SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 3 7440U + Intel Arc A370M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

88 Score

Top 12% Ranking

88 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 12% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

82%

GPU

93%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 3 7440U

15,682 Benchmark Score

Top 18% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A370M

29,175 Benchmark Score

Top 7% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 3 7440U and Intel Arc A370M pairing represents a specific slice of the mobile market, targeting thin and light laptops that need to balance daily productivity with a meaningful step up in graphical horsepower. The CPU, a 4-core Zen 4 part, and the GPU, Intel’s entry-level Arc discrete chip, combine to deliver a system that sits in the 72nd percentile of all pairings. This analysis draws exclusively from the provided benchmark data to outline capabilities, limitations, and the ideal user profile for this hardware combination.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: This is not a platform for pushing high refresh rates at maximum detail. The Arc A370M’s average benchmark score of 29175 places it in the 74th percentile of all GPUs, but its 4 GB VRAM and 64-bit memory bus will constrain performance. While the GPU can handle esports titles, the lack of measured FPS data means expectations should be tempered; users should target 1080p with competitive settings rather than expecting high refresh rates in demanding AAA titles.

Streaming: The combination of the Ryzen 3 7440U’s 8 threads and the Arc A370M’s dedicated encoder makes this a viable, if modest, streaming setup. The CPU’s PassMark multithread score of 12991 indicates it can handle the encoding overhead of a 720p or 1080p stream, while the GPU’s dedicated hardware keeps the impact on game performance lower than CPU-only encoding. However, the 4-core limit means simultaneous gaming and encoding will strain the system.

Video Editing: The Arc A370M’s 1024 shading units and 8 RT cores provide hardware acceleration for effects and rendering in modern editors. The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multicore score of 11042 suggests that 1080p timeline editing and light 4K work is feasible, though export times will not be class-leading. The 4 GB VRAM is a limiting factor for complex multi-layer compositions, making this a system for light to moderate editing rather than professional workflows.

3D Rendering: This workload leans heavily on the GPU, and the Arc A370M’s 4.198 TFLOPS of FP32 performance is respectable for an entry-level chip. The GPU’s score in Geekbench OpenCL of 29676 indicates it can handle basic 3D rendering tasks and viewport navigation, but the 4 GB memory capacity will quickly become a bottleneck with larger scenes. The CPU’s 8 threads will assist with CPU-based rendering tasks, but the Cinebench R20 multicore score of 4637 shows its limits.

Software Development: The Ryzen 3 7440U is a capable development engine. Its strong single-core performance, evidenced by a Geekbench single-core score of 2003 and a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1558, ensures snappy compilation of small to medium projects and responsive IDE interaction. The 8 threads and 8 MB of L3 cache provide enough parallelism for build tools, while the DDR5 memory support and 89.6 GB/s bandwidth prevent memory from becoming a bottleneck in most coding tasks.

Student and Office Work: This is where the pairing excels. The CPU’s PassMark single-thread score of 2614 handles spreadsheet calculations, document processing, and web browsing with ease. The integrated Radeon 740M provides a fallback for power efficiency, while the Arc A370M ensures smooth 4K display output and hardware acceleration for video conferencing effects. The 28W TDP of the CPU makes it suitable for all-day battery life in a well-designed chassis.

Benchmark Performance

The core benchmark picture is defined by a CPU that outperforms its core count suggests and a GPU that is a solid entry-level discrete solution. The Ryzen 3 7440U’s average benchmark score is 15682, placing it in the 69th percentile of all CPUs. This score is remarkably close to the Intel Core i5-11400H, which has an average score of 15749, putting the Ryzen 3 7440U just 0.4% behind that 6-core rival. This is a significant achievement for a 4-core part, highlighting the efficiency of the Zen 4 architecture at 4 nm. The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multicore score of 11042 and Geekbench multicore score of 5806 reinforce its position as a strong performer in its class.

The Intel Arc A370M delivers an average benchmark score of 29175, placing it in the 74th percentile of all GPUs. Its Geekbench OpenCL score of 29676 and Vulkan score of 28673 show balanced performance across different APIs. The GPU’s nearest rival is the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH, which scores 29197, putting the Arc A370M just 0.1% behind that older, higher-power part. It also trades blows with the desktop AMD Radeon RX 470, which scores 28996, meaning the Arc A370M is 0.6% ahead of that card.

The combined system percentile of 72 reflects a balanced pairing where neither component is drastically holding back the other. The CPU’s 69th percentile and GPU’s 74th percentile are closely aligned, suggesting that in most workloads, the system will perform at a level consistent with the mid-to-upper range of laptop configurations. The CPU’s ability to nearly match a 6-core Intel H-series chip is the standout result, while the GPU’s performance is competitive for its class.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The upgrade path for this platform is defined by the AMD Socket FP7 and the end-of-life status of the Intel Arc A370M. The Ryzen 3 7440U is soldered to the motherboard, meaning CPU upgrades are not possible. The platform supports dual-channel DDR5 memory, and upgrading from a smaller capacity to a larger dual-channel kit could improve performance in memory-sensitive tasks. The CPU provides 14 PCIe Gen 4 lanes, which is sufficient for the Arc A370M’s PCIe 4.0 x8 interface and a single fast NVMe SSD.

The Arc A370M is also soldered in most implementations, making a GPU upgrade impossible in a typical laptop. The GPU’s 35W TDP and the CPU’s 28W TDP combine for a system TDP of 63W, which is modest and allows for a compact cooling solution. The suggested PSU field is null, but given the low TDPs, a standard laptop power adapter in the 90W to 130W range would provide ample headroom, though this is not specified in the data. The most sensible "upgrade" for a user is to ensure they have maximum RAM and a fast NVMe drive, as those are the only user-serviceable components that can extend the system's useful life.

Who Should Build It

This is a laptop configuration, so the question is who should buy it rather than build it. The target user is a student or professional who needs a single device for both productivity and light gaming. The Ryzen 3 7440U’s strong single-core performance, with a PassMark single-thread score of 2614, makes it ideal for office work, coding, and research. The Arc A370M extends the system’s capability to 1080p gaming at medium settings and hardware-accelerated content creation.

This is not for users who prioritize high-refresh gaming or heavy 3D rendering. The 4 GB VRAM on the GPU is a hard limit for modern AAA titles at high textures. It is also not for developers who compile massive codebases, as the 4-core CPU will struggle with long build times. The ideal user is one who values portability, battery life, and a system that can do 80% of tasks very well and the remaining 20% (gaming, rendering) adequately. Small business workstations that need a compact, reliable machine for office software and light design work would also find this configuration sufficient.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data shows a system that is remarkably well-balanced, with the CPU and GPU percentiles within 5 points of each other. However, the nature of the bottleneck shifts depending on the workload. In gaming, the Arc A370M is the primary limiter. Its 74th percentile score, while good, is held back by the 4 GB VRAM and 64-bit memory bus with 112.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This will cause texture pop-in and stuttering in games that require more than 4 GB of VRAM, even if the GPU’s compute power is sufficient.

In CPU-bound scenarios like software compilation or heavy multitasking, the Ryzen 3 7440U becomes the bottleneck. Despite its strong showing, its 4 cores and 8 threads are the physical limit. The PassMark multithread score of 12991 shows it can handle moderate parallel loads, but it will fall behind more expensive 6 and 8-core parts in heavily threaded workloads. The CPU’s 69th percentile versus the GPU’s 74th percentile suggests that in a purely balanced workload, the CPU is slightly more likely to be the limiting factor.

The FPS scaling evidence, while not measured, points to a GPU-limited experience at higher resolutions and detail levels. At 1080p with lower settings, the CPU’s strong single-core performance will allow the GPU to stretch its legs. At 1440p or with high detail, the GPU’s memory bandwidth and capacity will cause frame rates to drop. This is a classic pairing where the CPU is capable of driving a more powerful GPU, but the GPU is capped by its own memory subsystem.

Gaming Performance

Note: No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU-GPU combination. All gaming performance figures are estimates based on the GPU’s benchmark scores, specifically its Geekbench OpenCL score of 29676 and Vulkan score of 28673, relative to its nearest rivals.

The estimated gaming performance for the Arc A370M is that of a competent 1080p entry-level card. In esports titles like Counter-Strike 2 or Valorant, the GPU’s 4.198 TFLOPS of FP32 power and 131.2 GTexel/s texture rate should deliver playable frame rates well above 60 FPS at medium to high settings. The CPU’s high single-core score of 1558 in Cinebench R23 ensures that these CPU-light games will not be bottlenecked.

For modern AAA titles, the estimate is more conservative. The 4 GB VRAM is the primary concern; games like Cyberpunk 2077 or Starfield will require significant texture quality reductions to avoid exceeding this limit. At 1080p with low to medium settings, the GPU should manage 30 to 50 FPS in these demanding titles. The GPU’s 8 RT cores provide ray tracing support, but the 4.198 TFLOPS of compute power is insufficient for meaningful ray tracing performance; expect to disable it for acceptable frame rates.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A370M is built on the Xe-HPG architecture (Alchemist generation) using a 6 nm process at TSMC. It features 1024 shading units, 64 TMUs, and 32 ROPs, along with 8 dedicated ray tracing cores. The GPU operates at a base clock of 1550 MHz and a boost clock of 2050 MHz. Memory is a critical specification: 4 GB of GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus, providing 112.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This is a significant bottleneck for a modern GPU, as the bandwidth is roughly half of what a 128-bit solution would offer.

The GPU’s compute capabilities are quantified by its 4.198 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 8.397 TFLOPS of FP16 performance (2:1 ratio). Its pixel rate is 65.60 GPixel/s and texture rate is 131.2 GTexel/s. In the Geekbench OpenCL test, it scores 29676, placing it in the 74th percentile of all GPUs. This puts it in direct competition with the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH, which scores 29197 (0.1% ahead), and the AMD Radeon RX 470, which scores 28996 (0.6% behind).

For rendering, the 4 GB VRAM is the defining limitation. It is sufficient for 1080p textures and moderate 3D scenes in Blender or similar software, but it will fail to load larger textures or high-polygon scenes. The 8 RT cores are present for hardware-accelerated ray tracing, but the raw compute power limits their effectiveness. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring broad software compatibility. Its production status is end-of-life, meaning no future driver optimizations are planned, which is a consideration for long-term use.

FAQ

Q: Is the Intel Arc A370M good for gaming?

A: It is a capable entry-level 1080p gaming GPU. Its average benchmark score of 29175 places it in the 74th percentile, but the 4 GB VRAM and 112.0 GB/s bandwidth limit it to medium or low settings in modern AAA titles.

Q: How does the Ryzen 3 7440U compare to a typical 6-core laptop CPU?

A: Despite having only 4 cores, its average benchmark score of 15682 is just 0.4% behind the Intel Core i5-11400H, which scores 15749. This is due to the efficient Zen 4 architecture.

Q: Can this system handle video editing?

A: Yes, for light to moderate 1080p editing. The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multicore score of 11042 and the GPU’s hardware acceleration make it feasible, but the 4 GB VRAM will limit complex effects and large timelines.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this pairing?

A: The system has a combined percentile of 72, indicating it performs better than 72% of all CPU-GPU pairings in the database.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU the bottleneck in this system?

A: It depends on the workload. In gaming, the GPU’s 4 GB VRAM is the primary limiter. In CPU-heavy tasks like compilation, the 4-core CPU is the bottleneck, as evidenced by its PassMark multithread score of 12991.

Q: Does this system support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the AMD Ryzen 3 7440U supports ECC memory, a feature often found in workstation-class hardware.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of this platform?

A: The CPU supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a total bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, which is adequate for the CPU’s 8 threads and the GPU’s 112.0 GB/s dedicated bandwidth.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 3 7440U is a 4-core, 8-thread processor from the 7000 series, built on the Zen 4 architecture with the codename Phoenix2. It is manufactured on a 4 nm process at TSMC, with a die size of 137 mm² and a transistor count of 20,900 million. The CPU has a base clock of 3.00 GHz and a boost clock of 4.70 GHz, with a TDP of 28W. It features 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 cache per core, and 8 MB of shared L3 cache.

The benchmark results paint a picture of a processor that maximizes its core count. Its Cinebench R23 multicore score of 11042 is strong for a 4-core part, and its single-core score of 1558 is excellent. This is reflected in its Geekbench scores of 5806 (multicore) and 2003 (single-core). The PassMark suite shows a balanced set of results: a multithread score of 12991, a single-thread score of 2614, and strong scores in integer math (36758) and floating-point math (20291).

The CPU’s average benchmark score of 15682 places it in the 69th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rival, the Intel Core i5-11400H, has an average score of 15749, making the Ryzen 3 7440U only 0.4% slower. This is a remarkable result for a low-power mobile chip, demonstrating the efficiency of the Zen 4 architecture. The CPU supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with ECC, and provides 14 PCIe Gen 4 lanes. This is a highly efficient processor that delivers desktop-class single-core performance in a 28W envelope, making it an excellent choice for a wide range of mobile workloads.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 3 7440U + Intel Arc A370M

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 3 7440U

Intel Arc A370M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Usage Scenarios

Benchmark Performance

Upgrade Path and Platform

Who Should Build It

Balance and Bottleneck

Gaming Performance

GPU Analysis

FAQ

CPU Analysis

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds