SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 3 8440U + Intel Arc A530M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

89 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 11% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
82%
VS
GPU
96%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 3 8440U

16,663 Benchmark Score
Top 18% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A530M

46,614 Benchmark Score
Top 4% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# AMD Ryzen 3 8440U + Intel Arc A530M: A Balanced Mobile Duo

This pairing combines AMD's efficient Zen 4 mobile architecture with Intel's dedicated Arc graphics silicon in a laptop-class build. The data shows a system that sits at the 78th percentile overall among all CPU+GPU combinations, with the CPU at the 70th percentile and the GPU at the 85th percentile. This is a configuration aimed at mainstream gaming and content creation, where the GPU carries more weight than the processor in most visual tasks.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The AMD Ryzen 3 8440U is built on the Zen 4 architecture with the Hawk Point codename, manufactured on TSMC's 4 nm process node. It uses the AMD Socket FP7 socket, which is a mobile platform design. The CPU supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, providing a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The platform also offers PCIe Gen 4 with 14 lanes from the CPU, which provides ample bandwidth for the Intel Arc A530M's PCIe 4.0 x8 interface.

The CPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 28 watts, which classifies it as a low-power mobile processor. The GPU, by contrast, has a TDP of 65 watts. Combined, this system draws roughly 93 watts of thermal load, which is modest for a laptop-class build. Since the FACT PACK does not include a suggested PSU rating, any discussion of power supply headroom must remain qualitative; however, the combined thermal envelope indicates that a standard laptop power adapter should handle this configuration without issue, given the mobile form factor.

For a sensible next upgrade, users could consider moving to a higher-tier Ryzen 8000 series processor that fits the same FP7 socket, assuming motherboard compatibility. Alternatively, the GPU could be upgraded to a more powerful Arc 5 or Arc 7 series mobile part if the chassis allows. The DDR5 memory support means that memory upgrades are straightforward, but the dual-channel bus limits the maximum bandwidth to 89.6 GB/s regardless of module capacity. The PCIe Gen 4 support also ensures that any future NVMe storage upgrades will run at full speed, though the 14-lane allocation from the CPU must be shared between the GPU, storage, and other peripherals.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score is 16663, which places it at the 70th percentile of all CPUs in the database. The nearest rival is the Intel Core Ultra 5 115U with an average score of 16753, which is a 0.5% difference. The Intel Core i5-1235U scores 16770, a 0.6% delta, while the AMD Ryzen 3 7335U scores 16827, a 1% delta. The Intel Core i3-12100E scores 16853, a 1.1% delta. These numbers indicate that the Ryzen 3 8440U is essentially neck-and-neck with its closest competitors, trailing by less than 1.1% in every case.

The GPU's average benchmark score is 46614, placing it at the 85th percentile of all GPUs. The AMD Radeon RX 5600M scores 46601, which is a 0% delta, meaning these two parts are statistically identical. The AMD Radeon RX 6550M scores 46702, a 0.2% delta, while the NVIDIA RTX A2000 scores 46043, a 1.2% delta. The NVIDIA RTX 5880 Ada Generation scores 45972, a 1.4% delta. The GPU is thus 1.4% ahead of the RTX 5880 Ada Generation and 0.2% behind the RX 6550M, showing that it sits firmly in the mid-range mobile GPU tier.

The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing is 78, which reflects a system where the GPU is the stronger component. The CPU's 70th percentile and GPU's 85th percentile combine to put this build in the upper-middle tier of laptop configurations, meaning it should handle modern games at medium-to-high settings and productivity tasks with reasonable efficiency.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 3 8440U is a 4-core, 8-thread processor with a base clock of 3.00 GHz and a boost clock of 4.70 GHz. It uses the Zen 4 architecture, which is a significant generational leap over older Zen 3 designs in terms of instructions per clock. The chip is built on a 4 nm TSMC process with 20,900 million transistors on a 137 mm² die. The cache hierarchy includes 64 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 8 MB of shared L3 cache.

In Cinebench R23, the CPU scores 10884 in multi-core and 1536 in single-core. The single-core score of 1536 is strong for a mobile part, indicating that the 4.70 GHz boost clock is effective for lightly threaded workloads. The multi-core score of 10884 is respectable for a 4-core part, though it is clear that the 28-watt TDP limits sustained all-core performance.

PassMark results show a single-thread score of 3648, which is consistent with the Cinebench single-core numbers. The multi-thread score is 12805, which is lower than the Cinebench multi-core score might suggest due to different workload characteristics. The integer math score is 37468, while floating-point math is 23017, showing that the CPU is stronger at integer operations. The data compression score is 146273, which is high and suggests that the CPU handles compression workloads well. The extended instructions score of 11059 indicates solid SIMD performance, which benefits multimedia applications.

The data encryption score of 8012 is moderate, reflecting the lack of dedicated encryption hardware beyond what Zen 4 provides. The find prime numbers score is 43, which is a low score and indicates that the CPU is not optimized for certain mathematical workloads. The physics score of 685 and random string sorting score of 17725 round out the picture of a processor that is balanced for general-purpose computing but not specialized for any single task.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact CPU+GPU combination. Therefore, all FPS figures discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and should be treated as approximations rather than measured results.

Given the GPU's 85th percentile ranking and the CPU's 70th percentile ranking, this system is likely to deliver playable frame rates at 1080p resolution in most modern titles. The GPU's 3.994 TFLOPS of FP32 compute and 8 GB of GDDR6 memory suggest that it can handle medium-to-high settings at 1080p in demanding games, while esports titles should run at high refresh rates. The CPU's 4.70 GHz boost clock and strong single-core score of 1536 in Cinebench R23 indicate that it will not bottleneck the GPU in most gaming scenarios.

For AAA games at 1080p, the system likely averages between 60 and 90 FPS on high settings, depending on the title. For competitive shooters like Valorant or CS2, the system should exceed 144 FPS at 1080p with competitive settings, given the GPU's compute throughput and the CPU's single-thread performance. At 1440p, the GPU will become the primary limiting factor, and users should expect to lower settings to maintain 60 FPS in demanding titles. The 8 GB VRAM is sufficient for 1080p gaming but may be a constraint at higher resolutions with texture-heavy settings.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The GPU's 85th percentile ranking and the CPU's strong single-core performance make this system suitable for 1080p high-refresh gaming. Esports titles should run well above 144 FPS, while AAA games will require medium settings to reach high frame rates.

Streaming: The CPU's 8 threads and 28-watt TDP may limit streaming performance when combined with gaming. The GPU does not have dedicated encoder hardware listed in the FACT PACK, so encoding would fall to the CPU, which could impact frame rates in CPU-intensive games.

Video editing: The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 10884 and the GPU's compute power of 3.994 TFLOPS suggest that 1080p video editing is feasible. The 8 GB VRAM helps with GPU-accelerated effects, but 4K editing may be sluggish due to the CPU's limited core count.

3D rendering: The GPU's 12 RT cores and 1536 shading units provide decent rasterization performance, but the 3.994 TFLOPS FP32 throughput is modest for serious 3D rendering. The CPU's multi-core score of 10884 is adequate for CPU-based rendering but not exceptional.

Software development: The CPU's integer math score of 37468 and data compression score of 146273 indicate solid performance for compilation and data processing tasks. The 8 threads handle parallel builds reasonably well, and the single-thread score of 3648 in PassMark ensures responsive IDE performance.

Student and office work: The 28-watt TDP and efficient 4 nm process make this an ideal laptop for battery-conscious users. The PassMark single-thread score of 3648 and multi-thread score of 12805 are more than sufficient for document editing, web browsing, and spreadsheets.

FAQ

Q: What socket does the AMD Ryzen 3 8440U use?

A: The CPU uses AMD Socket FP7, which is a mobile platform socket.

Q: How much L3 cache does the Ryzen 3 8440U have?

A: The CPU has 8 MB of shared L3 cache, along with 1 MB of L2 cache per core and 64 KB of L1 cache per core.

Q: What is the GPU's memory bandwidth?

A: The Intel Arc A530M has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 224.0 GB/s.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: No, the FACT PACK states that ECC memory is not supported.

Q: What is the combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 78, indicating that this system outperforms 78% of all CPU+GPU combinations in the database.

Q: What is the GPU's boost clock?

A: The Intel Arc A530M has a base clock of 900 MHz and a boost clock of 1300 MHz.

Q: Which rival GPU is closest in performance to the Arc A530M?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 5600M has an average score of 46601, which is a 0% delta from the Arc A530M's 46614, making them statistically identical.

Who Should Build It

This CPU+GPU pairing is best suited for laptop users who want a balanced system for 1080p gaming and general productivity. The GPU's 85th percentile ranking and 8 GB VRAM make it capable of running modern games at medium-to-high settings at 1080p, while the CPU's 70th percentile ensures that everyday tasks remain responsive. Content creators who work with 1080p video and photos will find the GPU's compute power and the CPU's multi-threaded performance adequate, though 4K workflows may be challenging.

Students and office workers will benefit from the 28-watt TDP and efficient 4 nm process, which should deliver long battery life in a laptop form factor. The DDR5 memory support and PCIe Gen 4 connectivity also future-proof the platform for storage and memory upgrades. Small business workstations that need to run productivity suites, light CAD, and data analysis software will find this configuration sufficient, given the CPU's PassMark multi-thread score of 12805 and the GPU's OpenCL score of 49735.

Gamers targeting 1080p high-refresh displays should consider this build, as the GPU is 1.4% ahead of the NVIDIA RTX 5880 Ada Generation in average benchmark score, indicating strong rasterization performance. However, users who prioritize ray tracing should note that the GPU has only 12 RT cores, which is modest for real-time ray-traced effects.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build combining the AMD Ryzen 3 8440U mobile processor with the Intel Arc A530M dedicated GPU. The CPU is a 4-core, 8-thread Zen 4 part with a 28-watt TDP, while the GPU is a 6 nm Xe-HPG architecture chip with 8 GB of GDDR6 memory and a 65-watt TDP. The system sits at the 78th combined percentile, with the GPU at the 85th percentile driving most of the performance.

This pairing represents a mainstream mobile configuration that prioritizes GPU performance over CPU compute. The GPU's 85th percentile ranking places it well above the CPU's 70th percentile, suggesting that the system is designed for graphics-intensive tasks rather than heavily multi-threaded CPU workloads. The total thermal envelope of roughly 93 watts is modest for a laptop, making this a practical choice for portable systems.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data shows a clear imbalance between the GPU and CPU performance tiers. The GPU's 85th percentile ranking and the CPU's 70th percentile indicate that the GPU is the stronger component in this pairing. In gaming workloads, the CPU is unlikely to bottleneck the GPU at 1080p, given its Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1536 and boost clock of 4.70 GHz. However, at 1440p or higher resolutions, the GPU will be the limiting factor, as its 3.994 TFLOPS of FP32 compute is modest for high-resolution rendering.

In CPU-intensive tasks like video encoding or 3D rendering, the CPU's 4-core, 8-thread configuration will be the primary constraint. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 10884 is lower than what a 6-core or 8-core processor would achieve, meaning that heavily threaded workloads will take longer on this system. The GPU's 12 RT cores and 1536 shading units provide some acceleration for rendering tasks, but the CPU's limited core count will still bottleneck in scenes that require substantial physics or simulation calculations.

The memory bandwidth also plays a role in system balance. The CPU's 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth is lower than the GPU's 224.0 GB/s, which is typical for a discrete GPU setup. This means that data transfers between the CPU and GPU are not the primary bottleneck, but the CPU's dual-channel memory bus may limit performance in memory-intensive applications.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A530M is based on the Xe-HPG architecture with the DG2-256 chip, manufactured on TSMC's 6 nm process. The chip contains 11,500 million transistors on a 269 mm² die, with a transistor density of 42.8 million per mm². The GPU has 1536 shading units, 96 texture mapping units, and 48 raster output units, along with 12 ray tracing cores. It does not have listed tensor cores, which may limit AI-accelerated workloads.

The GPU operates at a base clock of 900 MHz and a boost clock of 1300 MHz. Memory runs at 1750 MHz, which translates to 14 Gbps effective, across a 128-bit bus. This configuration yields a memory bandwidth of 224.0 GB/s, which is adequate for 1080p gaming but may be limiting at higher resolutions. The GPU's pixel rate is 62.40 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 124.8 GTexel/s. FP32 performance is 3.994 TFLOPS, while FP16 performance is 7.987 TFLOPS at a 2:1 ratio.

In Geekbench, the GPU scores 49735 in OpenCL and 43492 in Vulkan. These scores place it at the 85th percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 46614. The nearest rival, the AMD Radeon RX 5600M, scores 46601, which is statistically identical. The GPU's API support includes DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with modern games and applications. The 12 RT cores provide some ray tracing capability, but the 3.994 TFLOPS FP32 throughput means that heavy ray tracing workloads will be challenging. Overall, this GPU is well-suited for 1080p gaming and GPU-accelerated content creation, but it is not a high-end part for 4K rendering or advanced RT effects.