SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 5600GT + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

91 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
85%
VS
GPU
97%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 5 5600GT

20,733 Benchmark Score
Top 15% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080

54,247 Benchmark Score
Top 3% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 5 5600GT and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 pairing represents a study in contrasts: a budget-minded, six-core CPU on a mature platform paired with a flagship-tier graphics card. The data shows a system with immense graphical headroom but a CPU that anchors overall system performance in specific workloads. This analysis breaks down the measured benchmark results to determine where this combination excels and where it falls short.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is built around the AMD Socket AM4, which is the foundation of the Ryzen 5000 series. The Ryzen 5 5600GT is a desktop-class processor based on the Zen 3 architecture, specifically the Cezanne codename, fabricated on a 7 nm process at TSMC. This socket offers a clear upgrade path for users who want more CPU horsepower later, as the platform supports newer generations of AMD processors, though the exact models are not specified in the data.

Memory support is limited to DDR4, utilizing a dual-channel memory bus. The theoretical memory bandwidth is capped at 51.2 GB/s, which is a modest figure for a modern system. This is a critical bottleneck when paired with a high-end GPU, as the CPU's ability to feed data to the graphics card is constrained by this bandwidth. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 3 with 16 lanes from the processor itself, while the GPU in this build uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface.

For power delivery, the CPU has a 65 W TDP, which is very manageable for most motherboards and coolers. The GPU, however, has a 320 W TDP, and the suggested PSU for this configuration is 700 W. This indicates that a substantial power supply is required, but the CPU's low draw leaves significant headroom for the GPU to boost and for potential future upgrades. A sensible next upgrade would be to a higher-core-count Ryzen processor on the same AM4 socket, which would increase multi-threaded performance without requiring a new motherboard or memory. This would also help to alleviate potential CPU bottlenecks in high-refresh gaming scenarios.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 is a behemoth of a graphics card, built on the Ada Lovelace architecture. It is equipped with 16 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering a substantial memory bandwidth of 716.8 GB/s. The GPU core operates at a base clock of 2205 MHz and boosts to 2505 MHz. The card features a high transistor count of 45,900 million on a 5 nm process at TSMC.

The RTX 4080 is not just about raw rasterization. It includes 76 RT cores and 304 tensor cores, which are dedicated to ray tracing and AI-accelerated tasks like DLSS. The compute capabilities are substantial, with an FP32 rating of 48.74 TFLOPS. The benchmark scores support this position. It scores 6567 in 3DMark Steel Nomad (DX12), which is a modern, demanding test. In synthetic compute tests, it achieves 214,739 in Geekbench OpenCL and 263,779 in Geekbench Vulkan. The PassMark G3D score is 34457, placing it in the 86th percentile of all GPUs.

This performance data shows a card that is designed for high-resolution, high-detail rendering. The 16 GB VRAM and high bandwidth make it suitable for 4K textures and complex scenes. The RT and tensor cores provide a significant advantage in ray-traced titles and for creative applications that leverage these accelerators. The data indicates it sits 0.1% ahead of the RTX 4080 SUPER, but is 1.1% behind the AMD Radeon Pro W5700X and 2.6% behind the AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB in average benchmark score. This confirms it is a top-tier consumer card, though the specific benchmark averages place it just above its direct successor.

Benchmark Performance

The benchmark results reveal a system with a significant performance disparity between its two main components. The CPU, the AMD Ryzen 5 5600GT, achieves an average benchmark score of 20733, placing it in the 74th percentile of all CPUs. Its single-thread score in 3DMark is 913, and its max-thread score is 5554. In Cinebench R23, it scores 2438 in single-core and 17272 in multi-core. These are respectable numbers for a mid-range processor.

However, the GPU's performance is in a different league. The RTX 4080's average benchmark score is 54247, placing it in the 86th percentile of all GPUs. The combined percentile for this build is 80, but this figure masks the underlying imbalance. The CPU's nearest rivals include the Intel Core i5-12490F, which is only 0.3% faster, and the Intel Xeon 6325P, which is 0.4% faster. This indicates the 5600GT is competitive with other mid-range options from the same era.

The combined picture is one of a system that is heavily GPU-bound in most graphical tasks. The pair's rank by FPS across all tested games is 347 out of 3732 pairs, with an average FPS of 191.9 across the measured titles. This puts the system in the top 10% of all pairings, but the CPU's lower percentile (74) compared to the GPU (86) suggests that the CPU is the limiting factor in achieving the absolute highest frame rates possible.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: The combination is exceptionally strong for high-refresh gaming at 1080p and 1440p. In esports titles, the system produces massive frame rates, with Counter-Strike 2 hitting 325 FPS at 1080p and Valorant reaching 419 FPS. At 1440p, these figures remain high, with Rainbow Six Siege at 253 FPS. The CPU is sufficient to push the GPU to these levels in most cases, though the PCIe Gen 3 interface could theoretically limit performance in some edge cases.

Streaming: The RTX 4080's built-in NVENC encoder (part of the Ada Lovelace architecture) offloads streaming workloads from the CPU. This makes the system viable for streaming while gaming, as the 6-core CPU can dedicate its resources to the game while the GPU handles encoding. The high frame rates in games like Fortnite (156 FPS at 1080p) and Call of Duty: Warzone (130 FPS at 1080p) provide ample headroom for a stream.

Video Editing: This workload benefits from both the CPU's multi-threading and the GPU's compute power. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 17272 suggests it can handle 1080p video editing timelines, but the GPU's 48.74 TFLOPS FP32 and 16 GB VRAM will accelerate effects, rendering, and export times significantly. The PassMark GPU compute score of 20671 confirms strong computational throughput.

3D Rendering: The RTX 4080 is a powerhouse for 3D rendering. The 76 RT cores and 304 tensor cores accelerate ray tracing and AI denoising. The CPU's 6 cores and 12 threads, with a 3DMark max-thread score of 5554, will handle scene preparation and physics, but the GPU will be the primary driver for final frame rendering. This pairing is viable, but a more powerful CPU would reduce render times in CPU-based render engines.

Software Development: The CPU's performance is adequate for typical software development tasks. The PassMark data compression score of 258882 and integer math score of 69566 show strong performance for compilation and data processing. However, the single-thread score of 913 in 3DMark indicates that heavy single-threaded workloads might not be as snappy as with a newer CPU.

Student and Office Work: This system is massively overkill for standard office tasks. The CPU's single-core score of 2438 in Cinebench R23 and the GPU's capabilities are far beyond what is needed for spreadsheets, documents, or web browsing. The system would be extremely responsive, but the cost and power draw make it an impractical choice for a typical office machine.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 5 5600GT is a 6-core, 12-thread processor based on the Zen 3 architecture. It has a base clock of 3.60 GHz and a boost clock of 4.60 GHz. The CPU has a 65 W TDP, making it efficient. It is manufactured on a 7 nm process at TSMC, with 10,700 million transistors on a 180 mm² die. The cache hierarchy includes 64 KB of L1 per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and a 16 MB L3 cache.

The benchmark scores show a capable mid-range processor. In Cinebench R20, it scores 7254 multi-core and 1023 single-core. The 3DMark scores show scaling from 1794 with 2 threads to 5554 with max threads, indicating good multi-threading efficiency. The PassMark multithread score is 20325, with a single-thread score of 3348.

The data shows that this CPU is positioned between several other processors. It is 0.3% slower than the Intel Core i5-12490F and 0.4% slower than the Intel Xeon 6325P and Intel Core Ultra 5 125U. It is also 0.5% slower than the AMD EPYC 7J13. This places it in a competitive but not dominant position in the mid-range segment. For real workloads, this means it can handle modern games and productivity tasks well, but it will be the limiting factor in achieving the maximum possible frame rates in CPU-intensive titles when paired with a GPU as powerful as the RTX 4080.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile for this system is 80, indicating it outperforms 80% of all tested CPU and GPU pairings.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its closest rival, the Intel Core i5-12490F?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 5600GT is only 0.3% slower in average benchmark score than the Intel Core i5-12490F, making them statistically equivalent in overall performance.

Q: What is the GPU's memory bandwidth and capacity?

A: The RTX 4080 has 16 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 256-bit bus, providing a memory bandwidth of 716.8 GB/s.

Q: Is the system capable of high-refresh-rate esports gaming?

A: Yes, the data shows it achieves 325 FPS in Counter-Strike 2 and 419 FPS in Valorant at 1080p, making it ideal for high-refresh esports.

Q: What is the suggested power supply wattage for this build?

A: The suggested PSU for this configuration is 700 W, which accounts for the GPU's 320 W TDP and the CPU's 65 W TDP.

Q: What is the CPU's socket and memory type?

A: The CPU uses the AMD Socket AM4 and supports dual-channel DDR4 memory.

Q: How does the GPU's average benchmark score compare to the RTX 4080 SUPER?

A: The RTX 4080 has an average score of 54247, which is 0.1% higher than the RTX 4080 SUPER's average score of 54209.

Who Should Build It

This system is a clear fit for gamers who prioritize graphical fidelity and high resolution over extreme CPU-bound frame rates. The measured performance shows that at 2560x1440, the system delivers excellent results in most titles, such as 116 FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone and 102 FPS in Control. At 4K (3840x2160), it is still very capable, with 47 FPS in Cyberpunk 2077 and 98 FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone, though some demanding titles dip below 60 FPS.

Content creators who work heavily with GPU-accelerated applications will find the RTX 4080's power beneficial. The 16 GB VRAM and high compute throughput are well-suited for 3D rendering and video editing, where the GPU's performance is the primary bottleneck. The CPU is sufficient to keep up with the GPU in these workflows, though it is not the strongest option available.

Developers and students working on multi-threaded code will find the CPU's 12 threads and PassMark multithread score of 20325 adequate for compilation and testing. The system is also a viable option for small business workstations that require high-end graphical compute for tasks like CAD or data visualization, where the GPU's tensor and RT cores can accelerate specific workloads.

Build Overview

This build pairs the AMD Ryzen 5 5600GT, a desktop-class CPU from the 5000 series, with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080, a flagship graphics card from the GeForce 40-series. The CPU is a 6-core, 12-thread processor based on the Zen 3 architecture, while the GPU is a massive card based on the Ada Lovelace architecture with 9728 shading units and 16 GB of GDDR6X memory.

The overall tier of this system is high, as evidenced by its combined percentile of 80. The GPU's individual percentile of 86 is significantly higher than the CPU's percentile of 74. This indicates that the system is positioned as a high-end gaming and content creation machine, but its performance is ultimately limited by the CPU's mid-range capabilities. The data suggests this is a desktop build that prioritizes graphics performance above all else, making it a specialized tool for visual workloads.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance data clearly indicates that the CPU is the primary bottleneck in this system. The GPU is in the 86th percentile, while the CPU is in the 74th percentile. This 12-point difference is substantial. In gaming, this manifests as a situation where the GPU is often not fully utilized, especially at lower resolutions like 1080p. The average FPS across all games is 191.9, which is high, but the CPU limits the system's ability to achieve the absolute highest frame rates in CPU-bound scenarios.

For example, at 1080p, the system achieves 717 FPS in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive, but this is likely limited by the CPU. At 4K, the GPU becomes the limiting factor, as the resolution increases the GPU's workload. This is seen in a game like Cyberpunk 2077, where the frame rate drops from 85 FPS at 1080p to 47 FPS at 4K, indicating the GPU is now the primary constraint. The PCIe Gen 3 interface on the CPU is another potential bottleneck, as it offers less bandwidth than the GPU's PCIe 4.0 interface, though the practical impact on gaming is often minimal. In compute-heavy workloads, the GPU will dominate the CPU, which will be waiting on data to process.

Gaming Performance

The measured FPS data shows a system that excels in a wide variety of gaming scenarios. At 1920x1080, the system provides extremely high frame rates in esports and lighter titles, with games like Roblox at 420 FPS and Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege at 386 FPS. Even demanding titles like Cyberpunk 2077 reach 85 FPS at this resolution. The performance remains strong at 2560x1440, with most games staying above 60 FPS. Examples include Red Dead Redemption 2 at 65 FPS and Microsoft Flight Simulator at 95 FPS.

At 3840x2160, the system is still capable of delivering playable frame rates in many games. Call of Duty: Warzone runs at 98 FPS, and Control at 69 FPS. However, some of the most demanding games begin to struggle. Ark: Survival Ascended averages only 16 FPS at 4K, and Cyberpunk 2077 drops to 47 FPS. The Medium also dips to 45 FPS. This data confirms that the system is best suited for 1080p and 1440p gaming, where it can fully leverage the RTX 4080's power, while 4K gaming is possible but requires settings adjustments for the most demanding titles.