SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 7235HS + Intel Arc A350M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

87 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 13% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
82%
VS
GPU
92%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 5 7235HS

16,902 Benchmark Score
Top 18% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A350M

24,647 Benchmark Score
Top 8% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 5 7235HS and Intel Arc A350M form a laptop pairing that sits at the 70th percentile for both its CPU and GPU components, indicating a system built for balanced, mainstream performance rather than extreme high-end workloads. The combination of a 4-core/8-thread Zen 3+ processor with a 4 GB Arc 3 mobile GPU targets a specific performance tier where neither component wildly outclasses the other, but where the CPU often has the upper hand in compute-heavy tasks. Benchmark data shows this is a system with clear strengths in multi-threaded productivity and 1080p-class gaming, but with a hardware ceiling that becomes apparent under sustained loads. This analysis draws exclusively from the provided benchmark scores, architectural details, and comparative rankings.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance relationship between the Ryzen 5 7235HS and the Arc A350M is one of a capable CPU paired with a constrained GPU. The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 10418 and single-core score of 1470 place it at the 70th percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU’s Geekbench OpenCL score of 24546 and Vulkan score of 24747 also sit at the 70th percentile among all GPUs. This parity in overall percentile suggests a system designed to avoid a severe mismatch, but the nature of the workloads will dictate which component becomes the limiting factor.

In CPU-bound scenarios, such as data compression and encryption, the Ryzen 5 7235HS demonstrates substantial headroom. The Passmark data compression score of 152168 and data encryption score of 9051 indicate that the processor can handle these tasks with relative ease, meaning the GPU is unlikely to interfere. Conversely, in gaming or GPU-accelerated rendering, the Arc A350M’s 4 GB GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus with 112.0 GB/s bandwidth will likely be the primary constraint. The FP32 throughput of 3.379 TFLOPS and pixel rate of 52.80 GPixel/s are modest figures, suggesting that the CPU will frequently wait on the GPU to complete frame rendering tasks.

The bottleneck dynamic is most evident in the FPS scaling expectations. Without measured FPS data for this exact combination, the scores indicate that at lower resolutions or less demanding settings, the CPU’s single-thread performance (Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1470) can feed frames efficiently. However, as resolution increases, the GPU’s limited memory bandwidth and compute resources will become the limiting factor, causing frame rates to drop disproportionately. The data suggests a system where the CPU is the stronger partner in productivity tasks, while the GPU is the ceiling for gaming and graphics workloads.

FAQ

Q: Is the AMD Ryzen 5 7235HS a high-performance processor?

A: The Ryzen 5 7235HS sits at the 70th percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 16902. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 10418 and single-core score of 1470 show it is a solid mid-range mobile processor, competitive with the Intel Core i3-12100E (0.3% ahead) and AMD Ryzen 3 7335U (0.4% ahead).

Q: How much VRAM does the Intel Arc A350M have, and is it sufficient?

A: The Arc A350M features 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus with 112.0 GB/s bandwidth. This is sufficient for 1080p gaming at medium settings and light creative work, but the limited capacity and bandwidth will be a constraint for high-resolution textures or heavy rendering tasks.

Q: Does the Ryzen 5 7235HS support error-correcting memory?

A: Yes, the processor supports ECC memory. It also supports DDR5 memory on a dual-channel bus, providing a total memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s, which is beneficial for workstation-style tasks.

Q: What is the performance difference between the Arc A350M and the AMD Radeon RX 590?

A: The Arc A350M’s average benchmark score of 24647 is 0.4% lower than the RX 590’s score of 24744. This indicates near-identical synthetic benchmark performance, despite the Arc being a mobile chip with a 25 W TDP.

Q: What kind of gaming performance can I expect from this system?

A: Since no measured FPS data exists for this exact combination, gaming performance is estimated from the benchmark scores. The GPU’s 70th percentile ranking suggests it can handle 1080p gaming, but the 4 GB VRAM and 112.0 GB/s bandwidth mean the system is better suited for medium settings rather than ultra presets.

Q: Is the Ryzen 5 7235HS unlocked for overclocking?

A: No, the multiplier is locked, meaning the processor cannot be overclocked. The base clock is 3.20 GHz with a boost clock of 4.20 GHz, so performance is fixed within those parameters.

Q: What is the thermal design power of this CPU and GPU combination?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 45 W, while the GPU has a TDP of 25 W. This combined 70 W thermal envelope is typical for a thin-and-light gaming or creator laptop.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A350M is built on the Xe-HPG architecture using the DG2-128 chip, manufactured on a 6 nm process at TSMC. The chip contains 7,200 million transistors on a 157 mm² die, giving it a transistor density of 45.9 million per mm². The GPU’s base clock runs at 1150 MHz with a boost clock of 2200 MHz, which allows it to reach a peak FP32 throughput of 3.379 TFLOPS. Memory is a key specification: 4 GB of GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus, operating at 1750 MHz with an effective data rate of 14 Gbps, yielding a bandwidth of 112.0 GB/s.

The rendering hardware consists of 768 shading units, 48 texture mapping units, and 24 raster output pipelines. This configuration produces a pixel rate of 52.80 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 105.6 GTexel/s. For ray tracing, the GPU includes 6 dedicated RT cores, which is a modest count but capable of basic ray-traced effects in supported titles. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with modern game APIs.

Benchmark results show the Arc A350M achieving a Geekbench OpenCL score of 24546 and a Vulkan score of 24747, with an average score of 24647. This places the GPU at the 70th percentile among all GPUs. The nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon RX 590 (0.4% faster), NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile (0.5% faster), AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT (0.8% slower), and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 (1.5% slower). The data indicates that the Arc A350M performs on par with desktop cards from a previous generation, but its 25 W TDP and end-of-life production status suggest it is a low-power solution for mainstream laptops. The 4 GB VRAM is a limiting factor for modern titles at high resolutions, but the 112.0 GB/s bandwidth is adequate for 1080p gaming.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Ryzen 5 7235HS uses the AMD Socket FP7, which is a mobile-only socket, meaning the processor is soldered to the motherboard and cannot be upgraded in the traditional sense. The platform supports DDR5 memory on a dual-channel bus, delivering a memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s, and ECC memory support is included, which is an unusual feature for a mobile processor. The CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes, allowing for high-speed NVMe storage and external GPU connections, although the laptop form factor limits physical expansion.

The GPU is an IGP (integrated graphics processor) slot width, indicating it is also soldered onto the motherboard. This means neither the CPU nor GPU can be swapped out for a more powerful part. The upgrade path for this system is therefore limited to increasing system memory capacity or replacing storage drives. The CPU’s TDP of 45 W and the GPU’s TDP of 25 W suggest that the laptop’s cooling solution and power delivery are designed for a combined 70 W load, leaving little headroom for overclocking or adding power-hungry peripherals through the PCIe lanes.

For users considering this platform, the data suggests it is a closed system with no meaningful CPU or GPU upgrade path. The PCIe Gen 4 interface provides sufficient bandwidth for current storage and expansion devices, but the end-of-life status of the GPU and the socket design mean the system’s performance is fixed at the time of purchase. A sensible next upgrade would be to increase RAM to maximize the dual-channel memory bandwidth, as the 76.8 GB/s figure is already a limiting factor for the integrated Radeon 660M graphics. However, the primary takeaway is that this is a self-contained platform designed for the life of the laptop.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 5 7235HS is a 4-core, 8-thread processor from the 7000 series, based on the Zen 3+ architecture with the codename Rembrandt-R. It is manufactured on a 6 nm process at TSMC, with a die size of 210 mm². The base clock is 3.20 GHz, boosting up to 4.20 GHz, and the processor has a TDP of 45 W. It features a cache hierarchy of 64 KB L1 per core, 512 KB L2 per core, and 8 MB of shared L3 cache.

The processor’s benchmark results are strong for its core count. In Cinebench R15, it scores 1050 multi-core and 148 single-core. In Cinebench R20, the scores are 4375 multi-core and 617 single-core. The more modern Cinebench R23 yields a multi-core score of 10418 and a single-core score of 1470. These scores place the CPU at the 70th percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 16902. The nearest rivals include the AMD EPYC 7702 (0.2% faster), Intel Core i5-1240U (0.3% faster), Intel Core i3-12100E (0.3% slower), and AMD Ryzen 3 7335U (0.4% slower).

For real-world workloads, the Passmark scores provide context. The multi-thread score of 12243 and physics score of 574 indicate solid performance for multi-tasking and productivity applications. The integer math score of 40174 and floating point math score of 23091 show that the CPU can handle calculation-heavy tasks well. The data encryption score of 9051 and compression score of 152168 are respectable for a 45 W mobile part. The single-thread score of 2873 is competitive, suggesting responsive application performance. The architecture’s support for DDR5 memory and 76.8 GB/s bandwidth means memory-intensive workloads will not be starved, and the ECC memory support makes this a viable option for entry-level workstations where data integrity is important.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU and GPU combination, so all gaming performance figures are estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The Intel Arc A350M’s 70th percentile ranking and its benchmark scores (Geekbench OpenCL 24546, Vulkan 24747) suggest it is capable of running modern titles, but the 4 GB VRAM and 112.0 GB/s memory bandwidth will be the limiting factors.

At 1080p resolution, the data indicates the system can achieve playable frame rates at medium settings in most titles. The CPU’s single-core performance (Cinebench R23 score of 1470) is sufficient to feed the GPU in CPU-bound scenarios, and the 6 RT cores provide a baseline for ray tracing features. However, the GPU’s FP32 throughput of 3.379 TFLOPS and pixel rate of 52.80 GPixel/s suggest that high settings will strain the system, causing frame rates to drop below 60 FPS in demanding games.

At 1440p or higher resolutions, the 4 GB VRAM will be exceeded by many modern games, leading to texture popping or reduced draw distances. The 64-bit memory bus and 112.0 GB/s bandwidth are insufficient for high-resolution textures and high refresh rates. The estimated gaming performance is therefore best described as 1080p-class, with medium settings being the sweet spot for a smooth experience. Users expecting ultra settings at 1080p or any 1440p gaming will find the GPU to be the bottleneck.

Benchmark Performance

The combined performance picture for this system is defined by the CPU and GPU both sitting at the 70th percentile of their respective categories. The CPU’s average benchmark score is 16902, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 10418 and a single-core score of 1470. The GPU’s average benchmark score is 24647, with Geekbench OpenCL and Vulkan scores of 24546 and 24747, respectively. The combined percentile for this build is 70, indicating a consistent level of performance across components.

The CPU’s nearest rival, the AMD EPYC 7702, scores 16932, a 0.2% difference, while the Intel Core i3-12100E scores 16853, a 0.3% difference. This places the Ryzen 5 7235HS in the middle of a tightly grouped cluster of mid-range processors. The GPU’s nearest rival, the AMD Radeon RX 590, scores 24744, a 0.4% difference, while the NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile scores 24763, a 0.5% difference. The Arc A350M also falls within 1.5% of the GeForce GTX 1630, showing that the GPU is competitive with older desktop parts.

The data shows a system where the CPU is slightly stronger in relation to its peers than the GPU. The CPU’s 70th percentile ranking is supported by a robust multi-core score, while the GPU’s 70th percentile ranking is achieved despite its low power envelope. This suggests that in mixed workloads, such as gaming while streaming or rendering while browsing, the system will maintain balanced performance without one component dragging the other down significantly. The Cinebench R15 scores of 1050 multi-core and 148 single-core further corroborate the CPU’s mid-range status.

Build Overview

This build pairs the AMD Ryzen 5 7235HS, a 4-core/8-thread mobile processor from the 7000 series, with the Intel Arc A350M, a 4 GB GDDR6 mobile GPU from the Alchemist generation. The build class is a laptop, and the combined percentile is 70, placing it in the upper-mid-range tier of systems. The CPU is based on the Zen 3+ architecture, manufactured on a 6 nm process, while the GPU is based on the Xe-HPG architecture, also on a 6 nm process.

The system is designed for users who need a balance between CPU and GPU performance. The CPU’s 45 W TDP and the GPU’s 25 W TDP create a combined thermal load that is manageable in a laptop chassis. The CPU’s support for DDR5 memory and ECC modules, along with its 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes, makes it a capable platform for data processing and entry-level workstation tasks. The GPU’s 4 GB VRAM and 112.0 GB/s bandwidth are sufficient for 1080p gaming and light creative work, but not for high-end rendering.

The overall tier of this build is defined by the 70th percentile ranking for both components. It is not a high-end system, nor is it a budget one; instead, it occupies a middle space where it can handle mainstream productivity and gaming without excelling in either. The end-of-life status of the GPU means this is a mature platform, but the CPU’s active production status suggests it will be supported for a while longer. The build is a coherent pairing that avoids a severe bottleneck, with the CPU being slightly more capable than the GPU.

Who Should Build It

The Ryzen 5 7235HS and Arc A350M pairing is best suited for users who prioritize portability and balanced performance over raw power. The CPU’s multi-core performance (Cinebench R23 score of 10418) and the GPU’s 1080p gaming capability make this an ideal system for college students or early-career professionals who need a single device for both coursework and light gaming. The DDR5 memory support and ECC capability also make it suitable for small business workstations where data integrity is a concern.

Gamers who play at 1080p with medium settings will find the Arc A350M’s 4 GB VRAM and 112.0 GB/s bandwidth adequate for popular esports titles and older AAA games. Content creators working with light photo editing or 1080p video editing will benefit from the CPU’s strong multi-thread scores (Passmark multi-thread score of 12243) without needing the GPU’s full rendering power. Developers who write code and run virtual machines will appreciate the 8 threads and 8 MB L3 cache, which provide enough headroom for compilation and testing.

The system is not designed for users who require high-resolution gaming, 3D rendering, or machine learning workloads, as the GPU’s 4 GB VRAM and 3.379 TFLOPS FP32 throughput are insufficient for those tasks. Similarly, users who need extreme multi-core performance for video encoding or 3D animation will find the 4-core CPU limiting. The target audience is therefore the mainstream user who needs a reliable, portable device for daily tasks and moderate gaming, with the CPU taking on the heavier lifting in productivity scenarios while the GPU handles graphics at 1080p.