SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 7400F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

93 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
90%
VS
GPU
96%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 5 7400F

32,750 Benchmark Score
Top 10% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti

41,187 Benchmark Score
Top 4% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 5 7400F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti form a desktop pairing that targets high-refresh 1440p gaming and serious content creation. The CPU, a 6-core/12-thread Zen 4 part, delivers strong single-threaded performance that feeds the GPU well, while the RTX 3080 Ti provides massive rasterization and ray tracing throughput. This is a combination where the processor’s efficiency and the graphics card’s raw power create a system that excels in both esports and demanding triple-A titles, though the GPU’s 350 W TDP requires a robust power supply.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 5 7400F is built on the Zen 4 architecture using TSMC’s 5 nm process, a significant shift from older nodes that allows for higher efficiency at lower power draw. It operates with 6 cores and 12 threads, with a base clock of 3.70 GHz and a boost clock of 4.70 GHz. The 65 W TDP is remarkably low for a desktop CPU with this level of performance, making it an excellent choice for systems where heat and power consumption are concerns. The cache hierarchy includes 64 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 32 MB L3 pool, which is sufficient for feeding the processor’s cores in gaming and productivity tasks.

Benchmark scores reveal a processor that punches above its core count. In Cinebench R23, the CPU scores 21765 in multi-core and 3072 in single-core. The single-core result is particularly strong, placing it in the top tier for gaming and lightly-threaded applications. The multi-core score, while lower than higher-core-count rivals, is still substantial for a 6-core part, handling video encoding and 3D rendering tasks competently. PassMark results reinforce this: a multi-thread score of 25645 and a single-thread score of 3689 indicate balanced performance across both heavily threaded and single-threaded workloads.

The processor’s 83rd percentile against all CPUs is telling. Its average benchmark score of 32750 puts it in a tight cluster with rivals like the Intel Core i5-14600T (32707, 0.1% delta) and the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 (32662, 0.3% delta). This means the 7400F is statistically indistinguishable from those parts in aggregate performance, despite differences in architecture. For real workloads, the high single-core score translates to snappy responsiveness in daily tasks and fast frame generation in games, while the multi-core score ensures that productivity tasks like compiling code or batch photo editing are not bottlenecks. Data encryption and compression scores of 16712 and 289999 respectively show strong throughput for storage-related workflows.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti is a high-end Ampere architecture GPU built on Samsung’s 8 nm process, featuring the GA102 chip with 28,300 million transistors on a 628 mm² die. It comes equipped with 12 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 384-bit bus, delivering a massive 912.4 GB/s of memory bandwidth. This bandwidth is crucial for high-resolution textures and ray tracing workloads, where data movement is often the limiting factor. The GPU’s clock speeds are set at a base of 1365 MHz and a boost of 1665 MHz, with the memory running at 19 Gbps effective.

The compute specifications are formidable: 10240 shading units, 320 TMUs, and 112 ROPs. Ray tracing is handled by 80 dedicated RT cores, while 320 tensor cores accelerate DLSS and other AI-based features. The GPU’s raw compute throughput is rated at 34.10 TFLOPS for both FP32 and FP16 (1:1), which is a high figure for rasterization and compute tasks. Pixel fill rate is 186.5 GPixel/s and texture rate is 532.8 GTexel/s, ensuring that the GPU can handle high resolutions without geometry or fill-rate bottlenecks.

In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, the GPU scores 5077, which places it in the 83rd percentile of all GPUs. Its average benchmark score is 41187, placing it near the AMD Radeon Pro 5300 (40870, 0.8% delta) and above the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 (40377, 2.0% delta). PassMark G3D scores of 26896 and GPU compute scores of 15282 confirm its strong performance in both gaming and compute-heavy applications. For rendering, the 12 GB VRAM is sufficient for most 1440p and many 4K workloads, though the memory capacity may become a constraint in extreme multi-GPU or AI training scenarios. The GPU’s end-of-life status means it is a mature product with well-established driver support.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU is socketed on AMD Socket AM5, which is the current platform for AMD’s desktop processors. This socket supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with a theoretical memory bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s. The CPU also supports ECC memory, which is a boon for workstation builds where data integrity is critical. PCIe connectivity includes Gen 5 with 24 lanes from the CPU, providing ample bandwidth for the latest NVMe SSDs and high-end graphics cards. The RTX 3080 Ti itself uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface, so it will not be bottlenecked by the CPU’s PCIe lanes.

The platform’s upgrade path is straightforward. The AM5 socket is expected to support future AMD processors, so a user could potentially drop in a higher-core-count CPU like a Ryzen 7 or 9 without changing the motherboard. The CPU’s 65 W TDP is very modest, so most AM5 motherboards will handle it with ease, leaving headroom for cooler and VRM upgrades. The GPU, however, has a 350 W TDP and requires a 750 W power supply per the suggested PSU rating. This is a significant power draw, meaning a user upgrading from a lower-tier GPU must ensure their PSU has the necessary wattage and connectors (1x 12-pin).

For a sensible next upgrade, the GPU is the first candidate for replacement given its end-of-life status, but only if the user needs more VRAM or ray tracing performance. The CPU, being newer, has more longevity. A user could add more RAM or faster SSDs without touching the core components. The platform’s support for ECC memory is a unique feature for a consumer platform, making it viable for small business workstations that require error-checking. The 750 W PSU recommendation is a hard constraint; a user with a 650 W unit would need to upgrade that before considering any other changes.

Who Should Build It

This build is for gamers who prioritize high refresh rates at 1440p. The CPU’s strong single-core performance and the GPU’s massive bandwidth combine to push frame rates well above 100 FPS in many titles at 2560x1440, as seen in games like Counter-Strike 2 (167 FPS) and Tom Clancy’s Rainbow Six Siege (197 FPS). For content creators, the CPU’s 6 cores and 12 threads handle video editing timelines, while the GPU’s 34.10 TFLOPS of FP32 compute accelerates 3D rendering and effects processing. The 12 GB VRAM is sufficient for 4K video scrubbing and moderate 3D scenes, making it a viable workstation for freelance creators.

Software developers benefit from the fast single-core performance, which speeds up compilation times for projects that are not fully parallelized, and the PassMark data compression score of 289999 indicates strong performance in build artifact archiving. Students and small business users will find the platform’s ECC memory support unusual but valuable for long-running simulations or financial modeling where bit-flip errors are unacceptable. The CPU’s 65 W TDP means a modest air cooler suffices, keeping the system quiet for office environments. However, this is not a budget build; the GPU’s launch MSRP was 1,199 USD, and the CPU’s was $229, positioning it as a premium desktop solution.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between the Ryzen 5 7400F and RTX 3080 Ti is generally well-matched, but there are workloads where one component will limit the other. In CPU-bound games like Counter-Strike 2, the GPU is not the limiting factor at 1080p, where the CPU’s single-core performance determines the 253 FPS result. The GPU’s utilization will be lower in these scenarios, but the frame rate is still high enough for competitive play. Conversely, in GPU-bound titles like Cyberpunk 2077 at 4K, the GPU’s 37 FPS is the bottleneck, and the CPU has headroom to spare.

The percentile data shows both components are at the 83rd percentile of their respective categories, indicating a balanced pairing. However, the GPU’s average score of 41187 is closer to its rivals than the CPU’s score is to its peers, suggesting the GPU is the more competitive component. In multi-threaded workloads, the CPU’s 6 cores may limit performance compared to a system with a 12-core or 16-core processor, but the 7400F’s high single-core speed ensures that most games and common productivity tasks are not hampered. The FPS scaling across resolutions shows a typical curve: at 1080p, the CPU is often the limit, while at 4K, the GPU’s rendering load becomes dominant.

Evidence from the measured FPS data supports this. In Red Dead Redemption 2, the frame rate drops from 68 FPS at 1080p to 51 FPS at 1440p and 33 FPS at 4K, showing a clear GPU bottleneck at higher resolutions. In contrast, Valorant maintains 461 FPS at 1080p and drops to 437 FPS at 1440p, indicating that the CPU is still feeding the GPU enough frames even as resolution increases. For a balanced system, the user should target 1440p, where the GPU is the primary driver but the CPU still provides enough headroom to avoid stutters.

Gaming Performance

The measured FPS data, which is confirmed as actual measurements, shows this pairing excels across a wide range of titles. At 1920x1080, the system delivers exceptionally high frame rates in esports titles: Counter-Strike: Global Offensive runs at 558 FPS, Valorant at 461 FPS, and Tom Clancy’s Rainbow Six Siege at 300 FPS. These numbers are far beyond the refresh rate of most monitors, ensuring a competitive advantage. At 2560x1440, the performance remains strong, with Counter-Strike 2 at 167 FPS, Call of Duty: Warzone at 127 FPS, and Fortnite at 77 FPS. The 4K results are playable but less consistent, with Cyberpunk 2077 dropping to 37 FPS and Red Dead Redemption 2 to 33 FPS.

The data shows a clear pattern: the system is best suited for 1080p and 1440p gaming. At 1080p, most games exceed 100 FPS, with only Ark: Survival Ascended (37 FPS) and The Medium (53 FPS) falling below that threshold. At 1440p, the average frame rate across the measured games is still high, but some demanding titles like Ark (23 FPS) and Cyberpunk 2077 (56 FPS) require lowering settings for smooth gameplay. At 4K, the system struggles with the most demanding games, but manages 108 FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone and 395 FPS in Valorant, proving it can handle 4K in less graphically intense titles.

Comparing resolutions, the scaling from 1080p to 1440p is often a 30-40% reduction in FPS, while the drop to 4K is more severe, often halving the frame rate. This is consistent with the GPU’s 912.4 GB/s memory bandwidth, which is sufficient for 1440p but becomes a limiting factor at 4K with high-resolution textures. The pair’s rank of 1003 out of 3732 pairs by average FPS (157.8 FPS across games) places it in the top 27% of all pairings, confirming its strong gaming pedigree.

FAQ

Q: Does the AMD Ryzen 5 7400F support overclocking?

A: Yes, the CPU has an unlocked multiplier, allowing for manual overclocking on compatible AM5 motherboards, though its 65 W TDP limits the headroom.

Q: What is the maximum memory bandwidth of the Ryzen 5 7400F?

A: The CPU supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a theoretical bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s, and it also supports ECC memory for error correction.

Q: How much VRAM does the RTX 3080 Ti have and what type is it?

A: The GPU has 12 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 384-bit bus, providing 912.4 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: Is the RTX 3080 Ti still in production?

A: No, the production status is listed as end-of-life, meaning it is no longer manufactured, though it remains a capable GPU for current games.

Q: What power supply is recommended for this GPU?

A: The suggested PSU for the RTX 3080 Ti is 750 W, due to its 350 W TDP and the need for a 1x 12-pin power connector.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The pairing has a combined percentile of 83, indicating it outperforms 83% of all tested CPU-GPU combinations.

Q: Does the Ryzen 5 7400F have integrated graphics?

A: No, the CPU has no integrated graphics, so a discrete GPU is required for display output.

Build Overview

This is a high-performance desktop build, classified as a desktop system, that pairs a 6-core/12-thread Zen 4 CPU with an Ampere-based high-end GPU. The CPU, released in January 2025, is an active production part, while the GPU, released in May 2021, is end-of-life. The combination targets the 83rd percentile of all systems, meaning it outperforms the vast majority of configurations in both CPU and GPU benchmark suites. The CPU’s 65 W TDP is remarkably low, while the GPU’s 350 W TDP is high, making this a system that requires careful power planning.

The pairing is a classic example of a balanced gaming rig: the CPU provides sufficient single-threaded speed to avoid bottlenecking the GPU in most games, while the GPU delivers the raw rasterization and ray tracing horsepower needed for modern titles. The build’s overall tier is upper-midrange to high-end, given its 83rd percentile ranking. It is not a top-tier enthusiast system with a 16-core CPU and a flagship GPU, but it offers a strong compromise between price and performance for users who want high frame rates without the cost of the absolute best components.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s benchmark scores are consistently strong. In Cinebench R23, it scores 21765 multi-core and 3072 single-core, with the single-core result being particularly notable for gaming. PassMark multi-thread and single-thread scores are 25645 and 3689, respectively. The CPU’s average benchmark score is 32750, placing it in the 83rd percentile against all CPUs. Its nearest rival, the Intel Core i5-14600T, scores 32707 with a delta of 0.1%, showing the 7400F is essentially tied with that part. This indicates the 7400F is a well-rounded processor that does not excel in one area but also has no significant weaknesses.

The GPU’s benchmark scores are equally impressive. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, it scores 5077, and in PassMark G3D, it scores 26896. Its average benchmark score is 41187, placing it in the 83rd percentile of all GPUs. The nearest rival, the AMD Radeon Pro 5300, scores 40870 with a delta of 0.8%, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 scores 40377 with a delta of 2.0%. This shows the RTX 3080 Ti is slightly ahead of the newer RTX 5070 in this aggregate metric, likely due to its higher memory bandwidth. Combined, the CPU and GPU achieve a system percentile of 83, meaning this build is better than 83% of all tested configurations, reinforcing its status as a high-performing pairing.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: At 1080p and 1440p, this pairing excels. Measured frame rates in esports titles are exceptionally high, with Counter-Strike 2 hitting 253 FPS at 1080p and Valorant reaching 437 FPS at 1440p. The GPU’s 912.4 GB/s memory bandwidth ensures textures load quickly, and the CPU’s single-core score of 3072 in Cinebench R23 prevents frame pacing issues.

Streaming: The 6-core/12-thread CPU can handle game capture and encoding alongside gaming, though the GPU’s tensor cores can also assist with AI-based encoding. The PassMark multi-thread score of 25645 indicates sufficient headroom for simultaneous gaming and streaming at 1080p, while the GPU’s 12 GB VRAM prevents memory overflow when running OBS and a game.

Video editing: In applications like Premiere Pro, the CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 21765 accelerates timeline rendering and export. The GPU’s 34.10 TFLOPS of FP32 compute speeds up effects and color grading, while the 12 GB VRAM handles 4K timelines without stuttering.

3D rendering: The GPU’s 80 RT cores and 320 tensor cores are well-suited for ray-traced renders and denoising tasks. The CPU’s multi-core performance in Cinebench R20 (9141) supports CPU-based rendering engines, though 12 threads may be slower than higher-core-count CPUs. The GPU’s 34.10 TFLOPS provides a strong alternative for GPU-accelerated renderers.

Software development: The CPU’s single-core speed (PassMark 3689) accelerates compilation of large codebases, while the 32 MB L3 cache reduces latency for frequently accessed data. The ECC memory support is a unique advantage for long-running build servers, and the PCIe Gen 5 lanes allow for ultra-fast NVMe storage to reduce build times.

Student and office work: The system is overkill for typical office tasks, but the CPU’s low 65 W TDP means it runs cool and quiet, making it suitable for a quiet workspace. The PassMark single-thread score of 3689 ensures snappy response in spreadsheets and web browsing, while the GPU’s compute power is available for any research or simulation tasks that require acceleration.