SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 7400F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

91 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
90%
VS
GPU
93%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 5 7400F

32,750 Benchmark Score
Top 10% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060

26,331 Benchmark Score
Top 7% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 5 7400F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 form a desktop pairing built around a 6-core/12-thread Zen 4 processor and a Blackwell 2.0 graphics card. The CPU, part of the 7000 series, is fabricated on a 5 nm TSMC process and runs on the AMD Socket AM5 platform. Its base clock is 3.70 GHz, boosting up to 4.70 GHz, with a 65 W TDP. The GPU, based on the GB206 chip, also uses a 5 nm process from TSMC, featuring 8 GB of GDDR7 memory across a 128-bit bus. The combined system sits at the 78th percentile of all build pairings, with the CPU at the 83rd percentile and the GPU at the 72nd percentile.

CPU Analysis

The Ryzen 5 7400F is a 6-core, 12-thread processor built on the Zen 4 architecture, codenamed Raphael. It relies on a 5 nm process from TSMC, with a transistor count of 6,570 million on a 71 mm² die. The cache hierarchy includes 64 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 32 MB of L3 cache. It supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, which yields a theoretical memory bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s, and it also supports ECC memory. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 24 lanes from the processor itself, and it has no integrated graphics, meaning a discrete GPU is mandatory.

Benchmark results show the CPU's strengths in both multi-threaded and single-threaded workloads. In Cinebench R23, it scores 21,765 in multi-core and 3,072 in single-core. The R20 results are 9,141 multi-core and 1,290 single-core, while R15 shows 2,193 multi-core and 309 single-core. PassMark results are similarly robust: multi-thread score is 25,645, single-thread is 3,689, integer math is 74,745, floating point math is 45,799, and extended instructions hit 21,747. Data compression reaches 289,999, and encryption scores 16,712.

The average benchmark score is 32,750, placing the CPU at the 83rd percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals are tightly clustered. The Intel Core i5-14600T averages 32,707, a 0.1% difference. The Intel Core Ultra 7 155H scores 32,697, a 0.2% gap. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H is 0.2% ahead at 32,812, and the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 is 0.3% behind at 32,662. With such narrow margins, the 7400F essentially trades blows with these competitors, but the data shows it is a well-rounded processor for its class.

For real workloads, the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 21,765 suggests strong sustained performance for rendering and compilation tasks, though it is not a top-tier workstation chip. The single-core score of 3,072 is indicative of responsive day-to-day operations and solid gaming performance, where per-core speed matters. The PassMark physics score of 1,660 and prime number finding score of 191 further characterize its computational throughput. The data suggests this CPU is well-suited for mid-range gaming and productivity, where 6 cores and 12 threads handle modern games and light content creation without becoming the primary bottleneck.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 is built on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture, using the GB206 chip with 21,900 million transistors on a 181 mm² die. It features 3,840 shading units, 120 texture mapping units, and 48 raster operation units. The memory subsystem is 8 GB of GDDR7 on a 128-bit bus, delivering a bandwidth of 448.0 GB/s. The base clock is 2280 MHz with a boost of 2497 MHz, and the memory runs at an effective 28 Gbps. The GPU includes 30 RT cores and 120 tensor cores, which support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

The pixel rate is 119.9 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 299.6 GTexel/s. FP32 performance is 19.18 TFLOPS, with FP16 at the same 19.18 TFLOPS due to a 1:1 ratio. The card has a TDP of 145 W and requires a 300 W suggested PSU, with a single 8-pin power connector. It occupies a dual-slot design, measuring 241 mm in length. Display outputs include one HDMI 2.1b and three DisplayPort 2.1b. The bus interface is PCIe 5.0 x8.

Benchmark scores for the GPU are mixed across APIs. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, it scores 3,628. Geekbench OpenCL and Vulkan scores are 112,787 and 113,321, respectively. PassMark results show G3D at 20,891 and GPU compute at 10,899. The DirectX tests are lower: DX9 at 225, DX10 at 127, DX11 at 200, and DX12 at 77. The G2D score is 1,154.

The average benchmark score is 26,331, placing the GPU at the 72nd percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals are odd but informative. The AMD Radeon 860M averages 26,401, which is 0.3% ahead. The NVIDIA GeForce MX550 scores 26,421, also 0.3% ahead. The AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary is 0.8% ahead at 26,553. The AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT is 1.2% behind at 26,011. The 5060 sits in the middle of this group, suggesting it is a competent mid-range card, though the presence of the MX550, a low-end mobile part, in the rivals list is notable.

For rendering and gaming, the 8 GB of GDDR7 memory is a limiting factor at higher resolutions, but the 448.0 GB/s bandwidth is ample for 1080p and 1440p. The RT and tensor cores enable hardware-accelerated ray tracing and DLSS, which are not directly benchmarked here but are part of the architecture. The FP32 throughput of 19.18 TFLOPS is respectable for compute tasks, though the 192-bit bus width would be wider if it had more memory. The data indicates this GPU is designed for high-refresh 1080p gaming and entry-level 1440p, with 4K being a stretch for demanding titles.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 21,765 is a strong indicator of its multi-threaded capability, placing it at the 83rd percentile. The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 3,628, while not directly comparable, shows its DX12 performance. The combined percentile for the system is 78, which is lower than the CPU's individual percentile but higher than the GPU's, suggesting the CPU is relatively stronger than the GPU in this pairing.

Looking at the measured FPS data across games, the average FPS across all games and resolutions is 125.7. The system ranks 1,781 out of 3,732 pairs by FPS, placing it in the top half of all configurations. This ranking is lower than the combined percentile might suggest, because the FPS data includes many low-end games. For instance, in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive, the system hits 434 FPS at 1080p, but in Ark: Survival Ascended, it drops to 29 FPS at the same resolution.

The CPU's PassMark single-thread score of 3,689 and multi-thread score of 25,645 indicate balanced performance. The GPU's PassMark G3D score of 20,891 is solid, but the compute score of 10,899 lags behind, suggesting the card is better suited for graphics than raw compute. The 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 3,628 is a modern DX12 benchmark, and the system's performance there is consistent with a mid-range card.

The data shows a system where the CPU is above average for its class, while the GPU is slightly below the CPU's relative standing. In practice, this means the CPU can handle most tasks without issue, but the GPU will limit frame rates in graphically demanding games, especially at higher resolutions. The combination is well-matched for 1080p high-refresh gaming, but the 8 GB VRAM and 72nd percentile GPU ranking will become a bottleneck at 1440p or 4K in AAA titles.

Balance and Bottleneck

The CPU's 83rd percentile versus the GPU's 72nd percentile indicates a slight CPU-favoring imbalance. This means the CPU has more headroom than the GPU in most scenarios. For CPU-bound games, like Counter-Strike 2 at 196 FPS at 1080p, the GPU is not the limiter. For GPU-bound games, like Cyberpunk 2077 at 58 FPS at 1080p, the GPU is clearly the bottleneck, as the CPU could likely push more frames if the GPU were faster.

FPS scaling across resolutions confirms this. In Control, the system drops from 82 FPS at 1080p to 62 FPS at 1440p to 42 FPS at 4K. The scaling from 1080p to 1440p is a 24% reduction, which is typical for a GPU that is starting to run out of shading units. In contrast, a CPU-bound game like Valorant stays above 300 FPS at all resolutions, with 450 FPS at 1080p and 307 FPS at 4K, showing the GPU can handle the load easily.

The 8 GB VRAM is a potential bottleneck at 4K in texture-heavy games. In Ark: Survival Ascended, the system drops to 9 FPS at 4K, which is unplayable. This is likely due to the memory capacity being exceeded, causing severe stuttering. At 1440p, the same game only achieves 18 FPS, still poor. This indicates the GPU is the limiting factor in this pairing for demanding titles. The CPU, with its 32 MB L3 cache and 6 cores, is not the issue here.

For productivity, the CPU's 21,765 Cinebench R23 score is strong, but the GPU's compute score of 10,899 may limit tasks like machine learning training. However, for general 3D rendering that uses the GPU, the 19.18 TFLOPS FP32 performance is adequate. The balance is such that the system is well-suited for 1080p gaming and light productivity, but users pushing 1440p or 4K will find the GPU to be the primary constraint.

Who Should Build It

This system targets gamers playing at 1080p with high refresh rates. The measured FPS data shows 196 FPS in Counter-Strike 2, 234 FPS in Rainbow Six Siege, and 450 FPS in Valorant at 1080p. These are esports scenarios where the CPU and GPU combination excels. For AAA single-player games at 1080p, the system handles them well, with 82 FPS in Control and 143 FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. A 1440p monitor is viable for esports, as shown by 130 FPS in Counter-Strike 2 and 153 FPS in Rainbow Six Siege, but demanding titles drop to 43 FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.

Content creators who work with video editing or 3D rendering will find the CPU's 6 cores sufficient for light workloads. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 21,765 is comparable to other mid-range CPUs, and the single-core score of 3,072 ensures fast timeline scrubbing. The GPU's 8 GB VRAM is adequate for 1080p video editing but may be tight for 4K projects. Software developers will benefit from the 12 threads for compilation tasks, and the PassMark data encryption score of 16,712 indicates solid security operations.

Students and small business workstations will find this build more than capable. The CPU's single-thread performance makes everyday applications snappy, and the GPU can handle any graphics tasks for presentations or light design work. The 65 W CPU TDP and 145 W GPU TDP mean the system is power-efficient, keeping operating costs low in an office environment. The lack of integrated graphics on the CPU means the GPU is always active, but that is not a downside for this market.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's multi-core performance in Cinebench R23?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 7400F scores 21,765 in Cinebench R23 multi-core, placing it at the 83rd percentile of all CPUs.

Q: How much VRAM does the RTX 5060 have and what type?

A: The GPU has 8 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 448.0 GB/s.

Q: What is the combined percentile for this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The system has a combined percentile of 78, with the CPU at 83 and the GPU at 72.

Q: How does the CPU compare to the Intel Core i5-14600T?

A: The Ryzen 5 7400F has an average score of 32,750, which is 0.1% higher than the i5-14600T's 32,707.

Q: What is the average FPS across all games for this pairing?

A: The average FPS across all measured games is 125.7, and the system ranks 1,781 out of 3,732 pairs.

Q: Does the CPU have integrated graphics?

A: No, the Ryzen 5 7400F has no integrated graphics, so a discrete GPU is required for display output.

Q: What is the GPU's performance in 3DMark Steel Nomad?

A: The RTX 5060 scores 3,628 in the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 benchmark.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming at 1080p, this system is excellent. The data shows 196 FPS in Counter-Strike 2, 234 FPS in Rainbow Six Siege, and 450 FPS in Valorant, all at 1080p. These frame rates exceed the refresh rate of most 144Hz monitors, providing a smooth experience. At 1440p, esports titles remain playable, with 130 FPS in Counter-Strike 2 and 153 FPS in Rainbow Six Siege, but AAA games like Cyberpunk 2077 drop to 43 FPS.

Streaming at 1080p is feasible, as the CPU's 6 cores and 12 threads can encode video while gaming. The PassMark multi-thread score of 25,645 indicates enough headroom for streaming software, and the GPU's tensor cores could offload encoding tasks. However, the 8 GB VRAM may limit concurrent game and stream quality settings.

Video editing in 1080p is smooth, with the CPU's single-core score of 3,072 handling timeline operations, and the GPU's 19.18 TFLOPS FP32 accelerating effects. For 4K editing, the 8 GB VRAM is a constraint, but the system can handle basic cuts and color grading. The memory bandwidth of 448.0 GB/s is sufficient for 4K video playback.

3D rendering in Blender or similar software will use the GPU's CUDA cores. The PassMark GPU compute score of 10,899 is moderate, so renders will take longer than on higher-end cards. The CPU's 21,765 Cinebench R23 score helps with CPU-based rendering, but it is not a workstation-class chip.

Software development compiles will benefit from the 12 threads and 32 MB L3 cache. The PassMark integer math score of 74,745 and data compression score of 289,999 are strong for code compilation and version control operations. The system is responsive for IDE usage, with a single-thread score of 3,689.

Student and office work is more than adequately handled. The CPU's single-thread performance ensures fast application launches, and the GPU is overkill for spreadsheets or web browsing. The 65 W CPU TDP and 145 W GPU TDP mean the system runs cool and quiet, suitable for a shared workspace.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build combining the AMD Ryzen 5 7400F with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060. The CPU is a 6-core, 12-thread Zen 4 processor with a base clock of 3.70 GHz and boost of 4.70 GHz, using 65 W TDP. The GPU is a Blackwell 2.0 card with 8 GB of GDDR7 memory and a 145 W TDP. The combined system has a percentile of 78, indicating it performs better than 78% of all tracked pairings.

The CPU's percentile of 83 is higher than the GPU's 72, showing a CPU-favoring balance. The average FPS across games is 125.7, with a rank of 1,781 out of 3,732 pairs, placing it in the upper half. This is a mid-range gaming system that excels at 1080p and handles 1440p for less demanding titles. The 8 GB VRAM is the most limiting spec for future-proofing, as more games are optimized for 12 GB or more.

The build class is desktop, and the combination is a common choice for budget-conscious gamers. The launch MSRP for the CPU is $229. The system is not a high-end workstation, but it is a capable all-rounder for gaming and productivity. The data shows that the CPU is the stronger component, which is good for longevity, as it can be upgraded to a faster GPU later without a CPU bottleneck.

Gaming Performance

The measured FPS data is available for a wide range of games at ultra settings. At 1080p, the system delivers high frame rates in esports titles: Counter-Strike: Global Offensive at 434 FPS, Valorant at 450 FPS, and Roblox at 254 FPS. In AAA games at 1080p, it performs well: Call of Duty: Warzone at 143 FPS, Assetto Corsa at 116 FPS, and Control at 82 FPS. However, demanding titles like Cyberpunk 2077 (58 FPS) and Red Dead Redemption 2 (53 FPS) are still playable but not at ultra-high refresh rates.

At 1440p, the system maintains good performance for esports: Valorant at 384 FPS, Counter-Strike 2 at 130 FPS, and Rainbow Six Siege at 153 FPS. AAA games drop significantly: Cyberpunk 2077 at 43 FPS, Control at 62 FPS, and Call of Duty: Warzone at 127 FPS. The 1440p results show the GPU is still capable for competitive gaming but struggles with the most graphically intensive games.

At 4K, the system is not suitable for modern AAA games. Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 29 FPS, Control at 42 FPS, and Red Dead Redemption 2 at 26 FPS. Esports titles remain playable: Valorant at 307 FPS and Counter-Strike 2 at 73 FPS. The 8 GB VRAM is likely the limiting factor at this resolution, as seen in Ark: Survival Ascended dropping to 9 FPS. For 4K gaming, a GPU with more VRAM and higher compute performance is necessary.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses the AMD Socket AM5, which supports DDR5 memory. The platform supports PCIe Gen 5 with 24 lanes from the CPU, providing ample bandwidth for the RTX 5060's PCIe 5.0 x8 interface. The GPU's TDP is 145 W, and the suggested PSU is 300 W, meaning a standard 500 W PSU will easily handle the system with headroom for future upgrades.

The CPU has a 65 W TDP and an unlocked multiplier, allowing for overclocking if the user has a capable motherboard and cooler. The 83.2 GB/s memory bandwidth is sufficient for the 6-core CPU, but upgrading to faster DDR5 could improve performance slightly. The PCIe Gen 5 support ensures that future GPUs will not be bottlenecked by the interface.

A sensible next upgrade would be a GPU with more VRAM, such as a card with 12 GB or more, to handle 1440p and 4K gaming. The CPU's 83rd percentile suggests it has headroom to support a faster GPU. The platform itself, with AM5, is likely to support future CPU generations, so users could upgrade to a higher-core-count Ryzen 7000 or newer series without changing the motherboard. The 8-pin power connector on the GPU limits the maximum power draw, so a future GPU would need to use the same connector or an adapter, but the 300 W suggested PSU leaves room for a card with a higher TDP, up to around 200 W.