SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 7235HS + Intel Arc A550M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

89 Score

Top 11% Ranking

89 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 11% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

82%

GPU

96%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 5 7235HS

16,902 Benchmark Score

Top 18% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A550M

49,737 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 5 7235HS and Intel Arc A550M pairing represents a mid-range mobile configuration designed for a balance of CPU-heavy productivity and GPU-accelerated rendering. This analysis is based entirely on synthetic benchmark data, as no measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination. All performance discussions regarding gaming frame rates are therefore estimated from the component scores and their relative positions against known rivals.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 5 7235HS is a 4-core, 8-thread processor built on the Zen 3+ architecture, codenamed Rembrandt-R. It operates within the 7000 series family and is manufactured on TSMC's 6 nm process node, with a die size of 210 mm². The base clock is 3.20 GHz, boosting up to 4.20 GHz under load, all within a 45 W TDP envelope. The cache hierarchy consists of 64 KB of L1 per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and a shared 8 MB L3 pool.

Benchmark results show a processor that is competent in single-threaded tasks but surprisingly competitive in multi-threaded workloads given its modest core count. In Cinebench R23, it scores 10418 points in multi-core and 1470 in single-core. The single-core score of 1470 places it in a strong position for everyday responsiveness and lightly-threaded applications. The multi-core score of 10418 is notable because it rivals processors with more physical cores, suggesting efficient use of its 8 threads. PassMark results reinforce this: the multithread score is 12243, while single-thread sits at 2873. The integer math score of 40174 and floating-point math of 23091 indicate solid arithmetic throughput for general computing.

The CPU's percentile ranking against all CPUs is 70, meaning it outperforms 70% of the database's tracked processors. Its average benchmark score is 16902. The nearest rivals provide context: it sits 0.2% behind the AMD EPYC 7702 (avg score 16932), 0.3% ahead of the Intel Core i3-12100E (16853), 0.3% behind the Intel Core i5-1240U (16957), and 0.4% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 3 7335U (16827). These deltas are all within a fraction of a percent, indicating that the 7235HS performs essentially on par with a server-class EPYC part from an older generation and a modern desktop i3, which is a strong showing for a 45 W mobile chip.

For real workloads, the Cinebench R15 scores of 1050 multi-core and 148 single-core suggest that the CPU can handle video transcoding and compilation tasks with reasonable speed. PassMark data compression (152168) and encryption (9051) scores indicate it can manage file archiving and secure data operations without significant bottlenecks. The extended instructions score of 10887 points to capable AVX/SSE performance, useful for scientific computing and media encoding. The find prime numbers score of 31 is low, which is typical for a chip with only 4 physical cores, but this is a niche workload. Overall, the CPU is best described as a balanced mobile processor that excels in efficiency rather than raw core-count scaling.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between the Ryzen 5 7235HS and the Intel Arc A550M is defined by the CPU's 45 W TDP and the GPU's 60 W TDP. This is a laptop-class pairing where thermal and power constraints are shared. The CPU's percentile of 70 and the GPU's percentile of 86 indicate that the graphics solution is the stronger component relative to its own market. In synthetic benchmarks, the GPU's average score is 49737, while the CPU's average is 16902. The GPU outperforms the CPU by a significant margin in raw compute, which is expected given their different roles.

Bottleneck analysis based on scores suggests that the CPU will be the limiting factor in GPU-bound scenarios. The GPU's Geekbench OpenCL score of 49894 and Vulkan score of 49580 are high enough to drive modern game engines at high settings, but the CPU's 4 cores and 8 threads may struggle to feed the GPU in CPU-intensive titles. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 10418, while respectable, is not exceptional for high-refresh-rate gaming where frame times depend on single-core performance (1470 in R23 single-core). In lighter workloads like office productivity or web browsing, the CPU is more than sufficient, and the GPU remains mostly idle.

The data shows no measured FPS scaling, so precise bottleneck percentages cannot be calculated. However, the delta between the CPU's 70th percentile and the GPU's 86th percentile implies that in most gaming scenarios, the CPU will reach its limits before the GPU does. For 3D rendering, the GPU's FP32 throughput of 8.397 TFLOPS will dominate, but the CPU's PassMark multithread score of 12243 ensures that scene preparation and physics calculations proceed without stalling. In data encryption and compression, the CPU carries the load, and the GPU is irrelevant. The balance is therefore workload-dependent: GPU-heavy for rendering and gaming, CPU-heavy for compression and general multitasking.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The Intel Arc A550M's 8 GB of GDDR6 memory and 224.0 GB/s bandwidth support smooth 1080p gameplay at high settings, but the CPU's single-core score of 1470 in Cinebench R23 may cap frame rates in esports titles. Estimated FPS is not measured, but the GPU's 86th percentile ranking suggests it can handle 144 Hz in less demanding games, while the CPU might limit 1% lows in simulation-heavy titles.

Streaming: The CPU's 8 threads are adequate for software encoding at 720p or 1080p, but the Radeon 660M integrated graphics and the Arc A550M's fixed-function encoders could offload this task. The PassMark multithread score of 12243 indicates that simultaneous gaming and encoding will be tight, with the GPU's Vulkan score of 49580 suggesting it can handle hardware encoding without major CPU interference.

Video editing: The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 10418 and PassMark floating-point score of 23091 provide smooth timeline scrubbing and effect application. The GPU's OpenCL score of 49894 accelerates rendering exports, with the 8 GB VRAM handling 4K timelines. The combination is capable of light-to-moderate 4K editing, though longer exports will benefit from the GPU's 16.79 TFLOPS FP16 performance.

3D rendering: The GPU's 8.397 TFLOPS FP32 and 16 ray tracing cores make it suitable for real-time viewport rendering and final-frame GPU renders. The CPU's 4 cores are a bottleneck for CPU-based renderers like V-Ray, where the 10418 R23 score means longer render times compared to 8-core parts. For Blender Cycles, the GPU will dominate, and the CPU's role is reduced to scene preparation.

Software development: The CPU's PassMark integer math score of 40174 and data compression score of 152168 indicate brisk code compilation and package management. The 8 MB L3 cache and dual-channel DDR5 memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s support multi-threaded builds. The GPU is largely unused here, but its 86th percentile ranking means it can handle UI acceleration and occasional GPU compute for machine learning tasks.

Student and office work: The 7235HS's single-core performance (2873 in PassMark) ensures snappy spreadsheet and document handling. The GPU's 8 GB VRAM is overkill for office tasks, but the low 60 W TDP means the laptop remains cool and quiet. The CPU's 45 W TDP and 6 nm process node contribute to excellent battery life in light workloads, with the Radeon 660M iGPU available for power-saving modes.

Who Should Build It

This pairing targets users who need a single laptop for both productivity and creative work without extreme high-end demands. Gamers playing at 1080p with high refresh rates will benefit from the GPU's 86th percentile performance, which rivals the AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT (deltaPct -2.4%) and RX 6800 XT (deltaPct +2.6%) in synthetic scores, though those are desktop parts. Content creators working with 1080p or entry-level 4K video will find the GPU's 8 GB VRAM and 224.0 GB/s bandwidth sufficient for editing and rendering, while the CPU's 8 threads handle multitasking.

Students in engineering or computer science programs will appreciate the CPU's 70th percentile ranking for compilation and simulation tasks, with the GPU available for CUDA-like compute via Vulkan. Small business workstations requiring data encryption (PassMark encryption 9051) and compression (152168) will see responsive performance. The build is not ideal for professional 8K video editing or massive 3D scenes, where the CPU's 4 cores would become a clear limitation. The lack of a launch MSRP means pricing is not part of this analysis, but the component class suggests a mid-range laptop.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A550M is based on the DG2-512 chip using the Xe-HPG architecture, part of the Alchemist generation for mobile. It is fabricated on TSMC's 6 nm process with 21,700 million transistors on a 406 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 53.4M per mm². The GPU operates at a base clock of 900 MHz and boosts to 2050 MHz, with memory running at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective). It features 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing 224.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

The compute configuration includes 2048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, and 64 raster output pipelines. It has 16 ray tracing cores, though tensor cores are not specified. The pixel rate is 131.2 GPixel/s and the texture rate is 262.4 GTexel/s. FP32 performance is rated at 8.397 TFLOPS, with FP16 at 16.79 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio). The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, making it fully modern for gaming APIs.

Benchmark results show a Geekbench OpenCL score of 49894 and a Vulkan score of 49580, with an average of 49737. The GPU's percentile against all GPUs is 86, meaning it outperforms 86% of tracked graphics solutions. Its nearest rivals are the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti (avg 49957, deltaPct -0.4%), AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 (50001, -0.5%), AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT (50951, -2.4%), and AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT (48477, +2.6%). These deltas show the A550M sits within 2.6% of high-end desktop GPUs from previous generations, which is remarkable for a 60 W mobile part.

For rendering, the 8 GB VRAM is adequate for 1080p textures and moderate 4K workloads. The 224.0 GB/s bandwidth supports high-resolution texture streaming. The 16 RT cores enable hardware-accelerated ray tracing in supported titles, though the FP32 throughput of 8.397 TFLOPS suggests that ray tracing will be used sparingly at high resolutions. The GPU's production status is end-of-life, meaning it is a mature product with established drivers, but no future optimizations are likely.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses AMD Socket FP7, which is a mobile-specific socket. This limits upgrades to other FP7 processors within the same generation, but the 7235HS is already a mid-range part, so the upgrade path within the socket is narrow. The platform supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with a peak bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s. ECC memory is supported, which is unusual for a mobile chip and beneficial for workstation reliability. PCIe Gen 4 is provided with 20 lanes from the CPU, allowing for fast NVMe SSDs and external GPU enclosures.

The GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface, which is standard for mobile discrete graphics. Since the GPU is an IGP (integrated graphics package) with a 60 W TDP, it is soldered to the motherboard and not user-upgradable. The suggested PSU is not specified, but the combined 45 W CPU and 60 W GPU TDP indicate a total system power draw that is manageable for a typical laptop power brick. The production status of the GPU is end-of-life, meaning no new revisions are coming.

A sensible next upgrade for this platform would be increasing system RAM to the maximum supported by the FP7 socket, as the CPU's memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s is a potential bottleneck for the GPU's 224.0 GB/s. Adding a PCIe Gen 4 NVMe drive would reduce load times. Since the GPU is not upgradable, users would need to move to a new laptop for better graphics, as the CPU's socket does not support higher-end mobile GPUs.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score is 16902, with a percentile of 70. Its best results include a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 10418 and a single-core score of 1470. PassMark tests show a multithread score of 12243, single-thread of 2873, and integer math of 40174. The data compression score of 152168 and encryption of 9051 round out the productivity profile.

The GPU's average score is 49737, with a percentile of 86. Geekbench OpenCL is 49894 and Vulkan is 49580. The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing is 78, indicating that the system as a whole outperforms 78% of tracked builds. The CPU's nearest rival is the AMD EPYC 7702 with a delta of -0.2%, meaning the 7235HS is virtually tied with a server-class chip. The GPU's nearest rival is the RTX 5070 Ti at -0.4%, showing the A550M is within a rounding error of a modern high-end desktop GPU in synthetic compute.

The combined picture is a system where the GPU is the star performer, sitting at the 86th percentile, while the CPU is slightly above average at the 70th percentile. The 8-percentage-point gap between them suggests that in GPU-bound tasks, the system will perform exceptionally well, but in CPU-bound tasks, it will be merely adequate. The Cinebench R15 multi-core score of 1050 is a low absolute number, but it is consistent with a 4-core part. The PassMark physics score of 574 is also low, indicating that the CPU is not suited for complex physics simulations.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build (buildClass: "laptop") combining the AMD Ryzen 5 7235HS and Intel Arc A550M. The CPU is a 45 W mobile processor with 4 cores and 8 threads, while the GPU is a 60 W mobile graphics solution with 8 GB VRAM. The combined percentile of 78 places this system in the upper-midrange tier of all tracked builds, meaning it will handle most modern games at 1080p and all productivity tasks with ease.

The CPU's 70th percentile and GPU's 86th percentile indicate that the graphics card is the more powerful component relative to its peers. This is a balanced pairing for 1080p gaming and content creation, but not for high-end 4K or 8K workloads. The system is best described as a "sweet spot" laptop for users who want good performance without the cost or size of a desktop replacement. The Intel Arc A550M's end-of-life status means drivers are mature, but the platform is not future-proof. The AMD CPU's active production status ensures software optimizations will continue.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 78, meaning it outperforms 78% of all tracked builds in the database.

Q: How does the Intel Arc A550M compare to the AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT?

A: The A550M scores 49737 on average, while the RX 6800 XT scores 48477, giving the A550M a 2.6% advantage in synthetic benchmarks.

Q: Does the Ryzen 5 7235HS support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the CPU supports ECC memory, which is unusual for a mobile processor and useful for workstation reliability.

Q: What is the GPU's memory bandwidth and capacity?

A: The GPU has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing 224.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: Are there any measured FPS results for this specific combination?

A: No, the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU+GPU pairing, so all gaming performance is estimated from synthetic benchmark scores.

Q: What is the CPU's socket and memory type?

A: The CPU uses AMD Socket FP7 and supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a peak bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s.

Q: How does the CPU's single-core performance compare to its rivals?

A: In Cinebench R23 single-core, the CPU scores 1470. Its nearest rival, the Intel Core i5-1240U, has an average score 0.3% higher, indicating near-identical single-thread performance.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 7235HS + Intel Arc A550M

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 5 7235HS

Intel Arc A550M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Balance and Bottleneck

Usage Scenarios

Who Should Build It

GPU Analysis

Upgrade Path and Platform

Benchmark Performance

Build Overview

FAQ

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds