SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 5600GT + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

91 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
85%
VS
GPU
97%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 5 5600GT

20,733 Benchmark Score
Top 15% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090

60,347 Benchmark Score
Top 3% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

This pairing is a study in extremes: a six-core budget-minded AMD processor from the 5000 series, launched in early 2024, matched with NVIDIA’s flagship RTX 4090, a GPU that has already reached end-of-life status. The data reveals a system with a combined percentile rank of 81, placing it in the upper tier of all benchmarked configurations, yet the CPU’s individual 74th percentile and the GPU’s 88th percentile suggest a significant performance gap that defines the system’s behavior. This is a desktop build where the graphics card is the clear dominant force, capable of delivering exceptional frame rates, but the processor’s Zen 3 architecture and older platform standards create a bottleneck that becomes apparent in specific workloads and resolutions.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 5 5600GT is a 6-core, 12-thread processor built on the Zen 3 architecture, specifically the Cezanne codename, and fabricated on TSMC’s 7 nm process. It operates with a base clock of 3.60 GHz and a boost clock of 4.60 GHz, drawing a 65 W TDP. The chip features a 16 MB L3 cache and 512 KB of L2 per core, along with integrated Radeon Vega 7 graphics, a detail that is largely irrelevant when paired with a discrete RTX 4090 but indicates its heritage as an APU. Memory support is limited to DDR4, which is a key consideration for overall system performance.

Benchmark results show a processor that is competent but not exceptional. In Cinebench R23, it scores 17,272 points in multi-core and 2,438 in single-core. The multi-threaded performance is further illustrated by a 3DMark max-threads score of 5,554, which scales from 5,523 at 16 threads, indicating that the chip’s performance is consistent across heavy multi-threaded loads. The single-thread score of 913 in 3DMark is more modest. Its average benchmark score is 20,733, placing it in the 74th percentile of all CPUs.

Compared to its nearest rivals, the Ryzen 5 5600GT is essentially tied with the Intel Core i5-12490F, which has an average score of 20,802, a difference of only -0.3%. It also sits within a fraction of a percent of the Intel Xeon 6325P and Intel Core Ultra 5 125U. This indicates that while the 5600GT is not a top-tier performer, it is a solid mid-range option that holds its own against comparable chips. For real workloads, the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 17,272 suggests it can handle productivity tasks like video editing and 3D rendering, though it will not be the fastest in the room. The PassMark integer math score of 69,566 and floating-point math score of 39,817 further suggest it can handle general processing and scientific calculations, but the single-thread score of 3,348 in PassMark shows its limits in lightly-threaded tasks.

Gaming Performance

The measured FPS data at ultra settings demonstrates a clear pattern: the RTX 4090 is the star, but the CPU’s influence grows as resolution drops. This data is measured, not estimated, and provides a realistic picture of the pairing. At 1920x1080, the system excels in esports titles. Counter-Strike 2 hits 359 FPS, Valorant reaches 417.3 FPS, and Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege achieves 427 FPS. These are exceptional numbers, but they are not purely a result of the GPU. The CPU’s single-thread performance is sufficient to feed the GPU at these frame rates, but the gap between resolutions suggests it is starting to limit the ceiling.

The gap between 1080p and 1440p is notable. In Call of Duty: Warzone, the frame rate drops from 127.4 FPS at 1080p to 118.4 FPS at 1440p, a modest decline. However, in more CPU-intensive titles, the scaling is less smooth. In Cyberpunk 2077, the frame rate only drops from 83.5 FPS at 1080p to 79.1 FPS at 1440p, indicating that the CPU is not the primary limiter at these settings. At 4K, the GPU takes over as the definitive bottleneck. In Cyberpunk 2077, the system manages 50.4 FPS, and in Red Dead Redemption 2, it drops to 48 FPS. These are playable but not the high-refresh rates the GPU is capable of in less demanding titles.

The data shows that for the most demanding games, the 5600GT can hold the RTX 4090 back. In Ark: Survival Ascended, the frame rate is a mere 52 FPS at 1080p and falls to 14.7 FPS at 4K. This is a title that is notoriously demanding on both CPU and GPU, but the 1080p result is far below what the RTX 4090 should achieve, pointing to a significant CPU bottleneck. Conversely, in older or less demanding titles like Counter-Strike: Global Offensive, the system delivers a staggering 791.3 FPS at 1080p, showing that the CPU can push high frame rates when the game engine is efficient.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming at 1080p, the system is overkill for most titles but can be a disappointment in specific scenarios. Esports titles like Counter-Strike 2 and Valorant run at over 350 FPS, providing an extremely smooth experience. However, in CPU-bound games like Ark: Survival Ascended, the frame rate of 52 FPS at 1080p is a clear sign that the processor is the limiting factor, preventing the GPU from delivering its full potential.

For streaming and content creation, the 12 threads of the 5600GT are adequate but not ideal. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 17,272 suggests that video encoding and simultaneous gameplay will be possible, but users should not expect top-tier performance. The PassMark data encryption score of 15,873 indicates that the chip can handle encryption tasks, but the overall multi-threaded performance is a step below what a dedicated high-core-count processor would offer.

Video editing and 3D rendering are workloads where the CPU’s 74th percentile ranking becomes apparent. The 3DMark max-threads score of 5,554 and the Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 7,254 show that the processor can complete tasks, but it will take longer than with a higher-end CPU. The RTX 4090 can accelerate rendering through its CUDA cores, but the CPU still has to handle the scene setup and physics calculations, which can become a bottleneck.

Software development is a mixed bag. The single-thread score of 2,438 in Cinebench R23 is respectable for compilation tasks, but the multi-threaded performance is not exceptional. The PassMark find prime numbers score of 57 is a low number, but it is a specific test. For general office work and student use, the 5600GT is more than sufficient. The PassMark single-thread score of 3,348 ensures smooth application responsiveness, and the 65 W TDP means the system will not require a massive cooling solution.

Who Should Build It

This build is for a user who prioritizes GPU performance above all else. The target audience is a gamer who plays at 1440p or 4K resolution and wants to max out settings in AAA titles. At 1440p, the system delivers excellent frame rates in most games, such as 113 FPS in Control and 118.4 FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. For 4K gaming, it can handle most games at high settings, with titles like Microsoft Flight Simulator running at 77 FPS and Red Dead Redemption 2 at 48 FPS. This is not a build for a competitive esports player at 1080p who wants to maximize frame rates in CPU-bound titles, as the CPU will be a limiting factor.

Content creators who work primarily with GPU-accelerated applications will also find this build appealing. The RTX 4090’s compute prowess, evidenced by its Geekbench OpenCL score of 255,416, will accelerate video rendering and 3D rendering tasks. Software developers who need to run multiple virtual machines or compile large codebases may find the 6-core CPU insufficient for their needs. The system is also not ideal for a small business workstation that requires high multi-threaded throughput, as the CPU’s 74th percentile ranking lags behind the GPU.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance imbalance in this system is stark. The GPU’s average benchmark score is 60,347, placing it in the 88th percentile of all GPUs, while the CPU’s average score is 20,733, placing it in the 74th percentile of all CPUs. This 14-percentile gap is the core of the bottleneck. In gaming, the CPU is the limiting factor at 1080p in many titles. The FPS scaling from 1080p to 1440p to 4K shows this clearly. In Fortnite, the frame rate drops from 171.7 FPS at 1080p to 112 FPS at 1440p, a 34% decrease, and then to 55.4 FPS at 4K. This scaling suggests that the CPU is not the primary constraint at 1440p and 4K, where the GPU’s workload increases.

However, in CPU-intensive titles, the bottleneck is evident. In Ark: Survival Ascended, the frame rate is 52 FPS at 1080p and only 32.5 FPS at 1440p. The 4K result of 14.7 FPS is unplayable. The 1080p result is far below what the RTX 4090 should produce, indicating that the CPU is holding the system back. The GPU is the clear bottleneck in most scenarios at 4K, but the CPU becomes the limiting factor in esports titles and poorly-optimized games at lower resolutions. The PassMark physics score of 875 is a low number, further suggesting that the CPU’s physics calculations can be a bottleneck in games.

FAQ

Q: Is the AMD Ryzen 5 5600GT a good match for the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090?

A: The data shows a significant performance gap. The CPU is in the 74th percentile, while the GPU is in the 88th percentile. This means the CPU will limit performance in CPU-bound scenarios, especially at 1080p.

Q: What kind of frame rates can I expect in esports titles?

A: At 1080p, the system is very capable, with measured FPS of 359 in Counter-Strike 2 and 417.3 in Valorant. At higher resolutions, these numbers drop, but they remain high.

Q: Can this system handle 4K gaming?

A: Yes, but not at high refresh rates in all titles. In Cyberpunk 2077, the average FPS at 4K is 50.4, while in Red Dead Redemption 2, it is 48 FPS. Lighter titles like Minecraft can hit 117 FPS at 4K.

Q: Is the RTX 4090's performance hindered by the CPU?

A: Yes, in certain games. For example, in Ark: Survival Ascended, the 1080p frame rate is only 52 FPS, which is well below the GPU’s potential. The CPU is the bottleneck in these cases.

Q: What is the processor's memory support?

A: The Ryzen 5 5600GT supports DDR4 memory with a dual-channel bus and a maximum bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s.

Q: What is the power draw of this system?

A: The CPU has a 65 W TDP, and the GPU has a 450 W TDP. The suggested PSU for this configuration is 850 W.

Q: Does this CPU include integrated graphics?

A: Yes, it has Radeon Vega 7 integrated graphics. This is useful for troubleshooting or basic display output, but it is not for gaming.

Benchmark Performance

The combined benchmark picture shows a system that is more than the sum of its parts in terms of raw score, but less in terms of balance. The CPU’s average benchmark score is 20,733, and it sits in the 74th percentile of all CPUs. Its best results come from multi-threaded tests like Cinebench R23, where it scores 17,272, and 3DMark max-threads, where it scores 5,554. The GPU’s average benchmark score is 60,347, placing it in the 88th percentile of all GPUs, with a dominant 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 9,223 and a PassMark G3D score of 38,194.

The combined percentile rank for this build is 81, placing it in the upper echelon of all systems. The pair’s average FPS across all tested games is 207, which is a high number, but it is inflated by the excellent performance in esports titles. The pair ranks 188th out of 3,732 pairs in terms of FPS, which shows that while it is a strong performer, it is not the absolute best. The data indicates that the RTX 4090 is a top-tier component, while the 5600GT is a mid-range processor, and the combination results in a system that is excellent for most tasks but leaves performance on the table.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build class system that pairs an AMD Ryzen 5 5600GT with an NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090. The build’s combined percentile of 81 indicates it is a high-performance system, but the individual component percentiles (CPU at 74, GPU at 88) reveal a substantial imbalance. The RTX 4090 is a flagship GPU from the GeForce 40-series, built on the Ada Lovelace architecture and fabricated on a 5 nm process. It features 24 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 384-bit bus, offering a bandwidth of 1.01 TB/s, and a core configuration of 16,384 shading units, 512 TMUs, and 176 ROPs.

The CPU is a mid-range processor from AMD’s 5000 series, built on the Zen 3 architecture and fabricated on a 7 nm process. It is a 6-core, 12-thread chip with a base clock of 3.60 GHz and a boost clock of 4.60 GHz. The pairing is unusual, as the GPU is a top-of-the-line component that is several generations ahead of the CPU’s platform. The system is best described as a "GPU-first" build, where the graphics card is the primary investment and the CPU is a supporting component chosen to keep the overall cost down, even though the launch MSRP of the CPU is $140 and the GPU’s launch MSRP is $1,599 USD.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The AMD Ryzen 5 5600GT is built for the AMD Socket AM4 platform, which is a mature socket. The CPU supports DDR4 memory and PCIe Gen 3 with 16 lanes from the CPU, which is a limitation for the RTX 4090, as the GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface. The platform’s memory bandwidth is 51.2 GB/s. The CPU’s TDP is 65 W, and the GPU has a TDP of 450 W, which suggests the system needs a robust power supply. The suggested PSU for this configuration is 850 W.

The upgrade path is limited by the AM4 socket. Users can upgrade to other AM4 processors, but they will not be able to access newer platforms. The most sensible next upgrade for this system would be to replace the CPU with a higher-core-count AM4 processor, which would help alleviate the bottleneck in CPU-intensive games and productivity tasks. However, this would not address the platform’s PCIe Gen 3 limitation. The GPU is already an end-of-life product, so upgrading it is not a future-proofing move. The data suggests that the CPU is the component that would benefit most from an upgrade, as it is the primary bottleneck in many scenarios.