SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 5500 + AMD Radeon RX 7700

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

87 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 13% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
84%
VS
GPU
89%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 5 5500

19,593 Benchmark Score
Top 16% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 7700

15,852 Benchmark Score
Top 11% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 5 5500 and AMD Radeon RX 7700 form a desktop build that lands at the 66th percentile overall among all system pairs, with measured gaming data showing an average of 122.9 FPS across a wide range of titles at ultra settings. This is a pairing built around a six-core Zen 3 processor with a 73rd percentile CPU ranking and a Radeon RX 7000 series GPU with a 58th percentile ranking, creating a system that is stronger in compute-heavy tasks than in raw GPU-bound gaming scenarios. The data indicates a balanced yet CPU-leaning configuration, where the processor’s multi-threaded capabilities often set the ceiling for performance in modern titles.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 5 5500 is a six-core, twelve-thread processor based on the Zen 3 architecture, manufactured on TSMC’s 7 nm process with a transistor count of 10,700 million and a die size of 180 mm². It operates with a base clock of 3.60 GHz and a boost clock of 4.20 GHz, with a 65 W TDP that keeps power requirements modest. The cache hierarchy includes 64 KB of L1 per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and a 16 MB L3 cache, which is a standard configuration for this class of processor.

Benchmark results show a strong single-threaded foundation. The Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2319 and Geekbench single-core score of 1730 place it competitively among peers, while the 3DMark single-thread score of 836 reinforces that everyday responsiveness and lightly-threaded applications will run smoothly. Multi-threaded performance is where the processor shows its strengths. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 16429, Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 6900, and Geekbench multi-core score of 7976 demonstrate that the twelve threads are well-utilized in rendering and productivity workloads. The PassMark multi-thread score of 19330 further confirms this, with integer math at 65001 and floating-point math at 36815 indicating strong arithmetic throughput.

The processor’s average benchmark score of 19593 places it at the 73rd percentile of all CPUs, meaning it outperforms nearly three-quarters of the processors in the database. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen AI 5 430 with an average score of 19617 (0.1% higher), the Intel Core i5-12500 with 19668 (0.4% higher), the Intel Core i5-11600KF with 19723 (0.7% higher), and the Intel Core i7-10700F with 19499 (0.5% lower). These deltas are all within one percentage point, indicating that the Ryzen 5 5500 sits in a tightly contested performance band where no single competitor holds a decisive advantage.

In real workloads, the data suggests that the Ryzen 5 5500 handles video encoding, 3D rendering, and compilation tasks with confidence. The Cinebench R15 multi-core score of 1656 and the 3DMark 16-thread score of 5386 show that scaling across cores is efficient. Single-thread performance, while not class-leading, is sufficient for older games and productivity apps that rely on one or two cores. The PassMark data encryption score of 14851 and data compression score of 245533 indicate solid throughput for security and archival tasks, while the extended instructions score of 17236 supports modern AVX workloads. This is a processor that will not be the primary bottleneck in most gaming or content creation scenarios.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The AMD Ryzen 5 5500 uses the AMD Socket AM4 platform, which is a mature ecosystem with a wide range of compatible motherboards. Memory support is limited to DDR4 with a dual-channel memory bus and a bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s, and ECC memory is not supported. PCIe connectivity is Gen 3, which is a generation behind the current standard but still sufficient for most GPUs and NVMe drives. The processor has an unlocked multiplier, allowing overclocking on compatible boards, and its 65 W TDP means that even modest cooling solutions will suffice.

The GPU, an AMD Radeon RX 7700, has a TDP of 200 W and a suggested PSU rating of 550 W. When combined with the CPU’s 65 W TDP, the total system power draw is well within the range of a typical mid-range power supply. The GPU requires two 8-pin power connectors, so builders should verify that their PSU provides these. The physical dimensions of the GPU are 267 mm in length, 135 mm in height, and 50 mm in width, with a dual-slot design, making it compatible with most ATX cases and many smaller form factor cases that can accommodate a 267 mm card.

A sensible next upgrade for this platform would be a higher-core-count AM4 processor, as the socket supports the full 5000 series lineup. Given that the Ryzen 5 5500 already delivers strong multi-threaded performance, moving to an eight-core or twelve-core part would primarily benefit heavily threaded workloads like 3D rendering or software compilation, while gaming performance gains would be marginal. The PCIe Gen 3 limitation is worth noting for future GPU upgrades, as the RX 7700 uses PCIe 4.0 x16, but the bandwidth difference in gaming is typically small. For storage, Gen 3 NVMe drives are well-supported, though users with Gen 4 drives will see them run at reduced speeds.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 7700 is built on the RDNA 3.0 architecture with the Navi 32 chip, manufactured on TSMC’s 5 nm process with 28,100 million transistors and a die size of 346 mm². It features 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering a bandwidth of 624.1 GB/s, which is generous for a GPU in this performance tier. The memory clock runs at 2438 MHz, translating to 19.5 Gbps effective, and the memory bandwidth figures suggest that high-resolution textures and large datasets will not be constrained by memory throughput.

The GPU’s clock speeds are a base of 1900 MHz, a game clock of 2041 MHz, and a boost clock of 2459 MHz. It has 2560 shading units, 160 texture mapping units, and 96 raster operation units, with 40 ray tracing cores. The pixel rate is 236.1 GPixel/s and the texture rate is 393.4 GTexel/s, with FP32 performance rated at 25.18 TFLOPS and FP16 at the same 25.18 TFLOPS (1:1). The ray tracing cores provide hardware acceleration for DirectX Raytracing, though the performance in ray-traced titles will be moderate given the GPU’s position in the market.

Benchmark results show a mixed picture. The PassMark G3D score of 20974 places the GPU at the 58th percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 15852. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon R9 370X with an average score of 15862 (0.1% higher), the AMD Radeon RX 9060 with 16014 (1% higher), the AMD Radeon Pro W5500 with 15679 (1.1% lower), and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti with 16129 (1.7% higher). These deltas are small, indicating that the RX 7700 performs within a narrow band of its direct competitors. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2865 and Geekbench OpenCL score of 106028 provide additional context, with the latter showing strong compute throughput for a GPU of this class.

In rendering workloads, the 16 GB of VRAM is a significant advantage, allowing large scenes and high-resolution textures to be stored locally without spilling into system memory. The 624.1 GB/s bandwidth ensures that data flows quickly between the GPU and its memory, which is critical for 4K texture streaming and complex shaders. The FP32 and FP16 performance are identical, which is unusual and benefits workloads that can leverage half-precision math, such as certain machine learning inference tasks. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, covering the full range of modern graphics APIs.

Who Should Build It

This system is well-suited for gamers who play at 1920x1080 or 2560x1440 resolution, where the measured FPS data shows strong performance across a variety of titles. At 1080p, the average FPS across all tested games is 122.9, with many esports titles exceeding 150 FPS, such as Counter-Strike 2 at 195 FPS and Valorant at 384 FPS. At 1440p, the average drops but remains playable, with most games staying above 60 FPS. For 4K gaming, the GPU struggles with demanding titles, as seen in Cyberpunk 2077 at 28 FPS and Red Dead Redemption 2 at 26 FPS, making this a 1080p or 1440p gaming machine.

Content creators who work with video editing, 3D rendering, and software development will find the CPU’s multi-threaded performance valuable. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 16429 and the PassMark multi-thread score of 19330 indicate that rendering tasks will complete in reasonable time, and the GPU’s 16 GB of VRAM supports GPU-accelerated effects and large compositing projects. Students and small business users will appreciate the balanced performance for office applications, web browsing, and light productivity, though the system is arguably overkill for those tasks alone.

The GPU’s 58th percentile ranking and the CPU’s 73rd percentile ranking suggest that this build is optimized for CPU-heavy workloads. Users who prioritize gaming at high refresh rates on 1080p monitors will get the most value, as the CPU can feed the GPU effectively in most scenarios. For 4K gaming or heavy ray tracing, this system will require significant settings reductions, so those users should look at higher-tier GPUs.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data reveals a system where the CPU is the stronger component relative to its peers, while the GPU is closer to the middle of the pack. The CPU’s 73rd percentile ranking versus the GPU’s 58th percentile ranking creates a potential imbalance in GPU-bound scenarios. In games that are heavily GPU-dependent, such as Cyberpunk 2077 and Red Dead Redemption 2, the measured FPS at 1080p is 58 and 52 respectively, indicating that the GPU is the limiting factor. In contrast, CPU-bound games like Valorant and Counter-Strike 2 show exceptionally high FPS, 384 and 195 at 1080p, demonstrating that the CPU can drive high refresh rates when the GPU is not saturated.

The pair’s rank of 1881 out of 3732 pairs, with an average FPS of 122.9, places it in the top half of all system combinations. This suggests that the balance is generally good, but the bottleneck shifts depending on the workload. For multi-threaded productivity tasks, the CPU will be the primary driver, and its 73rd percentile ranking ensures it competes well. For gaming at 1440p and above, the GPU becomes the bottleneck, and users will need to adjust settings to maintain high frame rates.

The FPS scaling across resolutions provides further evidence. For example, in Counter-Strike 2, FPS drops from 195 at 1080p to 129 at 1440p to 72 at 4K, showing a clear GPU limitation at higher resolutions. In contrast, CPU-bound games like Valorant show less dramatic scaling, with 384 FPS at 1080p and 364 FPS at 1440p, confirming that the CPU is not the limiting factor there. Games like Minecraft show a similar pattern with 192 FPS at 1080p dropping to 121 at 1440p. This indicates that for most gaming scenarios, the GPU is the component that will determine playability at higher resolutions.

Gaming Performance

Measured FPS data at ultra settings is available for 51 games, with dataIsMeasured set to true, meaning these are actual recorded frame rates. The average FPS across all games and resolutions is 122.9, but this figure is heavily influenced by esports titles. At 1920x1080, the system delivers strong performance in most games. Valorant leads with 384 FPS, followed by Counter-Strike: Global Offensive at 431 FPS and Counter-Strike 2 at 195 FPS. Tom Clancy’s Rainbow Six Siege hits 232 FPS, and Roblox reaches 252 FPS. These numbers indicate excellent performance for competitive gaming on high-refresh monitors.

At 2560x1440, performance remains playable in most titles. Valorant still achieves 364 FPS, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 297 FPS, and Counter-Strike 2 129 FPS. Call of Duty: Warzone runs at 106 FPS, and Fortnite at 60 FPS. More demanding titles like Cyberpunk 2077 drop to 43 FPS, and Red Dead Redemption 2 to 39 FPS, which is borderline for smooth gameplay but playable with settings adjustments. At 3840x2160, only a few games remain above 60 FPS, namely Valorant at 305 FPS, Roblox at 95 FPS, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive at 175 FPS, and Call of Duty: Warzone at 90 FPS. Most AAA titles fall below 60 FPS, with Cyberpunk 2077 at 28 FPS and Red Dead Redemption 2 at 26 FPS.

The data shows that this system is best suited for 1080p and 1440p gaming. At 1080p, nearly all games exceed 60 FPS, with many exceeding 100 FPS. At 1440p, the average drops, but most games stay above 40 FPS, which is acceptable for slower-paced titles. For 4K gaming, only esports and less demanding games are playable, and users should not expect high settings in AAA titles.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: At 1080p, the system delivers exceptional frame rates in competitive titles, with Valorant at 384 FPS, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive at 431 FPS, and Counter-Strike 2 at 195 FPS. These numbers support 144 Hz or 240 Hz monitors, and the CPU’s single-thread performance ensures that the GPU is fed adequately.

Streaming: The CPU’s multi-threaded performance, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 16429, can handle game capture and encoding simultaneously with the game running. The 16 GB of GPU memory provides ample buffer for streaming software, and the PassMark data encryption score of 14851 indicates adequate security for streaming protocols.

Video editing: The combination of a six-core CPU and a GPU with 16 GB of VRAM is well-suited for 1080p and 1440p video editing. The Geekbench multi-core score of 7976 and the PassMark floating-point math score of 36815 support effects rendering, while the GPU’s FP32 performance of 25.18 TFLOPS accelerates preview and export tasks.

3D rendering: The Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 6900 and the 3DMark max threads score of 5411 show that CPU rendering will be efficient for small to medium scenes. For GPU rendering, the Radeon RX 7700’s 16 GB of VRAM and 25.18 TFLOPS FP32 performance are sufficient for many Blender and similar workloads, though larger scenes may require more VRAM.

Software development: The CPU’s 12 threads and PassMark integer math score of 65001 support compilation and testing. The 16 GB of system memory bandwidth at 51.2 GB/s is adequate for most development tasks, and the GPU can accelerate testing for graphics applications.

Student and office work: The system is overkill for word processing, spreadsheets, and web browsing, but the Ryzen 5 5500’s single-thread score of 836 in 3DMark and 3058 in PassMark ensure snappy responsiveness. The GPU’s PassMark G2D score of 1206 indicates solid 2D performance for office applications.

FAQ

Q: What is the average FPS across all games at ultra settings?

A: The average FPS across all games and resolutions is 122.9, based on measured data from the system pair.

Q: How does the Ryzen 5 5500 compare to its nearest rival, the Intel Core i5-12500?

A: The Ryzen 5 5500 has an average benchmark score of 19593, which is 0.4% lower than the Intel Core i5-12500’s score of 19668.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory bandwidth?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7700 has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 624.1 GB/s.

Q: Is this system suitable for 4K gaming?

A: The data shows that at 3840x2160, only a few games exceed 60 FPS, such as Valorant at 305 FPS and Call of Duty: Warzone at 90 FPS. Most AAA titles fall below 60 FPS, so 4K gaming is limited to less demanding games.

Q: What is the CPU’s percentile ranking among all CPUs?

A: The Ryzen 5 5500 is at the 73rd percentile of all CPUs, meaning it outperforms 73% of processors in the database.

Q: What power supply is recommended for this system?

A: The suggested PSU for the GPU is 550 W, which, combined with the CPU’s 65 W TDP, provides sufficient headroom for the entire system.

Q: Does the CPU support PCIe Gen 4?

A: No, the Ryzen 5 5500 supports PCIe Gen 3, while the GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x16, which will run at Gen 3 speeds on this platform.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s benchmark suite shows a consistent pattern of strong multi-threaded performance and adequate single-threaded performance. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 16429 and single-core score of 2319 place it in a competitive position. The Geekbench multi-core score of 7976 and single-core score of 1730 reinforce this. The PassMark suite shows a multi-thread score of 19330 and a single-thread score of 3058, with specific workloads like integer math at 65001, floating-point math at 36815, and data compression at 245533. The 3DMark scores range from 836 for single-thread to 5411 for max threads, showing good scaling across thread counts. The CPU’s average benchmark score of 19593 ranks it at the 73rd percentile, with rivals within 0.7% performance delta.

The GPU’s benchmarks show a more modest position. The PassMark G3D score of 20974 is its strongest result, while the G2D score of 1206 is lower. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2865 and Geekbench OpenCL score of 106028 provide additional data points. The PassMark DirectX scores are variable, with DirectX 9 at 261, DirectX 10 at 92, DirectX 11 at 186, and DirectX 12 at 96. The GPU compute score is 10963. The GPU’s average benchmark score of 15852 places it at the 58th percentile, with its nearest rival, the AMD Radeon R9 370X, within 0.1% and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti 1.7% higher.

The combined picture is a system that is stronger on the CPU side. The 73rd percentile CPU ranking versus the 58th percentile GPU ranking means that the processor is the component that boosts the system’s overall standing. The pair’s combined percentile is 66, and its rank of 1881 out of 3732 pairs places it in the top half of all tested combinations. The average FPS of 122.9 across all games is skewed upward by esports titles, but the data shows that this system is a capable gaming machine at 1080p and 1440p, with the CPU providing a solid foundation for productivity tasks. The GPU’s 16 GB of VRAM and 624.1 GB/s bandwidth are its key advantages, making it a reasonable choice for users who value memory capacity over raw rasterization speed.