SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 7520C + Intel Arc A370M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

81 Score

Top 19% Ranking

81 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 19% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

CPU Bottleneck

CPU

68%

GPU

93%

Your CPU is limiting system performance. Consider upgrading to a faster processor to better utilize your GPU.

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 5 7520C

2,127 Benchmark Score

Top 32% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A370M

29,175 Benchmark Score

Top 7% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Bottleneck Detected

CPU Bottleneck - Upgrading the weaker component will improve overall performance.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 5 7520C is a mobile processor built on the Zen 2 architecture, codenamed Mendocino, and manufactured on TSMC's 6 nm process node. It features 4 cores and 8 threads, with a base clock of 2.80 GHz and a boost clock of 4.30 GHz. The chip is designed for power-efficient laptops, as indicated by its 15 W TDP, and it integrates a Radeon 610M graphics solution alongside the CPU cores. The die size is 100 mm², and it supports dual-channel LPDDR5 memory with a peak bandwidth of 88.0 GB/s. The cache hierarchy includes 64 KB of L1 per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and 4 MB of shared L3 cache, which is modest for a modern processor but consistent with the low-power segment this chip targets.

Benchmark data from Cinebench reveals a mixed picture. In Cinebench R23, the processor scores 7355 points in multi-core and 1038 points in single-core. The single-core score is notably low, suggesting that while the boost clock reaches 4.30 GHz, the Zen 2 architecture and power constraints limit per-thread performance. In Cinebench R20, the multi-core score is 3089, and the single-core score is 435. The Cinebench R15 results show 741 multi-core and 104 single-core. The average benchmark score of 2127 places this CPU at the 46th percentile among all CPUs, meaning it sits just below the midpoint of the performance distribution. Compared to its nearest rivals, the Ryzen 5 7520C is nearly identical in average score to the Intel Core i7-1160G7 (deltaPct of 0.2%), the Intel Atom C5125 (deltaPct of 0.3%), the AMD Ryzen 3 5300U (deltaPct of -0.4%), and the Intel Core i5-9400T (deltaPct of -0.4%). These deltas are all within a fraction of a percent, indicating that the 7520C is effectively performance-equivalent to a mix of low-power and older desktop/mobile parts, though the competition varies widely in core counts and architecture.

For real workloads, the multi-core scores suggest this CPU can handle light productivity tasks such as document editing, web browsing, and basic spreadsheet work without severe bottlenecks. The 8 threads provide some parallelism, but the 4 MB shared L3 cache and dual-channel memory bandwidth of 88.0 GB/s will limit more demanding applications like video encoding or software compilation. The single-core scores, particularly the R23 score of 1038, are telling: this is not a processor for snappy, high-frequency workloads. The data implies that the 7520C is optimized for sustained battery life and low heat output rather than raw compute performance. The PCIe Gen 3 support with only 4 CPU lanes further reinforces that this is a platform for mainstream, non-enthusiast laptops where external GPU bandwidth is not a priority.

# Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU+GPU combination, and the dataIsMeasured field is false. Therefore, all FPS figures discussed in this section are estimates derived from the benchmark scores of the AMD Ryzen 5 7520C and the Intel Arc A370M, not from direct game testing. The absence of measured data means these estimates carry inherent uncertainty, but the underlying compute scores provide a reasonable foundation for expectations.

The Intel Arc A370M is a mobile GPU based on the Xe-HPG architecture (Alchemist generation) with a 6 nm process from TSMC. It has 1024 shading units, 64 TMUs, and 32 ROPs, along with 8 ray tracing cores. The GPU operates at a base clock of 1550 MHz and a boost clock of 2050 MHz, with 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, yielding a bandwidth of 112.0 GB/s. In Geekbench benchmarks, the A370M scores 29676 in OpenCL and 28673 in Vulkan, with an average score of 29175. This places the GPU at the 74th percentile among all GPUs, which is a solidly mid-range position. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH (deltaPct of -0.1%), the AMD FirePro W8000 (deltaPct of -0.1%), the AMD Radeon RX 470 (deltaPct of 0.6%), and the AMD Radeon RX 6800M (deltaPct of 1%). The small deltas indicate that the A370M performs nearly identically to these parts, despite the RX 6800M being a high-end mobile GPU — although the latter's delta of 1% suggests it is only marginally faster in aggregate benchmarks.

Given the CPU's 46th percentile ranking and the GPU's 74th percentile ranking, the estimated gaming performance at 1080p ultra settings would likely be limited by the CPU in many titles. For esports games like Counter-Strike or League of Legends, the A370M's compute power should be sufficient to push high frame rates, but the Ryzen 5 7520C's single-core scores (e.g., 1038 in R23) may cap performance below what the GPU can deliver. For AAA titles at 1080p ultra, the 4 GB VRAM and 112.0 GB/s bandwidth are modest, and frame rates would likely hover in the low-to-mid 30s to 50s range depending on the game's optimization. The 8 ray tracing cores are present, but with only 4.198 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, ray-traced effects would likely cause significant frame drops. At 1440p or higher, the GPU would become the primary bottleneck, and the 4 GB VRAM would quickly be exhausted by modern textures. In summary, this pairing is best suited for 1080p gaming at medium settings, where the A370M can leverage its 74th percentile position to deliver playable frame rates, while the CPU handles less demanding titles adequately.

# Upgrade Path and Platform

The AMD Ryzen 5 7520C is built for the AMD Socket FT6, which is a BGA (ball grid array) package typical of ultraportable laptops. This socket is not user-upgradeable, meaning the CPU is soldered to the motherboard and cannot be swapped for a higher-end part. The platform supports dual-channel LPDDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 88.0 GB/s, but the memory is also likely soldered or fixed in the laptop design, limiting future expansion. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 3 with 4 lanes, which is sufficient for an integrated GPU or a low-power discrete GPU but restricts the use of high-bandwidth add-in cards. The integrated graphics, Radeon 610M, serves as a fallback for basic display output when the discrete GPU is not in use.

The Intel Arc A370M uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 bus interface, which is a significant advantage over the CPU's PCIe Gen 3 lanes, but in a laptop form factor, both components are fixed. The GPU has a TDP of 35 W, which is low enough to be cooled in a slim chassis, and its slot width is listed as "IGP" (integrated graphics processor), indicating it is mounted directly on the motherboard. The suggested PSU field is null, and no power connector details are provided, which is typical for mobile designs where power delivery is handled by the laptop's internal power management. The combined TDP of the CPU (15 W) and GPU (35 W) totals 50 W, which is modest for a laptop and suggests that a standard 65 W or 90 W AC adapter would provide ample headroom for both components under load.

For a sensible next upgrade, the data indicates that the platform is closed. Users cannot replace the CPU or GPU, and the memory and storage are the only potentially upgradable components, though the FACT PACK does not specify storage or memory upgradeability. The realistic upgrade path is to move to a completely new laptop with a more powerful CPU and GPU, as the FT6 socket and the A370M's mobile integration preclude any meaningful component-level improvements. The PCIe Gen 3 x4 CPU lanes and the 4 GB GPU memory are the primary constraints, and neither can be addressed within this build. The takeaway is that this is a self-contained system designed for specific workloads, not a platform for future expansion.

# Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between the AMD Ryzen 5 7520C and the Intel Arc A370M is skewed toward the GPU in aggregate performance, with the CPU sitting at the 46th percentile and the GPU at the 74th percentile. This means that, in most workloads, the CPU is the limiting factor. The CPU's average benchmark score of 2127 is nearly identical to its nearest rivals, but its single-core performance is weak — the R23 single-core score of 1038 is a clear indicator. For gaming, this creates a bottleneck scenario where the GPU may be underutilized in CPU-bound titles. The A370M's 74th percentile ranking suggests it can handle moderately demanding graphics, but if the CPU cannot feed it enough frames, the GPU will idle. For example, a game that requires 60 FPS at 1080p might see the CPU maxing out at 40 FPS, leaving the GPU's performance headroom untapped.

Conversely, in GPU-bound workloads, such as 3D rendering or high-resolution gaming, the A370M becomes the bottleneck. The GPU's 4.198 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 112.0 GB/s bandwidth are limited compared to desktop-class parts, so tasks that stress the GPU heavily will see the CPU waiting on the GPU. The FPS scaling evidence is absent (no measured FPS data), but the benchmark scores imply that the CPU and GPU are not well matched for high-refresh gaming: the CPU's 46th percentile is too low to sustain high frame rates, while the GPU's 74th percentile is too low for high-fidelity settings. The combined percentile of 60 for the build reflects this middle-ground positioning. For productivity tasks like video editing, the CPU's multi-core score of 7355 in R23 is the limiting factor, as it is roughly 30% below what a more powerful 8-core part would deliver, though the exact comparison depends on rival data not included here. Overall, the bottleneck shifts depending on the workload: CPU-limited in gaming and light tasks, GPU-limited in heavy graphics or compute, and this imbalance is a key characteristic of this entry-level laptop pairing.

# GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A370M is built on the Xe-HPG architecture, specifically the Alchemist generation for mobile, and uses the DG2-128 chip with 7,200 million transistors on a 157 mm² die. The transistor density of 45.9M per mm² is a reflection of the 6 nm TSMC process. The GPU has 1024 shading units, 64 texture mapping units, and 32 raster output units, along with 8 dedicated ray tracing cores. The FP32 performance is 4.198 TFLOPS, and the FP16 performance is 8.397 TFLOPS with a 2:1 ratio, which is typical for consumer GPUs. The pixel rate is 65.60 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 131.2 GTexel/s. The memory subsystem consists of 4 GB of GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus, running at 1750 MHz with an effective data rate of 14 Gbps, providing 112.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The base clock is 1550 MHz, and the boost clock reaches 2050 MHz.

In benchmark terms, the A370M scores 29676 in Geekbench OpenCL and 28673 in Geekbench Vulkan, with an average score of 29175. This places it at the 74th percentile among all GPUs, which is a respectable position for a mobile part. The nearest rivals are clustered closely: the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH (deltaPct of -0.1%), the AMD FirePro W8000 (deltaPct of -0.1%), the AMD Radeon RX 470 (deltaPct of 0.6%), and the AMD Radeon RX 6800M (deltaPct of 1%). The fact that the A370M is within 1% of the RX 6800M in aggregate benchmark score is surprising, given that the RX 6800M is typically a high-end mobile GPU; however, the average scores may reflect specific workloads where the A370M's Xe-HPG architecture excels. The 8 ray tracing cores are present, but the low FP32 throughput means RT performance will be modest. For rendering tasks, the 4 GB VRAM is a significant constraint, especially for large scenes or high-resolution textures, and the 64-bit memory bus limits bandwidth to 112.0 GB/s, which is below what many desktop GPUs offer. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with modern APIs. The display outputs are listed as "Portable Device Dependent," confirming that this is a laptop component with output options determined by the original equipment manufacturer.

# Who Should Build It

This CPU+GPU pairing is targeted at users who need a laptop for everyday computing and light creative work, rather than heavy gaming or professional content creation. The Ryzen 5 7520C's 46th percentile CPU performance and the Arc A370M's 74th percentile GPU performance together define a system that is adequate for mainstream tasks. Gamers at 1080p with medium settings would find the A370M's compute power sufficient for many titles, but the CPU's low single-core scores (e.g., 1038 in R23) would limit performance in CPU-intensive games. Content creators working with photos or light 1080p video editing could benefit from the GPU's 4.198 TFLOPS, but the 4 GB VRAM and 112.0 GB/s bandwidth would become bottlenecks for 4K projects or complex effects. Software developers working on code compilation would see mixed results: the 8 threads help with parallel builds, but the single-core performance is below average, making interactive development slower. Students and small business users would find this laptop adequate for web browsing, document editing, spreadsheets, and video conferencing, as these tasks do not stress the CPU or GPU significantly. The integrated Radeon 610M provides a fallback for basic graphics, and the 15 W CPU TDP plus 35 W GPU TDP suggests excellent battery efficiency for on-the-go use. Overall, this build is not for enthusiasts or professionals requiring high-end performance; it is a balanced entry-level mobile solution.

# Benchmark Performance

The AMD Ryzen 5 7520C achieves an average benchmark score of 2127, placing it at the 46th percentile among all CPUs. In Cinebench R23, it scores 7355 multi-core and 1038 single-core; in R20, the scores are 3089 multi-core and 435 single-core; in R15, the scores are 741 multi-core and 104 single-core. The CPU's nearest rivals are the Intel Core i7-1160G7 (avgScore 2124, deltaPct 0.2%), the Intel Atom C5125 (avgScore 2122, deltaPct 0.3%), the AMD Ryzen 3 5300U (avgScore 2135, deltaPct -0.4%), and the Intel Core i5-9400T (avgScore 2136, deltaPct -0.4%). These deltas show that the 7520C is statistically indistinguishable from these parts, with the largest difference being just 0.4% below the Ryzen 3 5300U and i5-9400T. The Intel Arc A370M, on the other hand, achieves an average score of 29175, placing it at the 74th percentile among all GPUs. Its Geekbench scores are 29676 in OpenCL and 28673 in Vulkan. The nearest GPU rivals include the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH (avgScore 29197, deltaPct -0.1%), the AMD FirePro W8000 (avgScore 29211, deltaPct -0.1%), the AMD Radeon RX 470 (avgScore 28996, deltaPct 0.6%), and the AMD Radeon RX 6800M (avgScore 28874, deltaPct 1%). The combined percentile for this build is 60, indicating it sits in the upper-middle range of all systems. The picture is clear: the CPU is a mid-pack performer, while the GPU is notably stronger relative to its peers. This skew means the build's overall performance is driven by the GPU, but the CPU's limitations will cap the system in many real-world scenarios.

# FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's position relative to its nearest rivals?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 7520C has an average benchmark score of 2127, which is nearly identical to the Intel Core i7-1160G7 (deltaPct 0.2%), Intel Atom C5125 (deltaPct 0.3%), AMD Ryzen 3 5300U (deltaPct -0.4%), and Intel Core i5-9400T (deltaPct -0.4%). The largest performance difference is only 0.4%.

Q: How does the Intel Arc A370M compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The A370M's average score is 29175, and it is within 1% of the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH (deltaPct -0.1%), AMD FirePro W8000 (deltaPct -0.1%), AMD Radeon RX 470 (deltaPct 0.6%), and AMD Radeon RX 6800M (deltaPct 1%).

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this build?

A: The build has a combined percentile of 60, meaning it outperforms 60% of all CPU+GPU combinations in the benchmark database, with the CPU at the 46th percentile and GPU at the 74th percentile.

Q: Is there measured FPS data for this CPU+GPU combo?

A: No, the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact combination, and the dataIsMeasured field is false. All FPS discussions are estimates based on benchmark scores.

Q: What memory type and bandwidth does the CPU support?

A: The Ryzen 5 7520C supports dual-channel LPDDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 88.0 GB/s, and it does not support ECC memory.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration?

A: The Intel Arc A370M has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 112.0 GB/s and an effective data rate of 14 Gbps.

Q: What is the TDP of each component?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 15 W, and the GPU has a TDP of 35 W, for a combined thermal budget of 50 W.

# Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: This scenario is not ideal. The CPU's single-core score of 1038 in Cinebench R23 is a bottleneck for high frame rates, and the GPU's 4 GB VRAM limits texture quality. The 74th percentile GPU can handle 1080p medium settings, but high-refresh (144 Hz) monitors would be wasted, as the CPU is unlikely to sustain frame rates above 60 FPS in most titles.

Streaming: Streaming requires both CPU and GPU resources. The 8 threads of the CPU are sufficient for encoding at moderate bitrates, but the single-core performance is weak, which could cause dropped frames if the game is CPU-bound. The GPU's Vulkan score of 28673 suggests it can handle encoding offloading, but the 4 GB VRAM may limit game settings while streaming.

Video editing: The CPU's multi-core score of 7355 in Cinebench R23 indicates it can handle 1080p timeline editing, but 4K projects would be slow. The GPU's 4.198 TFLOPS of FP32 performance accelerates effects and rendering, but the 4 GB VRAM is a hard limit for large projects, and the 112.0 GB/s bandwidth may cause stutters with high-bitrate footage.

3D rendering: The GPU's 8 ray tracing cores and 4.198 TFLOPS are entry-level for 3D rendering. The 74th percentile position means it outperforms many integrated and older discrete GPUs, but the 4 GB VRAM will cap scene complexity. The CPU's 8 threads provide some multi-threaded rendering capacity, but the 46th percentile ranking limits final-frame render times.

Software development: For code compilation, the CPU's 8 threads help with parallel builds, and the R23 multi-core score of 7355 is respectable. However, the single-core score of 1038 means interactive tasks like IDE navigation and code indexing will feel sluggish. The GPU is underutilized in this scenario, so the system's performance is entirely CPU-bound.

Student and office work: This is the strongest scenario. The CPU's 46th percentile is adequate for web browsing, word processing, and spreadsheets, and the GPU's 74th percentile is irrelevant for these tasks. The low 15 W CPU TDP and 35 W GPU TDP suggest long battery life, making it a suitable choice for all-day campus or office use.

# Build Overview

This build pairs the AMD Ryzen 5 7520C with the Intel Arc A370M in a laptop form factor, as indicated by the buildClass field. The CPU is a 4-core, 8-thread Zen 2 processor with a 15 W TDP, and the GPU is a 35 W mobile part with 4 GB of GDDR6 memory. The combined percentile of 60 places this system in the upper-middle tier of all benchmarked builds, but the individual components are unevenly matched: the CPU sits at the 46th percentile, while the GPU sits at the 74th percentile. This means the GPU is the stronger component and will drive most performance gains, but the CPU's limitations will become apparent in CPU-bound tasks. The platform is closed, with no upgrade path for the CPU or GPU, and the memory and PCIe support are modest (dual-channel LPDDR5, PCIe Gen 3 x4). Overall, this is an entry-level mobile solution designed for general productivity, light creative work, and casual gaming at 1080p medium settings, with a clear emphasis on power efficiency over raw performance.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 7520C + Intel Arc A370M

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 5 7520C

Intel Arc A370M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Bottleneck Detected

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds