SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS + Intel Arc A550M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

90 Score

Top 10% Ranking

90 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 10% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

84%

GPU

96%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS

19,364 Benchmark Score

Top 16% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A550M

49,737 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS + Intel Arc A550M

This laptop build pairs AMD's 6-core Zen 3+ processor with Intel's Arc A550M discrete GPU, landing at the 80th percentile overall among all configurations in the database. The CPU alone sits at the 73rd percentile across all processors, while the GPU reaches the 86th percentile among all graphics cards. This is a mid-to-upper tier mobile combination designed for serious productivity and capable 1080p gaming, though the exact FPS figures are not measured and must be estimated from the component-level benchmark scores.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS is a 6-core, 12-thread mobile processor built on the Zen 3+ architecture, codenamed Rembrandt-R, and fabricated on TSMC's 6 nm process node. It belongs to AMD's 7000 series, though it is architecturally distinct from the newer Zen 4 parts. The base clock runs at 3.30 GHz, boosting up to 4.40 GHz under load. The die measures 208 mm², and the thermal design power is 35 W, making it suitable for thin-and-light laptops that still need sustained multi-core performance.

Cache topology follows a per-core design: 64 KB of L1 per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and a shared 16 MB L3 pool. This cache arrangement is typical of the Zen 3+ generation, with the shared L3 allowing efficient communication between the six cores. Memory support is DDR5 over a dual-channel bus, delivering 76.8 GB/s of theoretical bandwidth. The CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes, which is ample for a discrete GPU and NVMe storage. No ECC memory support is offered, and the multiplier is locked, so overclocking is not possible.

Benchmark data shows a balanced performer. In Cinebench R23, the CPU scores 12,342 points multi-core and 1,742 points single-core. The multi-core result is approximately 7x the single-core figure, indicating good scaling across all six cores. The Cinebench R20 scores are 5,183 multi-core and 731 single-core, while Cinebench R15 yields 1,243 multi-core and 175 single-core. PassMark results further confirm the profile: multi-thread score is 14,520, single-thread is 2,740, integer math hits 50,800, floating-point math reaches 27,800, and extended instructions score 11,219. Data compression scores 168,692, while encryption manages 10,718. Physics simulation in PassMark returns 821, and finding prime numbers scores 48.

Relative to close rivals, the Ryzen 5 7533HS is essentially tied with the Intel Core Ultra 5 226V (0% delta), the Intel Core i5-1345U (0.2% ahead), and the Intel Core i7-10700F (0.7% behind). It edges out the Intel Core i7-8700K by 0.7%. This places it in the same performance class as both recent low-power mobile chips and older desktop parts, meaning it can handle productivity workloads comparable to a desktop Core i7 from several generations ago. The average benchmark score across all tests is 19,364, which is a solid mid-range figure for a 35 W mobile processor.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's core and thread count?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS has 6 cores and 12 threads, with a base clock of 3.30 GHz and a boost clock of 4.40 GHz.

Q: How does the CPU compare to the Intel Core i7-8700K?

A: The Ryzen 5 7533HS scores 19,364 average across benchmarks, which is 0.7% higher than the Core i7-8700K's 19,238 average. In Cinebench R23, the laptop chip manages 12,342 multi-core points, a strong showing against a desktop processor.

Q: What memory type does this CPU support?

A: It supports DDR5 memory over a dual-channel bus, with a theoretical bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s. There is no ECC memory support.

Q: What is the GPU's VRAM capacity?

A: The Intel Arc A550M has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, delivering 224.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: How does the GPU compare to the AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT?

A: The Arc A550M's average benchmark score is 49,737, which is 2.4% lower than the RX 6900 XT's 50,951. It is also 0.5% behind the RX Vega 64 and 0.4% behind the RTX 5070 Ti, while running 2.6% ahead of the RX 6800 XT.

Q: Is the CPU overclockable?

A: No, the multiplier is locked. The CPU also has a fixed 35 W TDP, which is typical for a mobile processor in this class.

Q: What PCIe version and lane count does the CPU offer?

A: The CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes, which is sufficient for a discrete GPU and one or two NVMe SSDs.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score is 19,364, placing it at the 73rd percentile among all CPUs. The GPU's average score is 49,737, which lands at the 86th percentile among all GPUs. Together, this combination achieves an 80th percentile overall ranking, indicating a system that is stronger on the graphics side than on the processor side.

In compute tests, the GPU delivers 8.397 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 16.79 TFLOPS of FP16 performance. The pixel rate is 131.2 GPixel/s and the texture rate is 262.4 GTexel/s. These figures put the Arc A550M in a competitive position against desktop cards from prior generations. The nearest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti, scores 49,957, which is just 0.4% higher. The AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 scores 50,001 (0.5% higher), and the RX 6900 XT scores 50,951 (2.4% higher). The AMD RX 6800 XT trails at 48,477, which the Arc A550M beats by 2.6%.

The CPU's single-thread performance is moderate at 2,740 PassMark points, while multi-thread reaches 14,520. The Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1,742 is respectable for a 35 W part, though it trails higher-power desktop chips. The multi-core score of 12,342 indicates that the six cores scale well under sustained load, making the CPU capable for compilation, rendering, and other parallel workloads. The data encryption score of 10,718 and extended instructions score of 11,219 suggest solid AES and AVX2 performance, which benefits compression and scientific tasks. The data compression score of 168,692 is notably strong, indicating efficient cache utilization and memory bandwidth.

Combined, the CPU and GPU benchmarks paint a picture of a system that excels at graphics-heavy tasks relative to its CPU compute. The GPU's 86th percentile placement is significantly higher than the CPU's 73rd, meaning the GPU will often be the star of the show in gaming and rendering workloads.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses AMD Socket FP7, which is a mobile-only socket design. This means the processor is soldered to the motherboard and cannot be upgraded independently. The platform supports DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration, with a theoretical bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s. Users should ensure they populate both memory channels to achieve full bandwidth, as this directly impacts the CPU's performance in memory-sensitive tasks.

For PCIe, the CPU offers 20 Gen 4 lanes. This is sufficient for the discrete GPU (which uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface) and one or two Gen 4 NVMe SSDs. The GPU's bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x16, which is fully compatible with the CPU's lane allocation. There is no headroom for additional PCIe devices beyond the GPU and storage, so users should not plan for expansion cards.

The CPU's TDP is 35 W, and the GPU's TDP is 60 W. This totals 95 W for the two primary components alone, before accounting for memory, storage, display, and other system components. The suggested PSU field is null, so no specific wattage recommendation is available. However, given the combined 95 W TDP of the CPU and GPU, a laptop power adapter in the range of 100-150 W would be typical for this class of machine. The GPU is marked as an IGP (integrated graphics package) in terms of slot width, meaning it is designed for mobile integration rather than desktop installation.

The GPU is end-of-life, and the CPU has a release date of August 31, 2024, with a production status of active. This means the platform is current on the CPU side but the GPU is a mature product that may see driver support phased out over time. A sensible next upgrade would involve moving to a newer Intel Arc or NVIDIA discrete GPU, though the socket limitation means the CPU would need to be replaced at the same time if a faster processor is desired.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A550M is based on the Xe-HPG architecture, specifically the DG2-512 chip, and is part of the Alchemist generation for mobile. It is fabricated on TSMC's 6 nm process, with 21,700 million transistors on a 406 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 53.4 million per mm². This is a large die for a mobile GPU, indicating substantial compute resources packed into a 60 W TDP envelope.

The GPU has 2,048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, and 64 raster operation units. It features 16 ray tracing cores, which provide hardware-accelerated ray tracing for supported games and rendering applications. The tensor core field is null, so there is no dedicated AI acceleration hardware beyond what the Xe-HPG architecture provides through its general-purpose compute units. The base clock is 900 MHz, boosting to 2050 MHz. The memory runs at 1750 MHz, effectively 14 Gbps, across a 128-bit bus, yielding 224.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The 8 GB GDDR6 frame buffer is adequate for 1080p gaming and many 1440p titles, though higher resolutions may exceed the VRAM capacity in texture-heavy scenarios.

Compute performance is strong for a mobile GPU. FP32 throughput is 8.397 TFLOPS, and FP16 throughput is 16.79 TFLOPS with a 2:1 ratio. The pixel rate is 131.2 GPixel/s and texture rate is 262.4 GTexel/s. These figures indicate the GPU can sustain high fill rates, which benefits both gaming and 3D rendering. The API support includes DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, covering modern titles and professional applications.

The Geekbench OpenCL score is 49,894, and the Vulkan score is 49,580, with an average of 49,737. This places the GPU at the 86th percentile, outperforming the AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT by 2.6% and nearly matching the RX 6900 XT and RTX 5070 Ti. This is remarkable for a mobile part, suggesting the Arc A550M delivers desktop-class compute performance in a laptop form factor. For rendering workloads, the combination of 8 GB VRAM, 224 GB/s bandwidth, and 8.4 TFLOPS FP32 makes it suitable for GPU-accelerated rendering in Blender, Maya, or similar applications, though ray tracing performance is limited by the 16 RT cores and the absence of dedicated tensor hardware.

Who Should Build It

This laptop is well-suited for gamers who play at 1080p with high settings, as the GPU's 86th percentile placement and 8 GB VRAM provide a comfortable margin for modern titles. The CPU's 73rd percentile ensures it will not bottleneck the GPU in most gaming scenarios, though extremely CPU-heavy simulations may show some limitation. Content creators working with video editing or 3D rendering will benefit from the GPU's strong compute scores, particularly in OpenCL and Vulkan workloads, while the CPU's 12,342 Cinebench R23 multi-core score handles timeline scrubbing and export encoding.

Software developers will appreciate the 6-core, 12-thread processor for compilation tasks, with the PassMark integer math score of 50,800 indicating solid throughput for code builds. The 16 MB shared L3 cache helps with frequent recompilation. Students and office workers will find the 35 W CPU and 60 W GPU combination efficient for long battery life, with the CPU's single-thread score of 2,740 PassMark points handling everyday productivity applications without strain. Small business workstations that need occasional GPU acceleration for tasks like CAD or photo editing will find the Arc A550M's 8 GB VRAM and 224 GB/s bandwidth sufficient, though the end-of-life status of the GPU may be a concern for long-term support.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFps rows, so all frame rate figures below are estimates based on the component benchmark scores and should be treated as approximations rather than measured results.

Judging from the GPU's performance relative to desktop rivals, the Arc A550M should deliver playable frame rates at 1080p with ultra settings in most titles. The GPU's average score of 49,737 places it just below the RX 6900 XT (50,951), which was a high-end desktop card capable of 1440p gaming. However, the mobile form factor and 60 W TDP mean sustained clocks may be lower than desktop equivalents, so 1080p is the more realistic target. The 8 GB VRAM is sufficient for 1080p ultra textures in current games, though future titles may require reducing texture quality. At 1440p, frame rates will likely drop below 60 FPS in demanding games, while esports titles should run well above 100 FPS at 1080p. The CPU's 12,342 Cinebench R23 multi-core score indicates it can feed the GPU adequately in most scenarios, though the 4.40 GHz boost clock may limit performance in single-thread-bound titles.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build, as indicated by the buildClass field. The combination of the AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS (6-core, 12-thread Zen 3+ processor) and Intel Arc A550M (8 GB GDDR6 Xe-HPG GPU) targets the mid-to-upper tier of mobile computing. The combined percentile is 80, meaning this system outperforms 80% of all configurations in the database. The CPU's 73rd percentile and GPU's 86th percentile indicate a graphics-forward system where the GPU is the stronger component relative to its peers. This pairing is appropriate for users who need strong GPU compute and gaming performance without sacrificing portability, as the combined 95 W TDP of the two primary components is modest for a laptop.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data indicates that the GPU is the stronger component in this pairing, with an 86th percentile ranking versus the CPU's 73rd. This suggests that in GPU-bound workloads such as gaming at high resolutions or GPU rendering, the Arc A550M will be the limiting factor only when the workload exceeds its 8 GB VRAM or 8.4 TFLOPS compute capacity. In CPU-bound scenarios, such as physics simulation, compilation, or data compression, the Ryzen 5 7533HS will be the constraint, with its PassMark physics score of 821 and multi-thread score of 14,520 indicating moderate parallel throughput.

The FPS scaling evidence, while not measured, can be inferred from the benchmark scores. The GPU's 2.6% advantage over the RX 6800 XT in average score suggests it can maintain high frame rates at 1080p, but the CPU's single-thread score of 2,740 PassMark points may cause bottlenecks in games that rely heavily on a single core. In multi-threaded gaming workloads, the CPU's 12 threads will provide adequate support. For rendering tasks, the GPU will dominate the workload, and the CPU's 12,342 Cinebench R23 multi-core score will handle scene preparation and data transfer without significant delay. Overall, the system is well-balanced for its class, with the GPU slightly ahead in relative performance, meaning users should not expect the CPU to hold back the GPU in most real-world scenarios.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The Arc A550M's 86th percentile GPU score and 8 GB VRAM support 1080p gaming at high refresh rates, with the CPU's 4.40 GHz boost clock providing adequate single-thread performance for fast-paced titles.

Streaming: The CPU's 12 threads and 16 MB L3 cache can handle encoding at moderate bitrates, while the GPU's 16.79 TFLOPS FP16 performance offloads some encoding tasks via hardware acceleration.

Video editing: The GPU's 49,894 OpenCL score accelerates effects and color grading, while the CPU's 12,342 Cinebench R23 multi-core score handles timeline playback and export rendering.

3D rendering: The GPU's 8.397 TFLOPS FP32 and 16 RT cores enable hardware-accelerated ray tracing, with the 8 GB VRAM managing complex scenes, though the CPU's 73rd percentile may slow final frame assembly.

Software development: The CPU's 50,800 integer math score and 168,692 data compression score indicate strong compilation and serialization performance, with 12 threads for parallel builds.

Student and office work: The 35 W CPU TDP ensures long battery life, while the 2,740 PassMark single-thread score handles productivity suites efficiently, and the GPU provides acceleration for presentation graphics and light photo editing.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS + Intel Arc A550M

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS

Intel Arc A550M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

FAQ

Benchmark Performance

Upgrade Path and Platform

GPU Analysis

Who Should Build It

Gaming Performance

Build Overview

Balance and Bottleneck

Usage Scenarios

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds