SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 3 7440U + Intel Arc A530M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

89 Score

Top 11% Ranking

89 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 11% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

82%

GPU

96%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 3 7440U

15,682 Benchmark Score

Top 18% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A530M

46,614 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# FAQ

Q: What are the core and thread counts of the AMD Ryzen 3 7440U?

A: The CPU features 4 cores and 8 threads, built on the Zen 4 architecture with the Phoenix2 codename.

Q: What is the memory configuration of the Intel Arc A530M?

A: The GPU has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, delivering 224.0 GB/s of bandwidth with an effective speed of 14 Gbps.

Q: Which PCIe generation and lane count does the CPU support?

A: The Ryzen 3 7440U supports PCIe Gen 4 with 14 lanes (CPU only), while the GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface.

Q: What is the process node for each component?

A: The CPU is fabricated on TSMC's 4 nm process, while the GPU uses a 6 nm process, also from TSMC.

Q: Does the CPU include integrated graphics?

A: Yes, it has a Radeon 740M integrated GPU, complementing the discrete Intel Arc A530M in the build.

Q: What is the TDP for the CPU and GPU?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 28 W, while the GPU has a TDP of 65 W.

Q: Are there measured FPS results for this exact CPU+GPU combination?

A: No, there are no measured FPS rows in the data for this pairing; all gaming discussion is based on estimated performance from benchmark scores.

# Benchmark Performance

The combined benchmark picture for this AMD Ryzen 3 7440U and Intel Arc A530M pairing places it at the 77th percentile across all builds, indicating a solidly above-average configuration for a laptop. The CPU itself sits at the 69th percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 15,682. The GPU is notably stronger relatively, ranking at the 85th percentile among all GPUs with an average benchmark score of 46,614. This disparity in percentile rankings is the first clue that the graphics component outperforms the processor in relative terms.

Looking at the CPU's near rivals, the data shows it is tightly clustered with several high-end server and mobile parts. The Ryzen 3 7440U trails the Intel Core i5-11400H by a razor-thin margin of 0.4%, with the i5-11400H averaging 15,749. It is also 0.5% behind the AMD EPYC 9254 (15,756), 0.9% behind the EPYC 9354P (15,826), and 1.1% behind the EPYC 75F3 (15,859). These deltas are minuscule, meaning the Ryzen 3 7440U offers performance essentially equivalent to a range of enterprise and older mobile chips, despite its lower core count.

For the GPU, the Intel Arc A530M is virtually dead-even with the AMD Radeon RX 5600M, showing a 0% delta with the RX 5600M averaging 46,601. It trails the RX 6550M by just 0.2% (46,702) and actually leads the NVIDIA RTX A2000 by 1.2% (46,043) and the RTX 5880 Ada Generation by 1.4% (45,972). These comparisons show the Arc A530M punching in the same weight class as established mid-range mobile GPUs from both AMD and NVIDIA.

The combined picture reveals a system where the GPU is the stronger partner relative to its respective market position. With a CPU at the 69th percentile and a GPU at the 85th percentile, the data suggests that graphics-intensive tasks will benefit more from the hardware than CPU-bound workloads. The average benchmark scores reinforce this: the CPU's 15,682 is competitive with server-class EPYC parts, while the GPU's 46,614 places it among the better mobile graphics solutions. This is a laptop configuration that leans toward visual performance rather than raw compute throughput.

# CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 3 7440U is a 4-core, 8-thread processor built on the Zen 4 architecture with the Phoenix2 codename, part of the 7000 series. It operates at a base clock of 3.00 GHz and boosts up to 4.70 GHz, with a 28 W TDP fitting it into the mobile power envelope. The chip is manufactured on TSMC's 4 nm process, containing 20,900 million transistors on a 137 mm² die. Its cache hierarchy includes 64 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 8 MB of shared L3.

In Cinebench R23, the CPU scores 11,042 in multi-core and 1,558 in single-core tests. The multi-core figure, when placed alongside the nearest rivals, shows near-parity with the Intel Core i5-11400H, which is a 6-core part. This indicates that the Zen 4 architecture's efficiency and IPC are enough to close the core-count gap in heavily threaded workloads. The single-core score of 1,558 is strong for a mobile chip, reflecting the high 4.70 GHz boost clock and modern architecture.

Geekbench results show 5,806 in multi-core and 2,003 in single-core, which align with the Cinebench data in showing a processor that is capable but not exceptional in raw multi-threaded performance. The PassMark suite breaks down performance by specific tasks: integer math scores 36,758, floating-point math scores 20,291, and extended instructions score 10,356. Data compression hits 153,689, while data encryption reaches 9,215. These numbers suggest the CPU handles integer-heavy workloads better than floating-point, which is typical for a chip of this class.

The CPU's percentile of 69 versus all CPUs, combined with an average benchmark score of 15,682, places it in the upper-middle tier. The nearest rival comparisons show it within 1.1% of the AMD EPYC 75F3, a server processor, which is a remarkable result for a 28 W mobile chip. However, the 4-core limitation becomes apparent in tasks that scale beyond 8 threads, where the EPYC parts and the i5-11400H with more cores would eventually pull ahead in prolonged multi-threaded workloads.

Real-world implications from the data: the Ryzen 3 7440U is well-suited for everyday productivity, single-threaded applications, and light-to-moderate multi-threaded tasks like compiling small projects or batch photo editing. The high single-core score of 2,003 in Geekbench makes it responsive for general use and legacy software that relies on one or two threads. The low 28 W TDP also indicates it can sustain boosts without excessive thermal strain in a thin laptop chassis.

# Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for the AMD Ryzen 3 7440U combined with the Intel Arc A530M. Therefore, all gaming performance figures are estimates derived from the benchmark scores, not actual in-game measurements. The data clearly indicates this is the case, with no entries in the measuredFpsUltraByGame field.

With that caveat, the GPU's benchmark performance provides a strong basis for estimating gaming capability. The Arc A530M scores 49,735 in Geekbench OpenCL and 43,492 in Geekbench Vulkan, with an average benchmark score of 46,614. Placing it at the 85th percentile among all GPUs, the data suggests it should handle modern titles at 1080p with high settings, and potentially 1440p with adjustments. The GPU is within 0.2% of the Radeon RX 6550M, a known quantity for 1080p gaming, so frame rates should be comparable to that class of mobile GPU.

The CPU's gaming contribution comes from its strong single-core performance. A Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1,558 and Geekbench single-core of 2,003 indicate the Ryzen 3 7440U will not bottleneck the GPU in most gaming scenarios, especially at higher resolutions where the GPU becomes the limiting factor. The 4-core, 8-thread configuration is adequate for modern game engines that commonly use 4-6 threads, though the latest AAA titles may see some stutter in CPU-heavy scenes.

Estimated frame rates for esports and less demanding titles would be high, given the GPU's performance class. For graphically intensive games, the 8 GB VRAM and 224.0 GB/s bandwidth are sufficient for 1080p ultra textures, but the 128-bit bus may limit performance at 1440p ultra settings in VRAM-hungry titles. The pixel rate of 62.40 GPixel/s and texture rate of 124.8 GTexel/s support the notion of a capable 1080p gaming GPU.

Since no measured FPS exists, users should treat any specific frame rate expectations with caution. The benchmark-derived estimates point to a system that can deliver smooth gameplay at 1080p in most titles, with 1440p being achievable in less demanding games or with reduced settings. The combined percentile of 77 for the build supports this assessment, indicating a gaming laptop that sits above the median but below the top-tier performance level.

# Upgrade Path and Platform

The AMD Ryzen 3 7440U uses the AMD Socket FP7, which is a mobile-specific socket, and the platform supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with ECC capability. Memory bandwidth is rated at 89.6 GB/s, which is a solid figure for a mobile platform. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 4 with 14 lanes, enough for a discrete GPU and one or two NVMe drives.

The Intel Arc A530M connects via PCIe 4.0 x8, which is sufficient for its bandwidth needs. The GPU has a 65 W TDP, and with the CPU at 28 W, the total system power draw is modest. The suggested PSU field is null in the data, so no specific power supply recommendation exists, but the combined 93 W TDP of the two primary components leaves ample headroom in any standard laptop power brick or battery configuration.

For upgrades, the socket FP7 is typically soldered or BGA-mounted in laptops, meaning the CPU is not user-replaceable in most designs. Memory, if not soldered, could be upgraded to increase capacity, but the DDR5 standard is already current. Storage upgrades via the PCIe Gen 4 lanes are the most practical path, allowing for faster NVMe SSDs.

The GPU is also likely soldered, so upgrading the graphics would require a new laptop. The sensible next upgrade for this platform would be increasing RAM to the maximum supported capacity and ensuring storage is on PCIe Gen 4 SSDs to take advantage of the available bandwidth. External GPU enclosures are not applicable here due to the laptop form factor and lack of Thunderbolt in the data.

The 28 W CPU TDP and 65 W GPU TDP suggest this is a thin-and-light gaming or creator laptop, not a desktop replacement. The thermal headroom is limited, so any overclocking or sustained turbo boosts may be constrained. The CPU is not multiplier-unlocked, confirming that performance tuning is off the table.

# GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A530M is built on the Xe-HPG architecture, specifically the DG2-256 chip, and is part of the Alchemist generation under the Arc 5 Mobile series. It is manufactured on TSMC's 6 nm process with 11,500 million transistors on a 269 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 42.8 million per square millimeter. The GPU has 1,536 shading units, 96 texture mapping units, and 48 raster operation units.

Memory configuration is 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, providing 224.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The memory clock is 1750 MHz, with 14 Gbps effective speed. The GPU operates at a base clock of 900 MHz and boosts up to 1300 MHz. Compute capabilities include 3.994 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 7.987 TFLOPS of FP16 (2:1 ratio). It has 12 ray tracing cores, though tensor cores are not specified.

In benchmarks, the Arc A530M scores 49,735 in Geekbench OpenCL and 43,492 in Geekbench Vulkan. The average benchmark score of 46,614 places it at the 85th percentile among all GPUs. Compared to its nearest rivals, it is exactly tied with the AMD Radeon RX 5600M (46,601, 0% delta), 0.2% behind the RX 6550M (46,702), and ahead of the NVIDIA RTX A2000 (46,043) by 1.2% and the RTX 5880 Ada Generation (45,972) by 1.4%.

For rendering and compute workloads, the FP32 performance of 3.994 TFLOPS is modest, but the FP16 capability at 7.987 TFLOPS is more substantial, benefiting applications that can use reduced precision. The 12 RT cores provide hardware-accelerated ray tracing, which is a feature not always present at this performance level. The 8 GB VRAM is adequate for 1080p rendering and moderate 1440p work, though the 128-bit bus may limit complex scenes with large texture sets.

The pixel rate of 62.40 GPixel/s and texture rate of 124.8 GTexel/s are respectable for a mobile GPU. The API support includes DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with modern graphics APIs. The GPU's TDP of 65 W is reasonable for a laptop discrete GPU, allowing it to fit into thinner chassis without extreme cooling requirements.

# Balance and Bottleneck

The data reveals an imbalance between the CPU and GPU in this build. The CPU sits at the 69th percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU is at the 85th percentile among all GPUs. This 16-percentage-point gap indicates the GPU is relatively stronger, meaning graphics-intensive workloads will be less constrained than CPU-bound tasks.

In gaming, the CPU's strong single-core performance (Geekbench single-core of 2,003, Cinebench R23 single-core of 1,558) ensures it can keep up with the GPU in most scenarios. However, the 4-core, 8-thread configuration may become a bottleneck in CPU-heavy titles or when running background tasks while gaming. The GPU's performance, being at the 85th percentile, suggests it can push high frame rates, but the CPU could limit minimum frame rates in physics-heavy scenes.

For productivity, the CPU's multi-core score of 11,042 in Cinebench R23 is competitive with the i5-11400H, but the GPU's compute capabilities (3.994 TFLOPS FP32) offer acceleration for rendering tasks. The balance tips toward the GPU in workloads like video encoding or 3D rendering, where the Arc A530M can offload significant work from the CPU. Conversely, in tasks that are purely CPU-bound, such as data compression (153,689 in PassMark) or integer math (36,758), the GPU offers no assistance.

The FPS scaling evidence, while estimated, supports the bottleneck analysis. At 1080p, the GPU is likely the primary determinant of frame rates, as the CPU's single-thread performance is sufficient. At lower resolutions or in esports titles, the CPU could become the limiting factor if frame rates rise high enough to expose its thread limitations. The combined percentile of 77 for the build reflects this balance, indicating a system where neither component is drastically underpowered relative to the other.

# Build Overview

This build pairs the AMD Ryzen 3 7440U with the Intel Arc A530M in a laptop form factor, as indicated by the buildClass field. The CPU is a 4-core, 8-thread Zen 4 processor with a 28 W TDP, while the GPU is an 8 GB GDDR6 discrete graphics solution with a 65 W TDP. The combined percentile of 77 places this configuration in the upper-middle tier of all builds, suggesting it is a capable laptop for its class.

The CPU's 69th percentile ranking and the GPU's 85th percentile ranking create a configuration where the graphics subsystem is the standout component. The CPU, while not top-tier, offers performance within 1.1% of server-class EPYC parts, which is notable for a mobile chip. The GPU's near-parity with the RX 5600M and RX 6550M places it in well-established mobile gaming territory.

The platform supports DDR5 memory with dual-channel configuration and ECC, providing a modern foundation. PCIe Gen 4 with 14 lanes enables fast storage and the GPU connection. The total TDP of 93 W for the two main components suggests a laptop that balances performance with portability, likely fitting in a compact chassis without massive cooling requirements.

The build's overall tier, based on the 77th combined percentile, would be categorized as a mid-range to upper-mid-range laptop. It is not a flagship gaming machine, but it offers solid performance for the majority of users. The lack of measured FPS data means the gaming performance is estimated, but the benchmark scores from both components support a capable 1080p gaming experience.

# Who Should Build It

This laptop configuration is best suited for gamers who prioritize 1080p gaming at high settings, given the GPU's 85th percentile performance and 8 GB VRAM. The estimated frame rates, based on benchmark scores, would handle most modern titles smoothly at this resolution, making it a good choice for casual and competitive gamers alike who do not require 4K capability.

Content creators working with photo editing, 2D design, or light video editing would benefit from the GPU's compute performance (3.994 TFLOPS FP32) and the CPU's strong single-core speed. The 4-core CPU is adequate for these tasks, especially when the GPU can accelerate effects and rendering. For 3D artists, the 12 RT cores provide hardware ray tracing, though the overall performance is modest for heavy production workloads.

Developers building and compiling code would find the CPU's performance adequate for small-to-medium projects, with the multi-core score of 11,042 in Cinebench R23 handling parallel builds efficiently. The strong single-core performance of 1,558 in Cinebench R23 single-core makes for a responsive development environment. Students in engineering or computer science programs would appreciate the balance of portability and performance.

Small business workstations in this configuration would handle office productivity, data analysis, and light database work without issue. The CPU's PassMark data compression score of 153,689 indicates efficient handling of data-heavy tasks, while the GPU can accelerate visualization or presentation workloads. The 28 W CPU TDP and 65 W GPU TDP suggest reasonable battery life for a laptop, making it suitable for professionals on the go.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 3 7440U + Intel Arc A530M

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 3 7440U

Intel Arc A530M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds