SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 7400F + Intel Arc A310

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

87 Score

Top 13% Ranking

87 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 13% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

90%

GPU

85%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 5 7400F

32,750 Benchmark Score

Top 10% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A310

7,550 Benchmark Score

Top 15% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 5 7400F and Intel Arc A310 pairing is a desktop build that combines a high-end 2025 processor with an entry-level 2022 graphics card. The data shows a significant performance imbalance, with the CPU ranking in the 83rd percentile against all CPUs while the GPU sits in the 40th percentile against all GPUs, placing the overall combined system in the 62nd percentile. The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact combination, so all frame rate discussions below are estimates derived from the individual component benchmark scores rather than direct game testing.

Gaming Performance

Because the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this combination, the following gaming analysis is framed as an estimate based on the benchmark scores of each component. The Intel Arc A310 produces a PassMark G3D score of 5433, which places it just 0.1% ahead of the AMD Radeon R7 250 and 1% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 in average benchmark scores. This positions the GPU at the very low end of modern gaming hardware, suitable for 1080p gaming at reduced settings rather than high-refresh or high-resolution play.

The Arc A310’s PassMark DirectX 12 score of 29 and DirectX 11 score of 33 indicate that the card handles modern APIs but with modest raw throughput. The FP32 compute rate of 2.688 TFLOPS and the 4 GB GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus with 124.0 GB/s bandwidth suggest that texture-heavy scenes and high-resolution assets will quickly become bottlenecks. At 1080p with medium to low settings, the data implies playable frame rates in less demanding esports titles, but the GPU’s 40th percentile ranking means it will struggle with AAA releases at high presets.

The Ryzen 5 7400F’s strong single-thread performance, evidenced by a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3072, does little to rescue frame rates when the GPU is the limiting factor. At 1440p or 4K, the Arc A310’s 28.00 GPixel/s pixel rate and 56.00 GTexel/s texture rate will further constrain performance, making those resolutions impractical for smooth gaming. The estimated gaming experience is therefore heavily GPU-bound, with the CPU’s capabilities largely idle in most gaming workloads.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data clearly indicates a severe bottleneck imbalance favoring the CPU. The Ryzen 5 7400F’s avgBenchmarkScore of 32750 places it in the 83rd percentile, while the Arc A310’s avgBenchmarkScore of 7550 places it in the 40th percentile — a gap of roughly 43 percentile points. In gaming, where frame rates depend primarily on the GPU, the Arc A310 will be the limiting component in virtually every scenario, with the CPU waiting on the GPU to render frames.

This imbalance is confirmed by the FPS scaling expectations. Since the GPU’s PassMark G3D score of 5433 is comparable to the Radeon R7 250 and GTX 1650, both of which are entry-level or older parts, the data suggests that frame rates will scale poorly with CPU capability. The CPU’s PassMark multi-thread score of 25645 and single-thread score of 3689 indicate it can feed frames far faster than the GPU can render them, meaning CPU utilization will remain low in gaming while GPU utilization hits 100%.

For non-gaming workloads, the bottleneck shifts entirely to the CPU. The GPU’s PassMark GPU compute score of 2157 is minimal, so any compute-heavy task will be CPU-bound. The CPU’s PassMark data compression score of 289999, floating point math score of 45799, and integer math score of 74745 show a processor that excels at multi-threaded productivity, while the GPU contributes little to those workloads. The balance is therefore highly workload-dependent: gaming is GPU-limited, while productivity is CPU-limited, with the GPU often being the weaker link in both cases.

Benchmark Performance

The Ryzen 5 7400F delivers strong benchmark results across the board. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 21765 and single-core score of 3072 show balanced performance for a 6-core, 12-thread processor. The Cinebench R20 results of 9141 multi-core and 1290 single-core reinforce this picture, as does the Cinebench R15 score of 2193 multi-core and 309 single-core. The CPU’s PassMark single-thread score of 3689 and multi-thread score of 25645 place it in the 83rd percentile, with nearest rivals including the Intel Core i5-14600T (0.1% ahead), Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (0.2% ahead), and AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H (0.2% behind).

The Intel Arc A310’s benchmark profile is far more modest. Its Geekbench OpenCL score of 30607 and Vulkan score of 28964 show some compute capability, but the PassMark DirectX scores are low across the board: 31 for DirectX 10, 33 for DirectX 11, 29 for DirectX 12, and 69 for DirectX 9. The PassMark G2D score of 625 is similarly unremarkable. The GPU’s average benchmark score of 7550 places it in the 40th percentile, with the AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100 just 0.4% ahead and the Radeon HD 8850M 1.4% behind.

The combined picture is a system where the CPU operates at a high tier while the GPU operates at a low tier. The CPU’s 83rd percentile rank suggests it can handle demanding multi-threaded applications with ease, while the GPU’s 40th percentile rank limits the system to basic graphical tasks. The combinedPercentile of 62 reflects this mid-range overall positioning, pulled down by the GPU from what the CPU alone would achieve.

Who Should Build It

This pairing targets users who prioritize CPU-heavy workloads over gaming or GPU-accelerated tasks. The Ryzen 5 7400F’s 6 cores and 12 threads, with a base clock of 3.70 GHz and boost clock of 4.70 GHz, make it well-suited for content creators working in code compilation, video encoding, or 3D rendering where multi-threaded CPU performance matters. The CPU’s PassMark data encryption score of 16712 and extended instructions score of 21747 also support developers and security professionals handling encryption-heavy tasks.

For students and small business workstations, the system offers a capable CPU for spreadsheet analysis, document processing, and general productivity, with the Arc A310 providing basic display output and light graphics acceleration. The CPU’s DDR5 memory support with dual-channel bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s ensures fast data access for these workloads. However, gamers at 1080p will find the Arc A310 insufficient for modern titles, and those seeking 1440p or higher gaming should look elsewhere.

The build is not suitable for professionals relying on GPU compute, as the Arc A310’s PassMark GPU compute score of 2157 is minimal. Instead, the target user is someone who needs strong CPU performance for multi-threaded applications and only requires basic graphical output. The system’s 62nd combined percentile suggests it will handle everyday tasks and moderate productivity workloads well, but it is not a gaming or GPU-accelerated workstation.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s core and thread count?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 7400F has 6 cores and 12 threads, based on the Zen 4 architecture with a 5 nm process node.

Q: How much VRAM does the Intel Arc A310 have?

A: The Intel Arc A310 comes with 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, providing 124.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth.

Q: What is the CPU’s average benchmark score and percentile ranking?

A: The Ryzen 5 7400F has an average benchmark score of 32750, placing it in the 83rd percentile against all CPUs.

Q: Does the Arc A310 support ray tracing?

A: The Intel Arc A310 includes 6 RT cores, but its low overall performance means ray tracing workloads will be extremely limited.

Q: What is the GPU’s TDP and suggested power supply?

A: The Arc A310 has a TDP of 30 W, and Intel suggests a 200 W power supply for the system.

Q: What memory type does the Ryzen 5 7400F support?

A: The CPU supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with a maximum bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s.

Q: How does the CPU compare to the Intel Core i5-14600T?

A: The Ryzen 5 7400F is 0.1% ahead of the Intel Core i5-14600T in average benchmark score.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A310 is built on the Xe-HPG architecture with the DG2-128 chip, manufactured on a 6 nm process by TSMC. It contains 768 shading units, 32 TMUs, and 16 ROPs, with a base and boost clock of 1750 MHz. The GPU’s memory configuration of 4 GB GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus delivers 124.0 GB/s of bandwidth, which is modest for modern games but adequate for basic 1080p rendering.

The GPU’s RT hardware consists of 6 RT cores, though the overall FP32 performance of 2.688 TFLOPS limits any ray-traced workloads to minimal settings. The FP16 rate of 5.376 TFLOPS (2:1) provides some compute headroom, but the PassMark GPU compute score of 2157 indicates weak general-purpose compute capability. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 30607 and Vulkan score of 28964 show that the card can handle API-level tasks, but the DirectX scores — 31 for DirectX 10, 33 for DirectX 11, 29 for DirectX 12, and 69 for DirectX 9 — reveal inconsistent performance across legacy and modern APIs.

The GPU’s 40th percentile ranking against all GPUs means it sits below the median, with nearest rivals including the AMD Radeon R7 250 (0.1% behind), AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100 (0.4% behind), NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (1% ahead), and AMD Radeon HD 8850M (1.4% ahead). The texture rate of 56.00 GTexel/s and pixel rate of 28.00 GPixel/s are adequate for low-resolution rendering but will choke at higher settings. The 4 GB VRAM is also a limiting factor, as modern games often exceed this capacity at 1080p with high-resolution textures.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 5 7400F is a 6-core, 12-thread processor from the 7000 series, based on the Zen 4 architecture with the Raphael codename. It operates on the AMD Socket AM5 platform with a base clock of 3.70 GHz and a boost clock of 4.70 GHz, and it has a 65 W TDP. The CPU is fabricated on a 5 nm process by TSMC with 6,570 million transistors on a 71 mm² die, and it supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration with 83.2 GB/s of bandwidth.

The CPU’s cache hierarchy includes 64 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 32 MB of shared L3 cache. It supports ECC memory and has a PCIe Gen 5 interface with 24 lanes from the CPU. The multiplier is unlocked, allowing overclocking, and the CPU has no integrated graphics. The launch MSRP is $229, and it was released on 2025-01-08.

Benchmark results show strong performance: Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 21765 and single-core score of 3072, Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 9141 and single-core score of 1290, and Cinebench R15 multi-core score of 2193 and single-core score of 309. PassMark results include a multi-thread score of 25645, single-thread score of 3689, data compression score of 289999, data encryption score of 16712, floating point math score of 45799, integer math score of 74745, and extended instructions score of 21747.

The CPU’s 83rd percentile ranking places it just 0.1% ahead of the Intel Core i5-14600T and 0.2% ahead of the Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, while trailing the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H by 0.2%. For real workloads, the data shows that the CPU excels in multi-threaded tasks like video rendering, code compilation, and data processing, while its single-thread performance is also strong for everyday applications.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The system is built on the AMD Socket AM5 platform, which supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration with 83.2 GB/s of bandwidth. The CPU supports PCIe Gen 5 with 24 lanes from the CPU, providing a modern I/O foundation for future expansion. The Arc A310 uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface, which is compatible with the platform but leaves performance on the table given the CPU’s Gen 5 capability.

The GPU’s power requirements are minimal, with a 30 W TDP and no power connectors, making it suitable for any PSU. Intel suggests a 200 W power supply for the system, which is very low and leaves ample headroom for upgrades. The CPU’s 65 W TDP is also modest, meaning the platform has significant power budget for a more powerful GPU.

A sensible next upgrade would be replacing the Arc A310 with a higher-tier GPU, as the CPU’s 83rd percentile performance can support far more demanding graphics cards. The DDR5 memory and PCIe Gen 5 support ensure that the platform is future-proof for several years, and the unlocked multiplier allows CPU overclocking for additional performance. The single-slot GPU with 4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0 outputs is easy to remove and replace, making the upgrade path straightforward.

Build Overview

This desktop build combines the AMD Ryzen 5 7400F, a 6-core, 12-thread Zen 4 processor, with the Intel Arc A310, an entry-level Xe-HPG graphics card. The CPU is a high-tier component, ranking in the 83rd percentile against all CPUs, while the GPU is a low-tier component, ranking in the 40th percentile against all GPUs. The combined system percentile is 62, reflecting the significant gap between the two components.

The CPU’s average benchmark score of 32750 is nearly four times the GPU’s average benchmark score of 7550, making the system heavily CPU-centric. The build is best suited for productivity workloads that benefit from multi-threaded CPU performance, such as content creation, software development, and data processing, where the GPU’s limited capabilities are less relevant. For gaming, the system is limited to 1080p at low to medium settings, with the GPU acting as the primary bottleneck.

The platform’s AM5 socket, DDR5 memory support, and PCIe Gen 5 connectivity provide a solid foundation for future upgrades, particularly a GPU upgrade to balance the system. The low power requirements of both components — 65 W TDP for the CPU and 30 W TDP for the GPU — make this an energy-efficient build, with a suggested PSU of 200 W. Overall, this is a processor-first system where the GPU serves as a placeholder for basic display output rather than a serious gaming or compute solution.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 7400F + Intel Arc A310

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 5 7400F

Intel Arc A310

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Gaming Performance

Balance and Bottleneck

Benchmark Performance

Who Should Build It

FAQ

GPU Analysis

CPU Analysis

Upgrade Path and Platform

Build Overview

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds