SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 6600H + Intel Arc A550M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

92 Score

Top 8% Ranking

92 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

87%

GPU

96%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 5 6600H

25,550 Benchmark Score

Top 13% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A550M

49,737 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 5 6600H paired with the Intel Arc A550M is a laptop-class combination that ranks in the 82nd percentile overall, indicating a strong upper-midrange mobile platform. The data shows a balanced pairing where the CPU's 78th percentile standing and the GPU's higher 86th percentile position create a system capable of high-fidelity gaming and demanding productivity tasks, though it is not an absolute top-tier flagship. No measured FPS data exists for this exact combination, so all frame rate discussions are estimates based on the synthetic benchmark scores.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU+GPU combination, so all gaming frame rates discussed here are estimated from the benchmark scores rather than direct observations. The GPU's 86th percentile rank among all GPUs, combined with its Geekbench Vulkan score of 49580, positions this system for strong 1080p gaming and capable 1440p performance in many titles. The CPU's single-core Cinebench R23 score of 1458 and multi-core score of 10322 suggest it can feed the GPU adequately at standard resolutions, though at lower resolutions the CPU may become more of a factor.

The Intel Arc A550M's 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus with 224.0 GB/s bandwidth is sufficient for modern game assets at 1080p and most 1440p settings. The 2048 shading units and 128 TMUs provide a solid foundation for rasterized rendering, while the 16 ray tracing cores enable hardware-accelerated ray tracing, though the 8.397 TFLOPS FP32 performance suggests ray tracing will be a heavier load than traditional rasterization. The 64 ROPs deliver a pixel rate of 131.2 GPixel/s, which should support high frame rates at 1080p in less demanding titles.

The GPU's DirectX 12 Ultimate support (12_2) ensures compatibility with the latest game features, including mesh shaders and variable rate shading, which can improve performance in modern titles. The estimated gaming experience is that of a capable 1080p performer that can push into 1440p in esports and older titles, but will require settings adjustments for the most demanding AAA releases at higher resolutions. The 2050 MHz boost clock provides decent headroom, while the 60 W TDP is typical for a mobile midrange dGPU.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 10322 places it in the 78th percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 25550 across all tests. The single-core Cinebench R23 score of 1458 is modest, reflecting the Zen 3+ architecture's mobile power constraints. The Geekbench multi-core score of 7444 and single-core score of 1566 reinforce this picture: a processor that handles multi-threaded workloads well but is not a single-core leader.

The GPU's average benchmark score of 49737 from its Geekbench OpenCL score of 49894 and Vulkan score of 49580 puts it in the 86th percentile of all GPUs. This is notably higher than the CPU's percentile, making the GPU the stronger component in this pairing. The GPU sits within 0.4% of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti (49957) and 0.5% of the AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 (50001), while trailing the AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT (50951) by 2.4% and leading the AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT (48477) by 2.6%. These close margins place the Arc A550M in the upper echelon of mobile GPUs, competitive with desktop-class parts from previous generations.

The combined picture shows a system where the GPU outperforms the CPU in relative terms. The CPU's nearest rivals include the Intel Xeon D-2752TER (25530, 0.1% difference) and AMD Ryzen 7 5700 (25517, 0.1% difference), suggesting the 6600H performs equivalently to a desktop Ryzen 7 part in aggregate, despite being a mobile chip. The AMD Ryzen 5 7640U (25485) trails by 0.3%, while the AMD Ryzen 7 7730U (25625) leads by 0.3%, placing the 6600H in a tightly grouped cluster of upper-midrange processors.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A550M is built on the DG2-512 chip using the Xe-HPG architecture and Alchemist generation, fabricated on TSMC's 6 nm process with 21,700 million transistors on a 406 mm² die. The memory subsystem consists of 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, delivering 224.0 GB/s of bandwidth at 1750 MHz memory clock (14 Gbps effective). This bandwidth is adequate for 1080p gaming but may constrain performance at higher resolutions where texture streaming demands increase.

The GPU features 2048 shading units, 128 TMUs, and 64 ROPs, producing a texture rate of 262.4 GTexel/s and a pixel rate of 131.2 GPixel/s. The 16 ray tracing cores provide dedicated hardware for ray-traced effects, a feature that is increasingly important in modern games. The FP32 performance of 8.397 TFLOPS and FP16 performance of 16.79 TFLOPS (2:1) indicate strong compute capability for both gaming and content creation workloads.

The benchmark scores reveal the GPU's real-world positioning: the Geekbench Vulkan score of 49580 and OpenCL score of 49894 are nearly identical, suggesting consistent performance across different compute APIs. The 86th percentile ranking means this GPU outperforms the vast majority of installed GPUs, including many desktop parts. The PCIe 4.0 x16 interface ensures full bandwidth to the CPU, though in a laptop form factor, the actual bandwidth available may be limited by the platform's implementation. The 60 W TDP is modest for the performance level, indicating good efficiency from the 6 nm process.

FAQ

Q: How does the Intel Arc A550M compare to the AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT?

A: The Arc A550M scores an average of 49737, which is 2.6% higher than the RX 6800 XT's 48477 average score. This places the mobile Intel GPU slightly ahead of a desktop AMD flagship from the previous generation.

Q: What is the CPU's percentile ranking and what does it mean?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 6600H ranks in the 78th percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 25550. This means it outperforms approximately 78% of all CPUs in the benchmark database, placing it in the upper-midrange tier.

Q: Does the CPU support DDR5 memory?

A: Yes, the Ryzen 5 6600H supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, providing 76.8 GB/s of memory bandwidth. This is a significant advantage for memory-intensive workloads.

Q: What is the GPU's ray tracing capability?

A: The Intel Arc A550M has 16 dedicated ray tracing cores based on the Xe-HPG architecture. This enables hardware-accelerated ray tracing in supported games, though the 8.397 TFLOPS FP32 performance suggests ray tracing will be more demanding than traditional rasterization.

Q: How does the CPU compare to the AMD Ryzen 7 7730U?

A: The Ryzen 5 6600H scores 25550 on average, while the Ryzen 7 7730U scores 25625, making the 7730U 0.3% faster. The difference is negligible in real-world usage, placing both processors in the same performance tier.

Q: What is the combined percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 82, meaning this laptop configuration outperforms 82% of all CPU+GPU combinations in the database. This reflects the GPU's strong 86th percentile ranking combined with the CPU's solid 78th percentile.

Q: Is the GPU production status a concern?

A: The Intel Arc A550M is marked as end-of-life in production status. However, the benchmark scores show it remains competitive with current desktop GPUs, and the DirectX 12 Ultimate and Vulkan 1.4 support ensure ongoing software compatibility.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The AMD Ryzen 5 6600H uses the AMD Socket FP7, which is a mobile-specific socket, meaning the CPU is not upgradeable in the traditional sense. The platform's memory support is limited to DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration, providing 76.8 GB/s of bandwidth. The CPU offers PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes, while the GPU connects via PCIe 4.0 x16, providing adequate bandwidth for the Arc A550M.

The CPU has a TDP of 45 W, while the GPU has a TDP of 60 W, for a combined thermal envelope of 105 W for the two primary compute components. There is no suggested PSU listed for the GPU, but the combined TDP suggests that a laptop power adapter capable of delivering over 105 W to the compute components, plus overhead for the rest of the system, would be necessary. The integrated Radeon 660M graphics in the CPU provide a fallback display output, though the discrete Arc A550M is the primary graphics solution.

A sensible next upgrade for this platform would be increasing system memory to maximize the dual-channel DDR5 bandwidth, as the 76.8 GB/s memory bandwidth is a potential bottleneck for both CPU and GPU performance. The storage subsystem benefits from PCIe Gen 4 support, so upgrading to a high-speed NVMe SSD would reduce load times and improve overall system responsiveness. The GPU's 8 GB VRAM is adequate for current games, but future titles with higher VRAM requirements may necessitate a system-level upgrade rather than a component swap, given the laptop form factor.

Who Should Build It

This configuration targets gamers who prioritize 1080p performance with high settings and are willing to accept some compromises at 1440p. The GPU's 86th percentile ranking means it handles most modern titles at 1080p with high frame rates, while the CPU's 78th percentile ensures smooth gameplay without significant bottlenecking. Esports titles and older AAA games will run particularly well, potentially exceeding 60 FPS at 1440p with reduced settings.

Content creators working with video editing, 3D rendering, or photo processing will benefit from the CPU's multi-core performance, evidenced by the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 10322 and PassMark multi-thread score of 18669. The GPU's 16.79 TFLOPS FP16 performance and 8.397 TFLOPS FP32 performance provide acceleration for GPU-accelerated rendering and compute workloads. The PassMark data encryption score of 14277 and extended instructions score of 15903 indicate strong performance for security-related and AVX-heavy tasks.

Students and professionals in STEM fields requiring local compute for simulations, data analysis, or software development will find the combination adequate. The PassMark integer math score of 64927 and floating point math score of 36796 demonstrate solid general-purpose compute capability. Small business workstations running productivity suites, database applications, or virtualization workloads will perform well, though the mobile form factor limits expansion options compared to desktop systems.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data indicates that the GPU is the stronger component in this pairing, with an 86th percentile ranking versus the CPU's 78th percentile. In gaming workloads, the GPU will generally be the limiting factor at higher resolutions and with more demanding graphics settings, as the CPU's 1458 single-core Cinebench R23 score may struggle to maintain frame rates in CPU-bound scenarios at lower resolutions. The CPU's modest single-core performance suggests that at 1080p with reduced settings, the CPU could become the bottleneck in games that rely heavily on single-threaded performance.

The CPU's multi-core performance is comparatively stronger, with the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 10322 representing a 7.1x scaling from the single-core score, indicating efficient use of its 6 cores and 12 threads. In multi-threaded workloads like video encoding or 3D rendering, the CPU will keep pace with the GPU's compute capabilities, though the GPU's FP32 throughput may offload some of these tasks. Memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s is shared between CPU and GPU workloads, potentially creating contention in memory-intensive applications.

The PassMark physics score of 891 and find prime numbers score of 52 suggest that the CPU's integer and physics performance is modest, which could impact simulation-heavy games or physics-based workloads. The data compression score of 229879 and random string sorting score of 23888 indicate strong performance in data manipulation tasks, suggesting the system handles database and file compression workloads well. Overall, the system is well-balanced for gaming at 1080p and productivity tasks, with the GPU being the primary performance driver in graphics workloads and the CPU providing adequate support.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build combining the AMD Ryzen 5 6600H mobile processor with the Intel Arc A550M mobile GPU, achieving an 82nd combined percentile ranking. The CPU is a 6-core, 12-thread processor from the 6000 series based on the Zen 3+ architecture (Rembrandt codename), manufactured on TSMC's 6 nm process with a 208 mm² die size. The GPU is from Intel's Alchemist generation (Arc 5 Mobile) using the Xe-HPG architecture on the DG2-512 chip, also on TSMC's 6 nm process but with a larger 406 mm² die containing 21,700 million transistors.

The pairing represents an upper-midrange mobile platform that competes with desktop hardware from previous generations. The GPU's 86th percentile ranking is notably higher than the CPU's 78th percentile, making this a GPU-forward configuration. The combined 82nd percentile indicates that this system outperforms the majority of laptop configurations in the database, though it is not a flagship or enthusiast-tier offering. The 105 W combined TDP (45 W CPU + 60 W GPU) is moderate for a gaming laptop, suggesting reasonable battery life expectations when not under load.

The platform is built for gaming and content creation at 1080p and entry-level 1440p, with the GPU providing the primary performance advantage. The CPU's 6 cores and 12 threads are adequate for modern gaming and productivity, though power users seeking higher multi-threaded performance may find the core count limiting. This configuration is best suited for users who want a balanced, capable laptop without the expense or thermal demands of flagship mobile components.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 5 6600H is a 6-core, 12-thread processor from the 6000 series, based on the Zen 3+ architecture with the codename Rembrandt. It operates with a base clock of 3.30 GHz and a boost clock of 4.50 GHz, with a TDP of 45 W. The CPU is fabricated on TSMC's 6 nm process with a 208 mm² die size, and it uses the AMD Socket FP7 for mobile platforms. The cache hierarchy consists of 64 KB L1 per core, 512 KB L2 per core, and 16 MB shared L3 cache.

The benchmark results show a processor that excels in multi-threaded workloads relative to its mobile class. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 10322 is strong for a 45 W mobile chip, while the single-core score of 1458 is more modest, reflecting the power constraints of the mobile form factor. The Geekbench scores of 7444 multi-core and 1566 single-core reinforce this pattern, with the multi-core performance being significantly more competitive than single-core.

The PassMark results provide a detailed breakdown of the CPU's capabilities across different workload types. The multithread score of 18669 is solid, while the data compression score of 229879 and random string sorting score of 23888 indicate excellent performance in data manipulation tasks. The integer math score of 64927 and floating point math score of 36796 show balanced performance across both compute types, with the extended instructions score of 15903 demonstrating strong AVX and other instruction set extensions support. The data encryption score of 14277 and physics score of 891 are more modest, suggesting that security-heavy or physics-based workloads may not be this CPU's primary strength.

The 6 nm process from TSMC enables good efficiency, allowing the 45 W TDP to deliver competitive performance. The integrated Radeon 660M graphics provide a basic display output and hardware acceleration fallback, though the discrete Arc A550M handles the bulk of graphics workloads. The lack of an unlocked multiplier means overclocking is not supported, but the boost clock of 4.50 GHz provides adequate single-threaded performance for most applications. The CPU's 78th percentile ranking places it among the top quarter of all CPUs, making it a capable choice for a wide range of tasks in a mobile form factor.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 6600H + Intel Arc A550M

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 5 6600H

Intel Arc A550M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Gaming Performance

Benchmark Performance

GPU Analysis

FAQ

Upgrade Path and Platform

Who Should Build It

Balance and Bottleneck

Build Overview

CPU Analysis

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds