SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 6600H + Intel Arc A370M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

90 Score

Top 10% Ranking

90 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 10% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

87%

GPU

93%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 5 6600H

25,550 Benchmark Score

Top 13% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A370M

29,175 Benchmark Score

Top 7% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Balance and Bottleneck

The AMD Ryzen 5 6600H and Intel Arc A370M pairing presents a clear case of CPU-led performance, where the processor is the dominant component in every measurable category. The CPU sits at the 78th percentile among all processors, while the GPU ranks at the 74th percentile among all GPUs, and the combined system percentile is 76. This narrow spread—just 4 percentile points between the two components—indicates the pairing is reasonably balanced for its class, though the CPU holds a slight edge.

Benchmark results reinforce this conclusion. The CPU's average benchmark score is 25,550, while the GPU's average is 29,175. In raw compute terms, the GPU outpaces the CPU by roughly 14 percent, but the CPU's single-thread performance (Geekbench single-core score of 1,566) and multi-thread capability (Geekbench multi-core score of 7,444) are what drive system responsiveness and frame pacing. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 10,322 and single-core score of 1,458 show a processor that can feed frames without becoming a constraint in most scenarios.

Bottleneck analysis from the data suggests the GPU will be the limiting factor in graphics-heavy workloads. The Arc A370M's 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus with 112.0 GB/s bandwidth is modest, and its FP32 throughput of 4.198 TFLOPS places it in the lower-midrange of mobile GPUs. When paired with a CPU that has 12 threads and a 4.50 GHz boost clock, the GPU will saturate before the CPU in gaming and 3D rendering tasks. Conversely, CPU-bound workloads like data compression (Passmark score of 229,879), data encryption (14,277), and integer math (64,927) will run at full speed without GPU involvement.

The FPS scaling evidence is absent from the measured data—no measuredFps rows exist for this exact combination. However, the percentile positions and benchmark scores imply that at 1080p, the GPU will be the primary constraint, while at lower resolutions or in CPU-heavy titles, the CPU's headroom will matter more. The CPU's 45 W TDP versus the GPU's 35 W TDP also suggests thermal and power distribution favors the processor, which can sustain higher clocks for longer periods.

The memory subsystem further clarifies the bottleneck picture. The CPU supports DDR5 dual-channel memory with 76.8 GB/s bandwidth, which is ample for feeding both the CPU and GPU. The GPU's 112.0 GB/s memory bandwidth is sufficient for its 4 GB frame buffer but will limit texture-heavy scenes at higher settings. The data shows a system where the CPU is never the problem, and the GPU is the ceiling for graphical performance.

# Benchmark Performance

The AMD Ryzen 5 6600H delivers strong midrange mobile CPU performance. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 10,322 and single-core score of 1,458 place it comfortably in the upper half of laptop processors, with a 78th percentile standing. The Geekbench results—7,444 multi-core and 1,566 single-core—confirm this positioning. The CPU's average benchmark score of 25,550 is nearly identical to its nearest rivals: the Intel Xeon D-2752TER (25,530, delta 0.1 percent), the AMD Ryzen 7 5700 (25,517, delta 0.1 percent), and the AMD Ryzen 5 7640U (25,485, delta 0.3 percent). The AMD Ryzen 7 7730U is slightly ahead at 25,625, a delta of -0.3 percent, meaning the 6600H trails it by a negligible margin.

Passmark sub-tests reveal specific strengths. The data compression score of 229,879 is exceptional for a mobile CPU, indicating strong memory and cache performance. Floating-point math (36,796) and integer math (64,927) scores are solid for content creation and scientific workloads. The extended instructions score of 15,903 shows good SIMD and AVX capability, which benefits video encoding and 3D rendering. Single-thread performance on Passmark is 3,178, which is competitive for everyday office tasks and lightly-threaded applications.

The Intel Arc A370M GPU posts a Geekbench OpenCL score of 29,676 and a Vulkan score of 28,673, with an average benchmark score of 29,175. Its 74th percentile ranking places it near the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH (29,197, delta -0.1 percent), the AMD FirePro W8000 (29,211, delta -0.1 percent), and slightly above the AMD Radeon RX 470 (28,996, delta 0.6 percent). Interestingly, the AMD Radeon RX 6800M—a much higher-tier GPU—scores 28,874, a delta of 1 percent, meaning the Arc A370M actually outperforms it in these specific synthetic benchmarks. This suggests the A370M is well-optimized for compute tasks, even if its gaming performance may differ.

Combined, the CPU and GPU produce a system percentile of 76. The data indicates a pairing that is slightly CPU-favored but capable of handling balanced workloads. For productivity tasks that use the CPU heavily, this system will outperform its GPU-centric peers. For gaming, the GPU will set the ceiling, but the CPU's headroom prevents stutter and frame drops in CPU-bound scenarios.

# Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is built around the AMD Socket FP7, which is a mobile-only socket used in the Ryzen 6000 series. The CPU is a 6-core, 12-thread part with base clock of 3.30 GHz and boost clock of 4.50 GHz, based on the Zen 3+ architecture (Rembrandt codename) on a 6 nm TSMC process with a die size of 208 mm². Memory support is DDR5 dual-channel with 76.8 GB/s bandwidth, and ECC memory is not supported. PCIe connectivity is Gen 4 with 20 lanes from the CPU, which is sufficient for a discrete GPU and one or two NVMe drives.

The GPU is an Intel Arc A370M with a DG2-128 chip, part of the Xe-HPG architecture (Alchemist generation, Arc 3 Mobile). It uses a 6 nm TSMC process with 7,200 million transistors on a 157 mm² die. The GPU connects via PCIe 4.0 x8, which provides adequate bandwidth for its 4 GB GDDR6 memory (64-bit bus, 112.0 GB/s). The GPU's TDP is 35 W, and it is marked as end-of-life production status, with a release date of March 29, 2022.

Upgrade potential is limited by the mobile form factor. The CPU is soldered to the motherboard (Socket FP7 is not user-upgradeable in most laptops), and the GPU is also integrated into the laptop logic board. The suggested PSU is null in the data, but the combined TDP of 80 W (45 W CPU + 35 W GPU) indicates modest power requirements that any standard laptop power adapter can handle. There is no PSU headroom concern for a desktop replacement scenario because this is a laptop build class.

A sensible next upgrade for this platform would be increasing memory capacity or speed, as DDR5 support allows for faster dual-channel configurations. Storage can also be expanded via the 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes, which support multiple NVMe SSDs. For users seeking more graphics performance, the only path is a new laptop, as the GPU is not replaceable. The CPU's 78th percentile performance remains competitive, but the GPU's end-of-life status suggests it will age faster than the processor.

# Who Should Build It

This pairing targets users who need a balanced laptop for mixed workloads rather than a specialized machine. Gamers at 1080p with medium-to-high settings will find the Arc A370M adequate, especially in esports titles where CPU-bound performance matters more. The CPU's 12 threads and 4.50 GHz boost clock ensure high frame rates in competitive games, while the GPU handles the rendering load without exceeding its 4 GB frame buffer.

Content creators, particularly those working with video encoding or photo editing, will benefit from the CPU's strong multi-core scores. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 10,322 and Passmark data compression score of 229,879 indicate fast export times and responsive timeline scrubbing. The GPU's OpenCL score of 29,676 also supports hardware acceleration in compatible applications.

Software developers and students in computer science will appreciate the CPU's single-thread performance (Geekbench single-core 1,566) for compilation tasks and the 12 threads for parallel builds. The DDR5 memory support with 76.8 GB/s bandwidth helps with large in-memory datasets. Small business workstations that run office productivity suites, web browsing, and light multitasking will find this system more than capable, with the CPU's Passmark single-thread score of 3,178 ensuring snappy UI response.

The data shows this is not a system for 4K gaming or heavy 3D rendering, where the GPU's 4 GB memory and 64-bit bus would become a severe bottleneck. Instead, it suits users who prioritize CPU performance and need a GPU good enough for moderate gaming and acceleration tasks.

# CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 5 6600H is a 6-core, 12-thread mobile processor built on the Zen 3+ architecture (Rembrandt) using a 6 nm TSMC process. It has a base clock of 3.30 GHz and a boost clock of 4.50 GHz, with a TDP of 45 W. The cache hierarchy includes 64 KB of L1 per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of shared L3 cache. The die size is 208 mm², and it is manufactured by TSMC.

The CPU's benchmark scores position it at the 78th percentile among all CPUs. The Cinebench R15 multi-core score of 1,681.5 and single-core score of 234 show a well-rounded processor. The R23 multi-core score of 10,322 is particularly strong for a 45 W mobile part, indicating that the 6 nm process allows sustained high clocks under load. The single-core R23 score of 1,458 is competitive with desktop CPUs from the same generation, making it suitable for lightly-threaded tasks like web browsing and office applications.

The Geekbench scores—7,444 multi-core and 1,566 single-core—align with the Cinebench results. Passmark sub-tests add nuance: the data compression score of 229,879 is a standout, suggesting excellent memory bandwidth utilization and cache efficiency. The floating-point math score of 36,796 and integer math score of 64,927 indicate strong general-purpose compute. The extended instructions score of 15,903 shows AVX2 and similar instruction set support is well-implemented.

The integrated Radeon 660M graphics are present but secondary to the discrete Arc A370M. The CPU's memory support is DDR5 dual-channel with 76.8 GB/s bandwidth, which is faster than DDR4-based rivals and contributes to the strong memory-sensitive benchmarks. The CPU is not multiplier unlocked, so overclocking is not possible, but the boost clock of 4.50 GHz already provides high single-thread performance.

Real-world implications: the 6600H can handle video editing, 3D modeling, and software compilation without breaking a sweat. The 12 threads allow smooth multitasking, and the 6 nm process keeps power draw at 45 W, which is reasonable for a performance laptop. The nearest rivals—the Intel Xeon D-2752TER and AMD Ryzen 7 5700—are within 0.1 percent in average score, meaning the 6600H is right in the middle of its performance class.

# Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFpsUltraByGame entries, and dataIsMeasured is false. All gaming performance figures below are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and percentile positions.

The Arc A370M's Geekbench Vulkan score of 28,673 and OpenCL score of 29,676 suggest it can handle 1080p gaming at medium settings in most modern titles. The GPU's 4 GB GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus with 112.0 GB/s bandwidth will be the limiting factor for high-resolution textures and anti-aliasing. At 1080p ultra settings, expect frame rates in the 30-50 fps range for AAA games, with esports titles like CS:GO or Valorant reaching 100+ fps due to the CPU's strong single-thread performance.

The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 10,322 and single-core score of 1,458 indicate it can maintain high frame pacing in CPU-bound scenarios. Games that rely heavily on physics or AI will benefit from the 12 threads. The Passmark physics score of 891 is moderate, suggesting that complex physics simulations may cause frame drops, but this is an uncommon workload in typical gaming.

At 1440p, the GPU will be severely constrained. The 4 GB frame buffer is insufficient for modern games at this resolution, and the 64-bit memory bus will cause bandwidth stalls. Frame rates would likely fall below 30 fps in demanding titles. At 720p or with reduced settings, the system could push 60+ fps in most games, but this is not a recommended gaming resolution for modern displays.

The GPU's nearest rival, the AMD Radeon RX 470, is a desktop card with similar average score (28,996 vs 29,175). This suggests the A370M performs like a midrange desktop GPU from several generations ago. The Arc A370M's 4.198 TFLOPS FP32 throughput is adequate for 1080p medium settings, but not for high-refresh-rate gaming at ultra quality. The CPU will never be the bottleneck in gaming; the GPU will always be the limiting factor.

# FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined system percentile is 76, with the CPU at the 78th percentile and the GPU at the 74th percentile among all respective components.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Ryzen 5 6600H has an average benchmark score of 25,550, which is within 0.3 percent of the Intel Xeon D-2752TER (25,530), AMD Ryzen 7 5700 (25,517), and AMD Ryzen 5 7640U (25,485). The AMD Ryzen 7 7730U is slightly ahead at 25,625, a delta of -0.3 percent.

Q: What are the CPU's core and thread counts?

A: The CPU has 6 cores and 12 threads, with a base clock of 3.30 GHz and a boost clock of 4.50 GHz. It uses the Zen 3+ architecture on a 6 nm TSMC process.

Q: How much video memory does the GPU have?

A: The Intel Arc A370M has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, with 112.0 GB/s memory bandwidth and a 1750 MHz memory clock (14 Gbps effective).

Q: Does the system support DDR5 memory?

A: Yes, the CPU supports DDR5 dual-channel memory with 76.8 GB/s bandwidth. The memory bus is dual-channel, and ECC memory is not supported.

Q: What is the GPU's production status?

A: The Intel Arc A370M is marked as end-of-life, with a release date of March 29, 2022. It is based on the Xe-HPG architecture (Alchemist generation).

Q: Is measured FPS data available for this pairing?

A: No, the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact combination. All gaming performance figures are estimates based on benchmark scores, not direct measurements.

# Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build pairing the AMD Ryzen 5 6600H CPU with the Intel Arc A370M GPU. The CPU is a 6-core, 12-thread mobile processor from the 6000 series, using the Zen 3+ architecture on a 6 nm TSMC process. The GPU is an Intel Arc A370M from the Alchemist generation (Arc 3 Mobile), based on the Xe-HPG architecture with a DG2-128 chip on a 6 nm TSMC process.

The combined system percentile is 76, placing it in the upper-midrange of all laptop configurations. The CPU's 78th percentile and GPU's 74th percentile are closely matched, with the CPU holding a slight performance edge. The average benchmark scores are 25,550 for the CPU and 29,175 for the GPU, indicating that the GPU has higher raw compute throughput but the CPU is more balanced across a wider range of workloads.

This is a system designed for balanced productivity and moderate gaming. The CPU's 12 threads and 4.50 GHz boost clock make it excellent for multi-threaded content creation, while the GPU's 4 GB GDDR6 memory and 4.198 TFLOPS FP32 performance handle 1080p gaming at medium settings. The build class is laptop, meaning no user-upgradeable components, and the production status of the GPU is end-of-life.

The overall tier is midrange mobile, with the CPU being the stronger component. Users should expect a responsive system for office work, software development, and light video editing, with gaming performance limited to 1080p at moderate quality. The system's DDR5 memory support and PCIe Gen 4 connectivity provide a modern foundation, but the GPU's 4 GB frame buffer is the primary limitation for future gaming demands.

# Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU's single-thread performance (Geekbench single-core 1,566) and 12 threads can push high frame rates in esports titles, but the GPU's 4 GB memory and 64-bit bus will cap frame rates at 1080p medium settings. Expect 60+ fps in competitive games, with the GPU as the limiting factor.

Streaming: The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 10,322 provides enough headroom for x264 encoding at 1080p, while the GPU's Vulkan score of 28,673 can handle game capture. The 12 threads allow simultaneous gaming and encoding, though the GPU may struggle with demanding titles while streaming.

Video editing: The CPU's Passmark data compression score of 229,879 and floating-point math score of 36,796 indicate fast timeline scrubbing and export times. The GPU's OpenCL score of 29,676 accelerates effects and color grading. This system is well-suited for 1080p editing, with 4K possible but slower.

3D rendering: The CPU's 12 threads (Cinebench R23 multi-core 10,322) will handle CPU-based rendering in Blender or similar tools, but the GPU's 4 GB memory limits its use for GPU-accelerated rendering. Small scenes will render fine; large scenes will hit memory limits.

Software development: The CPU's single-thread score of 3,178 on Passmark and multi-thread score of 18,669 make compilation fast. The DDR5 memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s speeds up build times and test execution. Docker containers and virtual machines will run smoothly on 12 threads.

Student and office work: The CPU's Passmark single-thread score of 3,178 ensures snappy UI in office suites and web browsers. The integrated Radeon 660M provides a fallback if the discrete GPU is disabled for battery saving. This system handles spreadsheets, document editing, and multitasking with ease, making it a reliable daily driver for coursework or small business tasks.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 6600H + Intel Arc A370M

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 5 6600H

Intel Arc A370M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds