SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D + Intel Arc A770

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

95 Score

Top 5% Ranking

95 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 5% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

93%

GPU

97%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D

44,573 Benchmark Score

Top 7% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A770

68,809 Benchmark Score

Top 3% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D + Intel Arc A770

This desktop pairing combines a 6-core AMD processor built on the Zen 4 Raphael architecture with Intel's Alchemist-generation Arc A770 GPU, landing in the 90th percentile of all tracked CPU+GPU combinations. The CPU sits at the 89th percentile among all processors, while the GPU ranks at the 90th percentile among all graphics cards, making this a consistently high-tier pairing for a desktop build. The processor, released November 2025 with a launch MSRP of $269, brings AMD's 3D V-Cache technology to the 7000 series, while the GPU, launched October 2022 at a launch MSRP of 329 USD, represents Intel's flagship Arc 7 offering.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D is a 6-core, 12-thread desktop processor built on the 5 nm TSMC process with a transistor count of 11,270 million on a 71 mm² die. It operates at a 4.00 GHz base clock with a 4.50 GHz boost clock, drawing 65 W TDP on the AMD Socket AM5 platform. The Raphael codename and Zen 4 architecture are confirmed, with DDR5 dual-channel memory support providing 83.2 GB/s bandwidth and ECC memory capability. The 96 MB of shared L3 cache is the standout feature here, complemented by 64 KB L1 and 1 MB L2 per core.

Benchmark data shows a multi-threaded score of 25,047 in PassMark, with a single-thread score of 3,494. The integer math score of 70,774 and floating point score of 43,594 indicate strong arithmetic throughput, while the data compression score of 271,649 is exceptionally high — this is a workload that clearly benefits from the large L3 cache. The extended instructions score of 20,455 and random string sorting score of 32,999 round out the picture. Physics score of 2,779 and prime number finding score of 221 are lower, suggesting these workloads don't fully utilize the cache advantage.

The average benchmark score of 44,573 places this CPU in the 89th percentile of all processors. Compared to nearest rivals, it edges out the Intel Core Ultra X9 388H by 0.2% (44,466), the Intel Core i9-13950HX by 0.5% (44,342), and the AMD Ryzen AI Max 385 by 0.6% (44,309). However, it trails the Intel Core i5-14600 by 0.7% (44,889). These tight deltas — all within 1% — indicate that the 7500X3D is competitively positioned against both mobile HX-series chips and desktop mid-range parts, though it doesn't decisively beat any of them in aggregate scoring.

For real workloads, the 96 MB L3 cache shines in data compression and sorting tasks, where the 271,649 compression score and 32,999 sorting score suggest excellent performance for database work and file archiving. The multithreaded score of 25,047 indicates strong multi-core capability for its 65 W TDP, making it efficient for sustained workloads. The single-thread score of 3,494 is respectable but not class-leading, which means lightly-threaded applications won't see dramatic advantages over cheaper alternatives. The 12 threads and 6 cores handle typical productivity software well, but workloads that scale beyond 12 threads will find the ceiling quickly.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A770 is built on the Xe-HPG architecture with the DG2-512 chip, fabricated on TSMC's 6 nm process with 21,700 million transistors across a 406 mm² die. It features 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus with 512.0 GB/s bandwidth, running at 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective). The GPU clocks at 2100 MHz base and 2400 MHz boost, with 4,096 shading units, 256 texture mapping units, and 128 raster operation units. Ray tracing hardware includes 32 dedicated RT cores, and the card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Compute performance is substantial: FP32 throughput reaches 19.66 TFLOPS, with FP16 at 39.32 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio). Pixel rate is 307.2 GPixel/s and texture rate is 614.4 GTexel/s. The card draws 225 W TDP, requires a 1x 6-pin plus 1x 8-pin power connection, and carries a suggested 550 W PSU. Display outputs include 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 2.0, with PCIe 4.0 x16 interface. The card is dual-slot and has been marked end-of-life, with Battlemage as its successor.

Benchmark results place the Arc A770 at the 90th percentile of all GPUs, with an average score of 68,809. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 2,969, while Geekbench OpenCL reaches 109,175 and Vulkan 94,284. Compared to nearest rivals, it trails the NVIDIA CMP 90HX by 0.3% (69,000) and the AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 by 1.5% (69,870), while leading the AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 by 0.4% (68,562) and the NVIDIA Quadro P6000 by 1.7% (69,986). The deltaPct values show the Arc A770 is within 2% of these professional and mining-focused cards, which is notable for a consumer gaming GPU.

For rendering workloads, the 16 GB VRAM capacity is generous and the 512 GB/s bandwidth ensures data doesn't bottleneck texture streaming. The 32 RT cores provide hardware-accelerated ray tracing, and the DirectX 12 Ultimate support means modern games with mesh shaders and variable rate shading are fully supported. The FP32 throughput of 19.66 TFLOPS positions this for compute-heavy tasks like video encoding and 3D rendering, though the Vulkan score of 94,284 suggests some API overhead compared to the OpenCL result. The 225 W TDP is moderate for this performance class, making cooling manageable.

FAQ

Q: How does the Ryzen 5 7500X3D compare to its closest rival, the Intel Core i5-14600?

A: The 7500X3D has an average benchmark score of 44,573, which is 0.7% lower than the Intel Core i5-14600's score of 44,889. This is a negligible difference in aggregate, though the AMD chip's 96 MB L3 cache gives it an edge in cache-sensitive workloads like data compression (271,649 score).

Q: What is the Arc A770's ray tracing capability?

A: The GPU includes 32 dedicated RT cores on the Xe-HPG architecture, supporting DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2). This enables hardware-accelerated ray tracing in compatible titles, though the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2,969 reflects overall DX12 performance rather than RT-specific throughput.

Q: Is the 16 GB VRAM on the Arc A770 sufficient for modern games?

A: Yes, the 16 GB GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus provides 512.0 GB/s bandwidth, which is ample for high-resolution textures and large game assets. This capacity is higher than many competing cards in its performance percentile (90th), reducing the likelihood of VRAM-related stuttering in demanding titles.

Q: What memory does the Ryzen 5 7500X3D support?

A: It supports DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration, providing 83.2 GB/s memory bandwidth. ECC memory is also supported, which is useful for workstation builds where data integrity is critical.

Q: How does the CPU's multithreaded performance compare to its single-thread performance?

A: The multithreaded PassMark score is 25,047, while single-thread is 3,494. The ratio of about 7.2x between them indicates good scaling across the 6 cores and 12 threads, though the per-core performance is modest compared to higher-clocked rivals.

Q: What is the power requirement for the GPU?

A: The Arc A770 has a 225 W TDP and requires a 1x 6-pin plus 1x 8-pin power connector. Intel suggests a 550 W power supply for the system, which is reasonable given the CPU's 65 W TDP.

Q: Is the Arc A770 still in production?

A: No, the production status is listed as end-of-life, with Battlemage as its successor. The card was released October 2022 and remains available in the market, but it is no longer actively manufactured.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming at 1080p and 1440p, this pairing is well-suited based on the CPU's 89th percentile and GPU's 90th percentile rankings. The 6-core/12-thread processor with 96 MB L3 cache handles game logic and physics effectively, while the 16 GB VRAM GPU prevents texture-related bottlenecks. The single-thread score of 3,494 ensures responsive frame pacing, though the 2400 MHz boost clock may limit extreme refresh rates above 144 Hz in CPU-bound titles.

Streaming is a viable workload with this build. The CPU's multithreaded score of 25,047 and the GPU's 19.66 TFLOPS FP32 throughput provide sufficient headroom for encoding while gaming. The 12 threads can handle game threads plus encoding threads, and the 16 GB VRAM allows for high-bitrate streams without competing with game assets for memory.

Video editing performance is strong on both components. The CPU's data compression score of 271,649 accelerates codec operations, while the GPU's 512.0 GB/s bandwidth moves video frames efficiently. The 16 GB VRAM is particularly useful for effects-heavy timelines, and the OpenCL score of 109,175 indicates solid compute acceleration for rendering previews.

3D rendering workloads benefit from the GPU's 19.66 TFLOPS FP32 and the CPU's 12 threads. The 32 RT cores accelerate ray-traced renders, and the 16 GB VRAM holds large scenes. The 65 W CPU TDP means sustained multi-hour renders won't thermally throttle the processor, while the GPU's 225 W TDP is manageable with adequate cooling.

Software development benefits from the CPU's 96 MB L3 cache, which speeds up compilation of large codebases. The integer math score of 70,774 helps with build tools, and the 12 threads parallelize compilation jobs. The GPU's Vulkan support (1.4) is useful for graphics programming, though the end-of-life status means driver updates are limited.

Student and office work is handled comfortably. The 6 cores and 12 threads run productivity suites smoothly, and the 65 W TDP keeps power costs low. The integrated Radeon Graphics on the CPU provides a fallback display output, and the ECC memory support adds reliability for long-duration document work. The GPU's power is overkill for basic office tasks but future-proofs the system for any creative coursework.

Who Should Build It

Gamers targeting 1440p high-refresh displays will find this pairing well-matched. The GPU's 90th percentile and 16 GB VRAM handle modern titles at high settings, while the CPU's 96 MB L3 cache reduces stutter in open-world games. The 89th percentile CPU ensures the processor won't bottleneck the GPU in most scenarios, making this a balanced 1440p gaming rig.

Content creators working with video and 3D rendering should consider this build. The CPU's data compression score of 271,649 accelerates file workflows, and the GPU's OpenCL score of 109,175 powers render acceleration. The 16 GB VRAM is sufficient for 4K video editing and moderate 3D scenes, and the ECC memory support adds stability for long render jobs.

Software developers will appreciate the CPU's strong integer math (70,774) and multithreaded (25,047) scores for compilation. The 96 MB L3 cache speeds up incremental builds, and the 12 threads handle concurrent tasks. The GPU's Vulkan 1.4 support is relevant for graphics development, though the end-of-life status may concern developers needing long-term driver support.

Students in engineering or data science programs benefit from the CPU's 89th percentile ranking for simulation software. The 65 W TDP keeps dorm-room power draw low, and the ECC memory support protects against silent data corruption in long-running computations. The GPU, while powerful, is not necessary for coursework but adds capability for any GPU-accelerated assignments.

Small business workstations handling databases or financial modeling will find the CPU's data compression (271,649) and random string sorting (32,999) scores valuable. The 12 threads handle multi-user workloads, and the 16 GB VRAM supports visualization tasks. The combined 90th percentile ranking ensures this system outpaces most office desktops, though the GPU may be underutilized in pure office environments.

Gaming Performance

Note: No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows, so all frame rate discussions here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and percentile positions, not measured results from this specific pairing.

Based on the GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2,969 and its 90th percentile ranking, this system should deliver smooth 1080p and 1440p gaming experiences. The 16 GB VRAM and 512.0 GB/s bandwidth are sufficient for high-resolution textures and modern game engines. The CPU's 89th percentile ensures it won't starve the GPU in typical gaming scenarios, though the single-thread score of 3,494 may limit performance in poorly-optimized titles that rely heavily on one core.

For esports titles like competitive shooters, the system should achieve very high frame rates at 1080p given the GPU's FP32 throughput of 19.66 TFLOPS and the CPU's 4.50 GHz boost clock. At 1440p, frame rates will remain high but scale with the GPU's DX12 performance. The 32 RT cores enable ray tracing in supported games, though RT workloads will reduce frame rates compared to rasterized rendering.

At 4K resolution, the GPU's 90th percentile suggests playable frame rates in most titles at medium-to-high settings, but the 3DMark score of 2,969 indicates it is not a 4K-class card. The CPU's 6 cores and 12 threads handle modern game engines well, but the 65 W TDP means sustained high-frequency operation may be limited. Overall, this pairing is best suited for 1080p high-refresh and 1440p balanced gaming, with 4K possible for less demanding titles.

Balance and Bottleneck

The combined 90th percentile rating indicates a well-balanced pairing, but workload-specific bottlenecks exist. The CPU's multithreaded score of 25,047 is strong for a 65 W part, yet the GPU's 19.66 TFLOPS FP32 and 512.0 GB/s bandwidth suggest the GPU can outpace the CPU in compute-heavy workloads. In gaming, the CPU's single-thread score of 3,494 may become the limiting factor at high refresh rates, particularly in games that favor high clock speeds over cache capacity.

The CPU's 96 MB L3 cache provides a significant advantage in data-compression-heavy workloads, evidenced by the 271,649 compression score, which is far above what the GPU can accelerate. Conversely, the GPU's 32 RT cores and 16 GB VRAM handle rendering tasks the CPU cannot. For gaming at 1080p, the CPU is typically the bottleneck in CPU-bound titles, while at 1440p and above, the GPU becomes the limiting factor as resolution scales.

The FPS scaling between resolutions is expected to be steep: the GPU's 256-bit memory bus and 512.0 GB/s bandwidth are well-suited to 1080p and 1440p, but the 3DMark score of 2,969 suggests performance drops off significantly at 4K. The CPU's 6 cores handle most games, but titles using more than 12 threads will see the CPU as a hard limit. For mixed workloads like streaming while gaming, the 12 threads handle concurrent encoding and game threads, but the 65 W TDP may cause thermal throttling under sustained load.

The power envelope shows a 290 W combined TDP (65 W CPU + 225 W GPU), which is modest for the performance level. The PCIe 4.0 x16 interface provides ample bandwidth for the GPU, and the 83.2 GB/s CPU memory bandwidth matches the GPU's 512.0 GB/s in a way that avoids data starvation. The primary bottleneck in this pairing is the CPU's 6-core limitation for heavily-threaded games, while the GPU's 90th percentile covers most rendering workloads adequately.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build pairing AMD's Ryzen 5 7500X3D with Intel's Arc A770, landing in the 90th combined percentile of all tracked CPU+GPU combinations. The CPU, part of the 7000 series on the AM5 socket, is a 6-core/12-thread processor with 96 MB L3 cache and a 65 W TDP. The GPU, based on Intel's Alchemist architecture, offers 16 GB GDDR6 memory and 32 RT cores at 225 W TDP. The combination represents a mid-range-to-upper-tier desktop system suitable for gaming and content creation.

The CPU's 89th percentile ranking among all processors places it in the upper tier of desktop CPUs, competitive with mobile HX-series chips like the Intel Core Ultra X9 388H (0.2% faster) and desktop parts like the Intel Core i5-14600 (0.7% faster). The GPU's 90th percentile ranking places it alongside professional cards like the NVIDIA Quadro P6000 (1.7% faster) and AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 (0.4% slower), indicating strong performance for a consumer gaming card. The build class is desktop, and the overall tier is high, given both components sit in the 89th-90th percentile range.

The pairing is notable for its balance: the CPU provides strong cache-heavy performance for productivity, while the GPU delivers 16 GB VRAM and ray tracing support for modern gaming. The 65 W CPU TDP keeps the system power-efficient, and the 550 W suggested PSU is modest for this performance tier. The GPU is end-of-life, which may affect long-term driver support, but the CPU is active with a November 2025 release date.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score is 44,573, placing it in the 89th percentile of all processors. Key results include a multithreaded score of 25,047, single-thread score of 3,494, integer math of 70,774, floating point math of 43,594, and data compression of 271,649. The GPU's average benchmark score is 68,809, placing it in the 90th percentile of all GPUs. Key results include a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2,969, Geekbench OpenCL of 109,175, and Geekbench Vulkan of 94,284.

Compared to nearest rivals, the CPU is within 1% of the Intel Core Ultra X9 388H (0.2% faster), Intel Core i9-13950HX (0.5% faster), AMD Ryzen AI Max 385 (0.6% faster), and Intel Core i5-14600 (0.7% slower). The GPU is within 2% of the NVIDIA CMP 90HX (0.3% faster), AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 (0.4% slower), AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 (1.5% faster), and NVIDIA Quadro P6000 (1.7% faster). These tight margins indicate both components are competitively positioned within their respective performance tiers.

The combined picture shows a system where the CPU and GPU are nearly matched in percentile ranking (89th vs 90th), which is rare and indicates minimal bottlenecking. The CPU's data compression score of 271,649 is its standout benchmark, while the GPU's OpenCL score of 109,175 demonstrates strong compute capability. The CPU's average score of 44,573 versus the GPU's 68,809 reflects different benchmark scales, but the percentile alignment confirms this pairing is well-balanced. The overall combined percentile of 90 places this build in the top 10% of all tracked CPU+GPU combinations, making it a high-performing desktop system for its class.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D + Intel Arc A770

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D

Intel Arc A770

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

GPU Analysis

FAQ

Usage Scenarios

Who Should Build It

Gaming Performance

Balance and Bottleneck

Build Overview

Benchmark Performance

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds