SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 7400 + AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

91 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
93%
VS
GPU
88%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 5 7400

42,055 Benchmark Score
Top 7% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT

13,745 Benchmark Score
Top 12% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 5 7400 and AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT form a desktop pairing that is remarkably balanced at the CPU level but presents a stark contrast in GPU tiering. The Ryzen 5 7400 sits in the 88th percentile of all CPUs, delivering performance nearly identical to the Intel Core i9-12900K, while the RX 7900 XT, despite its high-end specifications, lands in just the 55th percentile of all GPUs. This creates a system where the processor is unlikely to bottleneck the graphics card in most scenarios, though the GPU’s benchmark percentile suggests its real-world standing is more modest than its specifications imply.

The combined percentile for this pairing is 72, positioning it as a solid upper-midrange desktop build rather than a top-tier enthusiast configuration. The data shows a system where the CPU’s strength relative to its peers outweighs the GPU’s standing, meaning workloads that depend heavily on processor performance will see the most benefit from this combination.

Balance and Bottleneck

Benchmark results indicate a system where the CPU is the dominant component in terms of relative performance. The Ryzen 5 7400 achieves an average benchmark score of 42055, placing it in the 88th percentile of all CPUs. This score is within 0.7% of the Intel Core i9-12900K (which scores 42335) and only 0.2% behind the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS (41963). In practical terms, this means the processor is capable of handling the most demanding multi-threaded workloads without becoming a constraint.

The RX 7900 XT, by contrast, has an average benchmark score of 13745 and sits in the 55th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon RX 570X (13871, -0.9%), the NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile (13821, -0.5%), and the AMD Radeon 660M (13812, -0.5%). This is a surprising result for a card with 20 GB of VRAM and 800.0 GB/s of bandwidth, but the data is clear: the GPU’s benchmark average places it in the middle of the pack, not the top.

For gaming at 1080p, the CPU’s single-thread score of 3248 is strong, and the data suggests the processor will not limit frame rates in most titles. The multi-thread score of 21712 further indicates headroom for background tasks while gaming. However, because no measured FPS data exists for this exact combination, the balance assessment must rely on these benchmark scores. The CPU’s 88th percentile ranking versus the GPU’s 55th percentile suggests that in CPU-light, GPU-heavy games, the RX 7900 XT will be the limiting factor. Conversely, in strategy or simulation games that stress processor threads, the Ryzen 5 7400 will hold up its end of the pairing.

The floating-point math score of 40784 and integer math score of 64733 show a processor that excels at sustained computational loads, which is beneficial for physics calculations in games. The data compression score of 261749 is exceptional, indicating that the CPU can handle asset streaming and decompression without causing hitches. The bottleneck profile, therefore, is workload-dependent: the GPU constrains raw graphical throughput, while the CPU provides ample headroom for logic and simulation.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Ryzen 5 7400 uses the AMD Socket AM5 platform, which is a modern desktop standard. The CPU natively supports DDR5 memory with a dual-channel bus, offering a memory bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s. It also supports ECC memory, a feature that benefits workstation-class reliability. The platform provides PCIe Gen 5 with 24 lanes from the CPU, which is future-proof for high-speed storage and expansion cards.

The integrated Radeon Graphics on the CPU provide a fallback display output, which is useful for troubleshooting or basic tasks without the discrete GPU installed. The CPU’s 65 W TDP is modest, meaning power delivery is rarely a concern. The RX 7900 XT, however, has a 300 W TDP, and the suggested PSU for the system is 700 W. The GPU requires two 8-pin power connectors and occupies a dual-slot width, measuring 276 mm in length, 110 mm in height, and 51 mm in width.

A sensible next upgrade for this platform would be a higher-core-count Ryzen 7000-series CPU, as the AM5 socket supports the entire generation. The DDR5 memory support and PCIe Gen 5 lanes mean storage and memory upgrades are viable without changing the motherboard. The GPU, while end-of-life in production status, can be replaced with a newer RDNA 4 card when available, though the current RX 7900 XT still offers 20 GB of VRAM, which is substantial for high-resolution textures.

The power delivery for the CPU is low enough that a standard air cooler is sufficient, leaving the 700 W PSU headroom primarily for the GPU. The PCIe 4.0 x16 interface on the GPU is backward compatible with the CPU’s PCIe Gen 5 lanes, ensuring no bandwidth bottleneck. For users considering a future upgrade, the platform’s longevity is a key strength, with the 5 nm process node and 6,570 million transistors on the CPU indicating a modern design that will remain relevant for several years.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 5 7400 is a 6-core, 12-thread processor based on the Zen 4 architecture, codenamed Raphael. It operates at a base clock of 3.30 GHz and boosts up to 4.30 GHz, with a 65 W TDP. The processor is built on a 5 nm process at TSMC, with 6,570 million transistors on a 71 mm² die. The cache hierarchy includes 64 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of shared L3 cache.

The benchmark scores paint a clear picture of a strong mid-range CPU. The single-thread score of 3248 is competitive with top desktop processors, and the multi-thread score of 21712 reflects the efficiency of the 12 threads. The data compression score of 261749 is a standout, indicating excellent performance in file archiving and decompression tasks. The encryption score of 14865 shows the CPU can handle secure data processing without significant slowdown.

The extended instructions score of 19924 and the prime number finding score of 79 are lower than some rivals, but these are niche workloads. The floating-point math score of 40784 and integer math score of 64733 are strong, making the CPU well-suited for scientific computing and financial modeling. The physics score of 1150 suggests adequate performance for game physics simulations, while the random string sorting score of 31110 indicates good data organization capabilities.

Compared to its nearest rivals, the Ryzen 5 7400 is virtually tied with the Intel Core i7-14700T (0.3% faster) and the Intel Core i7-12850HX (0.7% faster). It is 0.7% slower than the Intel Core i9-12900K, which is a remarkable result for a 6-core part against a 16-core processor. This indicates that the Zen 4 architecture’s IPC (instructions per clock) is exceptional, and the CPU’s performance per core is among the best available.

The multiplier is unlocked, allowing overclocking, and the production status is active, meaning it is a current product. The release date of September 2025 positions it as a new addition to the market. For real workloads, this means content creators will see fast rendering times, developers will experience quick compilation, and gamers will enjoy high minimum frame rates in CPU-bound titles.

Who Should Build It

This pairing targets users who prioritize CPU performance over raw GPU throughput. Gamers playing at 1080p or 1440p will find the Ryzen 5 7400 more than capable, as its single-thread score of 3248 ensures high frame rates in esports titles. The 88th percentile CPU ranking means the processor will not be the bottleneck in most games, even with the RX 7900 XT’s modest GPU percentile.

Content creators who work with video editing, 3D rendering, or software compilation will benefit from the CPU’s strong multi-thread score of 21712. The data compression score of 261749 is particularly useful for video encoding workflows that involve heavy file I/O. Developers will appreciate the 12 threads for parallel builds, and the ECC memory support adds reliability for long-running server or workstation tasks.

Students and small business users will find this build suitable for multitasking, with the CPU handling multiple applications simultaneously without strain. The integrated Radeon Graphics provide a backup display option, and the 65 W TDP keeps power consumption low during everyday tasks. The RX 7900 XT’s 20 GB VRAM is overkill for office work but provides headroom for future software demands.

For users who play at 4K resolution, the GPU’s 55th percentile may be a limitation, but the CPU’s performance ensures that frame pacing remains stable. The system is not ideal for users seeking maximum graphics fidelity, as the GPU’s benchmark scores lag behind its specifications. However, for a balanced desktop that excels at processor-intensive tasks and handles modern games at high settings, this pairing is well-suited.

The 72nd combined percentile indicates a system that outperforms the majority of desktop builds, making it a good choice for enthusiasts who want a strong CPU without sacrificing too much GPU capability. The end-of-life status of the GPU suggests that buyers should consider future availability, but the CPU’s active production status ensures long-term support.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT is based on the RDNA 3.0 architecture, with the Navi 31 chip codenamed Plum Bonito. It is built on a 5 nm process at TSMC, with 57,700 million transistors on a 529 mm² die. The GPU features 5,376 shading units, 336 texture mapping units, and 192 raster operation units, along with 84 ray tracing cores. The transistor density is 109.1 million per mm².

The memory subsystem is substantial: 20 GB of GDDR6 on a 320-bit bus, providing 800.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The memory clock is 2500 MHz, with 20 Gbps effective speed. The GPU’s base clock is 1387 MHz, with a boost clock of 2394 MHz and a game clock of 2025 MHz. The pixel rate is 459.6 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 804.4 GTexel/s. The FP32 performance is 51.48 TFLOPS, with FP16 at 103.0 TFLOPS (2:1).

The benchmark scores for the GPU are surprisingly modest given these specifications. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 5623, which is a modern test, while the PassMark G3D score is 29009. The Geekbench OpenCL score is 12756, and the Vulkan score is 71068. The PassMark GPU compute score is 16828, indicating strong compute performance for non-graphics tasks.

However, the average benchmark score of 13745 places the GPU in the 55th percentile, which is below expectations for a card with this hardware. Its nearest rival, the AMD Radeon 660M, is an integrated GPU, yet the RX 7900 XT only outperforms it by 0.5%. The NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile is also within 0.5% of the RX 7900 XT’s score, despite being a mobile workstation card. The data suggests that the RX 7900 XT’s benchmark results are heavily influenced by driver optimizations or specific test scenarios that do not favor its architecture.

For rendering tasks, the 20 GB of VRAM is a significant advantage, allowing large textures and complex scenes to be loaded without swapping. The ray tracing cores (84 of them) provide hardware acceleration for RT workloads, though the benchmark scores do not isolate this capability. The 800.0 GB/s bandwidth is ample for high-resolution texture streaming, and the 51.48 TFLOPS FP32 performance is sufficient for compute-heavy applications like machine learning inference.

The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with modern APIs. Display outputs include 1x HDMI 2.1a, 2x DisplayPort 2.1, and 1x USB Type-C, offering flexible monitor connectivity. The power draw is 300 W, requiring a 700 W PSU, and the dual-slot design with two 8-pin connectors is standard for high-end cards.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination — the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data. Therefore, all frame rate expectations below are estimated from the benchmark scores and should be treated as qualitative guidance rather than precise figures.

The CPU’s single-thread score of 3248 indicates that the Ryzen 5 7400 will not limit frame rates in most games, even those that are poorly optimized for multi-threading. The GPU’s PassMark G3D score of 29009, while modest for its class, still places it above the majority of GPUs. In 1080p gaming, the combination should deliver high frame rates in esports titles, with the CPU ensuring consistent minimums.

At 1440p, the GPU’s 20 GB VRAM and 800.0 GB/s bandwidth will handle high-resolution textures, but the 55th percentile GPU score suggests that maximum settings may require adjustments in demanding titles. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 5623 indicates the GPU can handle modern DirectX 12 workloads, but its performance relative to peers is average.

For 4K gaming, the RX 7900 XT’s 51.48 TFLOPS FP32 performance is theoretically sufficient, but the benchmark data does not support a confident recommendation for ultra settings at this resolution. The CPU’s strong physics score of 1150 will help maintain frame pacing in complex scenes, but the GPU is likely the limiting factor. Users should expect playable frame rates at high (not ultra) settings for 4K, with the 20 GB VRAM providing future-proofing for upcoming titles.

Ray tracing performance is supported by the 84 RT cores, but without measured FPS data, it is uncertain how this translates to real-world results. The Vulkan score of 71068 suggests good API efficiency, which may benefit games that use Vulkan. Overall, the gaming performance is estimated to be solid for 1080p and 1440p, with 4K requiring some compromises.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s performance percentile relative to all CPUs?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 7400 is in the 88th percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 42055.

Q: How does the GPU compare to its nearest rival, the AMD Radeon RX 570X?

A: The RX 7900 XT has an average score of 13745, which is 0.9% lower than the RX 570X’s 13871.

Q: What memory type and bandwidth does the CPU support?

A: The CPU supports DDR5 memory with a dual-channel bus, providing a memory bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory size and bus width?

A: The GPU has 20 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 320-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 800.0 GB/s.

Q: Is the CPU multiplier unlocked for overclocking?

A: Yes, the multiplier is unlocked, and the CPU has a 65 W TDP.

Q: What is the combined percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 72, indicating above-average performance among desktop builds.

Q: What is the GPU’s production status and launch MSRP?

A: The GPU is end-of-life in production status, with a launch MSRP of 899 USD.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build pairing the AMD Ryzen 5 7400 (7000 series, Zen 4 Raphael) with the AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT (Radeon RX 7000 series, RDNA 3.0 Navi 31). The CPU is an active, current product, while the GPU is end-of-life. The pairing falls into the desktop class, with a combined percentile of 72.

The CPU’s 88th percentile ranking makes it a standout component, delivering performance comparable to the Intel Core i9-12900K despite having only 6 cores. The GPU’s 55th percentile ranking is less impressive, but its 20 GB of VRAM and 800.0 GB/s bandwidth provide a solid foundation for high-resolution workloads. Overall, this build is a CPU-centric configuration where the processor is the star, and the GPU provides adequate, though not exceptional, graphical performance.

The system is best described as a balanced desktop for productivity and gaming at 1080p/1440p, with the CPU handling heavy computations and the GPU managing modern games. The 5 nm process nodes for both components indicate a modern, power-efficient design, with the CPU at 65 W and the GPU at 300 W. The AM5 platform offers a clear upgrade path, and the 700 W suggested PSU provides adequate headroom.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 42055, placing it in the 88th percentile of all CPUs. Its single-thread score is 3248, and its multi-thread score is 21712. The GPU’s average benchmark score is 13745, placing it in the 55th percentile of all GPUs. Its PassMark G3D score is 29009, and its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 5623.

The combined picture shows a CPU that outperforms its peers by a significant margin, while the GPU sits near the middle of the pack. The CPU is 0.7% slower than the Intel Core i9-12900K (42335) and 0.2% faster than the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS (41963). The GPU is 1.5% faster than the AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT (13543) but 0.9% slower than the AMD Radeon RX 570X (13871).

The combined percentile of 72 reflects a system where the CPU’s strength boosts the overall build, even though the GPU’s benchmark performance is below what its specifications might suggest. For users who prioritize processor performance in their workloads, this pairing delivers exceptional value in terms of raw compute, while the GPU ensures compatibility with modern graphics APIs and provides ample VRAM for large datasets. The benchmark data confirms that the CPU is the primary driver of this system’s performance, with the GPU serving as a capable but not class-leading companion.