SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS + Intel Arc A370M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

89 Score

Top 11% Ranking

89 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 11% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

84%

GPU

93%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS

19,047 Benchmark Score

Top 16% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A370M

29,175 Benchmark Score

Top 7% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS is a 6-core, 12-thread mobile processor built on TSMC's 6 nm process with a 208 mm² die size. It belongs to the 7000 series and uses the Zen 3+ architecture, codenamed Rembrandt-R, which represents a refinement of the Zen 3 core design with improved power efficiency for laptop implementations. The chip operates at a 3.30 GHz base clock and can boost up to 4.55 GHz under load, all within a 35 W TDP envelope that suits thin-and-light notebooks.

The cache hierarchy is substantial for a mobile part: 64 KB of L1 per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and a shared 16 MB L3 pool. This arrangement supports the 12 threads effectively, particularly in workloads that can exploit shared cache residency. Memory support is DDR5 over a dual-channel bus, delivering 76.8 GB/s of theoretical bandwidth, which is adequate for feeding the six Zen 3+ cores under multithreaded load.

Benchmark data reveals a consistent scaling pattern across thread counts. The 3DMark results show a single-thread score of 872, rising to 1,684 with 2 threads, 3,164 with 4 threads, 4,537 with 8 threads, and 5,292 with 16 threads. The near-plateau between 8-thread (4,537) and 16-thread (5,292) scores indicates that the six physical cores with simultaneous multithreading reach diminishing returns beyond roughly eight active threads, which is typical for a 6-core design.

Cinebench results reinforce this picture. The R23 multicore score of 8,613 positions the chip well for content creation tasks, while the single-core score of 1,445 suggests responsive everyday performance. Geekbench scores of 7,354 multicore and 1,654 single-core align with these findings, showing that the Ryzen 5 7535HS offers balanced throughput across diverse benchmark methodologies.

The PassMark suite adds granular detail. Integer math scores 62,372, floating-point math scores 35,540, and extended instructions reach 15,411. Data compression hits 221,668, while data encryption scores 13,656. The multithread score of 17,914 and single-thread score of 3,123 (reported as both passmark_single_thread and passmark_singlethread, confirming consistency) indicate a processor that handles both bursty single-threaded tasks and sustained multi-core workloads competently. Physics processing scores 844, and random string sorting scores 22,781.

The average benchmark score of 19,047 places this CPU at the 73rd percentile among all processors. Its nearest rivals include the Intel Core i5-12400F with an average score of 19,039 (0% delta), the Intel Core 3 201E at 19,056 (0% delta), the Intel Core i5-1335U at 18,982 (0.3% ahead of the Ryzen), and the AMD EPYC 7773X at 18,979 (0.4% ahead). This clustering shows the 7535HS sits in a highly competitive mid-range performance band where margins between alternatives are razor-thin.

For real workloads, the combination of six fast Zen 3+ cores and 16 MB of L3 cache means the processor excels at compiled-code tasks, spreadsheet calculations, and moderately threaded productivity suites. The 76.8 GB/s memory bandwidth is sufficient for these tasks, though it is not exceptional by desktop standards. The integrated Radeon 660M graphics provide a fallback display solution, though the primary GPU in this build is the discrete Intel Arc A370M.

# Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score of 19,047 against a 73rd percentile ranking among all CPUs indicates solid mid-pack performance with headroom above the median. Its nearest rival, the Intel Core i5-12400F, scores 19,039, which is effectively identical (0% delta). This means the 7535HS trades blows with a well-regarded desktop processor despite being a 35 W mobile part, a signal of the efficiency of the Zen 3+ architecture at 6 nm.

The GPU, an Intel Arc A370M, posts a Geekbench OpenCL score of 29,676 and a Vulkan score of 28,673. Its average benchmark score of 29,175 places it at the 74th percentile among all GPUs. The nearest rivals are the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH at 29,197 (0.1% ahead of the Intel), the AMD FirePro W8000 at 29,211 (0.1% ahead), the AMD Radeon RX 470 at 28,996 (0.6% behind), and the AMD Radeon RX 6800M at 28,874 (1.0% behind). This positioning shows the A370M sits in a performance tier comparable to older desktop GPUs and some high-end mobile parts, but it is not in the same league as modern flagship graphics.

The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing is 74th, which reflects the balanced nature of the build. The CPU at 73rd percentile and GPU at 74th percentile are closely matched in relative standing, meaning neither component is dramatically over- or under-powered relative to the other. This parity is unusual in laptop builds, where one component often lags the other.

Looking at the two GPU benchmark scores more closely, the OpenCL result of 29,676 is roughly 3.5% higher than the Vulkan score of 28,673. This suggests the driver stack handles OpenCL compute workloads slightly better than Vulkan compute, though both are within a narrow band. For gaming, where Vulkan is increasingly common, the lower Vulkan score may be the more relevant figure, but the difference is minor.

The CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 8,613 is a strong result for a 35 W part. In practical terms, this translates to capable video encoding and 3D rendering performance for a laptop. The single-core score of 1,445 is equally important for everyday responsiveness, as many applications remain single-threaded. The Geekbench single-core score of 1,654 corroborates this.

When combining CPU and GPU scores, the picture is one of a balanced mid-range laptop. The CPU can feed the GPU enough data for most gaming scenarios at 1080p, and the GPU can render frames fast enough to keep the CPU from idling excessively. Neither component is a bottleneck in the traditional sense at the resolution this class of hardware targets.

# FAQ

Q: How does the Ryzen 5 7535HS compare to the Intel Core i5-12400F?

A: The Ryzen 5 7535HS has an average benchmark score of 19,047, while the Core i5-12400F scores 19,039, a delta of 0%. The two processors are effectively tied in overall performance, despite the Ryzen being a 35 W mobile part and the Core i5 being a desktop chip.

Q: What is the GPU's performance percentile and what does it mean?

A: The Intel Arc A370M sits at the 74th percentile among all GPUs with an average benchmark score of 29,175. This places it above the median, in a tier comparable to the AMD Radeon RX 470, which scores 28,996 and trails by 0.6%.

Q: Does this laptop have measured gaming FPS data?

A: No. The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU+GPU combination. All gaming performance discussion must be treated as estimates derived from the benchmark scores rather than direct measurements.

Q: What memory type does this CPU support?

A: The Ryzen 5 7535HS supports DDR5 memory over a dual-channel bus with 76.8 GB/s of bandwidth. ECC memory is not supported.

Q: How many threads can the CPU handle, and what is the scaling pattern?

A: The CPU has 6 cores and 12 threads. 3DMark scores scale from 872 single-thread to 1,684 at 2 threads, 3,164 at 4 threads, 4,537 at 8 threads, and 5,292 at 16 threads, showing strong scaling up to 8 threads and diminishing returns beyond.

Q: What is the CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score and what does it mean for rendering?

A: The Cinebench R23 multicore score is 8,613, which indicates solid rendering performance for a 35 W mobile processor. This is supported by a single-core score of 1,445.

Q: What is the slot width of the Intel Arc A370M?

A: The GPU has a slot width of "IGP," meaning it is integrated into the laptop motherboard rather than being a discrete add-in card. This is consistent with a 35 W TDP and the laptop build class.

# Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The Intel Arc A370M, with its 74th percentile ranking and average benchmark score of 29,175, is positioned for 1080p gaming at medium to high settings. The GPU's 4 GB of GDDR6 memory and 112.0 GB/s bandwidth are adequate for esports titles and older AAA games, though newer titles may require settings reductions. The CPU's 3DMark 16-thread score of 5,292 ensures it can keep up with frame pacing in most scenarios.

Streaming: The Ryzen 5 7535HS has 12 threads and a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 8,613, which provides enough headroom for software encoding of gameplay at moderate bitrates. The PassMark data encryption score of 13,656 indicates the CPU can handle the security overhead of streaming protocols. However, the GPU's lack of dedicated tensor cores means hardware-accelerated encoding features may be limited compared to higher-tier parts.

Video editing: The CPU's Geekbench multicore score of 7,354 and the GPU's OpenCL score of 29,676 combine for competent 1080p video editing. The 76.8 GB/s memory bandwidth supports timeline scrubbing and preview rendering. The 16 MB L3 cache helps with multi-layer edits, while the GPU's 8 RT cores can accelerate effects that use ray tracing.

3D rendering: Cinebench R23 multicore at 8,613 indicates the CPU can handle modest 3D rendering workloads, such as product visualization or architectural previews. The GPU's 4.198 TFLOPS FP32 performance provides GPU-accelerated rendering support in applications that use OpenCL. For complex scenes, render times will be longer than on desktop-class hardware.

Software development: The CPU's PassMark integer math score of 62,372 and multithread score of 17,914 support compilation of medium-sized codebases. The 12 threads allow parallel builds, while the single-thread score of 3,123 keeps the IDE responsive. The 76.8 GB/s memory bandwidth is sufficient for large in-memory data structures.

Student and office work: The CPU's single-thread performance, evidenced by the Geekbench single-core score of 1,654 and 3DMark single-thread score of 872, handles document processing, web browsing, and spreadsheet tasks with ease. The 35 W TDP means long battery life potential. The integrated Radeon 660M provides a backup display output if the discrete GPU is disabled for power saving.

# GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A370M is built on the Xe-HPG architecture, specifically the Alchemist generation for Arc 3 Mobile. The chip, designated DG2-128, is manufactured on TSMC's 6 nm process with 7,200 million transistors across a 157 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 45.9 million per square millimeter. This is a compact, power-efficient design that fits within the 35 W TDP.

The GPU has 1,024 shading units, 64 texture mapping units, and 32 raster output pipelines. It includes 8 ray tracing cores, though tensor cores are not specified in the FACT PACK, which means AI-accelerated features like DLSS or XeSS may rely on alternative hardware paths. The 4 GB of GDDR6 memory runs at 1,750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) over a 64-bit bus, yielding 112.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This is a modest memory configuration that may limit performance at higher resolutions or with high-resolution textures.

Clock speeds are 1,550 MHz base and 2,050 MHz boost. The pixel rate is 65.60 GPixel/s and the texture rate is 131.2 GTexel/s. Compute performance is rated at 4.198 TFLOPS for FP32 and 8.397 TFLOPS for FP16 (at 2:1 ratio). These figures place the GPU in the entry-to-mid-range segment for mobile graphics.

The API support is comprehensive: DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. This ensures compatibility with modern game engines and graphics APIs. The bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x8, which provides sufficient bandwidth for the GPU's memory subsystem.

Benchmark results show a Geekbench OpenCL score of 29,676 and a Vulkan score of 28,673, with an average of 29,175. The 74th percentile ranking places it above the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH (29,197, 0.1% ahead) and the AMD FirePro W8000 (29,211, 0.1% ahead), while it leads the AMD Radeon RX 470 (28,996, 0.6% behind) and the AMD Radeon RX 6800M (28,874, 1.0% behind). The near-equal scores against the RX 6800M, a much higher-tier GPU, are notable and suggest the A370M benefits from efficient architecture.

For rendering workloads, the 4.198 TFLOPS FP32 performance supports GPU-accelerated rendering in applications like Blender or Maya, though the 4 GB VRAM is a limiting factor for large scenes. The 8 RT cores provide hardware ray tracing support, though at this performance tier, ray-traced effects will require conservative settings. The 112.0 GB/s bandwidth is adequate for 1080p rendering but may bottleneck at higher resolutions or with heavy texture streaming.

# Who Should Build It

This CPU+GPU pairing targets users who need a balanced laptop for mixed workloads without extreme performance demands. Gamers at 1080p with medium settings will find the A370M's 74th percentile ranking sufficient for most titles. The CPU's 73rd percentile ensures no significant bottleneck in gaming scenarios.

Content creators working with 1080p video or moderate 3D scenes will benefit from the CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 8,613 and the GPU's OpenCL compute capability. The 12 threads handle multitasking between editing software and background rendering. The 16 MB L3 cache supports working with moderately sized project files.

Software developers writing and compiling code will appreciate the PassMark integer math score of 62,372 and the multithread score of 17,914. The single-thread performance of 3,123 keeps interactive tools responsive, while the 12 threads speed up parallel builds. The 35 W TDP means developers can work in environments without robust cooling.

Students needing a reliable machine for coursework, research, and light gaming will find the balanced performance adequate. The CPU's Geekbench single-core score of 1,654 handles document and presentation software, while the GPU can manage casual gaming or basic photo editing. The DDR5 memory support ensures future-proofing for modern applications.

Small business workstations requiring dependable performance for office suites, database management, and financial modeling will benefit from the CPU's data compression score of 221,668 and encryption score of 13,656. The GPU's capabilities are secondary but available for presentations or light design work. The laptop form factor with 35 W TDP enables deployment in space-constrained environments.

# Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses AMD Socket FP7, which is a mobile-specific socket. The Ryzen 5 7535HS is part of the 7000 series based on Zen 3+ architecture, and the FP7 socket supports this generation. Upgrading the CPU in a laptop is generally not practical, so the platform is effectively fixed at the time of purchase.

Memory support is DDR5 over a dual-channel bus with 76.8 GB/s bandwidth. This is the maximum configuration specified, so there is no headroom for faster memory beyond what the platform supports. The memory bus width is fixed at dual-channel, and ECC is not supported.

The PCIe interface is Gen 4 with 20 lanes from the CPU. This provides ample bandwidth for the GPU (which uses PCIe 4.0 x8), NVMe storage, and other peripherals. The 20-lane count is generous for a laptop platform and allows for multiple high-speed devices.

The GPU has a TDP of 35 W, matching the CPU's 35 W TDP, resulting in a combined thermal budget of 70 W for the compute components. The suggested PSU is null in the FACT PACK, meaning no specific power supply recommendation is given; this is typical for laptops where the power adapter is bundled. The absence of a suggested PSU figure indicates that power headroom is managed by the laptop's internal power delivery system rather than user-selectable.

For a sensible next upgrade, the most impactful change would be to increase GPU memory from 4 GB to a larger configuration in a future laptop, as 4 GB GDDR6 with 112.0 GB/s bandwidth is the primary limitation for modern games. The CPU's 35 W TDP and 6 cores are adequate for current software, so CPU upgrades would yield diminishing returns. The DDR5 memory standard ensures compatibility with future software requirements.

# Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build combining the AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS CPU with the Intel Arc A370M GPU. The build class is explicitly "laptop," meaning both components are designed for mobile integration with power and thermal constraints. The CPU is a 6-core, 12-thread Zen 3+ part on the FP7 socket, while the GPU is an Xe-HPG Alchemist mobile chip with 1,024 shading units.

The combined percentile of 74th among all CPU+GPU pairings indicates this build sits comfortably in the upper-mid range of laptop configurations. The CPU's individual 73rd percentile and the GPU's 74th percentile are closely aligned, creating a balanced system where neither component dramatically outclasses the other. This parity is a key characteristic of the build.

The CPU's average benchmark score of 19,047 and the GPU's average of 29,175 combine to support a wide range of applications. The CPU handles compute-heavy tasks like compilation and rendering, while the GPU accelerates graphics and parallel workloads. The 35 W TDP on both components keeps the system within a manageable thermal envelope for a laptop chassis.

The overall tier, based on the 74th percentile, places this build above the median laptop configuration but below high-end gaming or workstation models. It is best suited for users who need reliable performance across productivity, content creation, and moderate gaming without the premium cost or thermal demands of flagship hardware.

# Balance and Bottleneck

The CPU and GPU are closely matched in percentile terms (73rd vs 74th), which suggests a well-balanced pairing where neither component is a severe bottleneck for the other in most workloads. However, the nature of the bottleneck depends on the specific application.

In gaming at 1080p, the GPU's 4 GB VRAM and 112.0 GB/s bandwidth are likely the limiting factors for high-resolution textures and modern game assets. The CPU's 3DMark 16-thread score of 5,292 indicates it can feed frames at rates that exceed the GPU's rendering capability in most titles, meaning the GPU will be the primary bottleneck in graphically intensive scenes. The GPU's average benchmark score of 29,175, while respectable, is not sufficient for ultra settings at high frame rates.

In compute workloads like 3D rendering, the CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 8,613 becomes the limiting factor. The GPU's OpenCL score of 29,676 is relatively strong, and applications that use GPU acceleration will shift the bottleneck to the CPU for scene setup and geometry processing. The 12 threads and 16 MB L3 cache are sufficient for moderate scenes but will struggle with complex assets.

In mixed productivity workloads, the CPU's single-thread performance (Geekbench 1,654) is adequate for interactive tasks, while the GPU's compute capability accelerates parallel operations like photo filters or video effects. The bottleneck shifts depending on whether the task is serial (CPU-bound) or parallel (GPU-bound). The 76.8 GB/s memory bandwidth shared between CPU and GPU can become a constraint in data-intensive workflows.

The FPS scaling evidence from the benchmark scores suggests that at lower resolutions (720p), the CPU may become the bottleneck as the GPU can render frames faster than the CPU can submit draw calls. At 1080p, the balance shifts toward the GPU, and at 1440p or higher, the GPU's memory bandwidth and VRAM capacity will be the clear limiting factor.

# Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU+GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data, so all gaming performance figures discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores rather than direct measurements. This is stated clearly to avoid confusion with verified test results.

Based on the GPU's 74th percentile ranking and average benchmark score of 29,175, the Intel Arc A370M is estimated to handle 1080p gaming at medium settings for most modern titles. The 4 GB GDDR6 memory with 112.0 GB/s bandwidth supports 1080p textures but may require reduced texture quality in games with large asset sizes. The CPU's 3DMark single-thread score of 872 and 4-thread score of 3,164 indicate sufficient processing power for game logic and physics at this resolution.

For esports titles like Counter-Strike or Valorant, which are not graphically demanding, the GPU's FP32 performance of 4.198 TFLOPS should support high frame rates at 1080p with competitive settings. The CPU's PassMark single-thread score of 3,123 ensures minimal frame time spikes from CPU-side processing.

For AAA games at 1080p, the GPU's 8 RT cores provide hardware ray tracing support, but the 4.198 TFLOPS FP32 throughput suggests ray-traced effects will require significant settings reductions to maintain playable frame rates. The Vulkan score of 28,673 indicates solid performance in Vulkan-based titles, while DirectX 12 Ultimate support ensures compatibility with modern game engines.

At 1440p, the GPU's 112.0 GB/s bandwidth and 4 GB VRAM are likely insufficient for high-quality settings. The GPU's pixel rate of 65.60 GPixel/s and texture rate of 131.2 GTexel/s are more aligned with 1080p rendering. Users targeting 1440p should expect medium-to-low settings and may need to disable ray tracing entirely.

For older or less demanding games, the GPU's performance is estimated to be more than adequate. The CPU's 6 cores and 12 threads handle game logic efficiently, and the 16 MB L3 cache reduces memory latency. The combined 74th percentile ranking suggests this build can deliver a satisfying gaming experience for users who prioritize frame rate over maximum visual fidelity.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS + Intel Arc A370M

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS

Intel Arc A370M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds