SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 6600U + Intel Arc A350M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

89 Score

Top 11% Ranking

89 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 11% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

86%

GPU

92%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 5 6600U

22,897 Benchmark Score

Top 14% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A350M

24,647 Benchmark Score

Top 8% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Balance and Bottleneck

The AMD Ryzen 5 6600U paired with the Intel Arc A350M presents a fascinating study in mobile computing balance, but the data reveals a clear asymmetry in where the performance ceiling lies. The CPU, with a percentile ranking of 76 among all processors, sits notably higher than the GPU, which holds a 70th percentile position among all graphics cards. This six-point gap suggests that in most workloads, the Intel Arc A350M will be the limiting factor before the Ryzen 5 6600U reaches its own constraints.

The CPU’s multicore might is substantial for a 15 W TDP part. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 9159.5, combined with a Geekbench multicore score of 6618, indicates a processor capable of sustaining significant threaded workloads. However, the GPU’s compute ceiling, represented by a Geekbench OpenCL score of 24546 and Vulkan score of 24747, places it in a tier where modern gaming at high settings will likely saturate its resources long before the CPU breaks a sweat. The deltaPct values against nearest rivals reinforce this: the GPU sits within 1.5% of the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 and within 0.8% of the AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT, while the CPU trades blows within 1.2% of the Intel Core i5-12500H and AMD Ryzen 5 2600X.

When considering FPS scaling, the lack of measured data forces an analytical approach based on component ceilings. The CPU’s single-thread performance, evidenced by a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1456.5 and a Passmark single-thread score of 3132, is more than adequate to feed a GPU of this class. The bottleneck, therefore, is not the processor’s ability to issue draw calls or maintain frame pacing, but rather the GPU’s raw pixel throughput and shading capacity. The A350M’s 3.379 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 52.80 GPixel/s pixel rate are modest figures that will govern frame rates in graphics-intensive scenarios.

For productivity tasks, the balance shifts. The CPU’s Passmark multithread score of 17026 and data compression score of 201364 indicate a processor that can handle heavy computational lifting. Here, the GPU is less relevant, and the CPU becomes the primary driver of performance. The 76th percentile CPU ranking versus the 70th percentile GPU ranking suggests that in mixed workloads, users will experience a system where the processor has headroom to spare while the graphics solution works closer to its limits.

# Benchmark Performance

The combined picture from the benchmark scores paints a portrait of a capable but not exceptional mobile platform. The CPU achieves an average benchmark score of 22897, placing it at the 76th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals underscore its positioning: the AMD Ryzen 5 2600X scores 22823 (0.3% delta), the AMD Ryzen 5 7535U scores 22791 (0.5% delta), and the Intel Core i5-12500H scores 22625 (1.2% delta). Only the AMD EPYC 4124P edges ahead with a score of 23167, a 1.2% margin. This clustering indicates that the Ryzen 5 6600U sits in a well-populated performance tier where minor architectural differences translate to negligible real-world distinctions.

The GPU’s benchmark results are equally telling. With an average score of 24647 and a 70th percentile ranking, the Intel Arc A350M positions itself near the AMD Radeon RX 590 (24744, -0.4% delta) and the NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile (24763, -0.5% delta). The Geekbench OpenCL score of 24546 and Vulkan score of 24747 demonstrate consistent performance across different compute APIs, suggesting the GPU’s drivers and hardware are well-matched for both general compute and graphics workloads.

The combined percentile for this pairing is 73, which reflects a system that sits above the median but below the enthusiast tier. The CPU’s individual scores show particular strengths in integer math (61723), floating-point math (33991), and extended instructions (13356), while the GPU’s Vulkan score slightly edges out its OpenCL result, hinting at solid driver optimization for gaming-oriented APIs. The overall picture is one of a balanced ultraportable platform that delivers competent 1080p gaming and respectable productivity performance, though neither component will set records in its class.

# CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 5 6600U is a 6-core, 12-thread processor built on the Zen 3+ architecture, codenamed Rembrandt. It operates with a base clock of 2.90 GHz and a boost clock of 4.50 GHz, all within a 15 W TDP envelope. This power constraint is remarkable given the performance on offer: the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 9159.5 and Geekbench multicore score of 6618 demonstrate that efficiency does not come at the cost of capability. The 6 nm process node from TSMC, with a die size of 208 mm², contributes to this balance of power and performance.

The cache hierarchy is generous for a mobile part: 64 KB of L1 per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of shared L3 cache. This configuration supports the processor’s strong showing in memory-sensitive workloads, as evidenced by the Passmark data compression score of 201364 and random string sorting score of 21241. The dual-channel DDR5 memory support, with a bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s, ensures the CPU has adequate data throughput to feed its six cores.

Single-thread performance is where the Ryzen 5 6600U shows its architectural maturity. The Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1456.5 and Geekbench single-core score of 1673 are competitive for a 15 W part, and the Passmark single-thread score of 3132 confirms that everyday tasks like web browsing, office applications, and light coding will feel responsive. The boost clock of 4.50 GHz is aggressive for the power envelope, and the data suggests it sustains well under load.

The Passmark physics score of 825 and find prime numbers score of 51 are lower than what desktop parts achieve, but these are not indicative of real-world deficiencies. The encryption score of 12783 shows the processor handles cryptographic workloads competently, which is relevant for VPN usage and encrypted storage. The processor is not multiplier-unlocked, so overclocking is off the table, but for a mobile platform this is expected and largely unnecessary given the balanced performance profile.

# Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU+GPU combination, and the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data. All gaming frame rates discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores of both components, and these figures should be treated as approximations rather than verified results.

Based on the Intel Arc A350M’s 70th percentile ranking and its proximity to the AMD Radeon RX 590 (within 0.4%) and the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 (within 1.5%), the gaming potential of this pairing is best described as entry-level to mid-range for 1080p. The GPU’s 3.379 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 112.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth suggest that esports titles and older AAA games will run smoothly, while modern graphically demanding titles will require reduced settings to maintain playable frame rates.

The CPU’s strong single-thread performance, with a Passmark single-thread score of 3132, ensures that it will not be the limiting factor in most gaming scenarios. The 4.50 GHz boost clock and 12 threads provide ample headroom for game logic, physics calculations, and background tasks. For competitive titles like first-person shooters and MOBAs, the estimated frame rates could approach or exceed 60 FPS at medium settings in 1080p, while more demanding open-world games might see 30-50 FPS at similar settings.

The GPU’s 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus is a constraint for modern games that increasingly require more video memory at higher resolutions and texture qualities. At 1080p, this is manageable with settings tuned appropriately, but at 1440p, the memory capacity and bandwidth would likely cause stuttering or force significant quality reductions. The system’s combined percentile of 73 suggests that as a gaming platform, it is best suited for 1080p gaming with realistic expectations about graphical fidelity.

# Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: This pairing is not optimized for high-refresh-rate displays beyond 60 Hz in demanding titles. The GPU’s 70th percentile ranking and modest compute capabilities would struggle to consistently push frame rates above 100 FPS in modern games, even at lower settings. The CPU’s strong single-thread performance would not compensate for the GPU’s limitations in this scenario.

Streaming: The CPU’s 12 threads and 15 W TDP provide a reasonable foundation for software encoding, though the lack of dedicated encoder analysis in the data limits certainty. The Passmark multithread score of 17026 suggests the processor can handle both gaming and encoding workloads, but the GPU’s performance ceiling would require lower game settings to free up CPU headroom.

Video Editing: The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multicore score of 9159.5 and Geekbench multicore score of 6618 indicate solid performance for video editing tasks like timeline scrubbing, export encoding, and effects rendering. The GPU’s 6.758 TFLOPS of FP16 performance and 105.6 GTexel/s texture rate could accelerate certain effects, but the 4 GB VRAM would limit work with high-resolution footage.

3D Rendering: The CPU would handle CPU-based rendering workloads competently, as evidenced by its Passmark floating-point math score of 33991 and integer math score of 61723. The GPU’s 3.379 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 6 RT cores provide some acceleration for GPU-based renderers, but the 4 GB memory capacity would constrain scene complexity.

Software Development: The CPU’s strong single-thread score of 3132 and multicore performance make it well-suited for compilation tasks, especially with the 12 threads available. The data compression score of 201364 and encryption score of 12783 indicate fast build times and secure handling of code repositories.

Student and Office Work: This is where the pairing excels. The CPU’s efficient 15 W TDP and strong single-thread performance ensure responsive productivity applications, while the GPU provides adequate acceleration for presentations, spreadsheets, and light photo editing. The 76th percentile CPU ranking means this system will handle typical student workloads without breaking a sweat.

# Upgrade Path and Platform

The AMD Ryzen 5 6600U is mounted on the AMD Socket FP7, which is a mobile-specific socket. This means the upgrade path for the CPU is limited to other FP7-compatible processors, though the data does not specify which models are available for this socket. The processor supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s, and ECC memory is not supported. For users considering a memory upgrade, the move to higher-capacity DDR5 modules is the most straightforward enhancement.

The PCIe interface is Gen 4 with 20 lanes from the CPU, which provides ample bandwidth for NVMe storage and the GPU’s PCIe 4.0 x8 interface. The Intel Arc A350M is an integrated-class GPU (slot width is listed as IGP), meaning it is soldered onto the motherboard and cannot be upgraded independently. This is a crucial limitation: the GPU’s 70th percentile ranking and 4 GB VRAM are fixed, and users cannot swap it for a more powerful discrete solution.

The GPU’s TDP is 25 W, and the CPU’s TDP is 15 W, totaling 40 W for the core compute components. The suggested PSU is not listed, but this is a laptop platform (build class is "laptop"), so power delivery is governed by the system’s battery and charger rather than a desktop PSU. The GPU is marked as end-of-life production status, so future driver support and performance optimizations may taper off.

For a sensible next upgrade, users would need to consider a new laptop entirely, as neither the CPU nor GPU can be swapped in a typical mobile chassis. The platform’s DDR5 memory support and PCIe Gen 4 connectivity are current-generation features, but the soldered nature of both compute components means the upgrade path is effectively closed. The data suggests this is a complete, sealed system optimized for its intended use case rather than a platform for future expansion.

# Who Should Build It

The AMD Ryzen 5 6600U and Intel Arc A350M combination targets users who need a balanced laptop for everyday computing and light-to-moderate gaming. The 76th percentile CPU ranking and 70th percentile GPU ranking indicate a system that outperforms a majority of laptops on the market, making it suitable for students who need a device for coursework, research, and occasional gaming during downtime.

Content creators working with 1080p video or basic photo editing will find the CPU’s multicore performance (Cinebench R23 score of 9159.5) sufficient for export tasks, while the GPU’s 4 GB VRAM can handle moderate effects work. Software developers will appreciate the 12 threads and strong single-thread score of 3132 for compilation and testing, and the 15 W CPU TDP ensures long battery life during coding sessions away from power outlets.

Small business workstations that require a reliable machine for office productivity, data entry, and light multimedia creation would be well-served by this pairing. The CPU’s data compression score of 201364 and encryption score of 12783 indicate fast file operations and secure data handling, which are important for business applications. Gamers at 1080p with realistic expectations about settings will find this system capable of running most titles at medium quality, with esports games performing particularly well given the CPU’s strong single-thread capabilities.

# FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s core and thread count?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 6600U has 6 cores and 12 threads, based on the Zen 3+ architecture with a base clock of 2.90 GHz and boost clock of 4.50 GHz.

Q: How much video memory does the Intel Arc A350M have?

A: The GPU has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 112.0 GB/s and a memory clock of 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective).

Q: What is the CPU’s performance ranking compared to other processors?

A: The Ryzen 5 6600U ranks at the 76th percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 22897. Its closest rival is the AMD Ryzen 5 2600X, which scores 22823 (0.3% delta).

Q: Is this a desktop or laptop platform?

A: The build class is "laptop," and the CPU uses the AMD Socket FP7, which is a mobile socket. The GPU is listed as an IGP (integrated graphics processor) with a 25 W TDP.

Q: What graphics APIs does the Intel Arc A350M support?

A: The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. Its Geekbench Vulkan score is 24747 and OpenCL score is 24546.

Q: Can the CPU be overclocked?

A: No, the multiplier is not unlocked. The processor is designed for efficient mobile operation within a 15 W TDP, and overclocking is not supported.

Q: What memory type does the CPU support?

A: The Ryzen 5 6600U supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s. ECC memory is not supported.

# GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A350M represents Intel’s entry into the discrete-class mobile GPU market with its Xe-HPG architecture, built on the DG2-128 chip using a 6 nm process from TSMC. The GPU contains 7,200 million transistors on a 157 mm² die, with a transistor density of 45.9M per mm². This hardware foundation delivers 768 shading units, 48 texture mapping units, and 24 raster operation units, along with 6 ray tracing cores.

The memory subsystem is a 4 GB GDDR6 configuration on a 64-bit bus, providing 112.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This is modest by modern standards, but the 1750 MHz memory clock (14 Gbps effective) keeps the implementation efficient. The GPU’s compute capabilities are quantified by its 3.379 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 6.758 TFLOPS of FP16 performance (at a 2:1 ratio), with pixel rate of 52.80 GPixel/s and texture rate of 105.6 GTexel/s.

Benchmark results place the A350M at the 70th percentile of all GPUs, with an average score of 24647. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon RX 590 (24744, -0.4% delta) and the NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile (24763, -0.5% delta), which puts it in surprisingly competitive company. The Geekbench Vulkan score of 24747 slightly exceeds the OpenCL score of 24546, suggesting the GPU’s driver stack is well-optimized for gaming workloads that leverage Vulkan.

The GPU’s ray tracing hardware, comprising 6 RT cores, is present but limited in scope. With only 3.379 TFLOPS of FP32 compute, ray-traced effects would likely require significant compromises in resolution or quality settings. The 4 GB VRAM is the most significant constraint, limiting texture quality and resolution headroom in modern titles. The GPU is marked as end-of-life production status, which means its driver support and optimization cadence may slow over time, though the current API support (DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, Vulkan 1.4) is comprehensive.

# Build Overview

This build pairs the AMD Ryzen 5 6600U with the Intel Arc A350M in a laptop form factor, creating a balanced mobile platform that targets the mainstream performance segment. The CPU’s 76th percentile ranking and the GPU’s 70th percentile ranking combine for a system-level combined percentile of 73, placing it above the majority of laptops while remaining accessible in terms of power requirements (15 W CPU + 25 W GPU).

The Ryzen 5 6600U brings 6 cores and 12 threads of Zen 3+ performance, with a boost clock of 4.50 GHz and a 15 W TDP that enables slim laptop designs. Its Cinebench R23 multicore score of 9159.5 and Passmark multithread score of 17026 demonstrate solid productivity capability, while the 4.50 GHz boost ensures responsive single-threaded tasks. The Intel Arc A350M, despite its 4 GB VRAM limitation, holds its own against established rivals like the AMD Radeon RX 590 and NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile in compute benchmarks.

This is a system designed for users who need a single device for work and play, without demanding extreme performance in either domain. The laptop class means portability is inherent, and the combined TDP of 40 W for both compute components suggests efficient battery life for a device of this capability. The pairing is well-matched in that neither component dramatically outstrips the other, creating a platform where the user experience is consistent across a wide range of applications. For a student, professional, or casual gamer seeking a versatile laptop, this configuration represents a sensible middle ground between ultraportable efficiency and desktop-replacement power.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 6600U + Intel Arc A350M

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 5 6600U

Intel Arc A350M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds