SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS + Intel Arc A550M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

84 Score

Top 16% Ranking

84 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 16% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

CPU Bottleneck

CPU

72%

GPU

96%

Your CPU is limiting system performance. Consider upgrading to a faster processor to better utilize your GPU.

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS

3,122 Benchmark Score

Top 28% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A550M

49,737 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Bottleneck Detected

CPU Bottleneck - Upgrading the weaker component will improve overall performance.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS paired with the Intel Arc A550M represents a mid-range laptop configuration that targets a specific balance between CPU efficiency and discrete GPU capability. Benchmark data shows this pairing sits at the 69th percentile overall, indicating a system that outperforms the majority of laptops while remaining accessible in its performance tier. The CPU’s 52nd percentile ranking contrasts sharply with the GPU’s 86th percentile, creating a dynamic where the processor is the clear limiting factor for graphics-intensive workloads. This analysis examines the benchmark scores, component characteristics, and practical implications for various user profiles, using only the provided data to draw conclusions.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance relationship between the Ryzen 5 6600HS and the Arc A550M is defined by a significant imbalance in their respective percentile standings. The CPU ranks at the 52nd percentile among all processors, placing it squarely in the middle of the performance distribution, while the GPU ranks at the 86th percentile among all graphics cards, placing it in the upper echelon of mobile graphics solutions. This 34-percentage-point gap strongly suggests that the CPU will be the bottleneck in most scenarios where both components are heavily utilized, particularly in gaming and 3D rendering tasks where the GPU’s higher relative performance will be constrained by the processor’s ability to feed it data.

The benchmark scores reinforce this interpretation. The CPU’s average benchmark score of 3122 places it within a tight cluster of rivals: it is 0.1% behind the AMD Ryzen 3 5425U (3124), 0.4% ahead of the Intel Core i3-13100TE (3111), 0.8% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 5 5625U (3096), and 1.0% behind the Intel Xeon E5-2650 v4 (3154). These deltas are all within a single percentage point, indicating that the 6600HS performs nearly identically to a set of mainstream and older workstation chips. Meanwhile, the GPU’s average benchmark score of 49737 places it in a much higher competitive bracket, with rivals including the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti (49957, 0.4% ahead), AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 (50001, 0.5% ahead), and AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT (48477, 2.6% behind). The GPU is competitive with flagship desktop-class cards from previous generations, while the CPU is merely average.

For gaming workloads, the implication is that frame rates will be dictated by the CPU in most titles, especially at lower resolutions where the GPU has spare capacity. The GPU’s high pixel rate of 131.2 GPixel/s and texture rate of 262.4 GTexel/s indicate it can push a large number of pixels, but the CPU’s modest 6-core, 12-thread configuration with a 4.50 GHz boost clock may struggle to maintain high instruction throughput in CPU-bound game logic. Conversely, for pure compute tasks like OpenCL or Vulkan workloads, the GPU’s 8.397 TFLOPS of FP32 performance can operate more independently, though data transfer and draw call generation still depend on the CPU. The balance is therefore workload-dependent, with the CPU limiting interactive and latency-sensitive tasks while the GPU excels in parallel throughput.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s Cinebench results provide a clear picture of its multi-threaded and single-threaded capabilities. In Cinebench R23, the processor scores 9131 in multi-core and 1465 in single-core. The multi-core score of 9131 is respectable for a 35W TDP mobile chip, suggesting it can handle sustained multi-threaded loads without excessive thermal throttling. The single-core score of 1465 indicates solid per-thread performance, which is critical for everyday responsiveness and lightly-threaded applications. In the older Cinebench R15 test, the scores are 1656 multi-core and 235 single-core, which follow the same pattern and confirm consistency across benchmark versions.

The GPU’s Geekbench scores are substantially higher in absolute terms. It achieves 49894 in OpenCL and 49580 in Vulkan, which are nearly identical, suggesting that the graphics card performs consistently across different compute APIs. These scores place the GPU at the 86th percentile, and the near-identical OpenCL and Vulkan numbers imply that the underlying Xe-HPG architecture handles both low-level and high-level compute interfaces with equal efficiency. The average benchmark score of 49737 is derived from these two results, and the tight clustering of rivals (all within 2.6% delta) shows that the Arc A550M lands in a highly competitive performance band.

When combining the two components, the system’s 69th percentile overall indicates that the GPU’s high standing partially compensates for the CPU’s average ranking. However, the data suggests that in a balanced workload, the system will perform closer to the CPU’s percentile for tasks that require sequential processing and closer to the GPU’s percentile for parallel tasks. The combined picture is a laptop that offers strong graphics compute for its class but is held back by a processor that is merely average among its peers.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS is built on the Zen 3+ architecture, codenamed Rembrandt, and manufactured on a 6 nm process by TSMC. It features 6 cores and 12 threads, with a base clock of 3.30 GHz and a boost clock of 4.50 GHz. The 35W TDP classifies it as a high-efficiency mobile chip, designed for thin-and-light laptops that need adequate performance without excessive power draw. The cache hierarchy includes 64 KB of L1 per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of shared L3 cache, which is a moderate amount that supports the 6-core design well.

The CPU’s memory support is DDR5 with a dual-channel bus, providing a memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s. This is a notable feature, as DDR5 support positions the platform for modern memory speeds, though the actual bandwidth is modest compared to desktop counterparts. The integrated graphics are Radeon 660M, which provides a fallback display output and basic 3D acceleration, but the discrete Arc A550M will be the primary graphics processor in this configuration. The CPU supports PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes, which is sufficient for a discrete GPU and NVMe storage, though the 20-lane count is lower than some desktop platforms.

The benchmark scores place the 6600HS at the 52nd percentile, with an average score of 3122. Its nearest rivals are all within a 1% delta, meaning the 6600HS is functionally equivalent to the Ryzen 3 5425U, Core i3-13100TE, Ryzen 5 5625U, and Xeon E5-2650 v4 in aggregate performance. For real workloads, this means the CPU handles everyday office tasks, web browsing, and productivity software with ease, but it will not excel in heavily multi-threaded content creation. The 9131 Cinebench R23 multi-core score suggests it can handle moderate video editing and 3D rendering, but users with heavy workloads should expect longer render times compared to higher-core-count desktop chips. The single-core score of 1465 is more competitive, indicating strong performance in games and applications that rely on one or two threads.

Who Should Build It

This CPU+GPU combination is suited for users who prioritize graphics compute over CPU throughput. Gamers playing at 1080p or 1440p will benefit from the GPU’s high percentile ranking, which suggests it can handle modern titles at high settings, though the CPU may limit frame rates in CPU-intensive games. The GPU’s 8 GB of GDDR6 memory and 224.0 GB/s bandwidth are adequate for 1080p and 1440p gaming, but the CPU’s mid-range standing means that users should not expect maximum frame rates in esports titles that are heavily CPU-bound.

Content creators who work with GPU-accelerated rendering, such as video editors using OpenCL or Vulkan, will find the Arc A550M capable, as its Geekbench OpenCL score of 49894 is competitive with desktop GPUs like the RX 6800 XT. However, the CPU’s 6-core limit will slow CPU-based tasks like encoding and compilation. Software developers will appreciate the CPU’s single-threaded performance for build times, but large parallel compilation jobs will be average. Students and small business workstations will find this configuration more than sufficient for general productivity, spreadsheets, and light photo editing, where the CPU’s 52nd percentile is adequate and the GPU accelerates any graphical tasks. The laptop form factor means it is portable, making it suitable for users who need a single machine for both work and play.

FAQ

Q: How does the Ryzen 5 6600HS compare to its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 3 5425U?

A: The Ryzen 5 6600HS has an average benchmark score of 3122, which is 0.1% lower than the Ryzen 3 5425U’s score of 3124. This means the two processors perform nearly identically in aggregate, despite the 6600HS having more cores and threads.

Q: What is the GPU’s performance percentile and what does it mean?

A: The Intel Arc A550M ranks at the 86th percentile among all GPUs, meaning it performs better than 86% of graphics cards in the database. Its average benchmark score of 49737 places it in the upper tier of mobile GPUs, competitive with desktop cards like the RX 6800 XT.

Q: Does the CPU bottleneck the GPU in gaming?

A: Yes, the data indicates a significant imbalance. The CPU is at the 52nd percentile while the GPU is at the 86th percentile, so in gaming scenarios the CPU is likely to be the limiting factor, especially at lower resolutions where the GPU is not fully utilized.

Q: What memory type does the CPU support?

A: The Ryzen 5 6600HS supports DDR5 memory with a dual-channel bus, providing a memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s. This is a modern memory standard that helps with overall system responsiveness.

Q: Is the GPU suitable for compute workloads?

A: Yes, the Arc A550M achieves a Geekbench OpenCL score of 49894 and a Vulkan score of 49580, indicating strong parallel compute performance. This makes it suitable for GPU-accelerated rendering and other compute-intensive tasks.

Q: What is the combined system percentile?

A: The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing is 69, meaning the system outperforms 69% of all configurations in the database. This is higher than the CPU’s individual percentile but lower than the GPU’s, reflecting the mixed performance profile.

Q: Are there any measured FPS data for this combination?

A: No, the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact combination. All FPS discussions in this analysis are estimates based on the benchmark scores, not direct measurements.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A550M is built on the Xe-HPG architecture, specifically the Alchemist generation, and uses the DG2-512 chip manufactured on a 6 nm process by TSMC. It contains 21,700 million transistors on a 406 mm² die, with a transistor density of 53.4 million per mm². The GPU has 2048 shading units, 128 TMUs, and 64 ROPs, along with 16 RT cores for ray tracing. It is equipped with 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 224.0 GB/s. The memory clock is 1750 MHz with an effective data rate of 14 Gbps.

The clock speeds are a base of 900 MHz and a boost of 2050 MHz, which is a substantial boost range that allows the GPU to ramp up under load. The pixel rate is 131.2 GPixel/s and the texture rate is 262.4 GTexel/s, both of which are high for a mobile GPU and support its high percentile ranking. The FP32 performance is 8.397 TFLOPS, while FP16 performance is 16.79 TFLOPS with a 2:1 ratio, indicating strong compute throughput for AI and other FP16 workloads. The TDP is 60W, which is modest for this level of performance, suggesting good efficiency.

The GPU’s benchmark scores are 49894 in Geekbench OpenCL and 49580 in Vulkan, with an average of 49737. This places it at the 86th percentile, and its nearest rivals include the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti (49957, 0.4% ahead) and AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 (50001, 0.5% ahead). The GPU is 2.4% ahead of the RX 6900 XT (50951) and 2.6% behind the RX 6800 XT (48477). For rendering, this means the Arc A550M can handle 3D scenes and video effects that leverage OpenCL or Vulkan acceleration, though the 8 GB VRAM may limit very large textures or scenes at high resolutions. The 16 RT cores provide hardware ray tracing support, but the performance impact is not quantified in the benchmark data.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The GPU’s 86th percentile performance suggests it can push high frame rates at 1080p, but the CPU’s 52nd percentile means frame rates in CPU-bound titles will be limited. Gamers targeting 144Hz or higher should expect the CPU to be the bottleneck in many games.

Streaming: Streaming requires both CPU encoding and GPU rendering. The CPU’s 6 cores and 12 threads can handle a stream encode at moderate settings, while the GPU’s strong compute performance handles the game rendering. However, the CPU’s average multi-threaded score may limit simultaneous game and stream performance.

Video editing: The GPU’s OpenCL score of 49894 accelerates video effects and color grading, while the CPU’s Cinebench R23 score of 9131 handles timeline editing and export encoding. For 1080p editing this is a capable combo, but 4K timelines may strain the CPU.

3D rendering: GPU-based renderers will leverage the Arc A550M’s 8.397 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, which is competitive with desktop GPUs. CPU-based rendering will be slower due to the 6-core limit, with the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 9131 indicating moderate performance.

Software development: The CPU’s single-core score of 1465 in Cinebench R23 provides good responsiveness for code editing and compilation of small projects. Larger builds will benefit from the 12 threads, but developers with massive codebases may find the CPU average.

Student and office work: This configuration is overkill for basic tasks like word processing, spreadsheets, and web browsing. The CPU’s 52nd percentile is more than sufficient, and the GPU’s high performance ensures smooth display output and any light graphics work.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build, as indicated by the buildClass field. It pairs the AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS, a 6-core/12-thread mobile processor based on Zen 3+ (Rembrandt) architecture, with the Intel Arc A550M, a discrete mobile GPU based on Xe-HPG (Alchemist) architecture. The CPU is manufactured on a 6 nm process by TSMC, with a 35W TDP, while the GPU is also on 6 nm but with a 60W TDP. The system sits at the 69th overall percentile, which places it in the upper-middle tier of laptop configurations.

The CPU’s 52nd percentile ranking is average among all CPUs, while the GPU’s 86th percentile is well above average, creating a system that is graphics-forward. The CPU’s average benchmark score of 3122 is nearly identical to several mainstream rivals, while the GPU’s average score of 49737 is competitive with high-end desktop cards. This pairing is best described as a mid-range laptop with a strong GPU, suitable for users who want above-average graphics performance without the cost of a top-tier CPU.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact combination, as the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps rows. Therefore, all FPS figures in this section are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and should be treated as approximations, not empirical measurements. The GPU’s high pixel rate of 131.2 GPixel/s and texture rate of 262.4 GTexel/s indicate it can render scenes quickly, while the CPU’s single-core performance of 1465 in Cinebench R23 suggests it can handle game logic.

For 1080p gaming, the GPU’s 86th percentile ranking suggests it should achieve high frame rates in most modern titles at high or ultra settings, potentially exceeding 60 FPS in many games. However, the CPU may limit frame rates in CPU-intensive games like strategy titles or simulations, where the 6-core/12-thread configuration with a 4.50 GHz boost clock may not be sufficient to maintain high frame rates. At 1440p, the GPU will be more fully utilized, and the CPU bottleneck will be less pronounced, though the 8 GB VRAM may become a limiting factor for very high-resolution textures.

For competitive esports titles, the CPU’s single-threaded performance is adequate but not exceptional, so players should expect frame rates in the 100-144 FPS range at 1080p, depending on the game. For AAA single-player games, the GPU’s compute performance is the stronger asset, and frame rates should be smooth at 1080p, with 1440p being playable at reduced settings. The lack of measured FPS data means these are estimates, and actual performance will vary based on thermal headroom, power limits, and driver optimizations.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses AMD Socket FP7, which is a mobile-specific socket, and the system is a laptop build, meaning upgrades are typically limited to memory and storage rather than the CPU or GPU. The CPU supports DDR5 memory with a dual-channel bus, providing 76.8 GB/s of bandwidth, so users can upgrade the RAM capacity but not the type. The CPU supports PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes, which is sufficient for a discrete GPU and one or two NVMe SSDs, so storage upgrades are possible.

The GPU has a TDP of 60W and is marked as end-of-life in production status, suggesting it is a current but mature product. The suggested PSU field is null, and the GPU’s power connector is listed as null, indicating that power delivery is integrated into the laptop’s design rather than a user-replaceable PSU. The CPU’s 35W TDP combined with the GPU’s 60W TDP means the total system power draw is modest, so the laptop’s included power adapter should be sufficient.

For a sensible next upgrade, users should consider increasing RAM capacity if the system has available slots, as the DDR5 support and dual-channel bus benefit both CPU and GPU performance. Storage upgrades to faster NVMe drives would also reduce load times, given the PCIe Gen 4 support. However, the CPU and GPU are soldered or otherwise non-replaceable in a typical laptop design, so the upgrade path is limited to memory and storage. The platform is not designed for component swapping, and users should treat the system as a complete unit rather than a modular build.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS + Intel Arc A550M

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS

Intel Arc A550M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Bottleneck Detected

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Balance and Bottleneck

Benchmark Performance

CPU Analysis

Who Should Build It

FAQ

GPU Analysis

Usage Scenarios

Build Overview

Gaming Performance

Upgrade Path and Platform

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds