SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 3 7335U + Intel Arc A570M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

90 Score

Top 10% Ranking

90 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 10% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

82%

GPU

97%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 3 7335U

16,827 Benchmark Score

Top 18% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A570M

58,239 Benchmark Score

Top 3% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

Balance and Bottleneck

The AMD Ryzen 3 7335U paired with the Intel Arc A570M presents a notable asymmetry in raw capability. The CPU sits at the 70th percentile among all processors, while the GPU commands a much stronger position at the 88th percentile among all GPUs. This 18-percentage-point gap suggests the graphics solution is the dominant partner in this pairing, capable of outrunning the processor in tasks where both are heavily engaged.

Benchmark data reinforces this interpretation. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 10,703 points is respectable for a 4-core/8-thread mobile part, but it is not a high-end compute monster. The GPU's Geekbench OpenCL score of 58,239 places it within 0.3% of the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT, a desktop-class discrete GPU. When a mobile processor is paired with a GPU performing at that level, the CPU becomes the limiting factor in many GPU-bound scenarios, particularly at lower resolutions where frame generation is more dependent on processor throughput.

The FPS scaling evidence, while not measured for this exact combination, can be inferred from the percentile positions. At 1080p, the CPU's single-thread score of 1,511 in Cinebench R23 and 3,053 in PassMark single-thread will likely cap frame rates in esports titles. At 1440p and above, the GPU's workload increases, and the bottleneck shifts toward the Arc A570M's 224.0 GB/s memory bandwidth and 5.325 TFLOPS of FP32 compute. The data suggests a system where the CPU limits at high refresh rates, but the GPU limits at higher resolutions or with heavy graphics settings.

Memory bandwidth is another point of balance. The CPU supports dual-channel DDR5 with 76.8 GB/s of bandwidth, while the GPU has its own dedicated 8 GB GDDR6 pool at 224.0 GB/s. These are separate resources, so the CPU's memory subsystem does not starve the GPU, but the CPU's 8 MB shared L3 cache is modest for a 2023 part. In mixed workloads, the processor's cache and memory latency will matter more than raw bandwidth, and the data shows a CPU that is competent but not exceptional in memory-sensitive tasks.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The Arc A570M's 88th percentile position and proximity to the RX 6950 XT in OpenCL suggest strong raw graphics throughput. However, the CPU's 70th percentile and single-thread score of 1,511 in Cinebench R23 will likely bottleneck frame rates in esports and competitive titles at 1080p. Estimated FPS figures for this pairing would show lower 1% lows and average frame rates than the GPU alone could deliver, especially in CPU-light engines.

Streaming: The CPU has no dedicated encoder hardware listed beyond its integrated Radeon 660M graphics, and the GPU's encoding capabilities are not specified in the data. The 8 threads and 28 W TDP suggest the processor can handle software encoding for a single stream at moderate quality, but the GPU's 16 RT cores and 2048 shading units could offload some encoding work if the software supports Intel's Quick Sync. The data does not confirm this, so streaming performance is a mixed bag.

Video editing: The CPU's PassMark multi-thread score of 12,592 and Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 10,703 indicate competent but not stellar rendering in timeline previews. The GPU's 10.65 TFLOPS of FP16 throughput (2:1 ratio) accelerates effects and color grading in compatible applications. The 8 GB VRAM is sufficient for 1080p and moderate 4K timelines, but the 128-bit memory bus may limit performance with heavy multi-stream timelines.

3D rendering: The CPU's Cinebench R15 multi-core score of 1,078 and R20 multi-core of 4,495 show a processor that will handle single-frame renders but not production-scale batch jobs. The GPU's 5.325 TFLOPS FP32 and 16 RT cores provide hardware-accelerated ray tracing in supported renderers, with the 224.0 GB/s bandwidth feeding the 2048 shading units efficiently. Expected render times are competitive for a mobile workstation, but the 4-core CPU will lag behind 6- and 8-core rivals.

Software development: The CPU's PassMark data encryption score of 9,335 and extended instructions score of 10,314 indicate solid performance for code compilation and cryptographic operations. The 4 cores and 8 threads handle parallel builds adequately, and the 3,053 single-thread score ensures responsive IDE interaction. The 70th percentile position means this is not a top-tier developer laptop, but it is above the median.

Student and office work: The CPU's 3.00 GHz base clock and 4.30 GHz boost clock deliver snappy responsiveness for document editing and web browsing. The integrated Radeon 660M graphics provide a fallback for display output when the discrete GPU is idle, saving power. The 28 W TDP and mobile class make this suitable for all-day battery use in light workloads, though the data does not specify battery capacity.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 3 7335U is a 4-core, 8-thread mobile processor built on the Zen 3+ architecture, codenamed Rembrandt-R. This 7000-series part uses TSMC's 6 nm process node with a die size of 208 mm². The base clock of 3.00 GHz boosts to 4.30 GHz, and the 28 W TDP classifies it as a low-power mobile chip designed for thin-and-light laptops.

The cache hierarchy is straightforward: 64 KB L1 per core, 512 KB L2 per core, and 8 MB shared L3. This is a modest amount of L3 compared to desktop parts, but adequate for the 4-core configuration. The CPU supports DDR5 memory in dual-channel mode with 76.8 GB/s of bandwidth and includes ECC support, which is unusual for a consumer mobile part and beneficial for workstation use.

Benchmark scores reveal a processor that trades single-thread performance for efficiency. The Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1,511 and PassMark single-thread score of 3,053 are competitive for the class, landing just 0.2% behind the Intel Core i3-12100E in average benchmark score and 0.3% ahead of the Intel Core i5-1235U. The multi-core Cinebench R23 score of 10,703 reflects the 4-core/8-thread design, which cannot match higher-core-count rivals but delivers consistent throughput for its power envelope.

The PassMark suite shows specific strengths: integer math at 42,493, floating-point math at 24,298, and extended instructions at 10,314. Data compression scores 146,309, which is strong for a mobile chip and indicates good memory subsystem efficiency. The find prime numbers score of 36 is low, reflecting the CPU's modest integer throughput in a single-threaded task. The physics score of 647 and multithread score of 12,592 round out a profile that is above-average for mobile but not exceptional.

The 70th percentile position among all CPUs means this processor outperforms roughly 70% of the installed base, but it sits near the bottom of the 7000-series lineup. The nearest rivals, including the Intel Core i5-1235U and AMD Ryzen 5 7235HS, are all within 0.4% of its average benchmark score of 16,827, indicating a tightly contested mid-range mobile segment.

Who Should Build It

This pairing targets users who prioritize graphics performance over CPU throughput in a laptop form factor. Gamers playing at 1080p with high settings will benefit from the GPU's 88th percentile position, provided they accept that the CPU may limit frame rates in CPU-intensive scenes. At 1440p, the GPU becomes the primary driver, and the CPU's limitations are less pronounced.

Content creators working with GPU-accelerated effects in video editing or 3D rendering software will find the Arc A570M's 8 GB VRAM and 16 RT cores valuable. The CPU's 4 cores handle timeline scrubbing and proxy generation adequately, and the ECC memory support adds reliability for long render sessions. The 28 W TDP keeps thermals manageable in a laptop chassis, making this suitable for on-location editing.

Software developers who value security features will appreciate the CPU's PassMark data encryption score of 9,335, which indicates solid AES and cryptographic performance. The 8 threads support parallel compilation, and the single-thread score of 3,053 ensures a responsive IDE. Students and office workers in STEM fields will find the combination of CPU and GPU capable for simulation software and data visualization, though the laptop class means portability is the priority over raw performance.

Small business workstations requiring GPU acceleration for design or engineering applications could use this pairing effectively. The GPU's OpenCL score of 58,239, within 0.3% of the RX 6950 XT, makes it a credible alternative to desktop-class GPUs in a portable form factor. The CPU's 70th percentile ensures it will not embarrass the system in general productivity tasks.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A570M is a mobile discrete GPU built on the Xe-HPG architecture, generation Alchemist (Arc 5 Mobile). It uses the DG2-256 chip on TSMC's 6 nm process, with 11,500 million transistors on a 269 mm² die. The base clock is 900 MHz with a boost clock of 1300 MHz, and memory runs at 1750 MHz, translating to 14 Gbps effective on 8 GB of GDDR6 across a 128-bit bus, yielding 224.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

The compute configuration includes 2048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, and 64 raster output units. The 16 ray tracing cores provide hardware-accelerated ray tracing, and the GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. Pixel rate is 83.20 GPixel/s and texture rate is 166.4 GTexel/s. FP32 performance is 5.325 TFLOPS, with FP16 at 10.65 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio).

The Geekbench OpenCL score of 58,239 places this GPU at the 88th percentile among all GPUs. It sits 0.3% behind the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT and 0.3% ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM, with the NVIDIA P102-100 0.5% ahead and the AMD Radeon PRO V710 0.7% ahead. This is a remarkable result for a mobile part, indicating that the Arc A570M delivers desktop-class compute performance in a laptop power envelope.

The 75 W TDP and IGP slot width (meaning it is integrated into the laptop board rather than a removable card) suggest this GPU is designed for performance laptops where space and power are constrained. The PCIe 4.0 x8 interface provides adequate bandwidth for the GPU's memory pool, and the 224.0 GB/s bandwidth is sufficient for 1080p and 1440p gaming, though it may limit 4K texture streaming.

FAQ

Q: How does the Ryzen 3 7335U compare to the Intel Core i3-12100E?

A: The Ryzen 3 7335U has an average benchmark score of 16,827, which is 0.2% lower than the Intel Core i3-12100E's 16,853. This places the two processors within statistical noise of each other in overall performance.

Q: Is the Intel Arc A570M faster than the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT?

A: In Geekbench OpenCL, the Arc A570M scores 58,239, which is 0.3% lower than the RX 6950 XT's 58,392. The two GPUs are effectively tied in this benchmark, though the RX 6950 XT holds a marginal lead.

Q: What memory does the Ryzen 3 7335U support?

A: The CPU supports DDR5 memory in dual-channel mode with a bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s. It also supports ECC memory, which is uncommon for consumer mobile processors.

Q: How many ray tracing cores does the Arc A570M have?

A: The GPU has 16 ray tracing cores, which provide hardware-accelerated ray tracing for DirectX 12 Ultimate workloads.

Q: What is the GPU's memory bandwidth?

A: The Arc A570M has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, delivering 224.0 GB/s of bandwidth at 14 Gbps effective memory speed.

Q: What socket does the Ryzen 3 7335U use?

A: The CPU uses AMD Socket FP7, which is a mobile socket. The part number is 100-000000537(FP7) or 100-000000549(FP7r2).

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 79, meaning this pairing outperforms 79% of all CPU+GPU combinations in the database.

Benchmark Performance

The AMD Ryzen 3 7335U achieves an average benchmark score of 16,827, placing it at the 70th percentile among all CPUs. Its nearest rivals are tightly clustered: the Intel Core i3-12100E at 16,853 (0.2% ahead), the AMD Ryzen 5 7235HS at 16,902 (0.4% ahead), the Intel Core i5-1235U at 16,770 (0.3% behind), and the Intel Core Ultra 5 115U at 16,753 (0.4% behind). This indicates the CPU is well-positioned in the mid-range mobile market, neither leading nor trailing its peers by a meaningful margin.

The Intel Arc A570M achieves a Geekbench OpenCL score of 58,239, placing it at the 88th percentile among all GPUs. Its nearest rivals are the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT at 58,392 (0.3% ahead), the AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM at 58,085 (0.3% behind), the NVIDIA P102-100 at 58,528 (0.5% ahead), and the AMD Radeon PRO V710 at 58,657 (0.7% ahead). The GPU's position is significantly stronger than the CPU's, confirming that the graphics solution is the standout component in this pairing.

The combined percentile of 79 reflects the GPU's strength pulling the overall score upward from the CPU's 70th percentile. In Cinebench R23, the CPU scores 10,703 multi-core and 1,511 single-core. In R20, it scores 4,495 multi-core and 634 single-core. In R15, it scores 1,078 multi-core and 152 single-core. PassMark results include multi-thread at 12,592, single-thread at 3,053, and specific workloads like data compression at 146,309 and integer math at 42,493.

The GPU's 5.325 TFLOPS FP32 and 10.65 TFLOPS FP16 provide substantial compute headroom. The 128 texture mapping units and 64 raster output units deliver a texture rate of 166.4 GTexel/s and pixel rate of 83.20 GPixel/s. When combined, the CPU and GPU present a system that is 79% better than the average pairing, with the GPU contributing the majority of the performance advantage.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The AMD Ryzen 3 7335U uses AMD Socket FP7, a mobile-only socket. The CPU supports PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes from the CPU itself. It supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with 76.8 GB/s bandwidth and ECC memory, making it suitable for workstation-class laptops. The 28 W TDP indicates a low-power design that is soldered to the motherboard in most implementations.

The Intel Arc A570M uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface and has a TDP of 75 W. The suggested PSU field is null, meaning the data does not specify a power supply requirement; in a laptop, the power delivery is handled by the system's adapter. The GPU's IGP slot width confirms it is integrated into the laptop board, so it is not user-upgradeable.

A sensible next upgrade on this platform would be increasing memory capacity or speed, since the CPU supports DDR5 and the dual-channel configuration is already in place. The 8 GB L3 cache is fixed, but additional RAM could improve performance in memory-intensive workloads. For storage, the CPU's 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes could support a fast NVMe SSD, though the data does not specify the exact lane allocation.

The platform's age (release date January 2023 for the CPU, July 2023 for the GPU) means newer sockets and architectures exist, but the FP7 socket and the Arc A570M's integration limit upgradeability. Users seeking more CPU performance would need a new laptop, as the processor is not removable. The 75 W GPU TDP and 28 W CPU TDP combine for a 103 W total thermal budget, which is modest for a laptop and allows for thinner designs.

Build Overview

This build pairs the AMD Ryzen 3 7335U, a 4-core/8-thread mobile processor from the 7000 series, with the Intel Arc A570M, a mobile discrete GPU from the Alchemist generation. The build class is laptop, meaning both components are designed for portable systems. The CPU is built on Zen 3+ architecture (Rembrandt-R) using TSMC's 6 nm process, while the GPU uses Xe-HPG architecture (DG2-256) also on TSMC's 6 nm process.

The combined percentile of 79 places this pairing above 79% of all CPU+GPU combinations in the database. The CPU's 70th percentile and GPU's 88th percentile indicate that the GPU is the higher-performing component, and the overall tier is mid-to-high for mobile systems. The CPU's 28 W TDP and GPU's 75 W TDP suggest a laptop that balances performance with portability, suitable for users who need discrete GPU performance without a desktop-class power draw.

The CPU's release date is January 2023, and the GPU's is July 2023, making this a pairing of components from the same generation cycle. The production status for both is Active, meaning they are still in current production. The GPU's 8 GB VRAM and 224.0 GB/s bandwidth, combined with the CPU's 76.8 GB/s system memory bandwidth, provide a balanced memory subsystem for a laptop.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination — the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data. All FPS discussion is therefore estimated from the benchmark scores and should be treated as approximations rather than measured results.

Based on the GPU's 88th percentile position and its proximity to the RX 6950 XT in OpenCL, the Arc A570M is capable of high frame rates in most modern titles at 1080p with high settings. The 8 GB VRAM is sufficient for 1080p textures, and the 224.0 GB/s bandwidth handles typical game asset streaming. The 16 RT cores enable ray-traced effects, though the 5.325 TFLOPS FP32 compute will limit ray tracing performance in demanding scenes.

The CPU's 70th percentile and single-thread score of 3,053 in PassMark will likely bottleneck frame rates in esports titles like competitive shooters and MOBAs at 1080p, where high CPU throughput is required to maintain 144+ FPS. In AAA titles that are more GPU-bound, the CPU's 4 cores and 8 threads are sufficient to feed the GPU, and frame rates will be limited by the GPU's rasterization throughput.

At 1440p, the GPU becomes the primary bottleneck, and the CPU's limitations are less impactful. The 128-bit memory bus may cause frame drops in games with heavy texture streaming, but the 8 GB VRAM provides ample capacity. At 4K, the GPU's 5.325 TFLOPS FP32 will struggle with demanding titles, and users should expect lower settings. Overall, the estimated gaming performance is strong for 1080p high-refresh and 1440p medium-to-high settings, with the CPU limiting in esports and the GPU limiting in AAA and higher resolutions.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 3 7335U + Intel Arc A570M

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 3 7335U

Intel Arc A570M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Balance and Bottleneck

Usage Scenarios

CPU Analysis

Who Should Build It

GPU Analysis

FAQ

Benchmark Performance

Upgrade Path and Platform

Build Overview

Gaming Performance

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds