SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 5600HS + Intel Arc A550M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

85 Score

Top 15% Ranking

85 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 15% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

CPU Bottleneck

CPU

73%

GPU

96%

Your CPU is limiting system performance. Consider upgrading to a faster processor to better utilize your GPU.

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 5 5600HS

3,447 Benchmark Score

Top 27% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A550M

49,737 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Bottleneck Detected

CPU Bottleneck - Upgrading the weaker component will improve overall performance.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 5 5600HS and Intel Arc A550M form a laptop-class pairing that sits at the 70th percentile overall among all builds, combining a 6-core Zen 3 mobile processor with a discrete Intel Xe-HPG graphics solution. The CPU, a 7nm TSMC part from the Cezanne family, posts an average benchmark score of 3447, placing it at the 54th percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU’s average score of 49737 lands it at the 86th percentile of all GPUs. This is a system where the graphics component is the statistical standout, but the processor provides a balanced, efficient foundation for the workloads that follow.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 5 5600HS is a 6-core, 12-thread mobile processor built on the Zen 3 architecture, manufactured on TSMC’s 7nm process node. It operates with a base clock of 3.00 GHz and a boost clock of 4.20 GHz, all within a 35 W TDP. The chip contains 10,700 million transistors on a 180 mm² die, with a cache hierarchy of 64 KB L1 per core, 512 KB L2 per core, and a shared 16 MB L3 cache. Memory support is limited to DDR4 on a dual-channel bus, yielding a theoretical bandwidth of 68.3 GB/s, and the integrated Radeon Vega 7 GPU is present for basic display tasks.

Benchmark results show a processor that is competitive with desktop parts from a previous generation. In Cinebench R23, the CPU scores 9564 points in multi-core and 1367 points in single-core, while Geekbench results show 6395 multi-core and 1569 single-core. The average benchmark score of 3447 places it exactly between the Intel Core i7-10870H (3446, 0% delta) and the AMD Ryzen 5 4600HS (3444, 0.1% delta). This indicates that despite being a 35 W mobile chip, the 5600HS effectively matches a high-end 8-core Intel H-series CPU from the same era in overall throughput, and it edges out its direct predecessor by a negligible margin.

The 54th percentile ranking against all CPUs means the processor sits in the middle of the pack globally, but within the mobile context, the 12-thread count and Zen 3 IPC improvements make it a solid performer for multi-threaded productivity. The 4.20 GHz boost clock ensures responsive single-threaded behavior, which is reflected in the Cinebench R15 single-core score of 223. For real workloads, this translates to snappy application launches, fluid code compilation in smaller projects, and competent video editing timelines that do not rely on heavy GPU acceleration.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is built around the AMD Socket FP6, which is a mobile-specific package. The CPU supports DDR4 memory in a dual-channel configuration, and the PCIe interface is limited to Gen 3. The GPU, in contrast, uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 bus interface, though the CPU’s Gen 3 support may bottleneck the link bandwidth in some scenarios, particularly for data-heavy GPU workloads that exceed the Gen 3 throughput.

The CPU has a 35 W TDP, while the GPU is rated at 60 W, making the combined thermal envelope approximately 95 W. There is no suggested PSU listed in the data, but the low combined TDP means a standard laptop power adapter is sufficient; there is no headroom for overclocking since the CPU multiplier is locked. The production status for the CPU is "Active," while the GPU is marked "End-of-life," so the upgrade path for this specific pairing is limited to replacing the entire laptop rather than swapping individual components.

A sensible next upgrade within the same platform family would be a higher-tier Ryzen 5000-series mobile chip with more cores, such as an 8-core variant, though the data does not specify exact model numbers or their performance. The memory bus remains dual-channel DDR4, so any upgrade would retain the same 68.3 GB/s bandwidth ceiling. The GPU, being end-of-life, has no successor listed, meaning users looking for more graphics performance would need to move to a different platform entirely.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU+GPU combination, and the `dataIsMeasured` flag is false. Therefore, all frame rate discussions below are estimates derived from the benchmark scores rather than direct measurements. The Intel Arc A550M scores 49894 in Geekbench OpenCL and 49580 in Geekbench Vulkan, averaging 49737, which places it at the 86th percentile of all GPUs. This is a strong compute result that suggests capable 1080p gaming, but without measured FPS data, specifics remain projections.

Given the GPU’s average score sits within 0.4% of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti (49957) and 0.5% of the AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 (50001), the Arc A550M should deliver frame rates comparable to those desktop-class parts in titles that are not bottlenecked by drivers or API overhead. At 1080p with ultra settings, this GPU would likely push well above 60 FPS in most esports titles and achieve playable 60 FPS in demanding AAA games, though the exact figures are unknown. At 1440p, the 8 GB GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus (224.0 GB/s bandwidth) may become a limiting factor, potentially dropping performance below the 60 FPS threshold in the most graphically intensive scenes.

The CPU’s single-core score of 1367 in Cinebench R23 suggests it can keep up with the GPU in most gaming scenarios, but the 35 W TDP may throttle sustained loads, especially in CPU-bound titles. The lack of measured FPS means these are estimates based on the 86th percentile GPU ranking, which is high, but the actual experience will vary by game and driver maturity.

Who Should Build It

This pairing targets mobile users who need a balanced system for gaming and productivity without a desktop footprint. The CPU’s 54th percentile ranking and the GPU’s 86th percentile ranking create a profile suited for gamers at 1080p resolution who prioritize frame rates over maximum visual fidelity, as the GPU’s compute scores suggest strong performance at that resolution. Content creators working with 1080p video editing or photo manipulation would benefit from the 12 threads and the GPU’s OpenCL score of 49894, which indicates acceleration in renderers that leverage OpenCL.

Software developers compiling code or running virtual machines would find the 6 cores and 12 threads adequate for moderate parallelism, with the Geekbench multi-core score of 6395 providing a reference point for compilation times. Students and small business users running office applications, web browsing, and spreadsheets would be well-served by the single-core performance, though the discrete GPU is overkill for such tasks. The 35 W CPU TDP makes this a viable option for thin-and-light laptops where battery life is a consideration, but the 60 W GPU adds heat and power draw, making it more of a performance-class machine.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data shows a system where the GPU is the dominant component, with an 86th percentile ranking versus the CPU’s 54th percentile. This imbalance means the CPU is likely the bottleneck in most gaming scenarios, particularly at lower resolutions where frame rates are high and CPU overhead becomes significant. The Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1367 is moderate, and in esports titles that rely heavily on single-thread performance, the CPU may struggle to feed the GPU enough frames to reach its full potential.

In multi-threaded workloads like 3D rendering or video encoding, the CPU’s 12 threads will be fully utilized, and the GPU’s 8.397 TFLOPS FP32 performance can assist in GPU-accelerated renderers, but the CPU’s 35 W TDP limits sustained all-core boost clocks. The GPU’s 2.6% lead over the AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT (48477) in average score suggests it is not the limiting factor in compute-heavy tasks, but the 128-bit memory bus and 224.0 GB/s bandwidth may cap performance in memory-intensive workloads like high-resolution texture streaming.

The FPS scaling from the estimated gaming performance shows that the GPU is capable of high frame rates, but the CPU’s single-threaded performance and the lack of PCIe Gen 4 support from the processor could introduce stuttering or frame pacing issues in CPU-bound titles. The combined 70th percentile ranking indicates a system that performs above average overall, but the bottleneck analysis points to the CPU as the primary constraint in gaming and the memory bandwidth as a secondary limitation in GPU compute tasks.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined percentile ranking of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The build sits at the 70th percentile overall, with the CPU at the 54th percentile and the GPU at the 86th percentile.

Q: How does the AMD Ryzen 5 5600HS compare to its nearest rival, the Intel Core i7-10870H?

A: The Ryzen 5 5600HS has an average benchmark score of 3447, which is 0% different from the Intel Core i7-10870H’s score of 3446, placing them statistically equal in overall performance.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the CPU, and what type of memory does it support?

A: The CPU supports DDR4 memory on a dual-channel bus with a theoretical bandwidth of 68.3 GB/s, and ECC memory is not supported.

Q: Is the Intel Arc A550M still in production?

A: No, the Intel Arc A550M is marked as "End-of-life" in the data, while the AMD Ryzen 5 5600HS is listed as "Active."

Q: What is the GPU’s FP32 performance in TFLOPS?

A: The Intel Arc A550M delivers 8.397 TFLOPS of FP32 compute, with FP16 at 16.79 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio).

Q: Does the CPU have an unlocked multiplier for overclocking?

A: No, the multiplier is locked, and the CPU has a fixed 35 W TDP, limiting overclocking potential.

Q: What is the process node and transistor count for the GPU?

A: The Intel Arc A550M is built on TSMC’s 6nm process and contains 21,700 million transistors on a 406 mm² die.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The GPU’s 86th percentile ranking suggests it can drive 1080p displays at high frame rates in competitive titles, but the CPU’s 54th percentile may cap performance below the refresh rate of 144Hz panels in CPU-bound games. The estimated FPS is not measured, so this is a projection based on the GPU’s average score of 49737.

Streaming: The 12 threads of the CPU provide enough headroom for software encoding at moderate bitrates, while the GPU’s 16 ray tracing cores and 2048 shading units can handle the rendering load. The combined TDP of 95 W (35 W CPU + 60 W GPU) may limit sustained streaming sessions in thin chassis.

Video editing: The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 9564 indicates capable 1080p timeline editing, and the GPU’s OpenCL score of 49894 accelerates effects and exports in OpenCL-compatible software. The 8 GB GDDR6 memory is sufficient for 1080p projects but may be tight for 4K multi-layer timelines.

3D rendering: The CPU’s 12 threads deliver a Geekbench multi-core score of 6395, which is adequate for CPU-based rendering, while the GPU’s 8.397 TFLOPS FP32 performance can accelerate GPU renderers. The 128-bit memory bus may slow down large scene data transfers.

Software development: Compilation tasks benefit from the 6 cores and 12 threads, with the Geekbench multi-core score providing a baseline for parallel build times. The single-core score of 1367 in Cinebench R23 ensures responsive IDE interaction, and the 16 MB L3 cache reduces latency in repetitive code loops.

Student and office work: The CPU’s single-core performance is more than sufficient for word processing, spreadsheets, and web browsing, and the integrated Radeon Vega 7 GPU can handle display output when the discrete GPU is idle. The 35 W CPU TDP contributes to longer battery life in light workloads, though the discrete GPU draws power even at idle.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build (buildClass: "laptop") pairing the AMD Ryzen 5 5600HS with the Intel Arc A550M. The CPU is a 6-core, 12-thread Zen 3 part from the 5000 series, while the GPU is an Intel Arc A550M from the Alchemist generation, based on the DG2-512 chip. The combined percentile ranking of 70 places this system above average, with the GPU’s 86th percentile being the standout component and the CPU’s 54th percentile providing a middle-of-the-road foundation. The GPU is marked as end-of-life, while the CPU remains active, suggesting this pairing is a snapshot of a specific transition period in mobile hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 3447, with specific results including 1563 in Cinebench R15 multi-core, 223 in single-core, 9564 in Cinebench R23 multi-core, 1367 in single-core, 6395 in Geekbench multi-core, and 1569 in single-core. This places it at the 54th percentile of all CPUs, with its nearest rival being the Intel Core i7-10870H at 3446 (0% delta) and the AMD Ryzen 5 4600HS at 3444 (0.1% delta). The GPU’s average score is 49737, from Geekbench OpenCL at 49894 and Vulkan at 49580, placing it at the 86th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rival is the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti at 49957 (-0.4% delta) and the AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 at 50001 (-0.5% delta).

The combined picture shows a GPU that outperforms its CPU counterpart by a significant margin in percentile terms (86 vs. 54). The GPU is within 2.4% of the AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT (50951) and 2.6% ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT (48477), indicating desktop-class rasterization potential. The CPU, meanwhile, is statistically tied with the Intel Core i7-10870H and the AMD Ryzen 5 4600HS, showing no generational improvement over its immediate predecessor. The overall build’s 70th percentile ranking reflects this imbalance: the GPU carries the system to above-average status, while the CPU holds it back from the top quartile. Benchmark results indicate that this pairing is best suited for graphics-intensive workloads at 1080p, where the GPU’s compute lead can be fully exploited, rather than CPU-bound tasks that would expose the processor’s mid-pack ranking.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 5600HS + Intel Arc A550M

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 5 5600HS

Intel Arc A550M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Bottleneck Detected

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Upgrade Path and Platform

Gaming Performance

Who Should Build It

Balance and Bottleneck

FAQ

Usage Scenarios

Build Overview

Benchmark Performance

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds