SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 7235HS + Intel Arc A370M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

88 Score

Top 12% Ranking

88 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 12% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

82%

GPU

93%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 5 7235HS

16,902 Benchmark Score

Top 18% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A370M

29,175 Benchmark Score

Top 7% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 5 7235HS paired with the Intel Arc A370M is a laptop-class combination that occupies the 70th percentile among CPUs and the 74th percentile among GPUs, combining into a combined percentile of 72. That mid-pack positioning defines the build's character: it is neither an entry-level struggle nor a performance leader, and the pairing of a four-core Zen 3+ processor with a compact Xe-HPG discrete GPU produces a machine suited to mainstream productivity, light content work, and moderate-resolution gaming. No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination in the database, so all frame-rate discussion below is estimated from benchmark scores rather than recorded measurements.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data indicates a reasonably balanced pairing with a slight CPU-side ceiling in heavily threaded work. The Ryzen 5 7235HS sits at the 70th percentile versus all CPUs with an average benchmark score of 16902, while the Arc A370M sits at the 74th percentile with an average benchmark score of 29175. The GPU therefore edges the CPU in relative standing, but only modestly — a four-percentile gap that suggests neither component dramatically overshadows the other.

The bottleneck picture flips depending on workload. In multi-threaded rendering, the CPU's four cores and eight threads are the clear limit: a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 10418 against a single-core score of 1470 shows the multi-thread scaling typical of a small-core-count part. In GPU-bound gaming at higher resolutions and detail presets, the A370M's 4 GB of GDDR6 and 112.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth become the constraint, with the CPU's healthy single-thread performance — a PassMark single-thread score of 2873 — more than capable of feeding a GPU of this class. For high-refresh, lower-resolution gaming, the CPU's per-core speed is adequate but the modest core count can cap throughput in titles that lean on many threads.

Memory is another factor in the balance equation. The CPU supports dual-channel DDR5 with 76.8 GB/s of bandwidth, and because the Arc A370M connects over PCIe 4.0 x8 with only 4 GB of dedicated VRAM, system memory becomes a shared resource when textures spill. That shared bus reinforces the conclusion that the GPU side is the practical ceiling in graphically heavy tasks, while the CPU side caps throughput in parallel workloads.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's benchmark sheet shows a consistent mid-tier profile. Cinebench R15 returns 1050 multi-core and 148 single-core; Cinebench R20 returns 4375 multi-core and 617 single-core; Cinebench R23 returns 10418 multi-core and 1470 single-core. PassMark results include a multithread score of 12243, a single-thread score of 2873, integer math at 40174, floating point math at 23091, data compression at 152168, encryption at 9051, extended instructions at 10887, physics at 574, and random string sorting at 15294. The average benchmark score across all tests is 16902, placing the chip at the 70th percentile of all CPUs.

Nearest rivals frame that position tightly. The AMD EPYC 7702 averages 16932, just 0.2 percent above the 7235HS; the Intel Core i3-12100E averages 16853, 0.3 percent below; the Intel Core i5-1240U averages 16957, 0.3 percent above; and the AMD Ryzen 3 7335U averages 16827, 0.4 percent below. Those deltas are small enough that all five parts effectively trade blows, which means real-world ranking will depend on whether a workload rewards the Ryzen's single-thread speed or suffers from its four-core limit.

On the GPU side, Geekbench OpenCL returns 29676 and Geekbench Vulkan returns 28673, averaging 29175 and landing the A370M at the 74th percentile of all GPUs. Its rivals are similarly clustered: the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH at 29197 is 0.1 percent ahead, the AMD FirePro W8000 at 29211 is 0.1 percent ahead, the AMD Radeon RX 470 at 28996 is 0.6 percent behind, and the AMD Radeon RX 6800M at 28874 is 1 percent behind on this aggregate metric. The combined percentile of 72 summarizes the machine: a mid-tier laptop build with dependable but unremarkable compute throughput on both sides.

CPU Analysis

The Ryzen 5 7235HS is a four-core, eight-thread mobile processor built on the Zen 3+ architecture, codenamed Rembrandt-R, and manufactured on TSMC's 6 nm process. It runs a 3.20 GHz base clock and boosts to 4.20 GHz within a 45 W TDP, using AMD Socket FP7. The die measures 210 mm². Cache is respectable for the class: 64 KB of L1 and 512 KB of L2 per core, plus 8 MB of shared L3. Memory support is dual-channel DDR5 with 76.8 GB/s of bandwidth, ECC capability is present, and PCIe connectivity is Gen 4 with 20 lanes from the CPU. Integrated Radeon 660M graphics are on board, and the multiplier is locked, so no overclocking headroom exists. The part number is 100-000001507 and it remains in active production.

The benchmark scores translate into a specific workload profile. The single-core numbers — 148 in R15, 617 in R20, and 1470 in R23 — indicate snappy responsiveness in applications that run on one or two fast threads: browsers, office suites, code editors, and most games' main simulation loops. The multi-core scores, particularly 10418 in R23, put sustained rendering and compilation in mid-pack territory; a four-core part simply cannot keep pace with higher-core-count rivals in Cinebench-style all-core loads, even though its aggregate average of 16902 keeps it statistically level with chips like the Core i5-1240U. The PassMark data-compression score of 152168 and encryption score of 9051 point to competent file-handling throughput, while the physics score of 574 suggests adequate but unspectacular simulation performance.

Who Should Build It

This combination targets users whose workloads are light-to-moderate threaded with a graphics component that stays within 4 GB of VRAM. Students are a natural fit: the 70th-percentile CPU handles writing, browsing, and web conferencing without strain, and the 74th-percentile GPU provides headroom for casual gaming between classes. Office and small-business users benefit similarly — the strong single-thread scores of 2873 in PassMark and 1470 in Cinebench R23 mean everyday applications launch and respond quickly, and the presence of ECC memory support appeals to workstations where data integrity matters.

Content creators working with light workloads are also served. Video editing at 1080p, photo editing, and small-scale 3D projects fit the GPU's 4.198 TFLOPS of FP32 throughput and 8 RT cores, though larger projects will collide with the 4 GB VRAM limit. Developers will find the 10418-point R23 multi-core score sufficient for compiling small-to-medium projects and comfortable for container work, while the 76.8 GB/s memory bandwidth helps when running databases, editors, and browsers concurrently. Gamers who play at 1080p with adjusted settings are the right gaming audience; those chasing high-refresh or high-detail experiences should look higher in the percentile tables.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A370M is built on the DG2-128 chip using the Xe-HPG architecture, part of the Alchemist generation (Arc 3 Mobile), fabricated on TSMC's 6 nm process. It packs 7200 million transistors into a 157 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 45.9M per mm². The GPU runs a 1550 MHz base clock and 2050 MHz boost, with GDDR6 memory clocked at 1750 MHz — 14 Gbps effective — across a 64-bit bus delivering 112.0 GB/s of bandwidth from its 4 GB frame buffer.

The rendering resources are compact but coherent: 1024 shading units, 64 TMUs, 32 ROPs, and 8 RT cores. Peak rates work out to 65.60 GPixel/s of pixel fill, 131.2 GTexel/s of texture fill, 4.198 TFLOPS of FP32 compute, and 8.397 TFLOPS of FP16 at a 2:1 ratio. The card connects over PCIe 4.0 x8, supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, and carries a 35 W TDP. It is classified as an IGP-slot part with portable-device-dependent display outputs, and its production status is End-of-life following a release date of March 2022.

For rendering work, the Geekbench OpenCL score of 29676 and Vulkan score of 28673 indicate usable GPU-compute throughput for entry-level acceleration — timeline playback in editing software, GPU-accelerated exports, and viewport work in modeling applications. The 8 RT cores enable hardware ray tracing in principle, but with only 1024 shading units and 4 GB of VRAM, path-traced or heavily RT-weighted workloads are beyond realistic scope. In rasterization, the fill-rate and bandwidth figures place the GPU in 1080p territory with adjusted detail settings, and its 74th-percentile standing confirms that positioning.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming is a partial fit. The CPU's single-thread strength can push high frame rates in lighter titles, but the GPU's average score of 29175 and 4 GB VRAM cap frame rates in modern AAA games, making high refresh realistic mainly in esports-style titles at reduced settings.

Streaming is viable at modest settings. NVENC-class hardware encoding is not listed in the fact pack, but the CPU's eight threads can absorb encoding alongside gameplay in software, and the PassMark multithread score of 12243 indicates enough headroom for a single-stream workflow without heavy production effects.

Video editing works best at 1080p. The OpenCL score of 29676 supports GPU-accelerated playback and effects, and the 112.0 GB/s of VRAM bandwidth helps timeline scrubbing, but 4 GB of VRAM limits 4K multicam or heavy-effects projects.

3D rendering is entry-level. With 4.198 TFLOPS of FP32 and 8 RT cores, viewport work in CAD and modeling applications is smooth for small scenes, while final renders will run faster on the CPU's 10418-point R23 score for simple jobs — though neither side competes with higher-percentile hardware.

Software development fits well. The 2873 single-thread score keeps editors and toolchains responsive, the 12243 multithread score handles compilation, and 76.8 GB/s of memory bandwidth supports running multiple services simultaneously.

Student and office work is the strongest match. Fast single-core performance, DDR5 memory, and ECC support cover productivity suites, browsing, video calls, and light creative tasks with room to spare relative to entry-level builds.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU+GPU combination — the database contains no measuredFps data for this pairing — so the figures discussed here are estimates derived from benchmark scores, not recorded measurements. The evidence base is the GPU's Geekbench scores of 29676 OpenCL and 28673 Vulkan, its 74th percentile standing, and its spec sheet of 1024 shading units, 4 GB GDDR6, and 112.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Against rivals, the A370M sits statistically level with the Radeon RX Vega M GH (29197, 0.1 percent ahead), the FirePro W8000 (29211, 0.1 percent ahead), the Radeon RX 470 (28996, 0.6 percent behind), and the Radeon RX 6800M (28874, 1 percent behind) on aggregate benchmark score. GPUs in this cluster generally deliver playable frame rates at 1080p in mid-generation titles when detail presets are reduced, and the estimates here follow that pattern. At ultra settings in modern AAA releases, the 4 GB frame buffer is the limiting variable, and frame rates are expected to fall below smooth-play thresholds at 1080p ultra. Older or lighter titles should run comfortably at 1080p, and competitive titles with modest visual demand are the best case for the pairing. The CPU side is unlikely to be the limiter in GPU-bound scenarios: the 7235HS's single-thread scores are strong for a mobile part, so the estimated frame rate ceiling in nearly all cases is set by the Arc A370M.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build. The Ryzen 5 7235HS is a mobile-segment processor with a 45 W TDP on Socket FP7, and the Arc A370M is a 35 W mobile discrete GPU over PCIe 4.0 x8 — a combination that defines a mainstream notebook rather than a desktop tower. Both parts are built on TSMC's 6 nm process, which speaks to a power-efficient design where the combined 80 W of package TDP fits the thermal envelope of a portable machine.

In tier terms, the build sits in the middle of the pack: 70th percentile CPU, 74th percentile GPU, and a combined percentile of 72. The rival data shows the CPU trading places with the Core i3-12100E, Core i5-1240U, Ryzen 3 7335U, and even the EPYC 7702 on aggregate score, while the GPU matches the RX Vega M GH, FirePro W8000, RX 470, and RX 6800M on its aggregate metric. The overall verdict is a balanced mid-tier laptop platform: capable of everyday productivity, light creative work, and adjusted-settings 1080p gaming, with clear ceilings in heavily threaded compute and graphically demanding rendering.

FAQ

Q: Is the CPU or GPU the bottleneck in this build?

A: It depends on the workload. The GPU ranks higher (74th percentile versus the CPU's 70th), but in multi-threaded tasks the CPU's four cores are the limit — its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 10418 versus 1470 single-core shows limited all-core scaling. In graphically heavy games, the Arc A370M's 4 GB VRAM is the ceiling.

Q: How does the Ryzen 5 7235HS compare to its closest rivals?

A: Its average benchmark score of 16902 puts it within a fraction of a percent of the AMD EPYC 7702 (16932, 0.2 percent higher), Intel Core i3-12100E (16853, 0.3 percent lower), Intel Core i5-1240U (16957, 0.3 percent higher), and AMD Ryzen 3 7335U (16827, 0.4 percent lower). All five are effectively equivalent on aggregate score.

Q: Can this build handle modern AAA games at 1080p ultra?

A: Not reliably, based on estimates. No measured FPS data exists for this pairing, but the GPU's 4 GB of GDDR6, 112.0 GB/s bandwidth, and 74th-percentile standing indicate that 1080p ultra settings in demanding titles will exceed the VRAM budget. Reduced detail presets are advisable.

Q: What are the CPU's key specifications?

A: Four cores, eight threads, Zen 3+ architecture (Rembrandt-R), 3.20 GHz base and 4.20 GHz boost clocks, 45 W TDP, 8 MB shared L3 cache, dual-channel DDR5 support with 76.8 GB/s bandwidth, PCIe Gen 4 with 20 CPU lanes, and integrated Radeon 660M graphics on Socket FP7.

Q: Is the Intel Arc A370M still in production?

A: No. The GPU's production status is End-of-life. It launched in March 2022 on the DG2-128 chip with the Xe-HPG architecture and a 35 W TDP.

Q: Does this build support ray tracing?

A: Yes, in a limited sense. The Arc A370M includes 8 RT cores and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and Vulkan 1.4, so hardware ray tracing is available — but with 1024 shading units and 4 GB VRAM, demanding RT workloads exceed its practical capacity.

Q: Is this combination good for software development?

A: Yes. The PassMark single-thread score of 2873 keeps toolchains responsive, the multithread score of 12243 handles compilation of small-to-medium projects, and the 76.8 GB/s of memory bandwidth supports running editors, containers, and services concurrently.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 7235HS + Intel Arc A370M

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 5 7235HS

Intel Arc A370M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Balance and Bottleneck

Benchmark Performance

CPU Analysis

Who Should Build It

GPU Analysis

Usage Scenarios

Gaming Performance

Build Overview

FAQ

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds