SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 5600GT + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

91 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
85%
VS
GPU
98%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 5 5600GT

20,733 Benchmark Score
Top 15% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090

79,842 Benchmark Score
Top 2% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 5 5600GT paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 is a study in extreme asymmetry. The CPU is a 6-core, 12-thread Zen 3 part from the 5000 series, built on TSMC's 7 nm process, while the GPU is a 32 GB GDDR7 behemoth on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The combined benchmark percentile of this pairing is 83, placing it above the vast majority of tracked systems, yet the individual components sit at starkly different performance tiers—the CPU at the 74th percentile and the GPU at the 92nd.

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The RTX 5090 is a rendering powerhouse defined by its memory subsystem and compute throughput. It carries 32 GB of GDDR7 memory across a 512-bit bus, yielding a memory bandwidth of 1.79 TB/s. This is a critical specification for high-resolution textures and large datasets, as the bandwidth directly feeds the 104.8 TFLOPS of FP32 compute. The GPU is built on Blackwell 2.0 architecture with 21,760 shading units, 680 texture mapping units, and 176 raster operations pipelines. Its core clocks operate at a base of 2017 MHz and a boost of 2407 MHz, with memory running at 1750 MHz (28 Gbps effective).

For ray tracing and AI-accelerated workloads, the hardware is equally formidable. The GPU includes 170 RT cores and 680 tensor cores, which are the dedicated units for handling ray-traced lighting and DLSS-style upscaling. The pixel rate of 423.6 GPixel/s and texture rate of 1,636.8 GTexel/s indicate the GPU can sustain heavy fragment and texture work without stalling. In benchmark results, the GPU scores 18,355 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, which is a pure rasterization test. More telling for compute and rendering are the Geekbench scores: 334,370 in OpenCL and 376,728 in Vulkan. These numbers suggest the card excels in heterogeneous compute tasks, which is typical of a high-end NVIDIA part.

The Passmark G3D score of 39,650 and GPU compute score of 26,756 further reinforce this, showing that the card's strength lies in graphics rather than pure general-purpose compute. The GPU's performance is so high that it lands in the 92nd percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 79,842. Its nearest rivals in the database are data-center and mobile parts, such as the NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB (0.3% slower) and the AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT (1.1% slower), but the RTX 5090 edges them out by a small margin. The 1.79 TB/s of bandwidth is the key enabler here, allowing the 32 GB frame buffer to be fed at rates that prevent bottlenecks in 4K rendering scenarios.

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

The CPU benchmarks tell the story of a solid mid-range processor. In Cinebench R23, the Ryzen 5 5600GT scores 17,272 in multi-core and 2,438 in single-core. The multi-core result is respectable for a 6-core part, but the single-core score of 2,438 is more indicative of its daily responsiveness. In Geekbench, it scores 7,986 multi-core and 1,843 single-core. Passmark results show a multithread score of 20,325 and a single-thread score of 3,348. The CPU's average benchmark score is 20,733, placing it at the 74th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rival is the Intel Core i5-12490F, which scores 20,802, a 0.3% difference—essentially a statistical tie.

The GPU's average benchmark score is 79,842, putting it in the 92nd percentile. The combined picture is one of imbalance. The CPU is a capable mid-tier performer, while the GPU is a top-tier monster. In the 3DMark threaded tests, the CPU shows scaling from 913 single-thread to 5,554 max-threads, indicating that it can utilize additional cores effectively but is limited by its 6-core count. The data shows a 74th percentile CPU paired with a 92nd percentile GPU, which means the GPU is likely to be underutilized in many CPU-bound scenarios. The combined percentile of 83 is a compromise between the two, reflecting that the system as a whole is strong but not as strong as the GPU alone would suggest.

Looking at the FPS data, the pair achieves an average of 214.4 FPS across all tested games, ranking 134th out of 3,732 pairs. This rank is surprisingly low for such a powerful GPU, which is a direct consequence of the CPU bottleneck. The rank indicates that while the GPU can produce massive frame rates, the CPU prevents the system from reaching the top tiers of the database.

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work. One short paragraph per scenario, citing the numbers that support the verdict

For high-refresh gaming at 1080p, this system is exceptional. The CPU's single-thread score of 2,438 in Cinebench R23 supports high frame generation in esports titles, and the GPU's raw power ensures no graphical bottleneck. Measured FPS shows Counter-Strike 2 hitting 370.3 FPS and Valorant reaching 419 FPS at 1080p, which is well beyond the refresh rate of any mainstream monitor.

Streaming is a mixed scenario. The GPU's NVENC encoder (implied by the 680 tensor cores and modern architecture) can handle the encoding load, but the CPU's 6 cores might struggle with simultaneous gaming and software encoding. The CPU's Passmark data compression score of 258,882 indicates it can handle some background tasks, but the multi-core score of 20,325 is not exceptional for a streaming workload that benefits from more than 6 cores.

Video editing in applications like Premiere Pro benefits from both components. The GPU's 32 GB of VRAM and 104.8 TFLOPS of FP32 compute accelerate effects and rendering, while the CPU's 12 threads handle timeline scrubbing. The Geekbench multi-core score of 7,986 is adequate for 4K editing, but the system will feel more responsive in GPU-accelerated export workflows.

3D rendering in Blender or similar software is where the GPU dominates. The OpenCL score of 334,370 is massive, and the 170 RT cores provide hardware acceleration for ray-traced renders. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 17,272 is a secondary factor, as most rendering will be GPU-bound. This is a scenario where the pairing makes sense.

Software development workloads, particularly compilation, are CPU-bound. The Passmark integer math score of 69,566 and the Cinebench multi-core score of 17,272 indicate that build times will be moderate. The CPU's 6 cores are sufficient for small to medium projects, but larger codebases will see slower compile times compared to higher-core-count CPUs.

Student and office work is a trivial load for this system. The CPU's single-thread score of 3,348 in Passmark ensures snappy application launches and web browsing. The integrated Radeon Vega 7 graphics are not needed given the discrete GPU, but they serve as a backup. The system is overkill for this use case, but it will never feel slow.

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

The measured FPS data is comprehensive, covering 55 games at three resolutions. At 1080p, the system delivers extremely high frame rates in most titles. Counter-Strike: Global Offensive hits 821.2 FPS, while Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege reaches 437 FPS. More demanding titles like Cyberpunk 2077 still manage 85 FPS at 1080p Ultra, and Red Dead Redemption 2 runs at 97.7 FPS. The data confirms that at 1080p, the CPU is the limiting factor in many esports titles, as frame rates exceed 300 FPS in several cases.

At 1440p, the GPU begins to take more of the load. Counter-Strike 2 drops to 245.2 FPS, while Valorant holds at 398 FPS. Cyberpunk 2077 falls to 77 FPS, and Red Dead Redemption 2 to 71.3 FPS. This resolution is the sweet spot for the pairing, as the GPU's bandwidth and compute are fully utilized while the CPU can still feed frames in less demanding titles.

At 4K (3840x2160), the GPU is the clear bottleneck, which is expected. Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 53 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 at 52.1 FPS, and Call of Duty: Warzone at 98 FPS. The 32 GB VRAM is not stressed at this resolution in these titles, but the bandwidth is fully utilized. Games like Ark: Survival Ascended drop to 17.1 FPS, which is unplayable, but this is an outlier. The average FPS across all games and resolutions is 214.4, with the pair ranking 134th out of 3,732. This rank is lower than the GPU's percentile would suggest, again pointing to the CPU as the weak link.

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

The balance analysis is clear from the percentiles: the CPU is at the 74th percentile while the GPU is at the 92nd. This 18-percentage-point gap indicates a significant bottleneck. In gaming, the evidence is in the FPS scaling across resolutions. At 1080p, several titles exceed 300 FPS (e.g., CS:GO at 821.2 FPS, Valorant at 419 FPS), which suggests the CPU is maxing out its frame generation capability. As resolution increases to 4K, the FPS drops are proportional to the GPU's workload, not the CPU's limits.

For example, Fortnite drops from 176 FPS at 1080p to 59 FPS at 4K, a 66% reduction, which is a GPU-bound scaling pattern. However, the absolute FPS at 1080p is lower than what the RTX 5090 is capable of in a system with a stronger CPU. The pair rank of 134th out of 3,732 pairs, despite the GPU being in the 92nd percentile, is conclusive evidence that the CPU limits the system's peak performance in CPU-bound scenarios. In contrast, GPU-bound workloads like 3D rendering show no such limitation; the GPU's compute scores are unaffected by the CPU's performance. The CPU's max-thread score of 5,554 in 3DMark is the ceiling for its multi-threaded capabilities, and it is this ceiling that caps the system's overall gaming rank.

FAQ — 5-7 Q&A pairs answerable from FACT PACK data (format: Q: ... A: ...)

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile for this desktop build is 83, which places it in the top 17% of all tracked system pairings.

Q: How much VRAM does the RTX 5090 have, and what is its memory bandwidth?

A: The RTX 5090 has 32 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 512-bit bus, providing a memory bandwidth of 1.79 TB/s.

Q: What is the CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 5600GT scores 17,272 in the Cinebench R23 multi-core benchmark.

Q: Does the CPU have integrated graphics?

A: Yes, the Ryzen 5 5600GT includes Radeon Vega 7 integrated graphics, which is useful for troubleshooting or basic display output without the discrete GPU.

Q: What is the GPU's average benchmark score and percentile?

A: The RTX 5090 has an average benchmark score of 79,842, placing it in the 92nd percentile of all GPUs.

Q: What is the suggested power supply wattage for this GPU?

A: The suggested PSU for the RTX 5090 is 950 W, based on its 575 W TDP.

Q: What is the CPU's memory bus and bandwidth?

A: The CPU supports dual-channel DDR4 memory with a bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s.

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The AMD Ryzen 5 5600GT is a 6-core, 12-thread processor based on the Zen 3 architecture, codenamed Cezanne. It is built on TSMC's 7 nm process with 10,700 million transistors on a 180 mm² die. The base clock is 3.60 GHz with a boost clock of 4.60 GHz, and it has a TDP of 65 W. The cache hierarchy includes 64 KB of L1 per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of L3 cache.

The benchmark scores show a CPU that is strong in single-threaded tasks but average in multi-threaded workloads. The Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2,438 is competitive, while the multi-core score of 17,272 is appropriate for a 6-core part. The 3DMark thread scaling from 913 (single) to 5,554 (max) shows that the CPU does not scale perfectly with additional threads, which is typical for a 6-core design. The Passmark integer math score of 69,566 and floating-point score of 39,817 indicate solid general-purpose compute. The data compression score of 258,882 is notable, suggesting the CPU handles archiving and compression tasks efficiently. The CPU's average benchmark score is 20,733, which is only 0.3% lower than its nearest rival, the Intel Core i5-12490F. This places it in the 74th percentile, meaning it outperforms 74% of all CPUs in the database.

For real workloads, this CPU is well-suited for gaming and office tasks where single-thread performance is key. For multi-threaded tasks like video encoding or 3D rendering, it is adequate but not exceptional. The 65 W TDP makes it easy to cool, and the unlocked multiplier allows for overclocking headroom if the user has a capable air cooler.

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class (desktop/laptop from buildClass), and overall tier from the percentiles

This is a desktop build, as indicated by the buildClass field. The pairing consists of a mid-range 6-core CPU from the 5000 series and a top-tier 32 GB flagship GPU from the GeForce 50-series. The overall tier of this system, based on the combined percentile of 83, is high-end. It is not the absolute fastest pairing in the database, but it ranks in the top 17% of all tracked systems. The CPU is in the 74th percentile, which is a solid mid-range position, while the GPU is in the 92nd percentile, which is near the top of the stack.

The system is a desktop platform with the CPU socketed on AMD Socket AM4 and the GPU using a PCIe 5.0 x16 interface. The GPU is a dual-slot card that is 304 mm long, 137 mm tall, and 40 mm wide, with a 1x 16-pin power connector. The CPU's memory support is dual-channel DDR4, which is an older standard compared to the GPU's modern architecture. The pairing is unusual in that it combines a budget-oriented CPU (launch MSRP of $140) with a flagship GPU (launch MSRP of 1,999 USD), creating a system that is GPU-dominant in almost every workload.

Who Should Build It — target users and industries (gamers at specific resolutions, content creators, developers, students, small business workstations) tied strictly to the measured performance

This build is for users who prioritize GPU performance above all else. Gamers at 4K resolution will see playable frame rates in most titles, with Cyberpunk 2077 at 53 FPS and Red Dead Redemption 2 at 52.1 FPS. At 1440p, the system is exceptional, delivering over 100 FPS in most games, including 245.2 FPS in Counter-Strike 2 and 286 FPS in Rainbow Six Siege. For 1080p esports players, the system is overkill, but it will never drop below 55 FPS in the most demanding titles like Ark: Survival Ascended.

Content creators working with 3D rendering or GPU-accelerated video effects will benefit from the 104.8 TFLOPS of FP32 compute and 170 RT cores. The OpenCL score of 334,370 suggests this system can handle complex renders that would take hours on lesser GPUs. Software developers who work with CUDA or GPU compute will find the 680 tensor cores and 32 GB VRAM useful for machine learning models or data processing.

Students and office workers do not need this level of performance. The CPU's single-thread score of 3,348 in Passmark is more than enough for word processing and web browsing, but the GPU is wasted on such tasks. Small business workstations that run GPU-accelerated databases or simulation software would benefit from the raw compute, but the 6-core CPU may limit multi-threaded database queries.

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

The platform is built around the AMD Socket AM4, which supports DDR4 memory. The CPU uses Gen 3 PCIe with 16 lanes, while the GPU uses PCIe 5.0 x16. This means the GPU is running on a PCIe Gen 3 slot, which can bottleneck the GPU's bandwidth in certain workloads, though the 1.79 TB/s GPU memory bandwidth is not directly affected by the system's PCIe bandwidth. The CPU's memory bandwidth is 51.2 GB/s, which is significantly lower than the GPU's, but this is expected as they serve different purposes.

The PSU headroom is a critical consideration. The GPU has a TDP of 575 W, and the suggested PSU is 950 W. The CPU has a TDP of 65 W, so the total system power draw is well within the 950 W budget. This leaves headroom for additional drives or fans.

A sensible next upgrade would be the CPU. Moving to a higher-core-count AM4 CPU, such as a 12-core or 16-core part from the 5000 series, would help balance the system in CPU-bound tasks. The data shows that the current CPU is 18 percentile points below the GPU, which is the primary bottleneck. However, the platform is at the end of its life for AM4, so a future upgrade would require a new motherboard and memory. The GPU is the strongest component and should be kept for multiple generations. The 32 GB VRAM and 1.79 TB/s bandwidth ensure it will remain relevant for years. The system's current rank of 134th out of 3,732 pairs can be improved by addressing the CPU bottleneck.