SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 3 7335U + Intel Arc A370M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

88 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 12% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
82%
VS
GPU
93%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 3 7335U

16,827 Benchmark Score
Top 18% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A370M

29,175 Benchmark Score
Top 7% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 3 7335U and Intel Arc A370M represent a specific pairing found in modern laptops, combining a 4-core mobile processor with a dedicated entry-level discrete GPU. The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact combination, meaning all frame rate discussions here are estimated from the individual CPU and GPU benchmark scores, not from direct game testing. The data confirms this is an ultraportable-class build, with the CPU holding the 70th percentile against all CPUs and the GPU holding the 74th percentile against all GPUs, placing the overall pairing at the 72nd combined percentile.

Gaming Performance

Since no measured FPS data exists in the FACT PACK for this CPU+GPU combination, frame rate expectations must be derived from the benchmark scores of both components. The Intel Arc A370M produces a Geekbench OpenCL score of 29676 and a Vulkan score of 28673, placing it at the 74th percentile among all GPUs. The CPU’s PassMark single-thread score of 3053 ensures it can feed the GPU in most scenarios, but the A370M’s 4 GB GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus with 112.0 GB/s bandwidth will constrain resolution and detail settings.

Estimated gaming performance at 1080p ultra settings would likely land in the 30-50 FPS range for modern AAA titles, based on the GPU’s position just ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 470 (which it beats by 0.6% in average benchmark score). The A370M’s pixel rate of 65.60 GPixel/s and texture rate of 131.2 GTexel/s support this interpretation, indicating a GPU designed for 1080p gaming at medium-to-high settings rather than ultra. The 4 GB VRAM is the primary limiting factor, as many current titles exceed that allocation at 1080p ultra, leading to texture popping or reduced draw distances.

Esports and older titles would fare considerably better. The CPU’s PassMark physics score of 647 and integer math score of 42493 suggest adequate processing for lightweight game logic, while the GPU’s 1024 shading units and 32 ROPs can push high frame rates in less demanding engines. Estimated performance for games like CS2 or Valorant at 1080p could exceed 100 FPS on competitive settings, though the absence of measured data means these figures remain projections rather than verified results.

The pairing’s 72nd combined percentile reinforces that this is not a high-refresh gaming machine at ultra settings. The GPU’s nearest rival, the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH, is only 0.1% faster in average score, yet that part was itself a modest performer. The data suggests 1080p medium is the realistic ceiling for smooth gameplay, with 1440p reserved for less demanding or older titles.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score of 16827 places it in the 70th percentile of all CPUs, a strong result for a 4-core mobile part. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 10703 and single-core score of 1511 reveal the balance of the Zen 3+ architecture. The single-core result is particularly notable, as it exceeds what older 4-core designs typically achieve, while the multi-core score benefits from simultaneous multithreading across 4 cores and 8 threads.

The GPU’s average benchmark score of 29175 at the 74th percentile tells a complementary story. Its Geekbench OpenCL score of 29676 and Vulkan score of 28673 show consistent performance across different compute APIs. The GPU’s nearest rival is the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH at 29197 (0.1% faster), with the AMD FirePro W8000 at 29211 (0.1% faster) and the AMD Radeon RX 470 at 28996 (0.6% slower). This cluster indicates the A370M sits in a well-populated performance band.

Combined, the CPU and GPU percentiles (70 and 74) yield a 72nd combined percentile, suggesting balanced performance where neither component dramatically outstrips the other. The CPU’s nearest rivals include the Intel Core i3-12100E (0.2% faster), Intel Core i5-1235U (0.3% slower), Intel Core Ultra 5 115U (0.4% slower), and AMD Ryzen 5 7235HS (0.4% faster). These tight deltas show the 7335U is competitive with a range of low-power and entry-level desktop parts.

The PassMark multi-thread score of 12592 and single-thread score of 3053 (also listed as 3053 for singlethread) provide additional context. The data compression score of 146309 and encryption score of 9335 indicate strong integer throughput, while floating point math at 24298 and extended instructions at 10314 round out a capable general-purpose compute profile.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming, the pairing is adequate only for competitive titles at lower settings. The GPU’s 74th percentile and the CPU’s single-thread score of 3053 support 144Hz play in esports games, but the 4 GB VRAM and 112.0 GB/s bandwidth will likely prevent consistent high frame rates in visually demanding titles.

Streaming is viable but not optimal. The CPU’s 8 threads and Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 10703 provide enough headroom for software encoding at moderate bitrates, while the GPU’s 8 ray tracing cores and 1024 shading units can offload some encode work. However, the 28W TDP of the CPU and 35W TDP of the GPU suggest thermal constraints that may limit sustained streaming sessions.

Video editing in 1080p is a reasonable workload for this build. The CPU’s PassMark multi-thread score of 12592 and the GPU’s OpenCL score of 29676 enable hardware-accelerated effects and previews. The 4 GB VRAM limits working with large timelines or 4K footage, but proxy workflows would function acceptably.

3D rendering is constrained by both components. The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 10703 is modest for rendering, and the GPU’s 4.198 TFLOPS FP32 performance is entry-level. Simple scenes and low-poly work are feasible, but complex renders would be slow.

Software development benefits from the CPU’s strong single-thread performance (1511 in Cinebench R23 single-core) and the GPU’s compute capabilities. Compilation times for small-to-medium projects would be acceptable, and the 8 MB L3 cache aids in repeated builds.

Student and office work is where this pairing excels. The CPU’s 70th percentile and power-efficient 6nm process (TSMC) deliver responsive productivity, while the GPU’s presence allows for light photo editing or CAD viewing. The 8 threads handle multitasking well, and the DDR5 memory support with dual-channel configuration and 76.8 GB/s bandwidth ensures smooth system operation.

Who Should Build It

Gamers targeting 1080p medium settings in modern titles or high refresh rates in competitive games would find this pairing adequate. The GPU’s 74th percentile and the CPU’s balanced scores support this use case, but users seeking 1440p ultra should look elsewhere.

Content creators working with 1080p video or light photo editing can leverage the GPU’s OpenCL performance and the CPU’s multi-thread capacity. The 8 GB of L3 cache and 8 threads help with media encoding tasks, though 4K work would strain the 4 GB VRAM.

Software developers writing and testing code will appreciate the CPU’s single-thread strength and the platform’s responsiveness. The PassMark integer math score of 42493 indicates solid performance for build tools and virtualization workloads.

Students need a machine for coursework, browsing, and occasional media consumption. The 28W TDP CPU and integrated Radeon 660M provide a fallback when the discrete GPU is unnecessary, extending battery life during lectures.

Small business workstations running office suites, spreadsheets, and light database applications would perform well. The CPU’s data compression score of 146309 and encryption score of 9335 support these tasks, while the GPU handles presentation graphics and video conferencing effects.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 3 7335U is a 4-core, 8-thread processor based on the Zen 3+ architecture, codenamed Rembrandt-R, built on TSMC’s 6nm process. It operates with a base clock of 3.00 GHz and a boost clock of 4.30 GHz within a 28W TDP. The CPU supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, providing 76.8 GB/s of bandwidth, and includes ECC memory support for data integrity.

The cache hierarchy consists of 64 KB L1 per core, 512 KB L2 per core, and 8 MB shared L3. This arrangement suits the 4-core design, giving each core ample local storage while the shared L3 facilitates inter-core communication. The die size of 208 mm² is relatively large for a 6nm part, reflecting the integrated Radeon 660M graphics and the 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes.

Benchmark results show a processor that punches above its core count. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 10703 is competitive with parts like the Intel Core i3-12100E (which scores 0.2% higher in average), while the single-core score of 1511 places it in a strong position for daily tasks. The PassMark data supports this: single-thread at 3053, multi-thread at 12592, and physics at 647.

The CPU’s 70th percentile ranking among all CPUs is impressive for a mobile part. Its nearest rivals include both low-power mobile chips (Intel Core i5-1235U at 0.3% slower) and desktop entry parts (Intel Core i3-12100E at 0.2% faster), showing the 7335U bridges mobile and desktop performance classes. The data encryption score of 9335 and extended instructions score of 10314 indicate robust security and vector processing capabilities.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The build holds a 72nd combined percentile, derived from the CPU’s 70th percentile and the GPU’s 74th percentile.

Q: How does the AMD Ryzen 3 7335U compare to its closest rival, the Intel Core i3-12100E?

A: The Intel Core i3-12100E has an average benchmark score of 16853, which is 0.2% higher than the 7335U’s 16827, placing them in a statistical tie.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory configuration and bandwidth?

A: The Intel Arc A370M has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, delivering 112.0 GB/s of bandwidth at an effective speed of 14 Gbps.

Q: Is there measured FPS data for this specific CPU+GPU combination?

A: No, the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact pairing, so all frame rate figures are estimates from benchmark scores.

Q: What ray tracing hardware does the Intel Arc A370M include?

A: The GPU features 8 dedicated ray tracing cores, part of the Xe-HPG architecture built on TSMC’s 6nm process.

Q: What is the CPU’s boost clock and TDP?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 7335U boosts to 4.30 GHz from a 3.00 GHz base clock, within a 28W TDP envelope.

Q: How does the GPU compare to the AMD Radeon RX 470?

A: The Arc A370M has an average benchmark score of 29175, which is 0.6% higher than the RX 470’s 28996.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data suggests a reasonably balanced pairing, but the GPU is the more likely bottleneck in gaming scenarios. The CPU’s 70th percentile and the GPU’s 74th percentile are close, yet the GPU’s 4 GB VRAM and 64-bit memory bus create a hard ceiling for texture-heavy workloads. In CPU-bound games, the 7335U’s 4 cores may limit frame rates, but its strong single-thread score of 3053 mitigates this in most titles.

The FPS scaling evidence, though estimated, points to the GPU limiting at higher resolutions. The A370M’s 65.60 GPixel/s pixel rate and 4.198 TFLOPS FP32 are modest figures, while the CPU’s Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1511 suggests it can handle game logic and physics without major issues. The PassMark physics score of 647 further indicates the CPU is not the primary constraint in gaming.

In compute-heavy workloads like rendering, the bottleneck shifts. The CPU’s multi-thread score of 10703 in Cinebench R23 is lower than what many desktop parts achieve, while the GPU’s OpenCL score of 29676 shows relative strength. For tasks like video encoding or 3D rendering that use both components, the CPU may finish its portion faster than the GPU, or vice versa, depending on the specific workload.

The memory subsystem also plays a role. The CPU supports dual-channel DDR5 at 76.8 GB/s, while the GPU has its own 112.0 GB/s bandwidth. This separation prevents memory contention, but the GPU’s lower bandwidth relative to its compute capabilities means it may stall when accessing textures, particularly at 1080p ultra where 4 GB VRAM is insufficient.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses AMD Socket FP7, which is a mobile-specific socket with no upgrade path in the traditional sense. The platform supports DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration, and the CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes. The GPU connects via PCIe 4.0 x8, which is adequate for its performance class.

The CPU’s TDP is 28W, and the GPU’s TDP is 35W, totaling 63W for the core components. The FACT PACK lists no suggested PSU, indicating this is a laptop build where power delivery is fixed by the manufacturer. The combined power draw is modest, allowing for thinner chassis designs.

A sensible next upgrade would be to a higher-tier GPU, but the 4 GB VRAM and 64-bit bus of the A370M suggest the platform can support faster graphics. The CPU’s PCIe Gen 4 support ensures compatibility with modern SSDs and GPUs, though the 20 lanes are shared between the GPU, NVMe storage, and other devices.

The production status of the CPU is Active, while the GPU is End-of-life, which may influence long-term driver support. The GPU’s DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) support and Vulkan 1.4 compatibility ensure it can run current games, but future titles may require more VRAM than 4 GB.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build combining the AMD Ryzen 3 7335U with the Intel Arc A370M. The CPU is a 4-core, 8-thread mobile processor from the 7000 series, built on Zen 3+ architecture, while the GPU is Intel’s entry-level Arc 3 Mobile part based on Xe-HPG architecture.

The pairing achieves a 72nd combined percentile, indicating above-average performance for a laptop. The CPU’s 70th percentile and the GPU’s 74th percentile are closely matched, suggesting the system is well-balanced for its intended use cases. The build class is explicitly laptop, and the GPU’s slot width is listed as IGP, though it has its own 4 GB GDDR6 memory.

Overall, this is an upper-midrange laptop configuration. It is not a high-end gaming machine, but it offers competent performance for productivity, light gaming, and content creation. The 6nm process for both components (TSMC) contributes to power efficiency, with the CPU at 28W and the GPU at 35W TDP.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A370M is built on the Xe-HPG architecture using the DG2-128 chip, manufactured on TSMC’s 6nm process. It contains 7,200 million transistors on a 157 mm² die, with a transistor density of 45.9M per mm². The GPU operates at a base clock of 1550 MHz and boosts to 2050 MHz, with memory clocked at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective).

The memory subsystem consists of 4 GB GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus, delivering 112.0 GB/s bandwidth. This is the GPU’s most significant limitation, as the bandwidth is low relative to the 1024 shading units, 64 TMUs, and 32 ROPs. The GPU includes 8 ray tracing cores and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Compute performance is rated at 4.198 TFLOPS FP32 and 8.397 TFLOPS FP16 (2:1 ratio). The pixel rate of 65.60 GPixel/s and texture rate of 131.2 GTexel/s are consistent with its entry-level positioning. The GPU’s Geekbench OpenCL score of 29676 and Vulkan score of 28673 place it at the 74th percentile, with its nearest rival being the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH at 29197 (0.1% faster).

For rendering workloads, the GPU’s FP32 performance and 8 ray tracing cores enable hardware-accelerated effects in supported applications. The 4 GB VRAM limits scene complexity, but the 112.0 GB/s bandwidth is sufficient for 1080p workflows. The GPU’s end-of-life production status means driver updates may become less frequent over time, though its modern API support ensures compatibility with current software.