1750 MHz with 14 Gbps effective data rate.

The GPU's compute configuration includes 2,048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, and 64 raster output units. Clock speeds range from a 900 MHz base to a 2,050 MHz boost, producing a pixel rate of 131.2 GPixel/s and texture rate of 262.4 GTexel/s. The FP32 throughput of 8.397 TFLOPS and FP16 of 16.79 TFLOPS (2:1) position this GPU for solid compute performance in rendering and light machine learning tasks.

Ray tracing hardware includes 16 dedicated RT cores, supporting DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) API features. The GPU also supports Vulkan 1.4 and OpenGL 4.6, ensuring broad API compatibility. The 21,700 million transistors on TSMC's 6 nm process (406 mm² die size) represent a substantial chip for a mobile GPU with a 60W TDP.

Benchmark results show the GPU scoring 49,894 in Geekbench OpenCL and 49,580 in Geekbench Vulkan, with an average benchmark score of 49,737. This places it 0.4% behind the RTX 5070 Ti and 2.6% ahead of the RX 6800 XT, indicating the Arc A550M competes with established desktop GPUs despite its mobile form factor. The 86th-percentile ranking confirms its position among upper-midrange graphics solutions.

For rendering workloads, the FP32 throughput and 8 GB VRAM provide adequate resources for GPU-accelerated renderers. The 16 RT cores enable hardware-accelerated ray tracing in supported applications, though performance will trail dedicated high-end RT implementations. The 2:1 FP16 ratio offers accelerated half-precision compute for compatible workloads.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS is a 6-core, 12-thread mobile processor built on Zen 3+ architecture (Rembrandt-R) using TSMC's 6 nm process. The 208 mm² die operates with a 35W TDP, making it suitable for thin-and-light laptops. Base clock is 3.30 GHz, boosting to 4.55 GHz for demanding workloads.

Cache configuration includes 64 KB L1 per core, 512 KB L2 per core, and 16 MB shared L3 cache. Memory support covers dual-channel DDR5 with 76.8 GB/s bandwidth, though ECC memory is not supported. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes, and integrates Radeon 660M graphics for systems that may operate without the discrete GPU active.

The CPU's average benchmark score of 19,047 ranks it at the 73rd percentile, with nearest rivals showing near-identical aggregate performance. The 3DMark results show scaling from 872 single-thread to 5,292 at 16 threads and 5,285 at maximum threads, indicating effective multi-threading with modest gains beyond 8 threads. Cinebench R23 scores of 1,445 single-core and 8,613 multi-core confirm this pattern.

PassMark results reveal workload-specific strengths: data compression at 221,668, integer math at 62,372, floating-point math at 35,540, and extended instructions at 15,411. The multithread score of 17,914 and single-thread score of 3,123 show balanced performance. The data encryption score of 13,656 indicates adequate security-related compute capability.

For real workloads, the 6-core/12-thread configuration handles typical productivity tasks with headroom, while the 4.55 GHz boost clock responds to burst workloads. The 16 MB L3 cache benefits applications with moderate working sets. The Zen 3+ architecture's efficiency at 35W makes this CPU well-suited for laptops that need sustained performance without excessive heat or power draw.

FAQ

Q: Does this laptop combination support ray tracing?

A: Yes, the Intel Arc A550M includes 16 dedicated ray tracing cores and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), enabling hardware-accelerated ray tracing in compatible games and applications.

Q: How much VRAM does the GPU have and is it sufficient?

A: The GPU has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus with 224.0 GB/s bandwidth, which is adequate for 1080p ultra settings and moderate 1440p gaming in most titles.

Q: What is the CPU's memory support?

A: The Ryzen 5 7535HS supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with 76.8 GB/s bandwidth. ECC memory is not supported.

Q: How does the GPU compare to desktop graphics cards?

A: The Arc A550M's average benchmark score of 49,737 places it 0.4% behind the RTX 5070 Ti, 0.5% behind the RX Vega 64, 2.4% behind the RX 6900 XT, and 2.6% ahead of the RX 6800 XT.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU the stronger component?

A: The GPU ranks at the 86th percentile among all GPUs, while the CPU ranks at the 73rd percentile among all CPUs, indicating the GPU is the stronger component relative to its peers.

Q: What PCIe interface does the GPU use?

A: The Intel Arc A550M uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 bus interface, while the CPU provides PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes.

Q: What is the CPU's integrated graphics capability?

A: The Ryzen 5 7535HS includes Radeon 660M integrated graphics, providing display output and basic graphics acceleration when the discrete GPU is not in use.

Build Overview

This pairing combines the AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS mobile processor with the Intel Arc A550M discrete GPU in a laptop class system. The CPU is a 6-core/12-thread Zen 3+ part on TSMC's 6 nm process, while the GPU is an Alchemist-generation Arc 5 Mobile chip with 2,048 shading units and 8 GB GDDR6 memory. The combined system ranks at the 80th percentile overall.

The CPU holds a 73rd-percentile position among all processors, with an average benchmark score of 19,047 that matches desktop-class rivals like the Core i5-12400F within 0%. The GPU's 86th-percentile ranking and 49,737 average score place it in competition with high-end desktop graphics cards from both NVIDIA and AMD.

This system represents a mid-range to upper-midrange laptop configuration. The CPU provides solid multi-threaded performance for productivity and content creation, while the GPU delivers gaming performance competitive with established desktop cards. The 35W CPU TDP and 60W GPU TDP indicate a power-conscious design that balances performance with portability.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses AMD Socket FP7 and supports DDR5 dual-channel memory with 76.8 GB/s bandwidth. The platform provides PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes from the CPU, while the GPU connects via PCIe 4.0 x16. The 35W CPU TDP leaves thermal headroom for the 60W GPU in a laptop chassis.

Memory upgrades are constrained to DDR5 modules due to the platform's memory support. The dual-channel configuration delivers the stated 76.8 GB/s bandwidth, and upgrading from smaller to larger capacity modules would benefit applications that exceed current memory availability, though the database does not specify a maximum capacity.

Storage expansion relies on the CPU's PCIe Gen 4 lanes, supporting fast NVMe drives. The 20 available lanes accommodate the GPU's x16 connection plus additional devices such as SSDs and wireless cards. The GPU's end-of-life production status means future replacement would involve a different GPU architecture.

The most sensible next upgrade for this laptop would be increasing memory capacity, as the CPU and GPU performance levels are well-matched. The GPU's 86th-percentile ranking and CPU's 73rd-percentile position suggest that upgrading either component alone would create imbalance without addressing the other. A future laptop with a higher-percentile CPU and comparable GPU would represent a more complete upgrade path.

The platform's PCIe Gen 4 support ensures compatibility with current high-speed storage, while DDR5 memory support aligns with modern standards. The 6 nm process for both CPU and GPU indicates a mature manufacturing node that balances performance and efficiency. The system's combined 80th-percentile ranking confirms its position as a capable mid-range laptop configuration.