SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 5600 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

89 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 11% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
85%
VS
GPU
94%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 5 5600

20,468 Benchmark Score
Top 15% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti

29,945 Benchmark Score
Top 6% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 5 5600 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti form a desktop pairing that sits at the 75th percentile for combined performance, a figure that places it ahead of the majority of systems while remaining a balanced, high-refresh 1440p-focused build. The data shows a CPU that delivers strong multi-threaded throughput for its class and a GPU whose memory bandwidth and compute resources are the defining assets, making this a versatile configuration for both gaming and productivity workloads.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti is built on the Ampere architecture using an 8 nm process from Samsung, with the GA104 chip housing 17,400 million transistors on a 392 mm² die. Its memory subsystem is a highlight: 8 GB of GDDR6X on a 256-bit bus delivers 608.3 GB/s of bandwidth, a figure that underpins its ability to handle high-resolution textures and demanding rendering tasks. The GPU operates at a base clock of 1575 MHz and a boost clock of 1770 MHz, with memory running at 1188 MHz (19 Gbps effective), and its 290 W TDP requires a 600 W suggested PSU and a single 12-pin power connector.

Compute resources are substantial. The GPU packs 6144 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 96 raster operation units, alongside 48 RT cores and 192 tensor cores. This translates to 21.75 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and an equal 21.75 TFLOPS for FP16 (1:1), with pixel and texture rates of 169.9 GPixel/s and 339.8 GTexel/s respectively. In benchmark terms, the GPU achieves a Passmark G3D score of 23356 and a Passmark GPU Compute score of 11601, with a Geekbench OpenCL score of 119718 and a Vulkan score of 139541. Its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 3478, and the overall average benchmark score is 29945.

The RTX 3070 Ti sits at the 75th percentile among all GPUs, and the nearest rival data shows it trading blows with modern and previous-generation parts. It is 0.1% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile, 0.5% ahead of the RTX 2080 Ti, 0.5% behind the AMD Radeon RX 6800, and 1.6% behind the AMD Radeon RX 6700. This means the GPU delivers performance essentially equivalent to a current-generation mobile flagship and slightly above a last-generation desktop flagship, while being marginally edged out by two AMD desktop cards. For rendering, the 608.3 GB/s bandwidth is the key enabler, allowing the GPU to feed its 6144 shading units efficiently in texture-heavy workloads, while the 48 RT cores provide hardware-accelerated ray tracing that is competitive with the RTX 2080 Ti but clearly behind newer architectures in ray-tracing-specific tests.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's benchmark results show a clear profile of a six-core processor that scales well with threads. In 3DMark tests, the Ryzen 5 5600 scores 882 single-thread, 1737 for 2 threads, 3313 for 4 threads, 4798 for 8 threads, 5641 for 16 threads, and 5659 for max threads. This scaling from 882 to 5659 indicates a 6.4x improvement from single-thread to max-thread, which is strong for a 6-core part. Cinebench results reinforce this: R15 multicore is 1845 with a single-core of 260, R20 multicore is 7689 with a single-core of 1085, and R23 multicore is 18309 with a single-core of 2584. The R23 multicore score represents a 7.1x improvement over single-core, showing efficient multi-threading.

Geekbench scores are 9158 multicore and 1936 single-core, while Passmark tests show a multithread score of 21541 and single-thread of 3256. The CPU's average benchmark score is 20468, placing it at the 74th percentile among all CPUs. Its nearest rivals are extremely close: the Intel Core Ultra 7 258V is 0.1% ahead, the AMD Ryzen 5 8500G is 0.2% ahead, the AMD EPYC 9454P is 0.2% ahead, and the AMD EPYC 7713 is 0.5% ahead. This indicates the Ryzen 5 5600's performance is nearly identical to a modern low-power Intel chip and two server-class EPYC parts, which is remarkable for a desktop mid-range processor.

The GPU's average benchmark score of 29945 at the 75th percentile is the higher-performing half of this pairing. Combined, the system sits at the 75th percentile for all builds. In gaming, the pair achieves an average FPS of 142 across all tested games, ranking 1329 out of 3732 pairs, which puts it in the top 35.6% of all CPU-GPU combinations. This combined picture shows a CPU that is slightly below the GPU in relative performance (74th vs 75th percentile), but the gap is minimal, indicating a well-matched pairing where neither component dramatically bottlenecks the other in most scenarios.

FAQ

Q: How does the Ryzen 5 5600 compare to its closest CPU rivals?

A: The Ryzen 5 5600 has an average benchmark score of 20468, which is 0.1% behind the Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, 0.2% behind the AMD Ryzen 5 8500G, 0.2% behind the AMD EPYC 9454P, and 0.5% behind the AMD EPYC 7713. This places it essentially at parity with those parts.

Q: What is the RTX 3070 Ti's memory bandwidth and why does it matter?

A: The RTX 3070 Ti has 608.3 GB/s of memory bandwidth from 8 GB of GDDR6X on a 256-bit bus. This high bandwidth allows the 6144 shading units to be fed data quickly, which is critical for high-resolution gaming and texture-heavy workloads.

Q: What are the CPU's multi-threaded capabilities?

A: With 6 cores and 12 threads, the CPU scores 18309 in Cinebench R23 multicore and 5641 in 3DMark 16-thread tests. This represents a 7.1x scaling from single-thread to multi-thread in R23, showing efficient use of its 12 threads.

Q: How does the GPU perform in compute tasks?

A: The GPU scores 11601 in Passmark GPU Compute and 119718 in Geekbench OpenCL, with 21.75 TFLOPS of FP32 and FP16 performance. This makes it suitable for GPU-accelerated workloads beyond gaming.

Q: What is the system's overall performance ranking?

A: The combined build is at the 75th percentile for all systems, with the CPU at the 74th percentile and GPU at the 75th percentile. In gaming, it averages 142 FPS across all tested games, ranking 1329 out of 3732 pairs.

Q: Is the GPU performance closer to newer or older cards?

A: The RTX 3070 Ti is 0.1% ahead of the RTX 5070 Mobile and 0.5% ahead of the RTX 2080 Ti, but 0.5% behind the RX 6800 and 1.6% behind the RX 6700. This shows it matches a current mobile flagship and slightly exceeds a previous-generation desktop flagship.

Q: What memory does the CPU support?

A: The CPU supports DDR4 memory in dual-channel configuration with a bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s. It also supports ECC memory, which is uncommon for consumer desktop processors.

Who Should Build It

This pairing is best suited for gamers targeting 1440p high-refresh-rate play, as the measured FPS data shows strong performance at 2560x1440 across a wide range of titles. The CPU's 74th percentile and GPU's 75th percentile make it a solid choice for content creators who need balanced multi-threaded CPU work and GPU compute acceleration for video editing or 3D rendering. Software developers will benefit from the 12 threads and the CPU's high memory bandwidth for compilation tasks, while students and small business workstations can leverage the 65 W TDP CPU for efficient operation without sacrificing performance.

The 6-core, 12-thread CPU with a 32 MB L3 cache handles typical office productivity and multitasking with ease, while the RTX 3070 Ti's 8 GB GDDR6X memory is sufficient for 1440p gaming and moderate 4K workloads. The ECC memory support is a niche but valuable feature for workstations where data integrity is critical. The build's dual-slot GPU and 267 mm length fit in most mid-tower cases, and the 65 W CPU TDP allows for a capable air cooler, keeping the system practical for a wide range of users.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 5 5600 is a 6-core, 12-thread desktop processor from the 5000 series, built on the Zen 3 architecture with the Vermeer codename. It uses a 7 nm process from TSMC, containing 4,150 million transistors on a 74 mm² die, with a 65 W TDP. The CPU operates at a base clock of 3.50 GHz and a boost clock of 4.40 GHz, and it is socketed on AM4 with PCIe Gen 4 (20 lanes from the CPU). It supports dual-channel DDR4 memory with a bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s and includes ECC memory support. The multiplier is unlocked, allowing overclocking, and it was released on April 19, 2022, with a launch MSRP of $199.

Benchmark data reveals a processor with strong single-thread and multi-thread performance for its class. The single-thread score of 882 in 3DMark and 2584 in Cinebench R23 indicate a high IPC design, while the multi-thread scores of 5659 in 3DMark max threads and 18309 in Cinebench R23 show robust scaling. Passmark tests show a multithread score of 21541, with specific workloads like integer math at 68396, floating point math at 38778, and data encryption at 15531. The CPU's average benchmark score is 20468, placing it at the 74th percentile, and its nearest rivals are all within 0.5% of its score, confirming it is a well-balanced performer.

For real workloads, the 12 threads handle video encoding and 3D rendering efficiently, as evidenced by the R23 multicore score, while the single-thread performance (3256 in Passmark single-thread) ensures snappy responsiveness in everyday tasks and older games that rely on fewer threads. The 32 MB shared L3 cache is fully utilized by the 6 cores, reducing latency in multi-threaded applications. The 51.2 GB/s memory bandwidth is adequate for the CPU's needs, though it is not a bottleneck in most gaming scenarios where the GPU is the limiting factor.

Gaming Performance

The measured FPS data (dataIsMeasured is true) shows this pairing excels at 1080p and 1440p, with 4K being playable in less demanding titles. At 1920x1080, the system delivers high frame rates in competitive shooters: Counter-Strike 2 hits 221.3 FPS, Valorant reaches 408 FPS, and Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege achieves 261 FPS. Heavier titles like Cyberpunk 2077 run at 63.1 FPS, while Red Dead Redemption 2 hits 59 FPS, showing that ultra settings at 1080p are achievable for most games.

At 2560x1440, the performance remains strong: Counter-Strike 2 runs at 148.8 FPS, Valorant at 387 FPS, and Call of Duty: Warzone at 113 FPS. More demanding games like Cyberpunk 2077 drop to 45.6 FPS, and Red Dead Redemption 2 runs at 44 FPS, indicating that 1440p ultra settings require some adjustments for the most graphically intensive titles. At 3840x2160, the system becomes more limited: Valorant still hits 343 FPS, and Counter-Strike 2 runs at 79.6 FPS, but Cyberpunk 2077 falls to 29.9 FPS and Red Dead Redemption 2 to 29 FPS. Games like Ark: Survival Ascended are unplayable at 4K (10 FPS) and challenging at 1440p (19.8 FPS).

The overall average FPS across all games is 142, with the pair ranking 1329 out of 3732. This suggests the system is best suited for 1080p high-refresh and 1440p high-refresh gaming, where it can consistently exceed 60 FPS in most titles and 144 FPS in esports titles. For 4K, the system is capable only in less demanding or older games, and users should expect to lower settings for modern AAA releases.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming, the data shows this build excels at 1080p and 1440p, with esports titles like Valorant (408 FPS at 1080p) and Counter-Strike 2 (221.3 FPS at 1080p) easily exceeding 144 Hz monitors. The 142 FPS average across all games confirms it handles competitive titles with headroom.

Streaming is supported by the 12-thread CPU, which can handle encoding while gaming, though the GPU's dedicated RT and tensor cores could offload this task. The CPU's multi-thread score of 18309 in R23 ensures smooth simultaneous gameplay and streaming software.

Video editing benefits from the balanced pairing: the CPU's 12 threads process timelines efficiently, while the GPU's 21.75 TFLOPS FP32 performance accelerates effects and rendering. The 8 GB GDDR6X memory is sufficient for 1080p and 1440p editing projects.

3D rendering in applications like Blender or Maya will use both components heavily. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 18309 handles viewport and physics, while the GPU's compute score of 11601 in Passmark provides fast final renders using CUDA cores.

Software development is well-served by the 6 cores and 12 threads, with the CPU's Passmark integer math score of 68396 indicating strong compilation speeds. The 32 MB L3 cache reduces latency in large codebases, and the ECC memory support adds stability for long-running build processes.

Student and office work is handled with ease, as the CPU's single-thread score of 3256 in Passmark ensures snappy application launches and multitasking. The 65 W TDP keeps power consumption low, and the system's overall 75th percentile ensures it is more than capable for spreadsheets, word processing, and web browsing.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build combining the AMD Ryzen 5 5600 CPU with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti GPU. The CPU is a 6-core, 12-thread Zen 3 processor on the AM4 socket, while the GPU is an Ampere architecture card with 8 GB GDDR6X memory. The pairing is classified as desktop and sits at the 75th combined percentile, with the CPU at the 74th percentile and GPU at the 75th percentile.

The system's tier is solidly mid-to-high range, as evidenced by its average FPS of 142 across games and its rank of 1329 out of 3732 pairs. The CPU's average benchmark score of 20468 is nearly identical to its closest rivals (within 0.5%), and the GPU's score of 29945 is within 1.6% of its nearest rivals. This places the build in a competitive position where it outperforms the majority of systems but is not at the absolute top tier. The 65 W CPU TDP and 290 W GPU TDP make it a power-efficient combination for the performance offered, requiring a 600 W PSU.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data shows a well-balanced pairing where the CPU and GPU are within 1 percentile point of each other (74th vs 75th), indicating neither component is a significant bottleneck in most scenarios. The CPU's average benchmark score of 20468 and the GPU's average of 29945 suggest that in CPU-intensive workloads, the processor will be the limiting factor, while in GPU-intensive tasks, the graphics card will be the constraint.

In gaming, the bottleneck shifts depending on resolution and title. At 1080p, the CPU's single-thread performance (3256 in Passmark) is sufficient to keep pace with the GPU in most games, as shown by high FPS in esports titles (408 FPS in Valorant). However, in CPU-heavy games like Ark: Survival Ascended (32.4 FPS at 1080p), the processor may limit performance. At 1440p and 4K, the GPU becomes the primary bottleneck, as evidenced by the drop in FPS for demanding games like Cyberpunk 2077 (45.6 FPS at 1440p and 29.9 FPS at 4K).

The FPS scaling from 1080p to 4K in games like Counter-Strike 2 (221.3 to 79.6 FPS) shows a 2.8x reduction, which is typical for GPU-bound scenarios. In contrast, the CPU's multi-thread scaling from single-thread (882) to max-threads (5659) in 3DMark shows a 6.4x improvement, indicating the CPU has headroom for multi-threaded workloads. For productivity, the CPU's 74th percentile vs the GPU's 75th percentile means the system is balanced, but in workloads that use only a few threads, the CPU's single-thread performance (2584 in R23) may be the limiting factor, while in GPU compute tasks, the GPU's 21.75 TFLOPS will be the primary driver.