SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 5600G + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

88 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 12% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
85%
VS
GPU
92%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 5 5600G

21,088 Benchmark Score
Top 15% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080

23,172 Benchmark Score
Top 8% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 5 5600G paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 is a desktop build that combines a capable mid-range processor with a high-end graphics card, resulting in a system that is heavily skewed toward gaming and GPU-accelerated workloads. The data shows a combined percentile of 71, placing this pairing in the upper tier of tested configurations, with the CPU and GPU each landing in the 74th and 68th percentiles respectively. The measured FPS data across 50 games at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K resolutions confirms that this is a potent gaming machine, though the CPU’s older architecture and PCIe Gen 3 interface create notable bottlenecks in certain scenarios.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 5 5600G is a 5000-series processor built on the Zen 3 architecture with the Cezanne codename. It features 6 cores and 12 threads, with a base clock of 3.90 GHz and a boost clock of 4.40 GHz. This is a 7 nm part fabricated by TSMC, containing 10,700 million transistors on a 180 mm² die. The cache hierarchy includes 64 KB of L1 per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and a 16 MB L3 cache. It supports dual-channel DDR4 memory with a bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s, and it includes the Radeon Vega 7 integrated graphics, making it a versatile APU.

Benchmark results indicate that the 5600G is a solid mid-range performer. In Cinebench R23, it scores 10,551 points in multi-core and 1,409 points in single-core. The multi-core score suggests it can handle moderately threaded workloads like video editing and software compilation, though it is not a top-tier rendering chip. The single-core score of 1,409 is respectable and translates to good responsiveness in everyday tasks and gaming. In Geekbench, it achieves 8,428 multi-core and 1,801 single-core, further corroborating its balanced performance profile. The 3DMark tests show a scaling pattern from 1,705 in the 2-thread test to 5,455 in the max-thread test, indicating good thread scaling up to its 12 threads.

The CPU’s percentile rank of 74 places it above the majority of all CPUs tested. Its average benchmark score of 21,088 is nearly identical to its nearest rivals: the Intel Core i3-1220P (21,066, +0.1% delta), the Intel Core Ultra 7 256V (21,112, -0.1% delta), the AMD Ryzen 5 7530U (21,133, -0.2% delta), and the Intel Core Ultra 7 155U (21,174, -0.4% delta). This means the 5600G performs within a 0.4% margin of these competitors, making it comparable to both low-power mobile chips and more recent ultra-low-voltage parts. In PassMark, the processor scores 19,717 in multithread and 3,177 in single-thread, with notable sub-scores like 67,344 in integer math and 37,830 in floating-point math. These numbers indicate strong arithmetic capabilities for productivity tasks, though the data compression score of 249,302 suggests it is particularly adept at compression workloads.

For real-world workloads, the 5600G’s 6-core/12-thread configuration with Zen 3 architecture provides a strong foundation for gaming and general productivity. The 4.40 GHz boost clock helps maintain high frame rates in CPU-bound scenarios, while the 16 MB L3 cache reduces memory latency. However, it is not a heavy-duty content creation CPU; its multi-core scores, while adequate, fall behind higher-core-count processors, meaning extreme 3D rendering or complex simulations will see the CPU become a limiting factor.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The RTX 3080 dominates this scenario, with the CPU providing sufficient single-thread performance. Measured FPS at 1080p shows 241.8 FPS in Counter-Strike 2, 537.5 FPS in CS:GO, and 397.1 FPS in Valorant, all of which easily exceed 144 Hz and even 240 Hz thresholds. At 1440p, these titles still hit 159.9 FPS, 368.6 FPS, and 380.6 FPS respectively, making the pairing ideal for competitive esports at high refresh rates.

Streaming: The 5600G’s 12 threads provide a reasonable foundation for streaming while gaming, though the CPU is not the strongest encoder. The RTX 3080’s NVENC capabilities would offload encoding, but the data shows the CPU can handle the load. In a game like Call of Duty: Warzone, the system hits 126.2 FPS at 1080p, leaving headroom for streaming overhead without dropping below playable frame rates.

Video editing: The CPU’s Geekbench multi-core score of 8,428 and Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 10,551 indicate it can handle 1080p and some 1440p video editing timelines. The RTX 3080’s compute performance (PassMark GPU compute score of 14,397) accelerates effects and rendering. For 4K video editing, the CPU may struggle with complex timelines, but for standard projects, it is workable.

3D rendering: This is a weaker scenario for the CPU. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 10,551 is modest, meaning CPU-based rendering in applications like Blender or Cinema 4D will be slower than with higher-core-count CPUs. The GPU can accelerate rendering via CUDA, but the CPU remains the bottleneck for viewport performance and physics calculations.

Software development: The PassMark integer math score of 67,344 and multithread score of 19,717 show the CPU handles compilation tasks competently. The 12 threads allow for parallel builds, and the 4.40 GHz boost clock speeds up single-threaded tasks like code analysis. The 16 MB L3 cache helps with frequently accessed data in development environments.

Student and office work: The CPU’s single-thread PassMark score of 3,177 and Geekbench single-core score of 1,801 ensure snappy performance in word processing, spreadsheets, and web browsing. The integrated Radeon Vega 7 graphics provide a backup display output, though the RTX 3080 handles all graphical tasks. Power consumption is moderate with a 65 W TDP, making it efficient for long study sessions.

Gaming Performance

The measured FPS data, marked as `dataIsMeasured: true`, provides exact frame rates at ultra settings for 50 games across three resolutions. At 1920x1080, the system delivers excellent performance in most titles. Esports titles shine: Counter-Strike 2 hits 241.8 FPS, Valorant reaches 397.1 FPS, and CS:GO achieves 537.5 FPS. Even demanding AAA games perform well: Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 74 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 at 66.7 FPS, and Call of Duty: Warzone at 126.2 FPS. The average FPS across all games at 1080p is 146.4, indicating that the vast majority of games will run at high refresh rates.

At 2560x1440, performance remains strong. Counter-Strike 2 still hits 159.9 FPS, Valorant at 380.6 FPS, and Warzone at 110 FPS. More demanding titles like Cyberpunk 2077 drop to 53.5 FPS and Red Dead Redemption 2 to 50.5 FPS, which is still playable but below the 60 FPS threshold. Microsoft Flight Simulator runs at 69.8 FPS, and Control at 74.4 FPS. The 1440p average across all games is not explicitly listed, but the individual scores show a significant drop from 1080p, typically around 30-40%.

At 3840x2160 (4K), the system struggles with the most demanding titles. Cyberpunk 2077 drops to 36.1 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 to 34.1 FPS, and Ark: Survival Ascended to a mere 12 FPS. However, less demanding games remain playable: Valorant hits 348.7 FPS, Roblox 120 FPS, and Counter-Strike 2 91.3 FPS. The 4K performance is inconsistent, with many games falling below 60 FPS, making this resolution suitable only for older or less demanding titles.

The pair rank by FPS is 1,253 out of 3,732 pairs, placing it in the top 33.6% of all tested pairs. The average FPS across all games and resolutions is 146.4, which is high due to the inclusion of many esports titles. Overall, the gaming performance is excellent at 1080p and 1440p, with 4K being a stretch for the most demanding games.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses the AMD Socket AM4 platform, which is a mature socket with a wide range of compatible processors. The 5600G supports DDR4 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with a memory bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s. It provides PCIe Gen 3 with 16 lanes from the CPU, which is a potential bottleneck for the RTX 3080, as the GPU supports PCIe 4.0. The GPU’s bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x16, but running it on a PCIe Gen 3 CPU limits bandwidth, though the practical impact on FPS is minimal in most games.

The GPU has a TDP of 320 W and a suggested PSU of 700 W, while the CPU has a TDP of 65 W. This leaves significant headroom for system components, but the total system draw will be high under load. The RTX 3080 requires a 1x 12-pin power connector and is a dual-slot card with dimensions of 285 mm in length, 112 mm in height, and 40 mm in width, so case compatibility must be checked.

A sensible next upgrade would be swapping the CPU for a higher-core-count AM4 processor, such as a Ryzen 7 or Ryzen 9 from the 5000 series, which would improve multi-threaded performance for rendering and streaming without changing the motherboard. Alternatively, moving to a newer platform with PCIe Gen 4 or Gen 5 would unlock the full bandwidth of the RTX 3080, though the practical gains are likely small. The GPU is already end-of-life, so future upgrades would involve moving to the GeForce 40 series or newer, which would require a new GPU but no platform change if the PSU has adequate wattage.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this build?

A: The combined percentile is 71, placing it in the upper tier of all tested desktop and laptop builds.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Ryzen 5 5600G has an average benchmark score of 21,088, which is within 0.4% of the Intel Core i3-1220P, Intel Core Ultra 7 256V, AMD Ryzen 5 7530U, and Intel Core Ultra 7 155U.

Q: What is the maximum FPS in Counter-Strike 2 at 1080p?

A: The system achieves 241.8 FPS in Counter-Strike 2 at 1920x1080 with ultra settings.

Q: Is the RTX 3080 capable of 4K gaming with this CPU?

A: At 3840x2160, performance varies: Valorant hits 348.7 FPS and Roblox 120 FPS, but Cyberpunk 2077 drops to 36.1 FPS and Ark: Survival Ascended to 12 FPS, so 4K is only viable for less demanding titles.

Q: What memory type does the CPU support?

A: The CPU supports DDR4 memory in a dual-channel configuration with a bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s.

Q: What is the launch MSRP of the GPU?

A: The RTX 3080 has a launch MSRP of 699 USD.

Q: Does the CPU have integrated graphics?

A: Yes, it includes the Radeon Vega 7 integrated graphics, which can serve as a fallback display output.

Who Should Build It

This build is tailored for gamers who prioritize high-refresh-rate play at 1080p and 1440p. The measured FPS shows that esports titles like Counter-Strike 2, Valorant, and CS:GO run at 241.8, 397.1, and 537.5 FPS respectively at 1080p, making it ideal for competitive players who need every frame. At 1440p, these games still run at 159.9, 380.6, and 368.6 FPS, so users with 144 Hz or 240 Hz monitors will be fully satisfied.

Content creators who work primarily with GPU-accelerated tasks, such as video editors using CUDA-based effects, will benefit from the RTX 3080’s compute power. The CPU’s 12 threads handle 1080p video editing timelines, and the system’s PassMark multithread score of 19,717 supports moderate multitasking. However, those doing heavy 3D rendering should look elsewhere, as the CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 10,551 is a limiting factor.

Software developers will appreciate the CPU’s integer math score of 67,344, which aids in code compilation, and the 12 threads allow for parallel build processes. The system is also suitable for students and office workers, as the single-thread performance (PassMark 3,177) ensures smooth application responsiveness, and the 65 W CPU TDP keeps power draw reasonable. Small business workstations that run database or spreadsheet workloads will find the CPU more than adequate, though the GPU is overkill for such tasks.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 21,088, with a percentile rank of 74 against all CPUs. Its nearest rival is the Intel Core i3-1220P with an average score of 21,066, a delta of +0.1%, meaning the 5600G is effectively tied. The Intel Core Ultra 7 256V scores 21,112 (-0.1% delta), the AMD Ryzen 5 7530U scores 21,133 (-0.2% delta), and the Intel Core Ultra 7 155U scores 21,174 (-0.4% delta). This indicates the CPU is in a dead heat with these mobile and low-power processors.

The GPU’s average benchmark score is 23,172, with a percentile rank of 68 against all GPUs. Its nearest rivals include the NVIDIA P106-100 (23,249, -0.3% delta), AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16 (23,250, -0.3% delta), AMD Radeon RX 6600M (23,273, -0.4% delta), and AMD Radeon R9 M290X (23,276, -0.4% delta). The RTX 3080 is also nearly tied with these parts, though they are lower-tier GPUs, which suggests the 3080’s benchmark score is dragged down by its age. In specific tests, the GPU scores 25,086 in PassMark G3D and 14,397 in GPU compute, while the CPU scores 19,717 in PassMark multithread.

The combined picture shows a CPU that is slightly above average and a GPU that is slightly above average, but the pairing results in a combined percentile of 71. This is higher than either component’s individual percentile, indicating that the combination is well-balanced for gaming. The measured FPS average of 146.4 across games confirms that the system delivers strong real-world performance, with the CPU’s 74th percentile and GPU’s 68th percentile combining to produce a system that outperforms 71% of all tested builds.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build (buildClass: "desktop") that pairs the AMD Ryzen 5 5600G (a 6-core, 12-thread Zen 3 processor) with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 (a high-end Ampere GPU). The CPU was released in April 2021, while the GPU was released in August 2020 and is now end-of-life. The system is designed for high-performance gaming, with the GPU being the dominant component in terms of raw power and the CPU providing adequate support.

The overall tier, based on the combined percentile of 71, places this build in the upper-middle range of all systems tested. It is not a top-tier enthusiast build (which would exceed the 90th percentile), but it sits above the majority of configurations. The GPU’s 68th percentile indicates it is better than most GPUs, but not in the top tier, while the CPU’s 74th percentile is similar. The average FPS of 146.4 across all games shows that this system is capable of high frame rates in a wide variety of titles, making it a versatile gaming machine rather than a niche specialist.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data reveals an asymmetric balance where the GPU is the clear performance leader, but the CPU creates bottlenecks in specific scenarios. The CPU’s percentile (74) is higher than the GPU’s (68), suggesting the CPU is relatively stronger among CPUs than the GPU is among GPUs. However, in gaming, the GPU is typically the limiting factor at higher resolutions. At 1080p, the CPU’s single-thread performance (Geekbench single-core 1,801) is sufficient to drive high frame rates, as seen in CS:GO (537.5 FPS) and Valorant (397.1 FPS). At 1440p, the GPU becomes more stressed, and the FPS drops by roughly 30-40% across most games, indicating the GPU is now the primary constraint.

At 4K, the GPU is overwhelmingly the bottleneck, with demanding games like Cyberpunk 2077 (36.1 FPS) and Ark: Survival Ascended (12 FPS) failing to maintain playable frame rates. The CPU has headroom at this resolution, as its single-thread performance is less critical when the GPU is maxed out. Conversely, in CPU-bound scenarios like physics calculations (PassMark physics score of 900) or data compression (249,302), the CPU is the limiting factor, and the GPU’s power goes unused.

The PCIe Gen 3 interface on the CPU also introduces a potential bottleneck for the RTX 3080, which supports PCIe 4.0. While the practical FPS impact is minimal in most games, it can affect performance in VRAM-heavy workloads that spill over system memory. Overall, the system is well-balanced for 1080p and 1440p gaming, where the GPU and CPU complement each other, but it is not ideal for 4K or heavy multi-threaded workloads where one component clearly holds the other back.