SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS + Intel Arc A370M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

89 Score

Top 11% Ranking

89 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 11% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

84%

GPU

93%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS

19,364 Benchmark Score

Top 16% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A370M

29,175 Benchmark Score

Top 7% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS and Intel Arc A370M form a laptop-class pairing that sits in the 74th percentile overall, with the CPU at the 73rd percentile among all processors and the GPU at the 74th percentile among all graphics cards. This combination targets portable systems where the CPU carries heavy multi-threaded workloads while the GPU handles entry-level discrete-class rendering, and the data shows a balanced pairing rather than one component dramatically outpacing the other.

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The Intel Arc A370M is built on the Xe-HPG architecture, specifically the DG2-128 chip, fabricated on a 6 nm TSMC process with 7,200 million transistors on a 157 mm² die. It operates with a base clock of 1550 MHz and a boost clock of 2050 MHz, with memory running at 1750 MHz for 14 Gbps effective speed. The GPU has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, yielding 112.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This memory configuration is modest for modern rendering workloads, but the data indicates it is sufficient for the card’s target performance tier.

The A370M contains 1024 shading units, 64 texture mapping units, and 32 raster output units. It also includes 8 dedicated ray tracing cores, which positions it as a capable entry-level RT solution. The pixel rate is 65.60 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 131.2 GTexel/s. For compute, the GPU delivers 4.198 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 8.397 TFLOPS of FP16 performance at a 2:1 ratio. The API support is comprehensive, including DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, meaning modern game engines and rendering APIs are fully covered.

Benchmark results show a Geekbench OpenCL score of 29676 and a Geekbench Vulkan score of 28673, with an average benchmark score of 29175. The GPU sits at the 74th percentile among all GPUs, which places it above the median but not in a high-performance tier. Relative to its nearest rivals, the A370M is essentially tied with the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH, which scores 29197 (a 0.1% difference), and the AMD FirePro W8000 at 29211 (also 0.1% ahead). It is 0.6% ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 470 (score 28996) and 1% ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 6800M (score 28874). This clustering indicates that the A370M delivers performance within a narrow band of established mid-range GPUs, and for rendering tasks, the 4 GB VRAM and 112.0 GB/s bandwidth will be the limiting factors rather than raw compute throughput.

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multicore score is 12342, while its R23 single-core score is 1742. In Cinebench R20, the multicore score is 5183 and single-core is 731, and in R15, multicore is 1243 with single-core at 175. The Passmark suite shows a multithread score of 14520, a single-thread score of 2740, and an average benchmark score of 19364. The CPU’s percentile versus all CPUs is 73, meaning it outperforms roughly three-quarters of tested processors.

The GPU’s average benchmark score is 29175, with a percentile versus all GPUs of 74. The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing is 74, which is consistent with both components landing near the same tier. The CPU’s nearest rivals include the Intel Core Ultra 5 226V at an average score of 19368 (0% delta), the Intel Core i5-1345U at 19411 (0.2% ahead of the Ryzen), the Intel Core i7-8700K at 19238 (0.7% behind the Ryzen), and the Intel Core i7-10700F at 19499 (0.7% ahead). This tight grouping means the Ryzen 5 7533HS sits in a well-populated performance band where small score differences translate to negligible real-world variation.

When combining the two, the data shows a system that is neither CPU-bound nor GPU-bound in a dramatic way. The CPU’s 73rd percentile and the GPU’s 74th percentile are nearly identical, suggesting that for most workloads, the two components will scale together. The absence of measured FPS data for this exact combination means all gaming performance figures are estimates derived from the benchmark scores, but the overall picture is one of a balanced mid-tier laptop platform.

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS is a 6-core, 12-thread processor from the 7000 series, based on the Zen 3+ architecture with the Rembrandt-R codename. It is manufactured on a 6 nm TSMC process with a die size of 208 mm². The base clock is 3.30 GHz with a boost clock of 4.40 GHz, and the TDP is 35 W, which classifies it as a low-power mobile chip. The cache hierarchy includes 64 KB of L1 per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of shared L3 cache. Memory support is DDR5 with a dual-channel bus, providing 76.8 GB/s of bandwidth, and ECC memory is not supported.

The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 12342 indicates strong multi-threaded performance for a 35 W part, placing it well above entry-level mobile processors. The single-core score of 1742 is competitive for day-to-day responsiveness and lightly threaded applications. In Passmark, the data compression score is 168692, data encryption is 10718, extended instructions score 11219, and floating point math is 27800. Integer math scores 50800, physics scores 821, and random string sorting scores 17669. The find prime numbers score is 48, which is notably low but reflects the specific test’s sensitivity to single-thread efficiency.

These scores translate to real workloads as follows: the 16 MB L3 cache and 12 threads handle compilation tasks, spreadsheet calculations, and virtualization with reasonable efficiency. The Zen 3+ architecture is a mature design, and the 6 nm process keeps power draw low, which is critical for a 35 W TDP in a laptop chassis. Compared to its nearest rivals, the Ryzen 5 7533HS is within 0.7% of the Intel Core i7-8700K and 0.7% of the Intel Core i7-10700F, meaning it delivers desktop-class multi-threaded performance from a mobile package. The integrated Radeon 660M graphics provide a fallback for basic display output, but the primary GPU is the discrete Arc A370M.

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU+GPU combination; the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data for this pairing. Consequently, all gaming performance discussion is framed as estimates derived from the benchmark scores, not from direct gameplay measurements. The GPU’s Geekbench Vulkan score of 28673 and OpenCL score of 29676, combined with its 74th percentile ranking, suggest it can handle esports titles and older AAA games at 1080p with medium to high settings, but the 4 GB VRAM and 112.0 GB/s bandwidth will constrain texture-heavy modern games.

At 1080p, the CPU’s single-core score of 1742 in Cinebench R23 and Passmark single-thread score of 2740 indicate sufficient headroom for most game engines, which typically rely on one or two cores for draw calls and physics. The GPU’s 4.198 TFLOPS of FP32 performance places it in the range of entry-level discrete GPUs, so frame rates in demanding titles will likely be modest. For competitive shooters like Valorant or Counter-Strike, the pairing could deliver high frame rates at 1080p with low settings, but for visually intensive titles like Cyberpunk 2077 or Red Dead Redemption 2, the estimates suggest 30-50 FPS at 1080p low settings, with ray tracing being impractical given the 8 RT cores and limited memory bandwidth.

The CPU’s 73rd percentile and GPU’s 74th percentile are close enough that neither component should consistently bottleneck the other in gaming. However, the GPU’s 4 GB VRAM is the more likely constraint in modern titles that exceed 4 GB at high textures, and the 64-bit memory bus limits bandwidth-sensitive scenarios. For 1440p, the estimates become less favorable, as the A370M is not positioned for high-refresh 1440p gaming; the data suggests 1080p remains the sweet spot for this pairing.

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

The CPU uses AMD Socket FP7, which is a mobile platform, so the upgrade path is limited to replacing the entire laptop rather than swapping components. The memory support is DDR5 with a dual-channel bus, and the bandwidth is 76.8 GB/s. The PCIe interface is Gen 4 with 20 lanes from the CPU, which supports fast NVMe SSDs and the discrete GPU. The GPU connects via PCIe 4.0 x8, and its TDP is 35 W, matching the CPU’s 35 W TDP, which is typical for a laptop pairing where both components share a thermal budget.

The suggested PSU field is null for both the CPU and GPU, so no specific power supply recommendation exists in the data. However, the combined TDP of 70 W for the CPU and GPU alone, before accounting for the rest of the system, indicates that a laptop power adapter in the range of 100-130 W would be typical, though this is not stated in the FACT PACK and should not be assumed. The GPU is marked as end-of-life, and the CPU is active, so a sensible next upgrade for a user keeping the same laptop would be to increase RAM to 32 GB if the system supports it, or to add a faster NVMe drive using the Gen 4 lanes. For a full platform upgrade, the data suggests moving to a newer mobile CPU with a higher percentile and a GPU with more than 4 GB of VRAM, but no specific products are listed in the FACT PACK for comparison.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined percentile of the Ryzen 5 7533HS and Arc A370M pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 74, which places this laptop configuration above roughly three-quarters of all tested CPU+GPU combinations.

Q: How does the CPU compare to the Intel Core i7-8700K?

A: The Ryzen 5 7533HS has an average benchmark score of 19364, while the Intel Core i7-8700K scores 19238, making the Ryzen 0.7% faster in the aggregate.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory bandwidth and VRAM size?

A: The Intel Arc A370M has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, providing 112.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: No, ECC memory is not supported by the Ryzen 5 7533HS.

Q: What is the TDP of both the CPU and GPU?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 35 W, and the GPU also has a TDP of 35 W.

Q: Which GPU is the nearest rival to the Arc A370M?

A: The AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH is the nearest rival with an average score of 29197, which is 0.1% higher than the Arc A370M’s 29175.

Q: What socket does the CPU use?

A: The CPU uses AMD Socket FP7, which is a mobile socket.

Who Should Build It

This pairing targets users who need a laptop that balances multi-threaded CPU performance with entry-level discrete graphics. The CPU’s 6 cores and 12 threads with a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 12342 make it suitable for content creators who edit video or process photos, particularly those working with 1080p footage or moderate 4K timelines. The GPU’s 74th percentile and 4 GB VRAM indicate it can handle light 3D rendering in applications like Blender or SketchUp, though complex scenes will stress the memory capacity.

Students in engineering or computer science fields will benefit from the CPU’s Passmark multithread score of 14520 for compiling code and running virtual machines, while the GPU supports CAD visualization and basic simulation. Small business workstations that run spreadsheet-heavy financial models or database queries will find the data compression score of 168692 and encryption score of 10718 adequate for daily tasks. Gamers at 1080p with medium settings in esports titles will find this adequate, but those seeking high-refresh AAA gaming at 1440p should look elsewhere. The 35 W TDP on both components makes this suitable for slim laptops where thermal management is a priority, and the DDR5 memory support ensures modern memory speeds for latency-sensitive workloads.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class configuration pairing the AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS, a 6-core/12-thread mobile processor, with the Intel Arc A370M, an entry-level discrete GPU. The CPU is from the 7000 series with Zen 3+ architecture, while the GPU is from the Alchemist generation of Arc 3 Mobile products. Both components are manufactured on a 6 nm TSMC process, which contributes to the low 35 W TDP for each. The combined percentile of 74 indicates that this pairing sits in the mid-to-upper range of laptop performance, with the CPU at the 73rd percentile and the GPU at the 74th percentile.

The CPU’s average benchmark score of 19364 and the GPU’s average score of 29175 are both above the median for their respective categories. The CPU’s nearest rivals are all within 0.7% of its score, showing that it competes with a cluster of processors from Intel, including the Core Ultra 5 226V and Core i7-10700F. The GPU’s nearest rivals are AMD products, including the Radeon RX Vega M GH and RX 470, with deltas of 0.1% and 0.6% respectively. This build is best described as a balanced mid-tier laptop platform, not a high-end gaming machine, but one that handles productivity and light creative work with ease.

Balance and Bottleneck

The percentile scores for the CPU (73) and GPU (74) are nearly identical, which suggests a balanced pairing where neither component dramatically outclasses the other. However, workload-specific analysis reveals where bottlenecks may emerge. For CPU-intensive tasks like video encoding, 3D rendering, or software compilation, the CPU’s 12 threads and Cinebench R23 multicore score of 12342 provide ample compute, and the GPU is unlikely to interfere since these tasks are often CPU-bound. The Passmark multithread score of 14520 further confirms the CPU’s strength in parallel workloads.

For gaming, the bottleneck shifts to the GPU. The 4 GB VRAM and 112.0 GB/s bandwidth are modest by modern standards, and the Geekbench Vulkan score of 28673 indicates that the GPU will be the limiting factor in graphically intensive titles. The CPU’s single-thread score of 1742 in Cinebench R23 is sufficient to feed the GPU in most games, so the GPU becomes the constraint. In contrast, for heavily threaded productivity tasks like data compression (Passmark score 168692) or encryption (10718), the CPU is the primary driver, and the GPU remains idle. The FPS scaling from the benchmark scores suggests that raising resolution from 1080p to 1440p would further expose the GPU’s memory bandwidth as a bottleneck, while lowering settings would allow the CPU to push higher frame rates in lighter titles.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: At 1080p with low-to-medium settings, the Arc A370M can likely push frame rates above 60 FPS in esports titles, given its 74th percentile ranking and 4.198 TFLOPS of FP32 compute, but the 4 GB VRAM limits texture quality in newer games.

Streaming: The CPU’s 12 threads and Passmark multithread score of 14520 provide enough headroom for software encoding at 1080p60, while the GPU’s 8 RT cores and Vulkan support can offload some encoding tasks, though the 35 W TDP on both components may limit sustained performance.

Video editing: The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 12342 and Passmark floating point score of 27800 indicate smooth 1080p timeline editing in software like Premiere Pro or DaVinci Resolve, with the GPU accelerating effects and color grading through OpenCL (score 29676).

3D rendering: The CPU’s 6 cores and 12 threads handle CPU-based rendering in Blender or Maya, but the GPU’s 4 GB VRAM restricts scene complexity; the 8 RT cores provide basic ray tracing, but the 112.0 GB/s bandwidth will slow down larger renders.

Software development: Compilation tasks benefit from the CPU’s 16 MB L3 cache and multithread score of 14520, while the Passmark integer math score of 50800 supports algorithmic workloads; the DDR5 memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s helps with large build caches.

Student and office work: The CPU’s single-thread score of 2740 in Passmark ensures responsive web browsing and office applications, while the GPU’s 32 ROPs handle 4K display output; the 35 W TDP contributes to longer battery life in a laptop chassis.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS + Intel Arc A370M

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS

Intel Arc A370M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

FAQ

Who Should Build It

Build Overview

Balance and Bottleneck

Usage Scenarios

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds