SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 7400F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

90 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 10% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
90%
VS
GPU
90%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 5 7400F

32,750 Benchmark Score
Top 10% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070

17,208 Benchmark Score
Top 10% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

Upgrade Path and Platform

The AMD Ryzen 5 7400F lands on the AMD Socket AM5 platform, which represents the current mainstream desktop socket from AMD. This is a significant upgrade consideration because AM5 is the platform that supports the 7000 series and subsequent generations, meaning the socket offers a forward-looking foundation for future CPU upgrades without requiring a motherboard swap. The Ryzen 5 7400F is built on the Zen 4 architecture with the Raphael codename, fabricated on TSMC's 5 nm process, and it pairs with DDR5 memory only. The memory support is dual-channel with a bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s, and the platform supports ECC memory, which is a feature that appeals to professionals seeking data integrity in workstation builds.

The CPU itself is a 65 W TDP part, which is notably modest for a desktop processor with six cores and twelve threads. This low power envelope means that the platform does not demand an elaborate cooling solution or a high-end power supply to accommodate the processor alone. The PCIe implementation is Gen 5 with 24 lanes available from the CPU, which provides ample bandwidth for modern NVMe storage and a discrete GPU. The GPU in this build, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070, uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface, and its suggested PSU is 550 W, which is a reasonable figure for a mid-range desktop. The RTX 3070 has a TDP of 220 W, and when combined with the 65 W CPU, the total system power draw remains well within the capacity of a 550 W power supply, leaving headroom for other components like drives and fans.

For a sensible next upgrade path, the data indicates that the CPU socket is the key asset. A user could move to a higher-core-count Ryzen 7000 series CPU on the same AM5 board without changing the platform. The DDR5 memory support is already current, so memory upgrades would be capacity or speed increases rather than a platform shift. The GPU, being PCIe 4.0, is also compatible with the Gen 5 slots, so a future GPU upgrade would not be bottlenecked by the interface. The 65 W TDP of the CPU also means that a future CPU upgrade with a higher TDP would require a better cooler, but the motherboard and PSU headroom from the 550 W suggestion would likely accommodate a moderate increase. The platform is not end-of-life, as the CPU is listed as active production, so this build sits on a viable upgrade trajectory rather than a dead-end socket.

Benchmark Performance

The benchmark data for this build separates into CPU and GPU scores, each with distinct percentile positions. The AMD Ryzen 5 7400F achieves a percentile rank of 83 among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 32750. This places it in the upper tier of desktop processors, and the nearest rivals confirm this positioning. The Intel Core i5-14600T scores 32707, which is a 0.1% delta, making the two effectively identical in average performance. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H scores 32812, putting the 7400F 0.2% behind, while the Intel Core Ultra 7 155H scores 32697 (0.2% ahead of the 7400F) and the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 scores 32662 (0.3% ahead). This cluster of rivals within a 0.5% band shows that the 7400F sits right at the top of a performance plateau, with no single competitor having a decisive edge.

In specific CPU workloads, the multi-core scores are strong. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score is 21765, while the single-core score is 3072. The single-thread Passmark score is 3689, and the multi-thread Passmark score is 25645. The data compression Passmark score is 289999, which is a high figure for a six-core part, indicating efficient integer throughput. The floating-point math score is 45799, and the integer math score is 74745, showing a balanced ALU/FPU design. The extended instructions score is 21747, and the physics score is 1660, which is relevant for gaming simulations.

The GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070, has a percentile rank of 61 among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 17208. This is a mid-range position, and the nearest rivals show a tight grouping. The AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT scores 17083, which is 0.7% behind the RTX 3070, while the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 scores 17037 (1.0% behind) and the AMD Radeon HD 7970M scores 17019 (1.1% behind). The NVIDIA Tesla K40c scores 17468, putting the RTX 3070 1.5% behind that compute-oriented card. The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 3162, the Geekbench OpenCL score is 112821, and the Vulkan score is 21022. The Passmark G3D score is 22214, with a G2D score of 1001 and a GPU compute score of 11195.

The combined picture shows a CPU that is well above the 80th percentile and a GPU that is just above the 60th percentile. The combined percentile for the build is 72, which reflects the pairing of a top-tier CPU with a mid-range GPU. The measured FPS data across games gives an average FPS of 133 across all tested games at various resolutions, and the pair ranks 1603 out of 3732 pairs, placing it in the top 43% of all CPU+GPU combinations. This indicates that the build is capable of high frame rates in many titles, but the GPU is the limiting factor at higher resolutions and in demanding titles.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: At 1920x1080, the build excels in esports and competitive titles. Counter-Strike 2 runs at 209 FPS, Valorant at 461 FPS, and Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege at 248 FPS. These numbers are well above the 144 Hz refresh rate that most high-refresh monitors offer, making this a strong 1080p competitive gaming machine. The CPU's single-core performance, with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3072, ensures that the CPU does not bottleneck the GPU in these frame-rate-heavy scenarios.

Streaming: For streaming, the CPU has 12 threads, and the multi-core Cinebench R23 score of 21765 indicates that it can handle encoding alongside gaming. The GPU also supports hardware encoding via its NVENC cores, though the specific encoder is not listed in the data. At 1080p, games like Call of Duty: Warzone run at 143 FPS, leaving headroom for a stream encoding load. The Passmark multi-thread score of 25645 suggests that the CPU can handle the extra workload of streaming software without drastic FPS drops.

Video Editing: Video editing software often relies on both CPU and GPU acceleration. The CPU's Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 9141 and the GPU's Geekbench OpenCL score of 112821 indicate that the build can handle 1080p and some 1440p editing timelines. The 8 GB VRAM on the GPU is sufficient for most editing tasks, and the 448.0 GB/s memory bandwidth helps with texture and effect processing. The Passmark GPU compute score of 11195 provides additional evidence of compute capability for effects rendering.

3D Rendering: For 3D rendering, the CPU is the stronger component. The Cinebench R15 multi-core score of 2193 and R20 score of 9141 show that the six-core CPU can handle moderate rendering workloads. The GPU's FP32 performance of 20.31 TFLOPS and its 46 RT cores provide ray tracing acceleration, though the 8 GB VRAM may limit scene complexity. The combined percentile of 72 suggests that this is a capable entry-level rendering machine for hobbyists, but not a professional-grade render farm component.

Software Development: Software development benefits from the CPU's integer math score of 74745 and data compression score of 289999, which are strong for compilation and data processing. The 12 threads handle parallel builds well, and the 32 MB of L3 cache provides fast access to working sets. The ECC memory support is a plus for long-running development servers or database work. The single-thread Passmark score of 3689 ensures that interactive IDE usage remains responsive.

Student and Office Work: For students and office users, the build is overkill in gaming performance but excellent for productivity. The Passmark data encryption score of 16712 and extended instructions score of 21747 handle everyday tasks with ease. The 65 W TDP means the system runs cool and quiet, which is beneficial in a shared workspace. The integrated graphics are N/A, but the discrete GPU handles all display output, so the system is not dependent on the CPU for video output.

FAQ

Q: Does the Ryzen 5 7400F have integrated graphics?

A: No, the integrated graphics field for the CPU is listed as N/A, so a discrete GPU is required for display output. This build includes the RTX 3070, which serves that purpose.

Q: What is the memory type supported by this build?

A: The CPU supports DDR5 memory only, with a dual-channel memory bus. The memory bandwidth is 83.2 GB/s, and ECC memory is supported.

Q: How does the Ryzen 5 7400F compare to the Intel Core i5-14600T?

A: The average benchmark scores are 32750 for the 7400F and 32707 for the i5-14600T, a delta of 0.1%. This makes the two CPUs effectively identical in overall performance.

Q: What is the suggested power supply wattage for the RTX 3070?

A: The suggested PSU for the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 is 550 W. The GPU has a TDP of 220 W, and the CPU has a TDP of 65 W.

Q: What is the VRAM capacity on the RTX 3070?

A: The RTX 3070 has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, with a memory bandwidth of 448.0 GB/s.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this build?

A: The combined percentile is 72, which reflects the pairing of a CPU at the 83rd percentile and a GPU at the 61st percentile.

Q: What is the average FPS across all tested games for this build?

A: The pair rank data shows an average FPS of 133 across all games tested at all resolutions, with a rank of 1603 out of 3732 pairs.

Balance and Bottleneck

The benchmark data reveals a clear imbalance between the CPU and GPU in this build. The CPU sits at the 83rd percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU sits at the 61st percentile. This 22-point gap indicates that the CPU is significantly more capable than the GPU in relative terms. In gaming workloads, this means the GPU will be the limiting factor in most scenarios, especially at higher resolutions. The FPS data supports this: at 1920x1080, the average FPS across games is high, but at 3840x2160, the frame rates drop dramatically. For example, Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 62 FPS at 1080p but drops to 30 FPS at 4K, while Counter-Strike 2 runs at 209 FPS at 1080p but only 77 FPS at 4K.

The CPU bottleneck appears in specific workloads that are heavily single-threaded or that require high physics simulation. The Passmark physics score of 1660 is relatively low compared to the multi-thread score of 25645, suggesting that physics-heavy games might see CPU limitations. However, in most modern games at 1080p, the GPU is the constraint. For instance, Red Dead Redemption 2 runs at 56 FPS at 1080p, which is below the 60 FPS target, and this is a GPU limitation given the CPU's strong single-core score of 3072 in Cinebench R23. The CPU can push high frame rates in esports titles, as seen in Valorant at 461 FPS at 1080p, but the GPU cannot maintain those rates at 4K, dropping to 326 FPS.

In compute and productivity workloads, the CPU is the dominant component. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 21765 and the Passmark multi-thread score of 25645 indicate that the CPU can handle parallel tasks like video encoding or 3D rendering efficiently. The GPU's compute score of 11195 in Passmark is lower than the CPU's multi-thread score, suggesting that for pure compute tasks, the CPU may actually be faster than the GPU. However, for GPU-accelerated tasks like ray tracing, the RTX 3070's 46 RT cores provide dedicated hardware, though the 8 GB VRAM may limit scene sizes. The overall balance is that the CPU has headroom for future GPU upgrades without becoming a bottleneck, while the current GPU is the limiting factor in high-resolution gaming and GPU-accelerated workloads.

Who Should Build It

The target user for this build is a gamer who prioritizes high-refresh-rate 1080p gaming but also wants the option to play at 1440p with some settings adjustments. The FPS data shows that at 1920x1080, the build delivers over 60 FPS in almost all tested titles, with many esports games exceeding 200 FPS. At 2560x1440, the frame rates drop but remain playable in most titles, such as Call of Duty: Warzone at 127 FPS and Counter-Strike 2 at 138 FPS. The GPU's 61st percentile rank means that this is not a 4K gaming machine, as many titles struggle to maintain 30 FPS at 3840x2160, including Cyberpunk 2077 at 30 FPS and Red Dead Redemption 2 at 28 FPS.

Content creators who work with 1080p or 1440p video editing will find the CPU's multi-core performance sufficient, with a Cinebench R23 score of 21765 that handles rendering and export tasks. The GPU's 8 GB VRAM and 20.31 TFLOPS FP32 performance provide acceleration for effects and color grading. Software developers will benefit from the CPU's integer math score of 74745 and data compression score of 289999, which speed up compilation and data processing tasks. The ECC memory support makes this a viable option for small business workstations where data integrity is important, though the lack of integrated graphics means the discrete GPU is always active.

Students and office workers who also game will find this build more than adequate for daily tasks, with the CPU's single-thread Passmark score of 3689 ensuring responsive application usage. The 65 W CPU TDP keeps the system efficient for long work sessions. The build is not aimed at professionals who need massive GPU compute or high-end 4K rendering, as the GPU's 8 GB VRAM and 61st percentile rank would be limiting. Instead, it targets users who want a fast CPU for productivity and a capable GPU for 1080p and entry-level 1440p gaming, with the option to upgrade the GPU later without changing the platform.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 5 7400F is a six-core, twelve-thread processor from the 7000 series, built on the Zen 4 architecture with the Raphael codename. It is fabricated on TSMC's 5 nm process, with 6,570 million transistors on a 71 mm² die. The base clock is 3.70 GHz with a boost clock of 4.70 GHz, and the multiplier is unlocked, allowing for overclocking. The cache hierarchy includes 64 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 32 MB of shared L3 cache. The CPU supports DDR5 memory with a dual-channel bus and a memory bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s, along with ECC memory support.

In benchmark terms, the CPU's average score of 32750 places it at the 83rd percentile, which is a strong showing for a mainstream six-core part. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 21765 is competitive with higher-core-count parts from other generations, and the single-core score of 3072 is excellent for gaming and lightly-threaded applications. The Passmark single-thread score of 3689 confirms this, as it is a high figure that ensures responsive performance in everyday tasks. The multi-thread Passmark score of 25645 shows that the CPU scales well with parallel workloads, despite having only six physical cores, thanks to simultaneous multithreading.

The individual Passmark scores reveal the CPU's strengths and weaknesses. The data compression score of 289999 is exceptional, indicating that the CPU excels at file archiving and compression tasks. The integer math score of 74745 is also strong, which benefits software compilation and spreadsheet calculations. The floating-point math score of 45799 is moderate, which means the CPU is not as well-suited for heavy scientific computing as it is for general productivity. The extended instructions score of 21747 shows good support for modern SIMD instructions, which is useful for media encoding. The physics score of 1660 is relatively low, which could impact physics simulation in games, but the high single-core clock speed mitigates this in most scenarios.

The nearest rivals for the 7400F are all within a 0.3% delta, which means the CPU is at the top of a performance plateau. The Intel Core i5-14600T is 0.1% faster, while the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H is 0.2% faster, and the Intel Core Ultra 7 155H is 0.2% slower. This tight grouping means that real-world differences between these CPUs are negligible, and the choice between them would come down to platform features rather than raw performance. The 7400F's 65 W TDP is a significant advantage for power efficiency, as it delivers this performance at a fraction of the power of higher-TDP rivals.

Build Overview

This build pairs the AMD Ryzen 5 7400F with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 in a desktop configuration, as indicated by the build class. The combined percentile is 72, which places this build in the upper-midrange tier of all desktop builds. The CPU is a high-end mainstream part, sitting at the 83rd percentile, while the GPU is a mid-range part at the 61st percentile. The combination results in a system that is well-suited for 1080p high-refresh-rate gaming and productivity work, but it is not a top-tier 4K gaming or professional rendering machine.

The measured FPS data shows an average of 133 FPS across all games and resolutions, with a rank of 1603 out of 3732 pairs. This places the build in the top 43% of all CPU+GPU combinations, which is a solid result for a mainstream desktop. The data is measured, not estimated, which adds confidence to the performance figures. The build's strength is its CPU, which provides a strong foundation for future GPU upgrades. The RTX 3070 is a capable GPU, but its 8 GB VRAM and 61st percentile rank mean that it will be the limiting factor in demanding games at higher resolutions.

The overall tier of this build is that of a balanced 1080p gaming rig with productivity capability. The CPU's 83rd percentile rank ensures that it will not hold back even a more powerful GPU, making this a good starting point for a long-term build. The GPU's 61st percentile rank is adequate for current games at 1080p and 1440p, but users who want to play at 4K or with high ray tracing settings will need to upgrade the GPU. The build class is desktop, which means it is a stationary system that can accommodate larger coolers and power supplies if needed.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 is a mid-range GPU from the GeForce 30-series, based on the GA104 chip with the Ampere architecture. It is fabricated on Samsung's 8 nm process, with 17,400 million transistors on a 392 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 44.4M per mm². The GPU has 5888 shading units, 184 texture mapping units, and 96 raster output units. It features 46 ray tracing cores and 184 tensor cores, providing dedicated hardware for ray tracing and AI-based features like DLSS. The base clock is 1500 MHz with a boost clock of 1725 MHz, and the memory runs at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) on 8 GB of GDDR6 memory with a 256-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 448.0 GB/s.

In benchmark terms, the GPU's average score of 17208 places it at the 61st percentile, which is a mid-range position. The nearest rivals are all within a 1.5% delta, with the AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT being 0.7% slower and the NVIDIA Tesla K40c being 1.5% faster. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3162 shows that the GPU can handle modern DirectX 12 workloads, while the Geekbench OpenCL score of 112821 and Vulkan score of 21022 indicate strong compute and graphics performance. The Passmark G3D score of 22214 is a solid overall graphics score, and the GPU compute score of 11195 shows that it can handle compute tasks, though not at the level of a dedicated workstation GPU.

For gaming, the 8 GB VRAM is adequate for 1080p and 1440p gaming, but it can be a limitation at 4K with high-resolution textures. The FPS data confirms this: at 1080p, the GPU delivers high frame rates in most games, but at 4K, many titles drop below 60 FPS. The pixel rate of 165.6 GPixel/s and texture rate of 317.4 GTexel/s are strong for a mid-range GPU, allowing it to handle high-resolution textures and effects. The FP32 performance of 20.31 TFLOPS and FP16 performance of 20.31 TFLOPS (1:1) provide good compute throughput for rendering and AI workloads.

The RTX 3070 supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with modern APIs. The display outputs include 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a, which support high refresh rates and multiple monitors. The GPU is end-of-life in production status, meaning it is no longer being manufactured, but it remains a viable option for a mid-range build. The 220 W TDP and suggested 550 W PSU make it a power-hungry card, but it is still manageable for a mainstream desktop. The 46 RT cores provide ray tracing acceleration, though the performance in ray-traced titles will be moderate, as seen in Cyberpunk 2077 at 62 FPS at 1080p, which likely includes some ray tracing effects.