SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 3 8440U + Intel Arc A370M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

88 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 12% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
82%
VS
GPU
93%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 3 8440U

16,663 Benchmark Score
Top 18% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A370M

29,175 Benchmark Score
Top 7% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# AMD Ryzen 3 8440U + Intel Arc A370M

This build pairs AMD's entry-level 8000-series mobile processor, the Ryzen 3 8440U, with Intel's Arc A370M discrete graphics in a laptop configuration. The CPU, based on the Zen 4 architecture with the Hawk Point codename, delivers a 70th percentile ranking among all CPUs, while the GPU sits at the 74th percentile among all GPUs, placing the combined system at the 72nd percentile overall. The data shows a balanced pairing where neither component dramatically overshadows the other, though their respective strengths and weaknesses target different workload types.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 3 8440U is a 4-core, 8-thread mobile processor built on TSMC's 4nm process node, containing 20,900 million transistors within a 137 mm² die. It operates with a base clock of 3.00 GHz and boosts up to 4.70 GHz, all within a 28W TDP envelope designed for thin-and-light laptops. The CPU features a cache hierarchy of 64 KB L1 per core, 1 MB L2 per core, and 8 MB of shared L3 cache, which is modest by modern standards but appropriate for a quad-core part.

In Cinebench R23, the CPU scores 10,884 in multi-core and 1,536 in single-core tests. These results indicate that the chip excels at lightly-threaded tasks where its high boost clock can shine, but the 4-core/8-thread configuration limits sustained multi-threaded throughput compared to higher-core-count rivals. The single-core score of 1,536 places it in a competitive position for everyday responsiveness, while the multi-core score reflects the physical core limitation rather than an efficiency problem.

The PassMark suite provides additional insight into specific workload characteristics. The CPU achieves 37,468 in integer math and 23,017 in floating-point math, with a multi-thread score of 12,805. Data compression scores hit 146,273, while encryption reaches 8,012. These figures suggest the processor handles compression and encryption tasks reasonably well for its class, though the floating-point performance trails integer performance, a pattern typical of processors without dedicated AVX-512 units. The extended instructions score of 11,059 indicates solid support for modern instruction sets, benefiting compiled applications and scientific workloads.

With an average benchmark score of 16,663, the Ryzen 3 8440U sits at the 70th percentile among all CPUs. Its nearest rivals include the Intel Core Ultra 5 115U at 16,753 (0.5% ahead), the Intel Core i5-1235U at 16,770 (0.6% ahead), the AMD Ryzen 3 7335U at 16,827 (1% ahead), and the Intel Core i3-12100E at 16,853 (1.1% ahead). The data shows this chip is essentially neck-and-neck with those alternatives, with the largest gap being barely over 1%. For real-world workloads, this translates to near-identical performance to its immediate competitors in productivity tasks, with the Zen 4 architecture providing efficient power scaling that benefits battery life in mobile scenarios.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's Cinebench R15 scores are 1,097 multi-core and 154 single-core, while R20 results show 4,571 multi-core and 645 single-core. These progressive benchmarks demonstrate a consistent scaling pattern: the chip maintains roughly a 7:1 ratio between multi-core and single-core performance across all Cinebench versions, which is expected for a 4-core/8-thread part with simultaneous multithreading. The PassMark single-thread score of 3,648 confirms strong per-core performance, placing the chip competitively for applications that rely on single-threaded execution.

The GPU contributes Geekbench OpenCL scores of 29,676 and Vulkan scores of 28,673, with an average benchmark score of 29,175. This places the Intel Arc A370M at the 74th percentile among all GPUs. The GPU's nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH at 29,197 (0.1% ahead), the AMD FirePro W8000 at 29,211 (0.1% ahead), the AMD Radeon RX 470 at 28,996 (0.6% behind), and the AMD Radeon RX 6800M at 28,874 (1% behind). The near-identical scores between these GPUs indicate that the Arc A370M performs at a level comparable to older desktop discrete GPUs, though the RX 6800M being only 1% behind in this specific benchmark is notable given that it is typically a much higher-tier mobile GPU in other metrics.

The combined picture shows a system where the CPU and GPU both hover around the 70th percentile, indicating a well-matched pair for mainstream laptop workloads. The CPU's 70th percentile and GPU's 74th percentile suggest that neither component is severely bottlenecking the other in general-purpose tasks. The combined percentile of 72 reflects this equilibrium, positioning the build for smooth 1080p gaming at medium settings and capable content creation at moderate complexity levels.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Ryzen 3 8440U uses AMD Socket FP7, a mobile-specific socket that limits upgrades to other FP7-compatible processors within the same generation. The platform supports DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration with a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, which is sufficient for the CPU's 8 MB L3 cache and the GPU's 4 GB VRAM to operate without starvation in most scenarios. ECC memory is not supported, making this platform unsuitable for error-critical workstation deployments.

PCIe connectivity is provided via Gen 4 with 14 lanes from the CPU, which is adequate for the Intel Arc A370M's PCIe 4.0 x8 interface and standard NVMe storage. The GPU has a 35W TDP, and with the CPU's 28W TDP, the combined thermal envelope of 63W is modest for a laptop chassis. The suggested PSU field is null, so power supply requirements must be inferred from the component TDPs; a typical laptop power adapter in the 65W-90W range would be sufficient given the combined 63W component draw.

A sensible next upgrade for this platform would be increasing memory capacity if the laptop supports it, as DDR5 dual-channel bandwidth is already at 89.6 GB/s, and the CPU's performance scaling with additional cores is limited by the socket's mobile constraints. The GPU, being end-of-life per its production status, does not offer a direct upgrade path within the same chassis; users seeking more graphics performance would need to consider a new laptop. The CPU's 4 nm process and 28W TDP suggest that this platform prioritizes efficiency over expandability, making it a fixed-configuration solution rather than a modular one.

Who Should Build It

This build targets users who need a balance of CPU and GPU performance in a mobile form factor without requiring top-tier specifications. The CPU's 70th percentile ranking makes it suitable for students and office workers who run productivity suites, web browsers, and light coding environments, where the 3,648 single-thread PassMark score ensures snappy application response. The 8 MB L3 cache and dual-channel DDR5 support handle typical multitasking scenarios without noticeable slowdowns.

Content creators working with 1080p video editing or photo manipulation will find the CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 10,884 adequate for rendering timelines, while the GPU's 4 GB VRAM and 112.0 GB/s bandwidth can accelerate effects and previews. Software developers benefit from the 14 PCIe Gen 4 lanes for fast storage and the CPU's 8,012 encryption score for secure operations, though compilation times will be longer than on higher-core-count alternatives. Small business workstations requiring efficient, reliable performance for document processing, spreadsheets, and database queries will find the 146,273 data compression score and 12,805 multi-thread score well-suited to these workloads.

Gamers at 1080p resolution with medium to high settings represent a primary audience, as the GPU's 74th percentile and the CPU's single-core strength combine to handle most current titles. The system is less suitable for 1440p or 4K gaming, where the 4 GB VRAM becomes a limiting factor, and for heavy 3D rendering, where the 4-core CPU will extend render times significantly compared to 8-core or higher alternatives.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU+GPU combination, so all frame rate figures discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores rather than direct measurements. The Intel Arc A370M's 4.198 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 65.60 GPixel/s pixel rate suggest it can handle 1080p gaming at medium settings in modern titles, with lighter esports games potentially running at high settings. The GPU's 112.0 GB/s memory bandwidth and 4 GB GDDR6 VRAM are adequate for 1080p textures but will struggle with high-resolution texture packs or titles exceeding 4 GB VRAM usage.

The CPU's single-core performance, reflected in the Cinebench R23 score of 1,536, ensures that frame pacing remains consistent in CPU-bound scenarios. The 8 MB L3 cache helps maintain game asset streaming efficiency, while the 4.70 GHz boost clock provides the responsiveness needed for competitive gaming. However, the 4-core/8-thread configuration may bottleneck in modern titles that utilize more than 8 threads, potentially causing frame dips in crowded scenes or open-world environments.

For competitive titles like first-person shooters at 1080p, the system should achieve high frame rates given the GPU's 74th percentile ranking and the CPU's strong single-thread performance. For AAA titles at 1080p ultra settings, the data suggests frame rates will be playable but not consistently high, as the GPU's 4 GB VRAM and 64-bit memory bus will limit texture detail and resolution scaling. The Geekbench Vulkan score of 28,673 indicates good API efficiency, which should translate to solid DirectX 12 and Vulkan game performance.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's core and thread count?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 8440U has 4 cores and 8 threads, running at a base clock of 3.00 GHz with a boost clock of 4.70 GHz.

Q: How much VRAM does the Intel Arc A370M have?

A: The GPU features 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, providing 112.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth.

Q: What is the combined TDP of this build?

A: The CPU has a 28W TDP and the GPU has a 35W TDP, totaling 63W for the core components.

Q: Does this CPU support ECC memory?

A: No, the Ryzen 3 8440U does not support ECC memory, as indicated in the platform specifications.

Q: What is the CPU's percentile ranking among all processors?

A: The Ryzen 3 8440U ranks at the 70th percentile, with an average benchmark score of 16,663.

Q: What is the GPU's production status?

A: The Intel Arc A370M is marked as end-of-life, with a release date of March 29, 2022.

Q: What memory type does this platform support?

A: The platform supports DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A370M is built on the Xe-HPG architecture with the DG2-128 chip, manufactured on TSMC's 6nm process with 7,200 million transistors in a 157 mm² die. It operates with a base clock of 1550 MHz and a boost clock of 2050 MHz, with memory clocked at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective). The GPU contains 1,024 shading units, 64 texture mapping units, and 32 render output units, along with 8 ray tracing cores. Its FP32 performance reaches 4.198 TFLOPS, with FP16 at 8.397 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio), producing a pixel rate of 65.60 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 131.2 GTexel/s.

The 4 GB GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus provides 112.0 GB/s bandwidth, which is the GPU's most significant limitation. This narrow bus width restricts memory throughput, making the GPU more suitable for 1080p gaming than higher resolutions. The 8 ray tracing cores offer entry-level ray tracing capability, though the modest FP32 throughput will limit ray-traced performance to lighter implementations. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with modern graphics APIs.

With an average benchmark score of 29,175, the GPU sits at the 74th percentile, performing nearly identically to the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH (0.1% ahead) and the AMD FirePro W8000 (0.1% ahead). For rendering workloads, the GPU's 4.198 TFLOPS FP32 throughput can accelerate Blender or similar applications, though the 4 GB VRAM limits scene complexity. The 131.2 GTexel/s texture rate ensures efficient texture filtering in games, while the 65.60 GPixel/s pixel rate handles fill-rate-bound scenarios adequately at 1080p.

Build Overview

This build combines the AMD Ryzen 3 8440U and Intel Arc A370M in a laptop configuration, representing a mainstream mobile platform designed for balanced everyday performance. The CPU, with its 4 cores and 8 threads based on Zen 4 architecture, delivers a 70th percentile ranking among all CPUs, while the GPU achieves a 74th percentile ranking. The combined system percentile of 72 indicates that this pairing sits comfortably in the upper-midrange tier of laptop configurations.

The CPU's 28W TDP and the GPU's 35W TDP create a combined thermal footprint of 63W, which is typical for thin-and-light gaming or content creation laptops. The platform supports DDR5 dual-channel memory at 89.6 GB/s bandwidth, and the CPU provides 14 PCIe Gen 4 lanes for storage and expansion. The GPU's PCIe 4.0 x8 interface is adequately fed by these lanes, ensuring no bandwidth bottleneck in data transfer between components.

The production status of the GPU is end-of-life, indicating that this configuration represents a mature platform rather than a advanced one. The CPU remains active in production, but the overall build class is laptop, meaning the upgrade path is essentially closed after purchase. This system is best viewed as a complete, self-contained solution for users who need reliable performance without plans for component-level upgrades.

Balance and Bottleneck

The benchmark data reveals a well-balanced pairing where the CPU and GPU are within 4 percentile points of each other (70th vs 74th), indicating that neither component consistently dominates the other in general workloads. However, specific workload types reveal different bottleneck characteristics. In CPU-intensive tasks like data compression (146,273 score) and encryption (8,012 score), the processor's 4-core limitation becomes the constraining factor, as these workloads scale with thread count.

In GPU-intensive scenarios such as gaming at 1080p, the GPU's 4 GB VRAM and 112.0 GB/s bandwidth become the limiting factors, particularly in modern titles that require more than 4 GB of video memory at higher settings. The CPU's single-core strength (1,536 in Cinebench R23) ensures that frame generation is not CPU-bound in most games, but the 4-core/8-thread configuration may cause bottlenecks in titles that effectively utilize more than 8 threads for physics, AI, or streaming assets.

The FPS scaling evidence, while estimated, suggests that the GPU will be the primary bottleneck at 1080p ultra settings due to VRAM constraints, while the CPU will bottleneck in heavily threaded productivity applications. The near-identical average benchmark scores of the CPU's nearest rivals (all within 1.1% delta) and the GPU's nearest rivals (all within 1% delta) confirm that this pairing performs consistently with similar-class components, without any unexpected performance cliffs or imbalances.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming at 1080p, the combination of the CPU's 4.70 GHz boost clock and the GPU's 4.198 TFLOPS FP32 performance should deliver frame rates exceeding 60 FPS in competitive titles, though the 4 GB VRAM may require reduced texture settings in newer games.

Streaming at 1080p benefits from the CPU's 8 threads and the GPU's hardware encoding capabilities, though the 4-core CPU may struggle with simultaneous game and encode workloads at higher bitrates, making a dedicated streaming setup or lower game settings advisable.

Video editing in 1080p timelines will run smoothly, with the CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 10,884 handling preview rendering and the GPU accelerating effects, though 4K editing will strain the 4 GB VRAM and 8 MB L3 cache.

3D rendering in applications like Blender will be slow but functional, with the CPU's 4 cores extending render times and the GPU's 8 ray tracing cores providing limited acceleration for ray-traced scenes.

Software development benefits from the CPU's 3,648 single-thread PassMark score for fast compilation of small to medium projects, while the 14 PCIe Gen 4 lanes support rapid storage access for large codebases.

Student and office work is well-served by the 12,805 multi-thread score for multitasking and the 146,273 data compression score for file operations, with the 28W CPU TDP ensuring long battery life for mobile productivity.