SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 7400F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

90 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 10% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
90%
VS
GPU
90%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 5 7400F

32,750 Benchmark Score
Top 10% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060

17,639 Benchmark Score
Top 10% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 5 7400F is a 6-core, 12-thread desktop processor built on the Zen 4 architecture (codenamed Raphael) using TSMC's 5nm process node. It belongs to the 7000 series family and operates with a base clock of 3.70 GHz and a boost clock of 4.70 GHz. The chip integrates 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 cache per core, and 32 MB of shared L3 cache, totaling 6,570 million transistors on a 71 mm² die. The 65W TDP classifies it as an efficient mainstream part, and the multiplier is unlocked, allowing overclocking headroom for enthusiasts.

Benchmark results place this CPU in the 83rd percentile among all processors, with an average benchmark score of 32,750. Its closest rival is the Intel Core i5-14600T, which scores 32,707 — a negligible 0.1% difference. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H scores 32,812, putting it 0.2% ahead, while the Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (32,697) and AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 (32,662) trail by 0.2% and 0.3%, respectively. These near-identical scores indicate that the 7400F sits in a tightly contested performance tier where generational and architectural differences translate to less than a fraction of a percent in aggregate performance.

Looking at specific workloads, the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 21,765 demonstrates strong sustained throughput for a 6-core part, while the single-core score of 3,072 shows excellent per-thread performance. The PassMark multi-thread score of 25,645 and single-thread score of 3,689 reinforce this pattern. Data encryption performance reaches 16,712 in PassMark, and floating-point math hits 45,799, suggesting the Zen 4 cores handle compute-heavy tasks efficiently. The integer math score of 74,745 is particularly strong, indicating solid general-purpose processing capability.

For real-world workloads, the 12 threads handle modern multi-threaded applications competently, while the high single-core boost clock ensures snappy responsiveness in lightly-threaded tasks. The 83rd percentile ranking means this CPU outperforms roughly five out of six processors in the database, making it a capable foundation for both productivity and gaming systems. The balanced scores across Cinebench and PassMark suites suggest it can transition between bursty single-threaded workloads and sustained multi-threaded rendering without significant performance cliffs.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Ryzen 5 7400F uses the AMD Socket AM5 platform, which provides DDR5 memory support via a dual-channel memory bus with 83.2 GB/s of bandwidth. ECC memory is supported, a feature that appeals to workstation users seeking data integrity. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 24 lanes, offering substantial bandwidth for modern storage and graphics cards. However, the GPU in this system, the RTX 4060, connects via PCIe 4.0 x8, meaning the CPU's Gen 5 lanes operate at Gen 4 speeds for graphics — still sufficient for this mid-range card.

The 65W TDP is modest, and the GPU's suggested PSU requirement is 300W, indicating that a typical mid-range power supply handles this configuration comfortably. The combined power draw leaves headroom for additional drives, fans, and peripherals without requiring a high-capacity unit. For upgrades, the AM5 platform supports future Ryzen processors within the same socket generation, allowing users to swap in a higher-core-count chip later without changing the motherboard. The DDR5 memory support future-proofs the memory subsystem, though users should verify their specific motherboard's compatibility with higher-speed kits.

A sensible next upgrade path would involve adding more cores via a higher-tier AM5 processor if multi-threaded workloads become a bottleneck, or upgrading the GPU to a higher-performance model if gaming at higher resolutions demands more graphics power. The PCIe Gen 5 support ensures that future storage devices with faster sequential read speeds will be accommodated, though current GPUs and NVMe drives typically use Gen 4 or lower. The 24 CPU lanes provide ample connectivity for a primary GPU and multiple NVMe SSDs, making the platform versatile for content creation setups.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 is based on the AD107 chip using the Ada Lovelace architecture, manufactured on TSMC's 5nm process. It packs 18,900 million transistors on a 159 mm² die, with a transistor density of 118.9 million per mm². The GPU features 3,072 shading units, 96 texture mapping units, and 48 raster output units. Clock speeds are set at a base of 1830 MHz and a boost of 2460 MHz, with memory running at 2125 MHz (17 Gbps effective). The 8 GB of GDDR6 memory operates across a 128-bit bus, delivering 272.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The card includes 24 RT cores and 96 tensor cores, enabling hardware-accelerated ray tracing and DLSS features. Compute performance reaches 15.11 TFLOPS for both FP32 and FP16 (1:1 ratio), with pixel rate of 118.1 GPixel/s and texture rate of 236.2 GTexel/s.

The GPU scores place it in the 61st percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 17,639. Its nearest rival is the AMD Radeon HD 7790, which scores 17,666 — just 0.2% ahead. The AMD Radeon 780M follows at 17,588 (0.3% behind), and the AMD Radeon Pro 560 scores 17,551 (0.5% behind). The Radeon Pro 460 trails by 0.7% with 17,509. These deltas are remarkably small, suggesting the RTX 4060's performance level is closely matched by several older and integrated graphics solutions in aggregate benchmarks, though the feature set differs substantially. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, the card scores 2,302, while Geekbench OpenCL reaches 95,057 and Vulkan scores 48,643. The PassMark G3D score of 19,545 and G2D score of 1,037 round out the picture.

For rendering workloads, the 8 GB VRAM and 272 GB/s bandwidth handle 1080p and 1440p textures comfortably, though 4K assets may exceed capacity in some titles. The 24 RT cores enable ray tracing at playable frame rates on lower resolutions, and the 96 tensor cores support DLSS upscaling, which can significantly boost performance in supported games. The dual-slot design with a 240 mm length fits most mid-tower cases, and the single 12-pin power connector simplifies cabling. The display outputs include 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a, covering modern monitors.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The combination of a strong CPU and mid-range GPU delivers excellent frame rates at 1080p. Counter-Strike 2 achieves 184 FPS, Valorant hits 422 FPS, and CS:GO reaches 407 FPS at 1080p, easily exceeding 144Hz and even 240Hz display thresholds. Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege runs at 219 FPS, making this system ideal for competitive esports titles.

Streaming: The 12 threads handle encoding workloads alongside gaming without major frame drops. The CPU's PassMark multi-thread score of 25,645 provides headroom for software encoding, while the GPU's Ada Lovelace architecture includes dedicated NVENC hardware, though specific encoding benchmarks are not in the dataset. Games like Call of Duty: Warzone run at 143 FPS at 1080p, leaving room for concurrent streaming tasks.

Video editing: Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 21,765 indicates strong rendering performance for export tasks, while the single-core score of 3,072 ensures smooth timeline scrubbing. The GPU's 15.11 TFLOPS compute capability accelerates effects and color grading, though 8 GB VRAM may limit complex 4K projects. The CPU's 83rd percentile ranking places it above most processors, suitable for intermediate editing workloads.

3D rendering: The CPU's 6-core/12-thread configuration handles moderate scene complexity, with Cinebench R20 multi-core at 9,141 indicating capable performance for preview renders. The GPU's 24 RT cores accelerate ray-traced renders, and the 15.11 TFLOPS compute power supports GPU-based render engines. Final frame renders will be faster than entry-level systems but slower than higher-core-count workstations.

Software development: The high single-thread score of 3,689 (PassMark) and integer math score of 74,745 benefit compilation tasks and code analysis. The 32 MB L3 cache reduces memory latency for frequently accessed data structures. The 83rd percentile CPU ranking ensures build times remain competitive, while the platform's ECC memory support adds stability for long-running test suites.

Student and office work: The 65W TDP keeps power consumption low, reducing heat and noise in shared spaces. The CPU's single-thread performance handles spreadsheet calculations and document processing effortlessly, while the GPU's G2D score of 1,037 supports smooth window rendering and multi-monitor setups. The system's overall 72nd combined percentile means it exceeds typical office hardware requirements significantly.

Gaming Performance

Measured FPS data at ultra settings across three resolutions reveals a clear performance hierarchy. At 1920x1080, the system delivers high frame rates in most titles, with Valorant leading at 422 FPS and CS:GO at 407 FPS. Competitive shooters thrive: Counter-Strike 2 runs at 184 FPS, Rainbow Six Siege at 219 FPS, and Call of Duty: Warzone at 143 FPS. Less demanding games like Minecraft (181 FPS) and Roblox (238 FPS) run exceptionally well. However, graphically intensive titles show the GPU's limits: Cyberpunk 2077 manages 54 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 drops to 49 FPS, and Ark: Survival Ascended struggles at 27 FPS. The Medium is particularly demanding at 39 FPS.

At 2560x1440, frame rates scale down predictably. Valorant still achieves 360 FPS, CS:GO hits 280 FPS, and Rainbow Six Siege runs at 143 FPS. Call of Duty: Warzone remains playable at 127 FPS, while Counter-Strike 2 drops to 122 FPS. Heavier titles show the 8 GB VRAM pressure: Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 41 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 at 37 FPS, and Ark: Survival Ascended at 17 FPS. The Medium drops to 32 FPS. Most games remain playable at 1440p, but ultra settings push the GPU to its limits.

At 3840x2160, the system is clearly constrained. Valorant still reaches 288 FPS, and CS:GO manages 165 FPS, but most titles fall below 60 FPS. Call of Duty: Warzone is an exception at 108 FPS, while Minecraft (60 FPS) and Dave The Diver (77 FPS) remain playable. Cyberpunk 2077 drops to 27 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 to 24 FPS, and Ark: Survival Ascended to 9 FPS. The Medium runs at 25 FPS. The data indicates 4K gaming is only viable for esports titles or with significant settings reductions.

The pair ranks 2030 out of 3732 pairs by average FPS across games, with an average of 118.3 FPS, placing it in the 46th percentile of system pairings — a mid-pack result driven by strong 1080p performance but weaker high-resolution capabilities.

Who Should Build It

The system targets gamers playing at 1080p with high refresh rates. The measured FPS data shows this resolution delivers the best balance, with most titles exceeding 60 FPS and competitive titles exceeding 144 FPS. Gamers at 1440p will find playable performance in most games, but should expect to adjust settings in demanding titles. Users seeking 4K gaming should look elsewhere, as the data shows only esports titles reach 60 FPS at that resolution.

Content creators working with 1080p or 1440p video will benefit from the CPU's strong multi-threaded rendering (Cinebench R23 multi-core 21,765) and the GPU's compute capabilities. The 83rd CPU percentile ensures efficient export times, while the 8 GB VRAM handles moderate video editing projects. 3D artists working with lighter scenes can leverage the RT cores for accelerated ray tracing.

Software developers will appreciate the fast compilation times from the high integer math score (74,745) and single-thread performance (3,689). The ECC memory support adds reliability for long-running processes. Students and office workers get a system that exceeds all productivity requirements while remaining energy-efficient at 65W TDP for the CPU and 115W for the GPU.

Small business workstations benefit from the balanced performance across CPU and GPU workloads, handling spreadsheets, databases, and light design work without bottlenecking. The platform's upgrade path — AM5 socket, DDR5 support, PCIe Gen 5 — ensures the system can evolve with future needs, though the GPU's end-of-life production status may prompt earlier upgrades for demanding users.

Balance and Bottleneck

The system demonstrates a well-balanced pairing for 1080p gaming, with both CPU and GPU contributing to the 118.3 average FPS across games. The CPU's 83rd percentile ranking exceeds the GPU's 61st percentile, indicating the processor has headroom above what the graphics card can utilize in most gaming scenarios. At 1080p, the GPU becomes the primary bottleneck in graphically intensive titles like Ark: Survival Ascended (27 FPS) and Cyberpunk 2077 (54 FPS), where the GPU's compute and VRAM limits constrain frame rates.

At higher resolutions, the GPU bottleneck becomes more pronounced. The transition from 1080p to 1440p shows average frame rate drops of roughly 30-40% across most titles, and the 4K results show even steeper declines. For example, Cyberpunk 2077 drops from 54 FPS at 1080p to 27 FPS at 4K — a 50% reduction — while the CPU's workload remains relatively constant. This pattern confirms the GPU is the limiting factor at higher resolutions.

In CPU-bound scenarios, the single-thread performance (PassMark single-thread 3,689) keeps frame rates high in esports titles, where Valorant reaches 422 FPS at 1080p. However, the CPU's 6-core limit may constrain heavily multi-threaded games, though the data shows most titles remain GPU-bound. The PassMark data compression score of 289,999 and extended instructions score of 21,747 indicate the CPU handles data-intensive tasks well, but the GPU's 8 GB VRAM becomes a constraint in texture-heavy scenes at 1440p and above.

The combined 72nd percentile ranking reflects a system that performs above average overall, but the gap between CPU (83rd) and GPU (61st) percentiles suggests that upgrading the GPU would produce more noticeable gains in gaming performance than upgrading the CPU. For non-gaming workloads like rendering or data processing, the CPU becomes the more relevant component, and the balance shifts accordingly.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's multi-core performance?

A: The Ryzen 5 7400F scores 21,765 in Cinebench R23 multi-core, 9,141 in Cinebench R20 multi-core, and 2,193 in Cinebench R15 multi-core, placing it in the 83rd percentile among all CPUs.

Q: How much VRAM does the RTX 4060 have?

A: The GPU has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, delivering 272.0 GB/s of bandwidth, which is sufficient for 1080p and moderate 1440p gaming at high settings.

Q: Does the CPU support overclocking?

A: Yes, the multiplier is unlocked, allowing overclocking on compatible AM5 motherboards, though the 65W TDP limits the headroom compared to higher-TDP parts.

Q: What memory type does this platform use?

A: The AM5 socket supports DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration, with 83.2 GB/s of bandwidth, and ECC memory is supported.

Q: How does the GPU perform in ray tracing workloads?

A: The RTX 4060 includes 24 RT cores and 96 tensor cores, providing hardware-accelerated ray tracing; the 15.11 TFLOPS FP32 compute and 118.1 GPixel/s pixel rate support rendering tasks, though 8 GB VRAM may limit heavy ray-traced scenes.

Q: What is the system's ranking by FPS across all pairs?

A: This CPU-GPU pair ranks 2030 out of 3732 pairs, with an average of 118.3 FPS across all measured games, placing it in the 46th percentile of all pairings.

Q: Is the GPU still in production?

A: The production status is listed as end-of-life, with the predecessor being GeForce 30 and successor being GeForce 50 series.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score is 32,750, placing it in the 83rd percentile among all processors. In Cinebench R23, the multi-core score of 21,765 and single-core score of 3,072 demonstrate strong balanced performance. PassMark tests show multi-thread at 25,645, single-thread at 3,689, integer math at 74,745, and floating-point math at 45,799. The nearest rival, Intel Core i5-14600T, scores 32,707 — just 0.1% behind. Other rivals include AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H at 32,812 (0.2% ahead), Intel Core Ultra 7 155H at 32,697 (0.2% behind), and AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 at 32,662 (0.3% behind).

The GPU's average benchmark score is 17,639, placing it in the 61st percentile among all GPUs. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, it scores 2,302, while Geekbench OpenCL reaches 95,057 and Vulkan scores 48,643. PassMark G3D scores 19,545, G2D scores 1,037, and GPU compute scores 9,213. The nearest rival, AMD Radeon HD 7790, scores 17,666 — 0.2% ahead. Other rivals include AMD Radeon 780M at 17,588 (0.3% behind), AMD Radeon Pro 560 at 17,551 (0.5% behind), and AMD Radeon Pro 460 at 17,509 (0.7% behind).

The combined system percentile is 72nd, reflecting a configuration that performs above the median across all paired systems. The measured FPS data across 52 games shows an average of 118.3 FPS, with the pair ranking 2030 out of 3732. The CPU's 83rd percentile versus the GPU's 61st percentile indicates the processor provides more headroom than the graphics card, making the GPU the limiting factor in most gaming workloads. For productivity, the CPU's strong multi-threaded and single-threaded scores dominate, while the GPU's compute capability supports acceleration in supported applications. The combined picture shows a system optimized for 1080p gaming and moderate productivity tasks, with clear upgrade paths available on the AM5 platform for users seeking more performance in specific workloads.