SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 7400F + Intel Arc A770

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

94 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 6% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
90%
VS
GPU
97%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 5 7400F

32,750 Benchmark Score
Top 10% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A770

68,809 Benchmark Score
Top 3% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 5 7400F and Intel Arc A770 pairing represents a desktop build that combines a modern 6-core Zen 4 processor with a high-end Alchemist graphics card, landing at the 87th percentile overall among all tested CPU-GPU combinations. The CPU holds the 83rd percentile among all processors, while the GPU achieves the 90th percentile among all graphics cards, indicating a system that is strong across both compute and rendering workloads. This analysis relies exclusively on the provided benchmark data, as no measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination; all gaming performance discussion is therefore framed as estimates derived from the synthetic scores.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile for the AMD Ryzen 5 7400F and Intel Arc A770 is 87, placing it in the upper tier of desktop configurations tracked in the database.

Q: How does the Ryzen 5 7400F compare to its closest rival, the Intel Core i5-14600T?

A: The Ryzen 5 7400F has an average benchmark score of 32750, which is just 0.1% higher than the Intel Core i5-14600T’s 32707, making the two effectively identical in overall CPU performance.

Q: What is the Intel Arc A770’s position relative to the NVIDIA Quadro P6000?

A: The Arc A770’s average benchmark score is 68809, which is 1.7% lower than the Quadro P6000’s 69986, placing the Intel card slightly behind that particular workstation-class rival in aggregate benchmarks.

Q: Does the Ryzen 5 7400F have integrated graphics?

A: No, the Ryzen 5 7400F lists integrated graphics as “N/A,” meaning a discrete GPU like the Intel Arc A770 is required for any display output or graphical workload.

Q: What memory type and bandwidth does the Ryzen 5 7400F support?

A: The CPU supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a total memory bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s, and it also supports ECC memory.

Q: What is the Intel Arc A770’s VRAM capacity and memory bus width?

A: The Arc A770 comes with 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 512.0 GB/s.

Q: Is the Intel Arc A770 still in production?

A: No, the production status for the Intel Arc A770 is listed as “End-of-life,” with its successor being Battlemage.

Benchmark Performance

The synthetic benchmark data paints a picture of a well-rounded desktop system with a slight edge toward GPU-heavy workloads. The Intel Arc A770 achieves an average benchmark score of 68809, placing it at the 90th percentile among all GPUs, which is a notably strong position. In contrast, the AMD Ryzen 5 7400F posts an average score of 32750, landing at the 83rd percentile among all CPUs. The combined percentile of 87 suggests that the GPU is the more dominant component in this pairing, though the CPU is far from a weak link.

Looking at the CPU’s raw compute scores, the Ryzen 5 7400F delivers a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 21765 and a single-core score of 3072. These numbers indicate strong multi-threaded throughput for a 6-core, 12-thread processor, while the single-core result shows solid per-thread performance. The Cinebench R20 results follow a similar pattern, with a multi-core score of 9141 and a single-core score of 1290. In PassMark tests, the CPU achieves a multi-thread score of 25645 and a single-thread score of 3689, with integer math at 74745 and floating-point math at 45799. These scores suggest a balanced processor that handles both integer-heavy and floating-point-heavy tasks competently.

The GPU’s benchmark results are equally telling. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, the Arc A770 scores 2969, a result that reflects its DirectX 12 Ultimate capabilities. In Geekbench compute tests, the GPU scores 109175 in OpenCL and 94284 in Vulkan, showing that it scales well across different compute APIs. The GPU’s nearest rival, the NVIDIA CMP 90HX, has an average score of 69000, which is just 0.3% higher than the Arc A770’s 68809, indicating that the Intel card trades blows with that NVIDIA part. Against the AMD Radeon Instinct MI25, the Arc A770 is 0.4% ahead, and it trails the AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 by 1.5%.

For the CPU, the nearest rival comparisons confirm its position in the market. The Intel Core i5-14600T scores 32707, a 0.1% deficit to the Ryzen 5 7400F, while the Intel Core Ultra 7 155H scores 32697, a 0.2% deficit. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H scores 32812, which is 0.2% higher than the 7400F, and the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 scores 32662, a 0.3% deficit. These tight margins show that the Ryzen 5 7400F sits squarely in a competitive mid-range CPU tier, where no single contender holds a decisive advantage.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact CPU-GPU combination, so all gaming performance figures here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores rather than observed results. The dataIsMeasured field is false, meaning the following FPS expectations are qualitative projections based on the Arc A770’s 90th percentile GPU ranking and the Ryzen 5 7400F’s 83rd percentile CPU ranking.

At 1080p resolution with ultra settings, the Arc A770’s 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2969 suggests it can handle modern DirectX 12 titles with high frame rates, though the exact FPS will depend on the game’s optimization for Intel’s Xe-HPG architecture. The GPU’s 16 GB of VRAM and 512.0 GB/s bandwidth provide ample headroom for texture-heavy scenes at this resolution, reducing the likelihood of stutter from memory bottlenecks. The CPU’s single-core score of 3072 in Cinebench R23 indicates that it can keep up with the GPU’s frame output in most titles, as modern games rarely require more than a few strong cores.

Moving to 1440p, the GPU becomes the primary driver of performance. The Arc A770’s 90th percentile position suggests it can maintain playable frame rates at this resolution, but the margin over lower-tier GPUs narrows. The 3DMark score of 2969 in Steel Nomad, which is a demanding DX12 test, implies that the GPU will deliver consistent results in AAA titles, though users may need to adjust some settings from ultra to high in the most demanding games to hit 60 FPS. The CPU’s 6 cores and 12 threads are sufficient for this resolution, as the workload shifts more heavily onto the GPU.

At 4K, the estimates become more conservative. The Arc A770’s 16 GB VRAM is a positive factor, as it prevents memory capacity from being a limiting factor at this resolution, but the GPU’s raw throughput may struggle to sustain high frame rates in the latest titles. The FP32 performance of 19.66 TFLOPS and the 307.2 GPixel/s pixel rate suggest that the GPU can handle 4K output, but users should expect lower frame rates than at 1080p or 1440p, potentially dipping below 60 FPS in demanding scenes. The CPU’s role at 4K is diminished, as the GPU is almost certainly the bottleneck in this scenario.

Who Should Build It

This desktop build is suited for users who prioritize GPU performance without neglecting CPU compute capability. The Arc A770’s 90th percentile GPU ranking makes it a strong choice for gamers targeting 1440p resolution, where the 16 GB VRAM and 512.0 GB/s bandwidth provide a solid foundation for high-quality textures and effects. The Ryzen 5 7400F’s 83rd percentile CPU ranking ensures that the processor will not hold back the GPU in most gaming scenarios, especially at higher resolutions where the GPU load is more significant.

Content creators and 3D renderers will find this pairing attractive due to the CPU’s multi-core performance. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 21765 and the PassMark multi-thread score of 25645 indicate that the Ryzen 5 7400F can handle video encoding, 3D rendering, and other multi-threaded workloads with reasonable efficiency. The GPU’s 19.66 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 32 RT cores add hardware acceleration for ray-traced rendering and compute tasks, making this build viable for small-scale production work.

Software developers and students working with code compilation, virtual machines, or data analysis will benefit from the CPU’s 6 cores and 12 threads, as well as its 32 MB of shared L3 cache. The PassMark data encryption score of 16712 and data compression score of 289999 suggest that the CPU handles these workloads competently. For small business workstations, the combination of a 65 W TDP CPU and a 225 W GPU offers a balanced power profile, though the GPU’s end-of-life status may be a consideration for long-term deployment.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data indicates that the GPU is the more dominant component in this pairing, as evidenced by the 90th percentile GPU ranking versus the 83rd percentile CPU ranking. In gaming workloads, the Arc A770 will typically be the limiting factor, especially at higher resolutions like 1440p and 4K, where the GPU’s raw throughput determines frame rates. The CPU’s single-core performance, with a Cinebench R23 score of 3072, is sufficient to feed the GPU in most titles, but in extremely CPU-bound games at 1080p, the Ryzen 5 7400F could become the bottleneck.

In compute-heavy workloads, the balance shifts. The Ryzen 5 7400F’s multi-core score of 21765 in Cinebench R23 shows that it can drive multi-threaded tasks effectively, but the GPU’s parallel architecture, with 4096 shading units and 19.66 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, will outperform the CPU in tasks like rendering or scientific simulations that can leverage GPU compute. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 109175 for the GPU dwarfs the CPU’s PassMark multi-thread score of 25645, confirming that the GPU is the primary compute engine for parallel workloads.

The FPS scaling from the benchmark scores suggests that the GPU bottleneck becomes more pronounced as resolution increases. At 1080p, the CPU may hold back the GPU in some scenarios, but at 4K, the GPU is almost certainly the limiting factor. This is a healthy balance for a gaming system, as it allows the GPU to be fully utilized at higher resolutions, but it means that users seeking maximum frame rates at 1080p might see diminishing returns from the GPU’s power.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A770 is built on the Xe-HPG architecture with the DG2-512 chip, manufactured on a 6 nm process by TSMC. It features 4096 shading units, 256 texture mapping units, and 128 raster output units, with 32 dedicated ray tracing cores. The GPU operates at a base clock of 2100 MHz and a boost clock of 2400 MHz, with memory running at 2000 MHz or 16 Gbps effective. The 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus delivers 512.0 GB/s of bandwidth, which is a substantial figure that supports high-resolution textures and large datasets.

The GPU’s compute capabilities are highlighted by its 19.66 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 39.32 TFLOPS of FP16 performance with a 2:1 ratio. The pixel rate is 307.2 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 614.4 GTexel/s, indicating strong fill rates for rasterization workloads. The 32 RT cores provide hardware support for ray tracing, though the performance relative to competing architectures is not specified in the data. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, making it compatible with modern graphics APIs.

In benchmark terms, the Arc A770 achieves a 90th percentile ranking among all GPUs, with an average score of 68809. Its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2969 places it in a competitive position for DirectX 12 gaming. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 109175 and Vulkan score of 94284 show that the GPU performs well across different compute interfaces. Against its nearest rivals, the NVIDIA CMP 90HX is 0.3% ahead, the AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 is 0.4% behind, the AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 is 1.5% ahead, and the NVIDIA Quadro P6000 is 1.7% ahead. These narrow margins indicate that the Arc A770 sits in a well-contested performance tier.

For rendering workloads, the GPU’s 16 GB VRAM is a significant advantage, as it allows large scenes and high-resolution textures to be loaded without spilling to system memory. The 512.0 GB/s bandwidth ensures that the GPU can feed its 4096 shading units efficiently, while the 32 RT cores add hardware acceleration for ray-traced effects. The 19.66 TFLOPS of FP32 performance is competitive for GPU rendering tasks, though the end-of-life production status suggests that driver optimization may not receive future improvements.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 5 7400F is a 6-core, 12-thread processor based on the Zen 4 architecture with the Raphael codename, manufactured on a 5 nm process by TSMC. It has a base clock of 3.70 GHz and a boost clock of 4.70 GHz, with a TDP of 65 W. The CPU supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration with 83.2 GB/s of bandwidth, and it also supports ECC memory. It uses the AMD Socket AM5 and provides PCIe Gen 5 with 24 lanes from the CPU.

The cache hierarchy consists of 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 cache per core, and 32 MB of shared L3 cache. The CPU has a transistor count of 6,570 million on a die size of 71 mm², with a multiplier that is unlocked for overclocking. It was released on January 8, 2025, and remains in active production. The CPU has no integrated graphics, requiring a discrete GPU.

In benchmark tests, the Ryzen 5 7400F achieves a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 21765 and a single-core score of 3072. The Cinebench R20 results are 9141 multi-core and 1290 single-core, while the older R15 test shows 2193 multi-core and 309 single-core. PassMark results include a multi-thread score of 25645, a single-thread score of 3689, an integer math score of 74745, and a floating-point math score of 45799. Additional PassMark scores include data compression at 289999, data encryption at 16712, extended instructions at 21747, find prime numbers at 191, physics at 1660, and random string sorting at 35096.

The CPU’s average benchmark score of 32750 places it at the 83rd percentile among all CPUs. Its nearest rivals are the Intel Core i5-14600T with a score of 32707 (0.1% behind), the Intel Core Ultra 7 155H with 32697 (0.2% behind), the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H with 32812 (0.2% ahead), and the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 with 32662 (0.3% behind). These results show that the Ryzen 5 7400F is a competitive mid-range CPU, though it does not hold a clear lead over its closest competitors.

For real workloads, the 6 cores and 12 threads are well-suited for gaming, where the single-core performance is often more important than the multi-core count. The Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3072 indicates strong per-thread performance, which translates to responsive gameplay. For content creation, the multi-core score of 21765 shows that the CPU can handle video editing and 3D rendering tasks, though it will not match higher-core-count processors in heavily threaded workloads. The PassMark encryption and compression scores suggest that the CPU is also capable for data-intensive tasks.

Build Overview

This build pairs the AMD Ryzen 5 7400F with the Intel Arc A770 in a desktop class configuration. The CPU is a 6-core, 12-thread Zen 4 processor with a 65 W TDP, while the GPU is a 225 W end-of-life graphics card with 16 GB of VRAM. The combined percentile of 87 places this system in the upper tier of tracked configurations, indicating that it offers strong overall performance for a desktop build.

The CPU’s 83rd percentile and the GPU’s 90th percentile show a slight imbalance in favor of the GPU, which is a common trait in gaming-focused builds. The CPU provides a solid foundation with its 6 cores and 12 threads, while the GPU delivers the bulk of the graphical and parallel compute performance. The build’s memory support for DDR5 and ECC adds flexibility for professional workloads, while the PCIe Gen 5 support from the CPU ensures compatibility with future high-bandwidth devices.

The Intel Arc A770’s end-of-life status is a notable consideration for this build, as it may affect long-term driver support and resale value. However, the GPU’s 90th percentile ranking and 16 GB of VRAM make it a capable choice for current gaming and rendering workloads. The Ryzen 5 7400F’s active production status and unlocked multiplier provide a path for future overclocking, though the 65 W TDP limits the headroom for significant gains.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming at 1080p, this build is well-suited, as the Ryzen 5 7400F’s single-core score of 3072 in Cinebench R23 ensures that the CPU can keep up with the GPU’s frame output. The Arc A770’s 90th percentile ranking suggests that it can push high frame rates in most titles, though the exact FPS will vary by game.

For 1440p gaming, the Arc A770’s 16 GB VRAM and 512.0 GB/s bandwidth provide a strong foundation for high-quality settings. The GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2969 indicates that it can handle demanding DX12 titles at this resolution, though some settings may need adjustment to maintain 60 FPS in the most intensive games.

For streaming, the CPU’s 6 cores and 12 threads, with a PassMark multi-thread score of 25645, can handle encoding workloads alongside gaming, though dedicated streaming hardware on the GPU may be preferred. The GPU’s 19.66 TFLOPS of FP32 performance can also assist with encoding tasks.

For video editing, the CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 21765 and the GPU’s compute capabilities combine to handle timeline rendering and effects. The 16 GB VRAM on the GPU is beneficial for previewing high-resolution footage, while the CPU’s 32 MB L3 cache supports efficient data access.

For 3D rendering, the GPU’s 32 RT cores and 19.66 TFLOPS of FP32 performance provide hardware acceleration for ray-traced renders, while the CPU’s 6 cores handle scene preparation and physics calculations. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 109175 confirms the GPU’s compute strength.

For software development, the CPU’s 12 threads and PassMark data compression score of 289999 support fast code compilation and data processing. The ECC memory support adds reliability for long-running build processes, while the GPU’s Vulkan 1.4 support enables development of graphics applications.

For student and office work, this build is more powerful than necessary, but the CPU’s 83rd percentile and the GPU’s 90th percentile ensure that it will handle any productivity task with ease. The 65 W CPU TDP and 225 W GPU TDP result in a system that is not overly power-hungry, though the GPU’s end-of-life status may be a concern for long-term use.