SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 7500F + Intel Arc A310

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

86 Score

Top 14% Ranking

86 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 14% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

86%

GPU

85%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 5 7500F

24,964 Benchmark Score

Top 14% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A310

7,550 Benchmark Score

Top 15% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 5 7500F and Intel Arc A310 pairing represents a fundamental mismatch in performance class, combining a high-end enthusiast CPU with an entry-level discrete GPU. The data shows a desktop platform where the processor’s substantial compute power is gated by the graphics card’s modest capabilities, resulting in a system whose overall character is defined by this bottleneck.

Balance and Bottleneck

The benchmark data provides clear evidence that the Intel Arc A310 is the dominant limiting factor in this pairing. The CPU sits in the 77th percentile among all processors, while the GPU occupies only the 40th percentile, a gap of 37 percentile points that indicates a severe performance imbalance. The CPU’s average benchmark score of 24964 stands in stark contrast to the GPU’s 7550 average, showing that the processor can handle far more demanding graphics workloads than the Arc A310 can feed to a display.

The CPU’s single-threaded performance, evidenced by a 3dmark_single_thread score of 974 and a geekbench_singlecore score of 2374, is sufficient to avoid holding back most games. However, the GPU’s passmark_g3d score of 5433 and its 2.688 TFLOPS of FP32 compute place it firmly in entry-level territory. In gaming scenarios, the A310 will saturate its rendering pipeline long before the Ryzen 5 7500F breaks a sweat, meaning frame rates will be dictated almost entirely by the graphics card. The CPU’s 6 cores and 12 threads, while not top-tier, provide enough multi-threaded headroom for background tasks without competing with the GPU for system resources.

The GPU’s 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus with 124.0 GB/s bandwidth is another bottleneck vector. Modern game assets frequently exceed this capacity, and the narrow bus limits the rate at which textures and geometry can be streamed. The CPU’s memory bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s over dual-channel DDR5 is irrelevant to this constraint, as the GPU’s own memory subsystem is the limiting factor. The combined system percentile of 59 reflects this imbalance, indicating that the whole is weaker than the sum of its parts due to the GPU’s inability to fully utilize the CPU’s capabilities.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The AMD Ryzen 5 7500F is built on the AMD Socket AM5 platform, which provides a contemporary foundation with several forward-looking features. The CPU supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration and includes ECC memory support, a feature useful for workstation tasks where data integrity is paramount. PCIe Gen 5 with 24 lanes from the CPU ensures that future graphics cards or NVMe storage devices will have ample bandwidth. The CPU’s 65 W TDP is modest, making it easy to cool and power, and the multiplier is unlocked, allowing overclocking for users who want to extract additional performance.

The Intel Arc A310, in contrast, is a PCIe 4.0 x8 card with a 30 W TDP and no power connectors, drawing all its power from the motherboard slot. The suggested PSU of 200 W is remarkably low, reflecting the GPU’s efficiency. However, the GPU is marked as end-of-life, with the successor being Battlemage, meaning it is not a platform for future expansion. The CPU, on the other hand, is active in production and has a clear upgrade path within the AM5 socket.

A sensible next upgrade for this platform would be to replace the Arc A310 with a more powerful graphics card. The CPU’s 77th percentile standing and its strong multi-threaded scores, such as the cinebench_r23_multicore result of 22799, indicate it can support a significantly faster GPU without becoming a bottleneck itself. The 200 W PSU requirement for the current GPU would need to be revisited, as a higher-tier card would likely require a more substantial power supply, but the motherboard and CPU platform itself would not need to be replaced. The move from a single-slot, passively powered card to a more capable GPU is the logical first step in realizing the platform’s potential.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming, this pairing is inadequate. The GPU’s passmark_directx_12 score of 29 and its overall 40th percentile position suggest that frame rates will be low even at modest settings, and the 4 GB VRAM will limit texture quality. The CPU’s single-threaded strength cannot compensate for the GPU’s rendering limitations.

Streaming and content creation are a mixed bag. The CPU’s passmark_multithread score of 26825 and geekbench_multicore score of 12362 provide enough headroom for encoding and broadcasting alongside gameplay, but the GPU’s weak compute performance will struggle with hardware-accelerated effects. The A310’s 6 RT cores and DirectX 12 Ultimate support offer some modern feature set, but the raw throughput is insufficient for demanding creative workloads.

Video editing is feasible on the CPU side, with the 6-core, 12-thread Zen 4 processor handling codecs and timeline operations well, as indicated by the cinebench_r23_multicore score of 22799. However, the GPU’s passmark_gpu_compute score of 2157 will slow down effects rendering and export tasks that offload to the graphics card. The 4 GB VRAM is also tight for high-resolution video work.

3D rendering is similarly constrained. CPU-based rendering would benefit from the Ryzen 5 7500F’s strong multi-threaded scores, but GPU-accelerated rendering would be limited by the A310’s 2.688 TFLOPS FP32 performance. The 768 shading units and 16 ROPs are low counts for this workload, making the GPU a poor choice for render engines that leverage graphics hardware.

Software development is a clear strength for this build. The CPU’s high single-threaded performance, shown by the passmark_single_thread score of 3841, speeds up compilation of small projects, and the 12 threads handle parallel builds efficiently. The GPU is irrelevant for most development tasks, and the platform’s ECC memory support adds reliability for long compile sessions. The 65 W TDP keeps power costs low during extended development work.

Student and office work are well served. The CPU’s 3dmark_2_threads score of 1902 and geekbench_singlecore score of 2374 ensure snappy responsiveness in everyday applications. The GPU’s passmark_g2d score of 625 is adequate for 2D desktop rendering and office productivity. The low TDPs of both components mean quiet operation and low electricity usage.

Who Should Build It

The target user for this pairing is constrained by the GPU. Gamers at 1080p with esports titles might find the A310 usable, although the passmark_directx_9 score of 69 suggests older games run better than modern ones. The 4 GB VRAM and 64-bit memory bus are insufficient for high-resolution textures, so this is not a system for AAA gaming at high settings.

Content creators who work primarily in CPU-bound applications, such as software developers or video editors using CPU-based encoders, would benefit from the Ryzen 5 7500F’s performance. The 77th percentile CPU ranking and its 12 threads make it a capable workstation processor for code compilation, data analysis, and script running. The GPU’s presence is almost incidental, providing basic display output and minimal hardware acceleration.

Students and small business workstations are the most sensible fit. The platform’s low power draw, with a 65 W CPU and 30 W GPU, makes it economical to run. The CPU’s strong single-threaded performance handles spreadsheets, documents, and web browsing with ease. The ECC memory support is a bonus for those working with large datasets where data integrity is critical. This is a build for users who need strong CPU performance but have minimal graphics requirements.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 5 7500F is a 6-core, 12-thread processor from the 7000 series, built on the Zen 4 architecture with the codename Raphael. It is manufactured on a 5 nm process at TSMC, with 6,570 million transistors on a 71 mm² die. The base clock is 3.70 GHz, boosting to 5.00 GHz, and it has a 65 W TDP. The cache hierarchy consists of 64 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 32 MB of shared L3 cache.

The benchmark scores place this CPU in the 77th percentile of all processors, with an average benchmark score of 24964. Its nearest rival is the Intel Core i7-11850H, which scores 24935, a delta of 0.1 percent, putting the Ryzen 5 7500F essentially at parity with that mobile processor. The AMD Ryzen 5 8400F is 0.2 percent ahead, and the Intel Core i7-13620H is 0.2 percent behind, showing that this CPU sits in a tight cluster of comparable performance.

The 3dmark tests show scaling from 1902 in the 2-thread test to 6379 in the max-thread test, indicating good multi-threading efficiency. The cinebench_r23_multicore score of 22799 is strong for a 65 W part, reflecting the efficiency of Zen 4. The geekbench_multicore score of 12362 confirms this. Single-threaded performance is also robust, with a cinebench_r23_singlecore score of 3218 and a passmark_single_thread score of 3841. The passmark integer math score of 79108 and floating point score of 47176 show balanced compute capabilities suitable for a wide range of workloads.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A310 is an entry-level discrete GPU based on the Xe-HPG architecture, specifically the Alchemist generation with the DG2-128 chip. It is manufactured on a 6 nm process at TSMC, with 7,200 million transistors on a 157 mm² die. The GPU has 768 shading units, 32 TMUs, and 16 ROPs, along with 6 RT cores. The base and boost clocks are both 1750 MHz, and the memory runs at 1937 MHz, effectively 15.5 Gbps.

The memory configuration is 4 GB of GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus, providing 124.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This is a severe limitation, as the narrow bus and small capacity will throttle performance in memory-intensive tasks. The GPU’s FP32 performance is 2.688 TFLOPS, with FP16 at 5.376 TFLOPS using a 2:1 ratio. The pixel rate is 28.00 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 56.00 GTexel/s.

The GPU’s benchmark scores place it in the 40th percentile of all GPUs, with an average score of 7550. Its nearest rival is the AMD Radeon R7 250, which scores 7557, a delta of -0.1 percent. The AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100 is 0.4 percent ahead, and the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 is 1 percent ahead. The passmark_g3d score of 5433 and passmark_gpu_compute score of 2157 underscore its low compute throughput. DirectX 12 support is present with a score of 29, but this is insufficient for modern gaming at playable frame rates.

The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, and it has 4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0 outputs. The TDP is 30 W, and it requires a 200 W PSU. The card is single-slot and requires no power connectors, making it easy to install but also indicating its low performance ceiling.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 59, reflecting the significant gap between the CPU’s 77th percentile and the GPU’s 40th percentile ranking.

Q: Does the Intel Arc A310 support ray tracing?

A: Yes, the Arc A310 has 6 RT cores and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), which includes ray tracing features, though the low compute power will limit its effectiveness.

Q: Can the AMD Ryzen 5 7500F be overclocked?

A: Yes, the multiplier is unlocked, allowing for overclocking, and the 65 W TDP provides some thermal headroom for increased clocks.

Q: What type of memory does the platform support?

A: The CPU supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration with a bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s, and it also supports ECC memory.

Q: What is the power supply requirement for the GPU?

A: The suggested PSU for the Intel Arc A310 is 200 W, and the GPU itself has a 30 W TDP with no power connectors required.

Q: Is the GPU still in production?

A: No, the Intel Arc A310 is marked as end-of-life, with its successor being Battlemage.

Q: How does the CPU compare to the Intel Core i7-11850H?

A: The Ryzen 5 7500F has an average benchmark score of 24964, which is 0.1 percent higher than the Intel Core i7-11850H’s 24935, making them effectively equal in performance.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build combining the AMD Ryzen 5 7500F, a 6-core Zen 4 processor on the AM5 socket, with the Intel Arc A310, an entry-level Xe-HPG graphics card. The CPU is a high performer, sitting in the 77th percentile of all processors, while the GPU is an entry-level part in the 40th percentile. The overall tier of this build is defined by the GPU’s limitations, placing it in the entry-level segment for graphics-intensive tasks, despite the CPU’s midrange-to-high-end standing. The platform is modern, with DDR5 memory, PCIe Gen 5, and ECC support, but the GPU’s 4 GB VRAM and 64-bit bus restrict it to light gaming and basic productivity.

Benchmark Performance

The AMD Ryzen 5 7500F achieves an average benchmark score of 24964, ranking in the 77th percentile of all CPUs. Its key results include a cinebench_r23_multicore score of 22799, a cinebench_r23_singlecore score of 3218, and a geekbench_multicore score of 12362. The Intel Arc A310 has an average benchmark score of 7550, ranking in the 40th percentile of all GPUs, with a passmark_g3d score of 5433 and a geekbench_opencl score of 30607.

The combined picture is one of stark imbalance. The CPU is 37 percentile points higher than the GPU, and its average score is more than three times higher. In a balanced system, these components would be closer in relative standing, but here the CPU is largely underutilized in graphics workloads. The combined percentile of 59 is pulled down almost entirely by the GPU, meaning the CPU’s potential is not realized in gaming or GPU-accelerated tasks.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination, and the data pack contains no measuredFps data. All frame rate discussion is therefore estimated from the benchmark scores. The CPU’s strong single-threaded performance, indicated by its 3dmark_single_thread score of 974, suggests it could support high frame rates in CPU-bound scenarios, but the GPU’s low compute scores will cap overall performance.

The Intel Arc A310’s passmark_directx_12 score of 29 and passmark_directx_11 score of 33 indicate very low gaming throughput. At 1080p, users can expect playable frame rates only in esports titles or older games, with the passmark_directx_9 score of 69 suggesting better performance in legacy DirectX 9 games. The 4 GB VRAM will require low texture settings in modern titles, and the 64-bit memory bus will cause stuttering in scenes with high asset density. At 1440p or higher, the GPU will be overwhelmed, and frame rates will likely fall below playable thresholds for most games. The CPU will sit idle relative to the GPU’s workload, making this a poor choice for any serious gaming beyond casual or retro titles.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 7500F + Intel Arc A310

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 5 7500F

Intel Arc A310

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Balance and Bottleneck

Upgrade Path and Platform

Usage Scenarios

Who Should Build It

CPU Analysis

GPU Analysis

FAQ

Build Overview

Benchmark Performance

Gaming Performance

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds