SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 7400F + Intel Arc B580

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

91 Score

Top 9% Ranking

91 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

90%

GPU

92%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 5 7400F

32,750 Benchmark Score

Top 10% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc B580

23,021 Benchmark Score

Top 8% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 5 7400F and Intel Arc B580 pairing creates a modern desktop build that targets 1080p and 1440p gaming with strong productivity potential. The combination of a 6-core Zen 4 processor and Intel’s Battlemage GPU places the platform in the 76th percentile overall among all pairings, with measured game data showing an average of 97.3 FPS across a broad test suite at 1080p. This analysis breaks down the component specifications, benchmark results, and real-world implications for various user profiles.

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The Intel Arc B580 is built on the Xe2-HPG architecture and the BMG-G21 chip, manufactured on a 5 nm process at TSMC with 19,600 million transistors on a 272 mm² die. The GPU operates at a fixed 2670 MHz base and boost clock, paired with 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, delivering 456.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This memory configuration is a key asset, as the 12 GB capacity provides headroom for modern game textures and rendering workloads at high resolutions without immediate capacity constraints.

The compute configuration includes 2560 shading units, 160 texture mapping units, and 80 raster operations pipelines. Ray tracing is handled by 20 dedicated RT cores, while the pixel rate reaches 213.6 GPixel/s and texture rate hits 427.2 GTexel/s. Floating-point performance is rated at 13.67 TFLOPS for FP32 and 27.34 TFLOPS for FP16 with a 2:1 ratio, which indicates balanced throughput for both traditional rasterization and compute-heavy tasks.

Benchmark results show the B580 achieving a Passmark G3D score of 15748 and a Geekbench OpenCL score of 92821. The Vulkan score is notably higher at 109672, suggesting strong performance in modern graphics APIs. DirectX 12 and DirectX 11 scores in Passmark are 76 and 128, respectively, while DirectX 9 and DirectX 10 scores are 183 and 76. The GPU compute score is 7729 in Passmark. These figures place the B580 in the 68th percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 23021. Compared to rivals, it sits 0.6% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 and 0.7% behind the RTX 3080, indicating performance in the upper mid-range tier.

For rendering workloads, the 12 GB frame buffer combined with 456.0 GB/s bandwidth supports texture-heavy scenes and 1440p rendering without excessive swapping. The RT cores enable hardware-accelerated ray tracing, though the measured FPS in ray-traced titles like Cyberpunk 2077 at 1080p (44 FPS) shows that ultra settings with RT will require compromises or upscaling. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3068 reinforces that the GPU is capable but not a top-tier performer, making it best suited for 1080p ultra and 1440p high settings rather than 4K maxed-out configurations.

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

The system’s combined percentile of 76 indicates a generally well-matched pair, but the data reveals specific bottlenecks depending on workload and resolution. At 1080p, the CPU becomes the limiting factor in many esports titles, while the GPU takes over as the primary constraint in demanding AAA games. The CPU’s Passmark single-thread score of 3689 and multi-thread score of 25645 show strong single-core performance, which supports high FPS in lighter titles.

FPS scaling across resolutions provides clear evidence of the GPU bottleneck. In Counter-Strike 2, the frame rate drops from 150 FPS at 1080p to 99 FPS at 1440p and 56 FPS at 4K, a 63% reduction from 1080p to 4K. Similarly, Valorant scales from 344 FPS at 1080p to 293 at 1440p and 235 at 4K, showing that the CPU maintains high throughput while the GPU struggles at higher resolutions. Conversely, in Cyberpunk 2077, the drop is from 44 FPS at 1080p to 33 at 1440p and 22 at 4K, indicating that the GPU is the limiting factor even at 1080p for this heavy title.

The pair rank of 2849 out of 3732 pairs, with an average FPS of 97.3 across games, suggests that this configuration is above average for gaming but not exceptional. The CPU’s 83rd percentile ranking versus the GPU’s 68th percentile implies that the processor has more headroom than the graphics card, meaning CPU-bound scenarios are less common than GPU-bound ones. In CPU-heavy games like Microsoft Flight Simulator, the 54 FPS at 1080p drops to 44 at 1440p and 32 at 4K, showing that both components contribute to the bottleneck. For esports titles, the CPU’s single-thread strength keeps FPS high at 1080p, but the GPU’s limits become apparent at higher resolutions, so users targeting 1440p high refresh rates may need to adjust settings.

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

The AMD Ryzen 5 7400F uses the AMD Socket AM5 platform, which is the current mainstream socket for AMD desktop processors. It supports DDR5 memory with dual-channel configuration and a memory bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s, along with ECC memory support for error-checking workloads. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 24 lanes available for the processor, ensuring compatibility with the latest storage and graphics cards. The Intel Arc B580 uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface, which works within the CPU’s PCIe budget.

The power requirements are modest for this build. The CPU has a TDP of 65 watts, while the GPU has a TDP of 190 watts and requires a single 8-pin power connector. The suggested PSU rating is 450 watts, which provides sufficient headroom for the combined draw of these components plus typical system peripherals. This makes the build compatible with a wide range of existing power supplies, though users upgrading from older systems should verify their PSU meets the 450-watt recommendation.

For future upgrades, the AM5 socket offers a clear path. Since the 7400F is a 6-core processor, users can move to higher-core-count Ryzen 7000 series chips without changing the motherboard or memory. The DDR5 memory support is current-generation, meaning memory upgrades are straightforward. The GPU upgrade path is also open, as the PCIe 4.0 x8 interface on the B580 can be replaced with a more powerful card, though users should ensure their PSU can handle the increased load. The CPU’s unlocked multiplier allows overclocking to extract additional performance, which can help bridge the gap until a full component swap. A sensible next upgrade would be a higher-tier AM5 CPU or a more powerful GPU, depending on whether the user is CPU-bound or GPU-bound in their primary applications.

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work. One short paragraph per scenario, citing the numbers that support the verdict

For high-refresh gaming at 1080p, this build delivers excellent results. Measured FPS shows Counter-Strike 2 at 150 FPS, Valorant at 344 FPS, and Tom Clancy’s Rainbow Six Siege at 178 FPS, all well above the 144 Hz threshold. Even at 1440p, Valorant maintains 293 FPS and CS2 drops to 99 FPS, which remains playable for competitive titles. The CPU’s single-thread score of 3689 in Passmark supports these high frame rates, making this a strong choice for esports.

Streaming workloads benefit from the CPU’s 12 threads and multi-thread score of 25645 in Passmark, which can handle encoding alongside gaming. The GPU’s 12 GB VRAM provides headroom for stream buffer and game textures simultaneously. However, the lack of dedicated tensor cores means that AI-based encoding features are limited, so users should rely on the CPU’s x264 encoding or the GPU’s standard encoders. The measured FPS in games like Fortnite at 72 FPS (1080p) suggests that streaming at high quality may require lowering in-game settings to maintain smooth output.

Video editing is a mixed scenario. The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 21765 indicates solid rendering performance for 6 cores, while the GPU’s compute score of 7729 in Passmark can accelerate effects and exports in compatible software. The 12 GB VRAM is beneficial for timeline previews and effects-heavy projects. The memory bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s on the CPU side is adequate for 1080p and 1440p editing, but 4K projects may see slower scrubbing. The single-core score of 3072 in Cinebench R23 ensures responsive interface interactions.

3D rendering relies heavily on the CPU’s multi-threaded performance. The Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 9141 and R15 multi-core score of 2193 show that the 6-core/12-thread configuration can handle moderate rendering tasks but will be slower than higher-core-count alternatives. The GPU’s FP32 performance of 13.67 TFLOPS can accelerate GPU-based renderers, and the 12 GB VRAM is sufficient for mid-sized scenes. Users with heavy production workloads may find the CPU limiting, but for occasional renders, this build is capable.

Software development benefits from the CPU’s strong single-thread performance. The Passmark single-thread score of 3689 and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3072 ensure fast compilation for single-threaded tasks, while the multi-thread score of 21765 handles parallel builds efficiently. The ECC memory support is a plus for code correctness. The 12 GB VRAM allows for GPU compute tasks like machine learning inference, though the lack of tensor cores limits training performance.

For student and office work, this build is substantially overpowered but offers longevity. The CPU’s 83rd percentile ranking and the GPU’s 68th percentile mean that everyday tasks like web browsing, document editing, and spreadsheet work are handled with ease. The 65-watt CPU TDP keeps power consumption low during light loads, and the system’s overall performance ensures it will remain responsive for years. The measured FPS in lighter games like Dave The Diver (124 FPS at 1080p) shows that even casual gaming is smooth.

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

The CPU achieves an average benchmark score of 32750, placing it in the 83rd percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals show tight competition: the Intel Core i5-14600T scores 32707 (0.1% behind), the Intel Core Ultra 7 155H scores 32697 (0.2% behind), the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H scores 32812 (0.2% ahead), and the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 scores 32662 (0.3% behind). This clustering indicates that the 7400F sits in a highly competitive performance band where small differences separate models.

In Cinebench tests, the CPU scores 2193 in R15 multi-core and 309 in R15 single-core. The R20 tests show 9141 multi-core and 1290 single-core, while R23 results are 21765 multi-core and 3072 single-core. These numbers indicate strong scaling from single to multi-core workloads, with the multi-core scores being roughly 7 times the single-core scores. Passmark tests further detail the CPU’s capabilities: 289999 in data compression, 16712 in data encryption, 21747 in extended instructions, 191 in find prime numbers, 45799 in floating point math, 74745 in integer math, 25645 in multithread, 1660 in physics, 35096 in random string sorting, and 3689 in single thread.

The GPU’s average benchmark score is 23021, placing it in the 68th percentile of all GPUs. Rivals include the AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP at 23061 (0.2% ahead), the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 at 22895 (0.6% behind), the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 at 23172 (0.7% ahead), and the NVIDIA P106-100 at 23249 (1% ahead). This positioning shows the B580 performing near the level of the RTX 2080 and RTX 3080, which were high-end cards in their respective generations.

The combined picture shows a balanced system. The CPU outperforms the GPU in percentile terms (83rd vs 68th), meaning the graphics card is more likely to be the performance ceiling in GPU-intensive workloads. The combined percentile of 76 indicates that the pairing is above average overall. The average FPS across games is 97.3, which is solid for 1080p gaming. The pair rank of 2849 out of 3732 pairs puts this configuration in the top 76% of all possible pairings, confirming that the components work well together without major imbalance.

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

The gaming data is measured, not estimated, providing concrete FPS figures for 48 games across three resolutions. At 1080p, the system excels in esports titles: Valorant hits 344 FPS, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive reaches 332 FPS, Roblox runs at 194 FPS, Tom Clancy’s Rainbow Six Siege achieves 178 FPS, and Counter-Strike 2 hits 150 FPS. These numbers confirm that the build is excellent for competitive gaming at high refresh rates.

For AAA titles at 1080p, performance varies. Call of Duty: Warzone runs at 143 FPS, Doom at 112 FPS, Assetto Corsa at 89 FPS, and Minecraft at 148 FPS. Heavier titles like Cyberpunk 2077 (44 FPS), Red Dead Redemption 2 (40 FPS), and Ark: Survival Ascended (22 FPS) require significant settings compromises. The Medium is particularly demanding at 31 FPS, indicating that some games will need upscaling or reduced quality for smooth play.

At 1440p, the FPS drops are noticeable but many games remain playable. Valorant still achieves 293 FPS, Warzone runs at 127 FPS, and CS2 hits 99 FPS. Roblox reaches 129 FPS, and Rainbow Six Siege manages 117 FPS. For AAA titles, Assetto Corsa runs at 62 FPS, Doom at 72 FPS, and Minecraft at 93 FPS. Cyberpunk 2077 drops to 33 FPS, and Red Dead Redemption 2 to 30 FPS, which is borderline for playability. Ark: Survival Ascended falls to 14 FPS, making it unplayable at this resolution without major settings changes.

At 4K, the system is limited. Valorant still runs at 235 FPS, and CS:GO hits 135 FPS, but most games struggle. Warzone achieves 108 FPS, Roblox runs at 73 FPS, and Rainbow Six Siege hits 64 FPS. Dave The Diver runs at 63 FPS, and Inside at 58 FPS. Heavier titles drop below 30 FPS: Cyberpunk 2077 (22), Red Dead Redemption 2 (20), and Ark: Survival Ascended (7). The 12 GB VRAM is sufficient, but the GPU’s compute power is not enough for 4K ultra settings in demanding games.

The data shows clear performance tiers: 1080p is the sweet spot for high-refresh gaming, 1440p is viable for most titles with some settings adjustments, and 4K is only suitable for lighter or older games. The average FPS across all games at 1080p is 97.3, reinforcing that this build is optimized for 1080p gaming.

Who Should Build It — target users and industries (gamers at specific resolutions, content creators, developers, students, small business workstations) tied strictly to the measured performance

This build is ideal for gamers who prioritize 1080p high-refresh-rate play. The measured FPS in esports titles (Valorant 344, CS:GO 332, Rainbow Six Siege 178) ensures a competitive edge, while the 12 GB VRAM and 456.0 GB/s bandwidth handle modern textures at 1080p ultra settings. Gamers at 1440p will find the system capable for most titles, with playable FPS in Warzone (127), CS2 (99), and Roblox (129), but should expect to lower settings in demanding AAA games like Cyberpunk 2077 (33 FPS at 1440p).

Content creators working with video editing or 3D rendering will benefit from the CPU’s multi-threaded performance. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 21765 and Passmark multi-thread score of 25645 provide solid rendering times for 1080p and 1440p projects. The GPU’s compute performance (Passmark GPU compute 7729) accelerates effects, and the 12 GB VRAM supports large preview buffers. However, professionals with heavy production workloads may find the 6-core CPU limiting.

Software developers will appreciate the CPU’s strong single-thread performance for compilation times. The Passmark single-thread score of 3689 and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3072 ensure fast builds for single-threaded tasks, while the multi-thread score handles parallel compilation. The ECC memory support is valuable for data integrity in development environments. The GPU’s 13.67 TFLOPS FP32 performance enables GPU compute for machine learning inference or scientific calculations, though the lack of tensor cores limits training workloads.

Students and office workers will find this build more than sufficient for their needs. The CPU’s 83rd percentile ranking ensures snappy response in productivity applications, and the 65-watt TDP keeps power consumption low. The measured FPS in lighter games (Dave The Diver 124, Inside 129) shows that even casual gaming sessions are smooth. The AM5 platform provides longevity, allowing future CPU upgrades without changing the motherboard.

Small business workstations can leverage the ECC memory support and strong multi-threaded performance for database tasks, as evidenced by the Passmark data compression score of 289999. The GPU’s 12 GB VRAM is useful for CAD or visualization work, though the gaming-focused drivers may limit professional application performance. The 450-watt PSU recommendation keeps system costs low, making this a cost-effective option for businesses that need a versatile desktop.

FAQ — 5-7 Q&A pairs answerable from FACT PACK data (format: Q: ... A: ...)

Q: What is the average FPS across all games for this CPU-GPU pairing?

A: The average FPS across all tested games is 97.3 at 1080p ultra settings, based on measured data. The pair ranks 2849 out of 3732 possible pairs.

Q: Does the CPU support DDR4 or DDR5 memory?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 7400F supports DDR5 memory with dual-channel configuration and a memory bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s. It also supports ECC memory.

Q: What is the launch MSRP of the Intel Arc B580?

A: The Intel Arc B580 has a launch MSRP of 249 USD.

Q: How much VRAM does the Intel Arc B580 have, and what is its memory bandwidth?

A: The Intel Arc B580 has 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, delivering 456.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: What is the CPU's percentile ranking compared to all CPUs?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 7400F is in the 83rd percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 32750.

Q: Is the gaming performance data measured or estimated?

A: The gaming performance data is measured, not estimated, as indicated by the dataIsMeasured field being true.

Q: What power supply is recommended for this build?

A: The suggested PSU rating is 450 watts, based on the GPU's 190-watt TDP and the CPU's 65-watt TDP.

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The AMD Ryzen 5 7400F is a 6-core, 12-thread processor based on the Zen 4 architecture, codenamed Raphael, and part of the 7000 series. It uses the AMD Socket AM5 platform and is manufactured on a 5 nm process at TSMC with 6,570 million transistors on a 71 mm² die. The base clock is 3.70 GHz with a boost clock of 4.70 GHz, and the TDP is rated at 65 watts. The CPU has an unlocked multiplier, allowing overclocking, and supports up to 24 PCIe Gen 5 lanes.

The cache hierarchy includes 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 cache per core, and 32 MB of shared L3 cache. This configuration provides low-latency access to frequently used data, which benefits gaming and productivity workloads. The memory support for DDR5 with dual-channel configuration and 83.2 GB/s bandwidth ensures the CPU has sufficient data throughput for multi-threaded tasks.

Benchmark results indicate strong performance across various workloads. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 21765 shows that the 6-core processor can handle demanding rendering tasks, while the single-core score of 3072 demonstrates excellent per-thread performance. The Passmark multi-thread score of 25645 and single-thread score of 3689 corroborate these results. The data compression score of 289999 in Passmark indicates strong performance in archiving and file compression tasks, while the encryption score of 16712 shows solid security processing.

The CPU’s 83rd percentile ranking places it ahead of the Intel Core i5-14600T (0.1% ahead), Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (0.2% ahead), and AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 (0.3% ahead), while trailing the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H by 0.2%. This tight competition means the 7400F is competitive with mid-range mobile and desktop processors from recent generations.

For real workloads, the 6-core/12-thread configuration is well-suited for modern gaming, where single-thread performance is critical for high FPS, and productivity tasks that benefit from parallel processing. The 65-watt TDP makes it easy to cool, and the unlocked multiplier provides headroom for enthusiasts. The lack of integrated graphics means a discrete GPU is required, which is already present in this build with the Arc B580. The CPU’s 5 nm process and TSMC fabrication contribute to its efficiency and performance characteristics, making it a solid foundation for a balanced desktop system.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 7400F + Intel Arc B580

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 5 7400F

Intel Arc B580

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Valorant

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

Valorant

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

Valorant

Valorant

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work. One short paragraph per scenario, citing the numbers that support the verdict

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

Who Should Build It — target users and industries (gamers at specific resolutions, content creators, developers, students, small business workstations) tied strictly to the measured performance

FAQ — 5-7 Q&A pairs answerable from FACT PACK data (format: Q: ... A: ...)

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds