SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS + Intel Arc A350M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

88 Score

Top 12% Ranking

88 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 12% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

84%

GPU

92%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS

19,364 Benchmark Score

Top 16% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A350M

24,647 Benchmark Score

Top 8% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS + Intel Arc A350M: A Balanced 1080p Mobile Duo

This build pairs AMD’s 6-core Zen 3+ mobile processor with Intel’s entry-level Arc 3 discrete GPU, creating a laptop platform that targets mainstream productivity and 1080p gaming. The CPU sits at the 73rd percentile among all processors, while the GPU lands at the 70th percentile, placing the combined system at the 72nd percentile overall. Benchmark data shows a cohesive pairing where neither component dramatically outclasses the other, making this a sensible mid-range mobile configuration for users who need both multi-threaded compute and dedicated graphics acceleration in a portable chassis.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS is a 6-core, 12-thread mobile processor built on the Zen 3+ architecture, codenamed Rembrandt-R, and manufactured on TSMC’s 6 nm process. It operates with a base clock of 3.30 GHz and a boost clock of 4.40 GHz, all within a 35 W TDP envelope that suits thin-and-light laptops. The cache hierarchy consists of 64 KB L1 per core, 512 KB L2 per core, and a shared 16 MB L3 pool, which is typical for a mainstream mobile part in the 7000 series. Memory support is limited to DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration, providing 76.8 GB/s of bandwidth, and the CPU exposes 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes for peripheral connectivity.

Benchmark results paint a picture of a capable all-rounder. In Cinebench R23, the chip scores 12,342 multi-core and 1,742 single-core. The multi-core figure indicates strong sustained throughput for a 35 W part, driven by the 6-core/12-thread arrangement and the efficiency of Zen 3+ on 6 nm. The single-core score of 1,742 is modest but adequate for everyday responsiveness and lightly threaded applications. Cinebench R20 results follow a similar pattern: 5,183 multi-core and 731 single-core. In PassMark testing, the CPU shows notable strengths in integer math (50,800) and floating-point math (27,800), alongside a strong data compression score of 168,692 and encryption throughput of 10,718. The multithread score of 14,520 and single-thread score of 2,740 reinforce that this is a balanced performer rather than a specialist in any single workload.

Relative to its nearest rivals, the Ryzen 5 7533HS is essentially neck-and-neck with several established desktop and mobile parts. Its average benchmark score of 19,364 sits within 0.7% of the Intel Core i7-8700K (19,238), within 0.2% of the Intel Core i5-1345U (19,411), and within 0.7% of the Intel Core i7-10700F (19,499). It is effectively tied with the Intel Core Ultra 5 226V (19,368, 0% delta). This means the 7533HS delivers desktop-class multi-threaded performance from a previous generation, but its single-core results are lower than what modern high-end laptops offer, so users upgrading from a recent flagship will notice slower per-thread responsiveness.

For real workloads, the data suggests that the 7533HS can handle code compilation, office multitasking, and moderate video editing without complaint. The 12 threads and 16 MB L3 cache help with parallel tasks like rendering and batch processing, while the 35 W TDP keeps thermals manageable in compact chassis. The lack of ECC support and the absence of an unlocked multiplier indicate this is a fixed-function mobile part, not intended for overclocking or workstation-class reliability.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A350M is an entry-level discrete GPU based on the Xe-HPG architecture, specifically the DG2-128 chip, and it is manufactured on the same 6 nm TSMC process as the CPU. It packs 768 shading units, 48 texture mapping units, and 24 ROPs, along with 6 dedicated ray tracing cores. The GPU runs at a base clock of 1150 MHz and boosts up to 2200 MHz, while its 4 GB of GDDR6 memory operates on a 64-bit bus at 1750 MHz, yielding 14 Gbps effective speed and 112.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The transistor count is 7,200 million on a 157 mm² die, giving a density of 45.9M transistors per mm². Compute throughput is rated at 3.379 TFLOPS for FP32 and 6.758 TFLOPS for FP16 (with 2:1 ratio), while pixel rate is 52.80 GPixel/s and texture rate is 105.6 GTexel/s.

The Arc A350M’s benchmark results come from Geekbench, where it scores 24,546 in OpenCL and 24,747 in Vulkan, averaging 24,647 overall. This places the GPU at the 70th percentile among all GPUs. Its nearest rivals are a mixed bag: the AMD Radeon RX 590 (24,744, -0.4% delta) is a desktop GPU from 2018, the NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile (24,763, -0.5% delta) is a professional mobile part, the AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT (24,442, 0.8% delta) is a desktop mid-ranger, and the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 (24,277, 1.5% delta) is a low-end desktop card. This suggests that the A350M’s raw compute is roughly equivalent to a last-generation desktop GPU, which is impressive for a 25 W mobile part but means it will struggle with modern AAA titles at high settings.

The 4 GB VRAM and 112 GB/s bandwidth are the primary bottlenecks for gaming and rendering. At 1080p with high textures, many modern games exceed 4 GB of VRAM, leading to potential stuttering or reduced texture quality. The 64-bit memory bus limits bandwidth, so memory-intensive workloads like 4K texture streaming will be constrained. However, the inclusion of 6 RT cores and support for DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), Vulkan 1.4, and OpenGL 4.6 means the GPU is feature-complete for ray tracing and modern graphics APIs, even if the raw performance is modest. The FP16 throughput of 6.758 TFLOPS suggests decent compute capability for AI inference or image processing tasks that leverage half-precision.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming, this pairing is best suited to 1080p at medium settings. The GPU’s 70th percentile rank and 3.379 TFLOPS of FP32 will drive esports titles like Fortnite or CS2 at high frame rates, but demanding AAA games will require lowering settings to maintain playable FPS. The CPU’s 1,742 single-core score in Cinebench R23 ensures that the processor will not bottleneck the GPU in most scenarios.

Streaming and content creation benefit from the CPU’s 12 threads and 12,342 multi-core Cinebench R23 score, which can handle encoding and simultaneous game capture without excessive strain. The GPU’s dedicated media engines (not detailed in the pack, but implied by the Arc architecture) would offload encoding tasks, but the 4 GB VRAM may limit simultaneous game and stream quality.

Video editing in software like Premiere Pro or DaVinci Resolve will see mixed results. The CPU’s 50,800 integer math score and 14,520 multithread PassMark score provide solid timeline scrubbing and export performance, while the GPU’s 24,647 average Geekbench score assists with effects and color grading. However, the 4 GB VRAM may cause issues with large projects or heavy GPU-accelerated effects.

3D rendering in Blender or similar tools will rely heavily on the CPU’s multi-core capability. The 12,342 Cinebench R23 multi-core score is competitive with older desktop i7 parts, so CPU-based rendering is viable for hobbyist projects. The GPU’s 6.758 TFLOPS FP16 could accelerate some render engines, but the limited VRAM and bandwidth make GPU rendering less practical for complex scenes.

Software development is a comfortable fit. The 12 threads, 16 MB L3 cache, and 168,692 PassMark data compression score ensure fast compile times and smooth virtualization. The single-core performance is sufficient for IDE responsiveness, and the 76.8 GB/s memory bandwidth supports frequent code reloads.

Student and office work is where this system shines. The CPU’s 73rd percentile rank ensures snappy web browsing, document editing, and spreadsheet manipulation, while the GPU’s presence enables hardware acceleration for video calls and presentation graphics. The 35 W CPU TDP and 25 W GPU TDP together keep power draw low, extending battery life for all-day portability.

Who Should Build It

This laptop configuration targets gamers who prioritize portability and 1080p gaming over maximum fidelity. The GPU’s 70th percentile rank means it can comfortably handle eSports and older titles at high settings, but users should expect to dial down settings for modern AAA releases. The CPU’s 73rd percentile ensures no bottleneck at 1080p medium settings.

Content creators who work primarily with photos, audio, or light video will find the CPU’s multi-threaded performance sufficient for batch exports and rendering, while the GPU accelerates effects and previews. The 12 threads allow for background encoding while editing, and the 16 MB L3 cache helps with random access patterns common in media files.

Software developers and IT professionals benefit from the 12-thread CPU and 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes, which enable fast NVMe storage and peripheral connectivity. The 35 W TDP makes this suitable for portable workstations used in meetings or on-site.

Students and small business users will appreciate the balance of performance and efficiency. The integrated Radeon 660M graphics provide a fallback if the Arc A350M is unavailable, and the discrete GPU’s compute power supports light CAD or data visualization tasks. The lack of ECC memory precludes mission-critical server roles, but for general-purpose workstations, this is a capable platform.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 19,364, placing it at the 73rd percentile among all CPUs. Its best results are in PassMark data compression (168,692), integer math (50,800), and multithread (14,520), while its weakest are in single-thread (2,740) and physics (821). The Cinebench scores of 12,342 multi-core and 1,742 single-core in R23 version provide a standardized comparison point.

The GPU’s average benchmark score is 24,647, at the 70th percentile among all GPUs. Geekbench scores are 24,546 for OpenCL and 24,747 for Vulkan, showing consistent performance across APIs. The GPU is within 1.5% of the NVIDIA GTX 1630 and within 0.8% of the AMD RX 6600 XT, indicating it performs like a low-end desktop card from the previous generation.

The combined percentile is 72, meaning this pairing outperforms approximately 72% of all CPU+GPU combinations in the database. The CPU’s 73rd percentile and GPU’s 70th percentile are closely aligned, suggesting a balanced system where neither component is a significant bottleneck. The deltaPct values against rivals show that the CPU is effectively tied with its nearest competitors, while the GPU has a slight edge over the GTX 1630 but trails the RX 6600 XT by a small margin.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s core and thread count?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS has 6 cores and 12 threads, with a base clock of 3.30 GHz and a boost clock of 4.40 GHz.

Q: How much VRAM does the Intel Arc A350M have?

A: The GPU has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, providing 112.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this build?

A: The combined percentile is 72, with the CPU at the 73rd percentile and the GPU at the 70th percentile.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: No, ECC memory is not supported. The CPU supports DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration.

Q: What is the TDP of each component?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 35 W, and the GPU has a TDP of 25 W.

Q: How does the CPU compare to the Intel Core i7-8700K?

A: The CPU’s average benchmark score is 19,364, which is 0.7% higher than the Core i7-8700K’s 19,238.

Q: Does the GPU support ray tracing?

A: Yes, the Intel Arc A350M has 6 dedicated ray tracing cores and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2).

Balance and Bottleneck

The data indicates a well-balanced pairing where the CPU and GPU are closely matched in percentile rank. The CPU’s 73rd percentile and GPU’s 70th percentile suggest that for most workloads, neither component will consistently bottleneck the other. However, specific scenarios reveal where the limits lie.

In gaming, the GPU is likely the primary bottleneck. The A350M’s 4 GB VRAM and 112 GB/s bandwidth are below what modern AAA titles require at high settings, so frame rates will be constrained by the GPU’s memory capacity and bandwidth rather than the CPU’s compute power. The CPU’s single-core score of 1,742 in Cinebench R23 is sufficient to keep up with the GPU’s output at 1080p medium settings, but if the user lowers resolution to 720p, the CPU may become the limiting factor in CPU-bound scenes.

In productivity tasks, the CPU is the dominant component. The 12-thread configuration and 12,342 multi-core score handle parallel workloads efficiently, while the GPU’s compute is only leveraged in specific applications like video encoding or GPU-accelerated rendering. For software development, the CPU’s integer math score of 50,800 is the key metric, and the GPU plays a minor role. In video editing, the balance shifts depending on the task: timeline scrubbing uses the CPU, while effects and color grading offload to the GPU, where the 24,647 average Geekbench score is adequate but not exceptional.

The FPS scaling data is not available for this exact combination, so estimates are based on the GPU’s benchmark scores. At 1080p, users should expect playable frame rates in eSports titles and older games, but will need to lower settings for newer releases. The CPU’s performance headroom means that upgrading the GPU in a future laptop would yield immediate FPS gains, while the GPU’s current performance does not demand a stronger CPU.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build (buildClass: "laptop") featuring the AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS, a 6-core/12-thread Zen 3+ mobile processor, paired with the Intel Arc A350M, a 4 GB GDDR6 discrete GPU based on Xe-HPG architecture. The CPU is from the 7000 series, uses the AMD Socket FP7, and is manufactured on a 6 nm TSMC process. The GPU is from the Alchemist generation (Arc 3 Mobile), also on 6 nm, and is marked as end-of-life in production status.

The overall tier is mid-range, with a combined percentile of 72. This puts the system above the majority of laptops in the database, but below high-end gaming or workstation configurations. The CPU’s 73rd percentile and GPU’s 70th percentile indicate that this is a competent mainstream performer, suitable for everyday use and moderate gaming. The CPU’s release date of 2024-08-31 and the GPU’s release date of 2022-03-29 show a generational gap, with the CPU being newer, but the GPU’s architecture remains competitive in its class.

The pairing is logical for a portable system: the 35 W CPU and 25 W GPU together draw only 60 W under load, which is manageable in a laptop chassis with modest cooling. The integrated Radeon 660M graphics provide a low-power fallback for basic tasks, while the Arc A350M activates for demanding workloads. This is not a high-performance desktop replacement, but rather a balanced mobile solution for users who need discrete graphics without sacrificing battery life.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination in the FACT PACK. Therefore, all frame rate expectations below are estimated from the benchmark scores and should be treated as approximations rather than verified results.

Based on the GPU’s 70th percentile rank and 3.379 TFLOPS of FP32 compute, this system is positioned for 1080p gaming at medium to low settings in modern titles. The 4 GB VRAM and 112 GB/s bandwidth will limit texture quality and resolution, so users should expect to run games at 1080p with reduced texture detail to avoid stuttering. In eSports titles like Overwatch or Rocket League, which are less demanding, the GPU’s 24,647 average Geekbench score suggests it can maintain high frame rates at 1080p high settings.

For single-player AAA games released in the last few years, the estimate is 30-60 FPS at 1080p low settings. The 6 RT cores allow for ray tracing, but the limited compute power means that enabling ray tracing will likely drop frame rates below playable levels in most games. Older titles from 2015-2020 should run at 1080p high settings with 60+ FPS, as the GPU’s performance is comparable to the desktop GTX 1630 (within 1.5% delta), which was a popular entry-level gaming card.

The CPU’s 12 threads and 16 MB L3 cache ensure that the processor will not be a bottleneck at these settings. In CPU-bound games like strategy titles or simulations, the 1,742 single-core score in Cinebench R23 may limit frame rates to around 60 FPS in busy scenes, but this is acceptable for the GPU’s output level. Users who prioritize gaming should consider this system for 1080p medium settings in competitive games, rather than 1440p or high-fidelity gaming.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses AMD Socket FP7, which is a mobile socket, meaning the CPU is soldered and cannot be upgraded in most laptops. The GPU is also integrated into the motherboard, so neither component is user-replaceable. This limits the upgrade path to external displays, storage, and memory, assuming the laptop allows for those changes.

The platform supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration with 76.8 GB/s bandwidth. Upgrading from 8 GB to 16 GB or 32 GB of DDR5 RAM is the most impactful improvement, as it will reduce stuttering in games and improve multitasking. The CPU’s 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes support fast NVMe SSDs, and users can upgrade their storage to a Gen 4 drive for faster load times.

The GPU’s suggested PSU is not listed, and the GPU TDP is 25 W, which is low enough that the laptop’s power adapter (typically 65-90 W for a 35 W CPU) provides sufficient headroom. The CPU’s TDP of 35 W and GPU’s TDP of 25 W together draw 60 W, so any adapter rated above 90 W is adequate. There is no discrete PSU to upgrade in a laptop, so power considerations are limited to the adapter.

A sensible next upgrade for this platform would be increasing memory to 32 GB and adding a high-capacity PCIe Gen 4 NVMe SSD. These changes will improve load times and allow for more background tasks without affecting the CPU or GPU. For users who need more graphics performance, the only path is to purchase a new laptop with a higher-tier GPU, as the Arc A350M is soldered and end-of-life. The CPU’s performance is competitive with desktop i7-8700K, so it will not feel outdated for several years, but the GPU’s 4 GB VRAM is the primary limitation for future gaming.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS + Intel Arc A350M

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS

Intel Arc A350M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

GPU Analysis

Usage Scenarios

Who Should Build It

Benchmark Performance

FAQ

Balance and Bottleneck

Build Overview

Gaming Performance

Upgrade Path and Platform

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds