SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 7400F + AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

89 Score

Top 11% Ranking

89 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 11% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

90%

GPU

88%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 5 7400F

32,750 Benchmark Score

Top 10% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT

13,745 Benchmark Score

Top 12% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 5 7400F and AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT form a desktop pairing that targets high-refresh 1080p and 1440p gaming, backed by a solid six-core CPU and a high-end GPU with substantial memory resources. The build’s combined percentile of 69 places it above the majority of tested configurations, though the data reveals a notable imbalance between the processor’s mid-range standing and the graphics card’s raw output. This analysis draws exclusively on the provided benchmark results, frame rates, and specification data to characterize the pairing’s strengths and limitations across different workloads.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 5 7400F is a 6-core, 12-thread processor built on the Zen 4 architecture, codenamed Raphael, and manufactured on a 5 nm process at TSMC. It operates on the AMD Socket AM5 platform with a base clock of 3.70 GHz and a boost clock of 4.70 GHz, drawing a 65 W TDP. The chip includes 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 32 MB L3 cache. Memory support is limited to DDR5, configured dual-channel, providing 83.2 GB/s of bandwidth, and the CPU supports ECC memory. It also offers PCIe Gen 5 with 24 lanes from the CPU, and the multiplier is unlocked for overclocking.

Benchmark results show a processor that is competitive in its class but not dominant. In Cinebench R23, the CPU scores 21,765 in multi-core and 3,072 in single-core. The multi-core figure suggests strong sustained performance for threaded workloads, while the single-core score indicates solid per-thread capability for everyday responsiveness. PassMark results reinforce this picture: a multithread score of 25,645 and a single-thread score of 3,689. The CPU’s percentile vs all CPUs is 83, meaning it outperforms 83% of tested processors overall.

Compared to its nearest rivals, the 7400F is essentially tied with several other mid-range parts. It sits just 0.1% above the Intel Core i5-14600T and 0.2% above the Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, while being 0.2% below the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H and 0.3% above the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360. These deltas are negligible, indicating that the 7400F’s average benchmark score of 32,750 is statistically indistinguishable from those competitors. For real workloads, this means the CPU will not be a differentiator in most tasks—it will handle similar loads at similar speeds as these alternatives.

In specific compute tasks, the 7400F shows varied performance. PassMark data compression scores 289,999, which is a very high number for that test, suggesting strong performance in file archiving and data-heavy operations. Data encryption scores 16,712, and extended instructions score 21,747. Floating-point math scores 45,799, while integer math scores 74,745. The physics test scores 1,660, and random string sorting scores 35,096. These numbers indicate a balanced processor that can handle both integer and floating-point work without a significant weakness, though it is not a top-tier performer in any single category.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming at 1080p, the CPU’s single-thread score of 3,072 in Cinebench R23 supports frame rates well above 144 Hz in many titles, as evidenced by measured results like 274 FPS in Counter-Strike 2 and 325 FPS in Tom Clancy’s Rainbow Six Siege at that resolution. The GPU is not the bottleneck at this setting for esports titles, allowing the CPU’s per-core strength to drive high frame rates.

Streaming while gaming benefits from the 12 threads, which handle encoding and game logic concurrently. The multi-thread score of 21,765 in Cinebench R23 indicates enough headroom for background tasks, though the 6-core layout is not as robust as higher-core-count alternatives. Measured frame rates in demanding titles at 1080p, such as 81 FPS in Cyberpunk 2077, suggest that streaming overhead could push the CPU closer to its limits in mixed workloads.

Video editing relies on both multi-core and single-core performance. The multi-core score of 21,765 in Cinebench R23 is respectable for a 6-core part, allowing for reasonable export times in consumer editing software. The single-core score of 3,072 ensures smooth timeline scrubbing and effects previews. However, the 32 MB L3 cache and 83.2 GB/s memory bandwidth may limit performance in very large projects versus higher-end CPUs.

3D rendering is heavily multi-threaded, and the 7400F’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 21,765 places it in a capable range for occasional renders. The PassMark floating-point math score of 45,799 further indicates solid geometry and physics calculations. For professional users who render daily, a higher-core-count CPU would be preferable, but for hobbyist or part-time rendering, this chip delivers adequate speed.

Software development involves compilation, which is multi-threaded, and code editing, which is single-threaded. The integer math score of 74,745 in PassMark suggests strong performance in logic-heavy tasks, while the single-thread score of 3,689 ensures a responsive IDE. The 12 threads handle parallel builds efficiently, making this a viable CPU for developers who do not require extreme core counts.

Student and office work is well-served by this CPU. The single-thread score of 3,072 in Cinebench R23 ensures snappy application launches and document editing, while the 65 W TDP keeps power consumption modest for all-day use. The ECC memory support adds reliability for data-sensitive academic work, and the 83.2 GB/s memory bandwidth handles typical multitasking with multiple browser tabs and office suites without strain.

Gaming Performance

The measured frame rates (dataIsMeasured is true) come from ultra settings across a wide range of games, showing a clear pattern of performance scaling with resolution. At 1920x1080, the pairing delivers high frame rates in most titles: 274 FPS in Counter-Strike 2, 270 FPS in Minecraft, 236 FPS in Inside, and 227 FPS in Dave The Diver. More demanding games still hold up, with 143 FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone, 114 FPS in Control, and 81 FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. The weakest 1080p result is 40 FPS in Ark: Survival Ascended, which is an outlier for this resolution.

At 2560x1440, frame rates drop but remain playable for competitive and most single-player titles. Counter-Strike 2 runs at 181 FPS, Valorant at 437 FPS (a notable anomaly as it is higher than 1080p results), and Call of Duty: Warzone at 127 FPS. Cyberpunk 2077 drops to 60 FPS, which is the threshold for smooth gameplay on many displays. Ark: Survival Ascended falls to 25 FPS, indicating that this game is particularly demanding on the GPU at this resolution.

At 3840x2160, the GPU becomes the primary limiter, with frame rates dropping significantly. Counter-Strike 2 runs at 101 FPS, Call of Duty: Warzone at 108 FPS, and Cyberpunk 2077 at 40 FPS. Valorant still achieves 406 FPS, which is unusually high and suggests a game that is not GPU-bound. Many titles fall below 60 FPS at 4K, including Ark: Survival Ascended at 13 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 at 36 FPS, and The Medium at 38 FPS. The average FPS across all games is 169.1, but this is heavily skewed by esports titles and does not reflect the 4K experience.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data shows a clear imbalance between the CPU and GPU in this pairing. The CPU’s percentile vs all CPUs is 83, while the GPU’s percentile vs all GPUs is 55. This means the CPU is better positioned relative to its peers than the GPU, yet the GPU is the more powerful component in absolute terms for gaming. The bottleneck shifts depending on the workload and resolution.

At 1080p, the CPU often limits frame rates in lighter titles. For example, Counter-Strike 2 runs at 274 FPS, which is high but could be higher with a stronger CPU. The GPU is not fully utilized at this resolution, as evidenced by the fact that many games exceed 200 FPS, indicating the CPU is the constraint. In contrast, at 4K, the GPU is clearly the limiting factor, with frame rates dropping to levels that are far below the CPU’s capability. The 13 FPS result in Ark: Survival Ascended at 4K is purely GPU-bound, as the CPU is not the issue at that frame rate.

The pairRankByFps data places this build at rank 758 out of 3,732 pairs, which is in the top 20% of all tested combinations. This suggests that despite the GPU’s lower percentile, the overall gaming performance is strong, particularly at 1080p and 1440p. The bottleneck is most pronounced at 4K, where the GPU’s 20 GB VRAM and 800 GB/s bandwidth are insufficient for ultra settings in the most demanding titles, as shown by sub-60 FPS results in several games.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 32,750, with a percentile of 83. Its best results include a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 21,765 and a single-core score of 3,072. PassMark multithread score is 25,645, and single-thread is 3,689. These place the CPU in the upper quartile of all processors, making it a strong mid-range choice.

The GPU’s average benchmark score is 13,745, with a percentile of 55. Its best results include a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 5,623, a Geekbench Vulkan score of 71,068, and a Geekbench OpenCL score of 12,756. PassMark G3D score is 29,009, and GPU Compute is 16,828. The GPU’s percentile is just above the median, which is surprising for a card with 20 GB VRAM, but the nearestRivals data shows it is closely matched with much lower-tier parts. The RX 7900 XT is 0.5% below the AMD Radeon 660M and NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile, 0.9% below the AMD Radeon RX 570X, and 1.5% above the AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT. This suggests the benchmark scores are not reflective of the GPU’s gaming performance, which is much stronger than its percentile indicates.

The combined percentile of 69 reflects the pairing’s overall capability, but it is dragged down by the GPU’s lower benchmark scores. In practice, the measured FPS data shows the build is capable of high frame rates at 1080p and 1440p, making the benchmark percentile a misleading indicator of real-world gaming performance. The combined picture is a CPU that is a solid performer and a GPU that outperforms its benchmark standing in actual games.

Who Should Build It

This build targets gamers who prioritize high-refresh 1080p or 1440p play. The measured frame rates show that most esports titles exceed 200 FPS at 1080p, and many AAA games stay above 60 FPS at 1440p. For example, Call of Duty: Warzone runs at 127 FPS at 1440p, and Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 60 FPS. Gamers with 144 Hz or 165 Hz monitors at 1440p will find this pairing sufficient for most titles, though 4K gaming is not recommended due to sub-60 FPS results in demanding games.

Content creators who work with video editing or 3D rendering will find the CPU’s multi-thread performance adequate for occasional projects, but the GPU’s compute benchmarks are not exceptional. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 12,756 and PassMark GPU Compute of 16,828 suggest that GPU-accelerated rendering will be functional but not class-leading. Developers will appreciate the CPU’s integer math score of 74,745 and the 12 threads for compilation, while the ECC memory support adds stability for long-running builds.

Students and small business workstations will benefit from the CPU’s single-thread speed and low 65 W TDP, which keeps systems quiet and cool. The 20 GB VRAM is overkill for office work but provides future-proofing for any GPU-accelerated tasks. However, the GPU’s 300 W TDP and dual-slot design require a substantial power supply and case, which may not suit compact or budget-oriented builds.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT is based on the Navi 31 chip with RDNA 3.0 architecture, manufactured on a 5 nm process. It has 5,376 shading units, 336 TMUs, and 192 ROPs, along with 84 ray tracing cores. The GPU runs at a base clock of 1387 MHz, a boost clock of 2394 MHz, and a game clock of 2025 MHz. Memory consists of 20 GB of GDDR6 on a 320-bit bus, providing 800.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The card is rated at 300 W TDP, requires dual 8-pin power connectors, and has a suggested PSU of 700 W.

The GPU’s raw compute capabilities are substantial: FP32 performance is 51.48 TFLOPS, and FP16 is 103.0 TFLOPS (2:1). Pixel rate is 459.6 GPixel/s, and texture rate is 804.4 GTexel/s. These numbers indicate strong rasterization performance, which aligns with the measured frame rates in most games. However, the ray tracing performance is not directly benchmarked in the provided data, but with 84 RT cores, it is present but not necessarily class-leading.

The benchmark scores tell a conflicting story. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 5,623 is a modern test that reflects real-world gaming, while the PassMark G3D score of 29,009 is more variable. The Geekbench Vulkan score of 71,068 is very high, suggesting excellent driver-level performance in that API. However, the GPU’s percentile of 55 is low, and it is closely matched with integrated graphics like the AMD Radeon 660M in average benchmark score. This is likely due to the specific test suite weighting, but the measured gaming FPS shows the GPU is far more capable than its percentile suggests.

For rendering, the FP32 and FP16 performance are strong for compute workloads, but the lack of tensor cores (the field is null) means AI-accelerated tasks will rely on standard compute paths. The 20 GB VRAM is ample for large textures and complex scenes, and the 800 GB/s bandwidth prevents memory bottlenecks in most games. The card’s end-of-life production status indicates it is being phased out, but its performance remains relevant.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s multi-core performance in Cinebench R23?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 7400F scores 21,765 in Cinebench R23 multi-core, which is a solid result for a 6-core processor.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The CPU’s average benchmark score of 32,750 is 0.1% above the Intel Core i5-14600T and 0.2% below the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H, indicating essentially tied performance.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory configuration?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT has 20 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 320-bit bus, providing 800.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: What frame rate can I expect in Cyberpunk 2077 at 1440p?

A: At 1440p ultra settings, Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 60 FPS, which is the minimum for smooth gameplay.

Q: Is this build suitable for 4K gaming?

A: No, at 3840x2160, many demanding games fall below 60 FPS, including Cyberpunk 2077 at 40 FPS and Red Dead Redemption 2 at 36 FPS.

Q: What is the GPU’s percentile ranking?

A: The GPU’s percentile vs all GPUs is 55, placing it just above the median in benchmark scores, though its gaming performance is stronger than this indicates.

Q: What is the combined percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 69, meaning it outperforms 69% of all tested CPU+GPU combinations.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build combining the AMD Ryzen 5 7400F, a 6-core Zen 4 processor, with the AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT, a high-end RDNA 3.0 GPU. The CPU is a mid-range part that competes closely with several Intel and AMD alternatives, while the GPU is a powerful card with 20 GB VRAM that excels in gaming despite a modest benchmark percentile. The overall tier, based on the combined percentile of 69, places this build in the upper third of all tested systems. The performance profile is best suited for 1080p and 1440p gaming, where it delivers high frame rates in most titles, but 4K gaming is limited by the GPU’s performance in demanding games. The CPU’s 65 W TDP and the GPU’s 300 W TDP make this a balanced power draw for a desktop system.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 7400F + AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 5 7400F

AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

Valorant

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

Valorant

Minecraft

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Usage Scenarios

Gaming Performance

Balance and Bottleneck

Benchmark Performance

Who Should Build It

GPU Analysis

FAQ

Build Overview

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds