SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 7500F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

88 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 12% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
86%
VS
GPU
89%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 5 7500F

24,964 Benchmark Score
Top 14% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

16,129 Benchmark Score
Top 11% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 5 7500F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti pairing is a cohesive desktop build that lands in the 68th percentile of all combinations, indicating a solidly above-average gaming and productivity platform. The data shows a strong processor mated to a capable, though aging, graphics card, with the CPU’s 77th percentile ranking driving the overall score higher than the GPU’s 59th percentile. This results in a system that excels in CPU-bound tasks and high-refresh 1080p gaming, while the GPU becomes the primary constraint at higher resolutions and in the most demanding titles. The following analysis breaks down the platform, performance metrics, and real-world usage scenarios based strictly on the benchmark data.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The foundation of this build is the AMD Socket AM5 platform, which is a forward-looking choice for a desktop system. The Ryzen 5 7500F is a 65 W TDP processor, a modest power requirement that gives builders significant headroom when selecting a power supply. The GPU’s suggested PSU is 550 W, so a power supply meeting that spec will comfortably handle the entire system’s load, leaving room for future component swaps without necessarily requiring a new PSU.

Memory support is limited to DDR5, operating on a dual-channel bus with a bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s. This is the only memory type compatible with the platform, so any upgrade path must consider the cost and availability of DDR5 modules. The CPU also supports ECC memory, which is a notable feature for users running stability-critical workloads, though it is not a standard requirement for gaming.

The processor provides 24 PCIe Gen 5 lanes from the CPU itself, ensuring ample bandwidth for the latest NVMe SSDs and graphics cards. The RTX 3060 Ti uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface, which is fully compatible and will not bottleneck the connection. For a sensible next upgrade, the data suggests focusing on the GPU. With the CPU sitting in the 77th percentile of all CPUs and the GPU in the 59th, the graphics card is the weaker link. A future GPU upgrade would be the most impactful change, and the AM5 platform and 550 W PSU headroom provide a viable path for that, provided the new card does not exceed the power supply’s capacity.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s benchmark results are consistently strong. In Cinebench R23, it scores 22,799 points in multi-core and 3,218 in single-core, demonstrating a balanced capability for both heavily threaded and lightly threaded tasks. Its Geekbench scores are 12,362 multi-core and 2,374 single-core. The 3DMark tests show a progression from 974 in single-thread to 6,379 in max-threads, indicating good scaling across core counts. The PassMark multi-thread score is 26,825, with a single-thread score of 3,841. In the overall CPU ranking, this lands the Ryzen 5 7500F at the 77th percentile, with an average benchmark score of 24,964. Its nearest rival, the Intel Core i7-11850H, scores 24,935, a marginal 0.1% difference, while the AMD Ryzen 5 8400F scores 25,005, putting the 7500F 0.2% behind. This places the CPU in a tight pack of high-performing chips where the differences are negligible.

The GPU’s performance is more modest. It scores 20,349 in PassMark G3D and 10,006 in GPU Compute, with a Geekbench OpenCL score of 78,927. Its percentile rank is 59, and its average benchmark score is 16,129. The nearest rival, the AMD Radeon RX 9060, scores 16,014, which is 0.7% lower, while the AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT scores 16,361, putting the RTX 3060 Ti 1.4% behind. The combined picture is clear: the CPU is a top-tier performer relative to the market, while the GPU is a mid-range part. This means the system’s ceiling in GPU-bound scenarios is dictated by the RTX 3060 Ti, but in CPU-bound scenarios, the Ryzen 5 7500F will not be the limiting factor.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s memory architecture and bandwidth?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 7500F supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s. It also supports ECC memory.

Q: Does the CPU have integrated graphics?

A: No, the FACT PACK lists the integrated graphics as null, meaning the Ryzen 5 7500F does not have an iGPU, and a discrete graphics card is required for display output.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory configuration?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 448.0 GB/s.

Q: What is the power supply requirement for this build?

A: The suggested PSU for the RTX 3060 Ti is 550 W. The CPU’s TDP is 65 W, so a 550 W unit provides ample headroom for the entire system.

Q: What PCIe generation and lane count does the CPU support?

A: The CPU supports PCIe Gen 5 with 24 lanes from the CPU. The GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface, which is backward compatible.

Q: How does the CPU’s average benchmark score compare to its closest rival?

A: The CPU’s average benchmark score is 24,964. Its closest rival, the Intel Core i7-11850H, scores 24,935, which is a 0.1% difference. The AMD Ryzen 5 8400F scores 25,005, making the 7500F 0.2% slower.

Q: What is the GPU’s production status?

A: The GPU is listed as "End-of-life," and its successor is the GeForce 40 series. The CPU is listed as "Active" in production.

Gaming Performance

The measured FPS data at ultra settings provides a detailed view of the gaming capabilities. At 1920x1080, the system is highly capable in esports and lighter titles. It achieves 425.4 FPS in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive, 357.1 FPS in Valorant, and 227 FPS in Tom Clancy’s Rainbow Six Siege. Heavier AAA titles still perform well, with Call of Duty: Warzone hitting 148.5 FPS and Counter-Strike 2 reaching 155 FPS. However, demanding titles like Cyberpunk 2077 (43.7 FPS) and Red Dead Redemption 2 (43 FPS) show the GPU’s limitations at 1080p ultra, as they fall below the 60 FPS threshold.

Moving to 2560x1440, performance scales down as expected. Valorant remains high at 300.9 FPS, and Counter-Strike: Global Offensive stays at 289.2 FPS, but Call of Duty: Warzone drops to 130.6 FPS. Cyberpunk 2077 falls to 32.3 FPS, and Red Dead Redemption 2 to 28.5 FPS, indicating that 1440p ultra settings are only viable for less demanding or competitive titles. At 3840x2160, the system struggles with modern AAA games, with Cyberpunk 2077 at 25.3 FPS and Red Dead Redemption 2 at 20.3 FPS. Less demanding games like Valorant (240.6 FPS) and Roblox (77.5 FPS) are still playable, but the overall picture is that 4K ultra is not a realistic target for this pairing. The average FPS across all games is 113.4, which ranks this pair at 2,134 out of 3,732 pairs, solidly in the upper half but not near the top.

Balance and Bottleneck

The benchmark data indicates a clear imbalance between the CPU and GPU. The CPU’s 77th percentile and the GPU’s 59th percentile suggest that the GPU is the primary bottleneck in graphics-intensive workloads. This is evident in the FPS scaling. In a CPU-bound game like Valorant, the 1080p score of 357.1 FPS drops to 300.9 FPS at 1440p and 240.6 FPS at 4K, showing that the GPU is still capable of pushing high frames even as resolution increases. Conversely, in a GPU-bound title like Cyberpunk 2077, the scores are 43.7 FPS at 1080p, 32.3 FPS at 1440p, and 25.3 FPS at 4K, demonstrating that the GPU is the limiting factor, as the CPU has plenty of headroom.

The CPU’s strong multi-threaded scores, such as the 22,799 in Cinebench R23, confirm that it will not bottleneck the GPU in gaming. The bottleneck is exclusively the RTX 3060 Ti’s compute and memory capabilities. For productivity tasks like video editing or 3D rendering, the CPU will be the primary driver, and the GPU will provide acceleration in specific workloads. In gaming, the data shows that this is a 1080p-centric build, with playable performance at 1440p for less demanding titles. At 4K, the GPU is severely strained, and the CPU’s performance is largely irrelevant to the final frame rate.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: This is the build’s strongest area. At 1080p, esports titles like Valorant (357.1 FPS) and Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (425.4 FPS) easily exceed high-refresh monitor capabilities. Even demanding shooters like Call of Duty: Warzone (148.5 FPS) and Counter-Strike 2 (155 FPS) are well above the 144 Hz mark. The CPU’s single-thread score of 3,218 in Cinebench R23 ensures it can keep up with the high frame rates.

Streaming: The CPU’s 12 threads and strong multi-core performance (22,799 in Cinebench R23) provide a solid foundation for encoding while gaming. The GPU’s dedicated NVENC encoder is a known feature of the Ampere architecture, but the data does not specify its performance. The CPU alone should handle a streaming workload without significant frame drops in the measured titles.

Video editing: The CPU’s PassMark multi-thread score of 26,825 and 12 threads will accelerate timeline editing and rendering. The GPU’s 16.20 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 8 GB of VRAM will aid in effects and GPU-accelerated exports. The data suggests a capable 1080p editing machine, with performance scaling down at higher resolutions.

3D rendering: The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22,799 is a strong indicator of CPU-based rendering performance. The GPU’s compute score of 10,006 in PassMark shows it can also handle GPU-accelerated rendering, though it is not a top-tier compute card. This is a viable entry-level rendering system.

Software development: The CPU’s high single-thread score (3,218 in Cinebench R23) will speed up compilation and code analysis. The 77th percentile ranking ensures smooth performance for most development tasks, though the 6-core/12-thread configuration may strain under extreme parallel builds.

Student and office work: This build is overkill for basic tasks. The CPU’s single-thread performance (974 in 3DMark single-thread) and the GPU’s 2D score (989 in PassMark G2D) will handle spreadsheets, documents, and web browsing with ease. The high power draw of the GPU (200 W) may be unnecessary for this use case, but the performance is unquestionably sufficient.

Who Should Build It

This system is targeted at gamers who prioritize 1080p high-refresh-rate play, as the data shows excellent FPS in competitive titles at that resolution. It is also suitable for those who want to dabble in 1440p gaming, provided they are willing to lower settings in AAA games. Content creators on a budget will benefit from the CPU’s strong multi-core scores for video editing and rendering, though the GPU’s 8 GB VRAM may limit high-resolution texture work. Software developers will appreciate the fast single-thread performance for compilation. Students and office workers will find this system exceptionally responsive, though the cost is high for such basic needs. Small business workstations that require CPU-heavy tasks like data analysis (PassMark integer math score of 79,108) would also benefit, but the gaming-focused GPU is not a necessary component for that purpose.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build combining the AMD Ryzen 5 7500F CPU with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti GPU. The CPU is a 6-core, 12-thread processor from the 7000 series, based on the Zen 4 architecture on a 5 nm process. The GPU is from the GeForce 30-series, based on the Ampere architecture on an 8 nm process. The combined percentile rank is 68, placing it above the majority of all possible CPU-GPU pairings. The pair’s rank by FPS is 2,134 out of 3,732, with an average FPS of 113.4. This is a mid-to-high-tier build, where the CPU’s high performance boosts the overall score, but the GPU’s mid-range position prevents it from being a top-tier 4K gaming machine.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 5 7500F is a 6-core, 12-thread processor with a base clock of 3.70 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. It is built on the Zen 4 architecture (codenamed Raphael) using a 5 nm process at TSMC, containing 6,570 million transistors on a 71 mm² die. The cache hierarchy includes 64 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 32 MB of shared L3 cache. The TDP is 65 W, and the multiplier is unlocked for overclocking. It has a launch MSRP of $179.

The benchmark scores reveal a processor that excels in both single-thread and multi-thread workloads. The Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3,218 and multi-core score of 22,799 are strong indicators of its capability. The PassMark data shows high performance in specific tasks: integer math (79,108), floating-point math (47,176), and extended instructions (22,776). The data compression score is 305,925, and data encryption is 17,510. The CPU’s 77th percentile ranking confirms it is a top-quartile performer. In real-world workloads, this means snappy application launches, fast compilation times, and smooth performance in CPU-intensive games. The 12 threads handle multitasking well, and the lack of integrated graphics is a minor caveat since a discrete GPU is required. The 5.00 GHz boost clock and Zen 4 architecture ensure it remains competitive with its nearest rivals, which are all within 0.4% of its average benchmark score.