SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 7400F + Intel Arc B570

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

90 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 10% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
90%
VS
GPU
91%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 5 7400F

32,750 Benchmark Score
Top 10% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc B570

20,556 Benchmark Score
Top 9% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 5 7400F and Intel Arc B570 form a desktop pairing that sits at the 74th combined percentile, with the CPU at the 83rd percentile against all processors and the GPU at the 65th percentile against all graphics cards. This is a system built around a modern 6-core Zen 4 processor and Intel’s Battlemage architecture, delivering a balanced 1080p gaming experience with strong productivity potential, though it carries clear limitations at higher resolutions and in the most demanding titles.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s position relative to its closest rivals in overall benchmark score?

A: The Ryzen 5 7400F has an average benchmark score of 32750, putting it 0.1% ahead of the Intel Core i5-14600T (32707), 0.2% ahead of the Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (32697), and 0.3% ahead of the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 (32662). It trails the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H (32812) by 0.2%.

Q: How does the GPU compare to its nearest competitors in average benchmark score?

A: The Intel Arc B570 scores 20556 on average, which is 0.1% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile (20534) and 0.4% ahead of the NVIDIA Quadro M4000M (20480). It sits 0.1% behind the Intel Arc A750 (20582) and 0.5% behind the AMD Radeon R9 M390X (20662).

Q: What are the core and thread counts of the Ryzen 5 7400F?

A: The CPU has 6 cores and 12 threads, with a base clock of 3.70 GHz and a boost clock of 4.70 GHz. It is built on the Zen 4 architecture (Raphael) using a 5 nm process from TSMC.

Q: What memory and expansion capabilities does the platform offer?

A: The CPU supports DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration with 83.2 GB/s bandwidth and ECC memory support. It provides PCIe Gen 5 with 24 lanes from the CPU, and the GPU itself uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory configuration and bandwidth?

A: The Intel Arc B570 has 10 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 160-bit bus, delivering 380.0 GB/s bandwidth. Its memory clock is 2375 MHz (19 Gbps effective), with a base and boost clock of 2500 MHz.

Q: Is the performance data for gaming measured or estimated?

A: The gaming frame rates are measured, with dataIsMeasured set to true. The system achieved an average FPS of 86.3 across all tested games, ranking 3041 out of 3732 pairs.

Q: What is the combined percentile of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The pairing sits at the 74th combined percentile, indicating that it outperforms roughly three-quarters of all tested CPU-GPU combinations in the database.

Benchmark Performance

The Ryzen 5 7400F delivers a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 21765 and a single-core score of 3072, while the R20 results are 9141 and 1290 respectively. In single-threaded Passmark testing, the CPU scores 3689, and its multithread score reaches 25645. These numbers place the processor at the 83rd percentile against all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 32750, which is statistically indistinguishable from its nearest rivals—the Intel Core i5-14600T (32707, 0.1% ahead) and the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H (32812, 0.2% behind).

On the GPU side, the Intel Arc B570 achieves a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2649, a Geekbench OpenCL score of 83514, and a Geekbench Vulkan score of 96844. Its Passmark G3D score is 14195, with a GPU compute score of 7281. The GPU sits at the 65th percentile against all graphics cards, averaging 20556, which places it in a tight cluster with the RTX 3070 Mobile (20534, 0.1% behind) and the Arc A750 (20582, 0.1% ahead).

The combined picture shows a system where the CPU is notably stronger than the GPU relative to their respective markets. The CPU’s 83rd percentile versus the GPU’s 65th percentile suggests that the processor has headroom to drive more powerful graphics cards, but the current pairing still yields a respectable 86.3 average FPS across the tested game suite. The system’s 74th combined percentile reflects this asymmetry, with the CPU carrying more weight in the overall score.

Gaming Performance

Measured frame rates at ultra settings show a wide variance across titles and resolutions. At 1920x1080, esports and lighter titles run exceptionally well: Valorant hits 304 FPS, CS:GO reaches 293 FPS, and Counter-Strike 2 manages 133 FPS. Tom Clancy’s Rainbow Six Siege achieves 158 FPS, and Call of Duty: Warzone runs at 143 FPS. These numbers indicate that the pairing is more than capable of driving high-refresh monitors in competitive shooters.

At 1440p, the same titles see expected drops: Valorant falls to 259 FPS, CS:GO to 201 FPS, and Rainbow Six Siege to 103 FPS. Call of Duty: Warzone remains playable at 127 FPS, while Counter-Strike 2 drops to 88 FPS. Single-player AAA titles at 1440p show strain—Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 29 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 at 27 FPS, and Ark: Survival Ascended at 12 FPS, all of which are below comfortable playability thresholds.

At 3840x2160, only a handful of games remain fluid. Valorant hits 207 FPS, CS:GO 119 FPS, and Call of Duty: Warzone 108 FPS, but demanding titles fall to slideshow levels: Cyberpunk 2077 at 19 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 at 18 FPS, and The Medium at 18 FPS. The data shows that 4K gaming is only viable for esports or older titles, with the system ranking 3041 out of 3732 pairs by average FPS.

Who Should Build It

This system targets gamers who primarily play at 1920x1080 with high refresh rates, as the measured FPS in competitive titles (304 FPS in Valorant, 293 FPS in CS:GO, 158 FPS in Rainbow Six Siege) far exceeds 144 Hz displays. Content creators working with CPU-heavy workloads will benefit from the 21765 Cinebench R23 multi-core score, which is competitive with the Intel Core i5-14600T and Core Ultra 7 155H. Software developers compiling code will find the Passmark integer math score of 74745 and data compression score of 289999 useful, though the GPU compute score of 7281 suggests limited GPU-accelerated workloads.

Students and office workers building a desktop for general productivity will find the CPU’s single-thread performance (3072 in Cinebench R23 single-core, 3689 in Passmark single-thread) more than adequate for daily tasks. Small business workstations can leverage the 65W TDP and ECC memory support for stable, low-power operations. However, the 6-core/12-thread configuration, while efficient, may feel constrained for heavy multi-threaded rendering compared to higher-core alternatives, and the GPU’s 65th percentile ranking means it is not suited for professional 3D rendering workflows.

CPU Analysis

The Ryzen 5 7400F is a 6-core, 12-thread processor based on the Zen 4 architecture (codenamed Raphael), manufactured on TSMC’s 5 nm process with 6,570 million transistors on a 71 mm² die. It has a base clock of 3.70 GHz and a boost clock of 4.70 GHz, with a 65W TDP. The cache hierarchy includes 64 KB L1 per core, 1 MB L2 per core, and 32 MB of shared L3 cache. This is a desktop-class chip with an unlocked multiplier, supporting DDR5 memory with ECC capabilities.

Benchmark results show a processor that excels in both single-threaded and multi-threaded tasks relative to its power envelope. The Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3072 is strong for a 6-core chip, and the multi-core score of 21765 demonstrates that the 12 threads scale well under load. Passmark results break down performance by workload: integer math scores 74745, floating-point math 45799, and extended instructions 21747, indicating balanced ALU and FPU performance. Data encryption scores 16712, and compression hits 289999, showing solid throughput for data-intensive tasks.

In real workloads, the CPU’s 83rd percentile ranking means it outperforms most processors on the market, but its nearest rivals show how close the field is: the Intel Core i5-14600T is only 0.1% behind, and the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H is 0.2% ahead. The 32 MB of L3 cache helps gaming performance, as evidenced by the high frame rates in esports titles. The 5 nm process keeps power draw low, making this a compelling option for compact builds.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc B570 is built on the Xe2-HPG architecture (Battlemage, Arc 5 generation), using TSMC’s 5 nm process with 19,600 million transistors on a 272 mm² die. It has 2304 shading units, 144 TMUs, and 80 ROPs, along with 18 ray tracing cores. The GPU operates at a fixed 2500 MHz base and boost clock, with memory running at 2375 MHz (19 Gbps effective) across a 160-bit bus for 380.0 GB/s of bandwidth. It supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, with display outputs of 1x HDMI 2.1a and 3x DisplayPort 2.1.

The FP32 performance is 11.52 TFLOPS, with FP16 at 23.04 TFLOPS (2:1), and pixel/texture rates of 200.0 GPixel/s and 360.0 GTexel/s respectively. These specs place the GPU at the 65th percentile, with an average benchmark score of 20556. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, it scores 2649, and in Geekbench, it achieves 83514 in OpenCL and 96844 in Vulkan. Passmark G3D is 14195, with GPU compute at 7281.

The GPU’s performance is tightly clustered with its rivals: the RTX 3070 Mobile is 0.1% behind, the Arc A750 is 0.1% ahead, and the Radeon R9 M390X is 0.5% ahead. This indicates that the B570 is a mid-range card that trades blows with previous-generation GPUs. The 10 GB VRAM is sufficient for 1080p and 1440p gaming, as shown by the measured frame rates, but the 160-bit bus limits bandwidth for 4K textures. The 18 RT cores provide some ray tracing capability, though the 39 FPS in Cyberpunk 2077 at 1080p suggests that RT workloads will require upscaling or reduced settings.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Ryzen 5 7400F uses the AMD Socket AM5, which supports DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration with 83.2 GB/s bandwidth and ECC capability. The CPU provides 24 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, while the GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface, which is sufficient for the B570’s bandwidth needs. The platform’s 65W CPU TDP is modest, and the GPU’s 150W TDP with a suggested 450W PSU means that a standard mid-range power supply will handle this system without issue.

For a sensible next upgrade, the GPU is the primary bottleneck in gaming, as the CPU’s 83rd percentile ranking leaves room for a more powerful graphics card. Moving to a higher-tier GPU would improve 1440p and 4K performance, where the current pairing struggles (e.g., 29 FPS in Cyberpunk 2077 at 1440p). The AM5 socket also supports future CPU upgrades within the same platform, allowing users to increase core counts without changing the motherboard. The 1x 8-pin power connector and dual-slot cooler on the GPU make installation straightforward, and the 272 mm length fits most mid-tower cases.

The memory bandwidth of 380.0 GB/s is a limiting factor for the GPU at higher resolutions, so a future GPU upgrade should prioritize wider bus widths or faster memory. The CPU’s DDR5 support and PCIe Gen 5 lanes ensure that the platform will not bottleneck next-generation components, though the 6-core configuration may become a constraint in heavily threaded workloads if the user upgrades to a high-end GPU. The ECC memory support is a plus for workstation use, but the desktop class of this build suggests a gaming-first focus.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class pairing of the AMD Ryzen 5 7400F and Intel Arc B570, combining a 6-core Zen 4 processor with a Battlemage mid-range GPU. The CPU’s 83rd percentile and the GPU’s 65th percentile yield a combined 74th percentile, indicating a system that is above average but not high-end. The measured average FPS of 86.3 across 51 games at ultra settings confirms that this is a 1080p-focused build, with 1440p playable only in less demanding titles.

The processor’s launch MSRP is $229, while the GPU’s launch MSRP is 219 USD, placing this pairing in the entry-to-mid-range segment. The CPU’s 65W TDP and the GPU’s 150W TDP make for an efficient combination, and the 5 nm process for both components suggests good thermal characteristics. The overall tier is solidly mid-range, with the CPU being the stronger component relative to its market position. The build is well-suited for users who prioritize CPU performance for productivity but still want decent gaming capability at 1080p.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data indicates that the GPU is the primary bottleneck in gaming workloads, particularly at higher resolutions. At 1080p, the CPU’s strong single-thread performance (3072 in Cinebench R23) pushes frame rates high in esports titles (304 FPS in Valorant), but the GPU’s 65th percentile limits AAA performance (39 FPS in Cyberpunk 2077). At 1440p, the GPU’s bandwidth constraints become more apparent, with most demanding titles falling below 60 FPS. At 4K, the GPU is clearly overwhelmed, with only esports titles exceeding 100 FPS.

In CPU-bound workloads, the processor shows no such limitation. The 21765 Cinebench R23 multi-core score and 25645 Passmark multithread score indicate that the CPU can handle heavy rendering and compilation tasks without bottlenecking. The GPU’s compute score of 7281 is low relative to the CPU’s integer math score of 74745, suggesting that GPU-accelerated compute would be the limiting factor in mixed workloads. The 0.1% to 0.5% deltas between the GPU and its rivals show that it is not dramatically weaker than its peers, but the CPU’s 0.1% to 0.3% deltas against its rivals indicate a more competitive field.

The bottleneck shifts depending on the workload: gaming at 1080p is balanced, with the GPU limiting AAA titles and the CPU limiting esports titles. At 1440p and above, the GPU is the clear constraint. In productivity, the CPU is the stronger component, and the GPU’s lower percentile means that any GPU-accelerated task will underperform relative to the CPU’s capabilities.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: At 1080p, the pairing excels in competitive titles, with Valorant hitting 304 FPS, CS:GO at 293 FPS, and Rainbow Six Siege at 158 FPS. This makes it ideal for 144 Hz or 240 Hz monitors in esports, though AAA titles like Cyberpunk 2077 at 39 FPS will require lower settings.

Streaming: The CPU’s 12 threads and strong multi-core score of 21765 in Cinebench R23 can handle encoding while gaming, but the GPU’s 65th percentile may struggle with simultaneous encoding and rendering. The 380.0 GB/s bandwidth is adequate for 1080p streaming, but the 10 GB VRAM could be a constraint at higher bitrates.

Video editing: The CPU’s Passmark data compression score of 289999 and extended instructions score of 21747 support fast codec processing, while the GPU’s 11.52 TFLOPS FP32 performance accelerates effects. The 83 GB/s CPU memory bandwidth and 380 GB/s GPU bandwidth handle 4K timelines, but rendering times will be moderate.

3D rendering: The CPU’s 83rd percentile makes it suitable for CPU-based rendering, with a 21765 Cinebench R23 score that beats the Intel Core i5-14600T by 0.1%. However, the GPU’s 65th percentile and 7281 compute score limit GPU-accelerated rendering, making this a CPU-first workstation.

Software development: The CPU’s Passmark integer math score of 74745 and single-thread score of 3689 provide strong compilation performance, while the 32 MB L3 cache reduces latency. The ECC memory support is valuable for long-running builds, though the 6-core limit may slow parallel compilation.

Student and office work: The CPU’s low 65W TDP and strong single-thread performance (3072 Cinebench R23) make it efficient for everyday tasks. The GPU is overkill for office applications, but the 293 FPS in CS:GO shows the system can handle light gaming during breaks. The 10 GB VRAM is unused in this scenario, but the overall system is responsive and quiet.