SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 3 7335U + Intel Arc A350M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

87 Score

Top 13% Ranking

87 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 13% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

82%

GPU

92%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 3 7335U

16,827 Benchmark Score

Top 18% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A350M

24,647 Benchmark Score

Top 8% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 3 7335U and Intel Arc A350M pairing represents a specific segment of the laptop market, combining a modern 6nm mobile processor with a dedicated entry-level discrete GPU. The data available does not include any measured frame rate results for this exact combination; the `measuredFpsUltraByGame` field is empty, and `dataIsMeasured` is false. Consequently, all discussion of gaming performance in this analysis is derived from the synthetic benchmark scores and performance percentiles of the individual components, presented as estimates rather than empirical results.

Gaming Performance

Given the absence of measured FPS data, gaming performance must be inferred from the component benchmark scores. The Intel Arc A350M’s `avgBenchmarkScore` is 24647, placing it in the 70th percentile of all GPUs. This score is notably close to that of the AMD Radeon RX 590, which has an average score of 24744, indicating a deltaPct of -0.4% (the Arc is slightly behind). This suggests that the A350M is capable of handling 1080p gaming at medium to high settings for many titles, but it is not a high-end solution. The GPU’s 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus with 112.0 GB/s bandwidth will be a limiting factor for modern games with high-resolution textures, so ultra settings at 1080p are likely to produce playable but not consistently high frame rates.

For CPU-bound scenarios, the Ryzen 3 7335U’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 10703 and single-core score of 1511 suggest a balanced performer. In gaming, the single-core score is often more indicative of frame pacing, and a score of 1511 is moderate, implying that the processor will not be the primary bottleneck in most GPU-limited scenarios. However, in esports titles that are less graphically demanding, the CPU’s four cores and eight threads should be sufficient to drive high frame rates. The estimated FPS for games would likely see the GPU as the limiting factor at 1080p, with the CPU providing adequate support for physics and AI calculations. At higher resolutions, the GPU’s workload increases, and the 4 GB VRAM capacity will likely cause performance drops in texture-heavy scenes.

FAQ

Q: What is the processor’s architecture and process node?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 7335U uses the Zen 3+ architecture, codenamed Rembrandt-R, and is fabricated on a 6 nm process node by TSMC.

Q: How much memory does the GPU have, and what is its bus width?

A: The Intel Arc A350M has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, providing a memory bandwidth of 112.0 GB/s.

Q: Does the CPU support error-correcting code (ECC) memory?

A: Yes, the Ryzen 3 7335U supports ECC memory, which is a feature typically found in workstation or server-class hardware.

Q: What is the thermal design power (TDP) for both components?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 28 W, while the GPU has a TDP of 25 W, making them suitable for a thin-and-light laptop chassis.

Q: What is the GPU’s production status?

A: The Intel Arc A350M is listed as "End-of-life," meaning it is no longer in active production, though it may still be found in existing laptop inventories.

Q: What is the CPU’s single-thread performance relative to its multi-core performance?

A: The CPU scores 1511 in Cinebench R23 single-core and 10703 in multi-core, indicating a multi-core score that is roughly 7 times higher, which is typical for a 4-core, 8-thread processor.

Q: What is the combined percentile ranking of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The build has a `combinedPercentile` of 70, indicating that it performs better than 70% of all recorded CPU+GPU combinations in the database.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is built around the AMD Socket FP7, which is a mobile-specific socket. The CPU supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with a maximum memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s. This is a modern memory standard, but the socket itself is not upgradeable in the traditional sense; users are typically locked into the processor that ships with the laptop. The CPU also provides PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes, which allows for a high-speed connection to the discrete GPU and NVMe storage. The GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface, which is sufficient for its bandwidth needs.

In terms of a sensible next upgrade, the data does not provide a `suggestedPsu` for either component, but the combined TDP of 53 W (28 W CPU + 25 W GPU) indicates that a laptop power adapter in the range of 65 W to 90 W would be typical, though this is not explicitly stated. A realistic upgrade path for a user would be to move to a system with a higher-tier GPU, as the 4 GB VRAM and 64-bit bus are the most likely bottlenecks in this configuration. For the CPU, upgrading would require a new motherboard and socket, so it is not a practical option. The platform’s support for DDR5 is forward-looking, but the 4-core, 8-thread CPU may limit performance in heavily threaded future workloads.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data reveals a clear balance between the CPU and GPU for gaming and general use. The GPU’s `avgBenchmarkScore` of 24647 places it in the 70th percentile, which is identical to the CPU’s `percentileVsAllCpus` of 70. This suggests that the two components are well-matched in terms of overall performance tier. However, the nature of the bottleneck depends on the workload. In gaming, the GPU is likely the limiting factor, particularly at 1080p with high settings, where the 4 GB VRAM and 64-bit memory bus will constrain texture loading and frame rates. The CPU’s single-thread score of 1511 in Cinebench R23 is moderate, but it should not bottleneck the GPU in most scenarios.

In contrast, for productivity tasks such as data compression or encryption, the CPU becomes the critical component. The PassMark data compression score of 146309 and encryption score of 9335 indicate strong performance for a mobile processor, and the GPU’s role is minimal in these tasks. The FPS scaling, while not measured, can be inferred from the GPU’s relative performance to the RX 590, which is a known 1080p gaming card. The deltaPct of -0.4% suggests that the A350M is essentially on par with the RX 590, meaning that users can expect similar frame rates in games, with the caveat that the A350M’s drivers and 4 GB VRAM may cause stuttering in newer titles.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 3 7335U is a 4-core, 8-thread processor from the 7000 series, built on the Zen 3+ architecture and codenamed Rembrandt-R. It operates at a base clock of 3.00 GHz and a boost clock of 4.30 GHz, with a 28 W TDP. The cache hierarchy includes 64 KB of L1 per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and 8 MB of shared L3 cache. This configuration is typical for a budget-to-midrange mobile processor, and the benchmark scores reflect that positioning.

In Cinebench R23, the multi-core score of 10703 is competitive with the Intel Core i3-12100E, which has an `avgScore` of 16853 and a deltaPct of -0.2% (the Ryzen is slightly behind). The single-core score of 1511 is modest, but it is sufficient for everyday tasks and light gaming. The PassMark scores provide a more granular view: the multithread score of 12592 and single-thread score of 3053 indicate that the processor can handle multi-threaded workloads like video encoding, but it is not a high-end content creation chip. The data encryption score of 9335 suggests that it can handle AES-NI workloads efficiently, while the floating-point math score of 24298 shows reasonable performance for scientific calculations. The processor also includes integrated Radeon 660M graphics, which can serve as a fallback if the discrete GPU is disabled, though its performance is not benchmarked here.

For real-world workloads, the 4-core, 8-thread design is adequate for office productivity, web browsing, and light code compilation. However, for tasks like 3D rendering or heavy video editing, the CPU will struggle compared to higher-core-count processors. The 6 nm process node from TSMC contributes to power efficiency, making it suitable for a thin-and-light laptop.

Who Should Build It

This CPU+GPU pairing is targeted at users who need a balance of portability and performance for everyday computing and light gaming. The 70th percentile combined ranking indicates that it outperforms the majority of laptop configurations, but it is not a high-end gaming or workstation machine. Gamers who play at 1080p with medium settings will find this build suitable, as the GPU’s performance is on par with the RX 590. The CPU’s 4 cores and 8 threads are sufficient for most modern game titles, which typically use 4 to 8 threads.

Content creators who work with photos or light video editing will benefit from the CPU’s multi-thread performance, as evidenced by the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 10703. However, for 3D rendering or 4K video editing, the 4-core limit will be a bottleneck. Developers writing and compiling code will appreciate the fast single-thread performance, which is close to the Intel Core i3-12100E. Students and small business users will find the 28 W CPU and 25 W GPU to be power-efficient, providing adequate performance for spreadsheets, presentations, and web-based applications. The inclusion of ECC memory support is a notable feature for professionals who require data integrity, though it is rarely found in consumer laptops.

Benchmark Performance

The combined benchmark picture shows a system that is consistently in the 70th percentile. The CPU’s `avgBenchmarkScore` is 16827, with a `percentileVsAllCpus` of 70. Its nearest rivals include the Intel Core i3-12100E (avg score 16853, deltaPct -0.2%), Intel Core i5-1235U (avg score 16770, deltaPct 0.3%), and Intel Core Ultra 5 115U (avg score 16753, deltaPct 0.4%). This indicates that the Ryzen 3 7335U is essentially tied with these processors, with performance deltas of less than half a percent. The AMD Ryzen 5 7235HS is slightly ahead, with an avg score of 16902 and a deltaPct of -0.4%, meaning the 7335U is 0.4% behind.

The GPU’s `avgBenchmarkScore` is 24647, with a `percentileVsAllGpus` of 70. Its closest rival is the AMD Radeon RX 590, which scores 24744 (deltaPct -0.4%), and the NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile, which scores 24763 (deltaPct -0.5%). The AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT scores 24442 (deltaPct 0.8%), meaning the Arc A350M is 0.8% ahead. The combined picture is a system that is balanced, with both components performing at the same percentile level, which is a sign of a well-matched pairing. The Geekbench scores for the GPU are 24546 in OpenCL and 24747 in Vulkan, showing consistent performance across different APIs.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build, as indicated by the `buildClass` field. It pairs the AMD Ryzen 3 7335U, a 4-core mobile processor, with the Intel Arc A350M, a discrete entry-level mobile GPU. The combined percentile is 70, which means that this system performs better than 70% of all recorded builds in the database. The CPU and GPU are both in the 70th percentile individually, which confirms that the pairing is balanced and that neither component is severely underpowered relative to the other.

The overall tier is mid-range for a laptop, suitable for daily driving, office work, and light gaming. The production status of the CPU is "Active," while the GPU is "End-of-life," which may affect availability in new systems. The CPU’s release date is January 2023, and the GPU’s is March 2022, so this is a pairing of a newer processor with an older graphics chip. The build is not a high-performance gaming rig, but it offers a solid foundation for a portable machine.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A350M is based on the Xe-HPG architecture, specifically the DG2-128 chip, and is part of the Alchemist generation (Arc 3 Mobile). It is fabricated on a 6 nm process by TSMC, with 7,200 million transistors on a 157 mm² die. The GPU has 768 shading units, 48 texture mapping units, and 24 raster output units, along with 6 ray tracing cores. It does not have a listed count for tensor cores, but the architecture supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

The memory configuration is 4 GB of GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 112.0 GB/s. The memory clock is 1750 MHz, which translates to 14 Gbps effective. The base clock is 1150 MHz, with a boost clock of 2200 MHz. The pixel rate is 52.80 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 105.6 GTexel/s. The FP32 performance is 3.379 TFLOPS, and the FP16 performance is 6.758 TFLOPS (2:1). The TDP is 25 W, and the bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x8.

For rendering, the benchmark scores indicate that the GPU is on par with the AMD Radeon RX 590, a desktop card from 2018. This means it can handle 1080p gaming at medium settings and can accelerate some 3D rendering tasks, but the 4 GB VRAM will be a limitation for large scenes. The 6 ray tracing cores support hardware ray tracing, but the low FP32 throughput suggests that ray-traced performance will be modest. The Geekbench Vulkan score of 24747 is slightly higher than the OpenCL score of 24546, indicating that the Vulkan API is better optimized for this hardware.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU’s single-core score of 1511 in Cinebench R23 is sufficient to drive high frame rates in esports titles. The GPU’s performance, which is 0.4% behind the RX 590, suggests that 144 Hz gaming is possible in games like CS:GO or Valorant at 1080p with low settings, though the 4 GB VRAM may cause frame drops in more demanding titles.

Streaming: The CPU’s 4 cores and 8 threads can handle software encoding at 720p, but the PassMark multithread score of 12592 indicates that simultaneous gaming and streaming may cause performance dips. The GPU’s support for DirectX 12 Ultimate could enable hardware encoding, but this is not explicitly benchmarked.

Video editing: The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 10703 suggests that the CPU can handle 1080p video editing in software like Premiere Pro, but 4K editing will be slow. The GPU’s 4 GB VRAM and 112.0 GB/s bandwidth are limiting factors for effects and color grading.

3D rendering: The GPU’s FP32 performance of 3.379 TFLOPS is modest, and the 4 GB VRAM will limit the size of renderable scenes. The CPU’s 4 cores will also be a bottleneck for CPU-based rendering, as indicated by the PassMark physics score of 647.

Software development: The single-thread score of 3053 in PassMark is adequate for code compilation and IDE responsiveness. The support for ECC memory is a plus for long-running builds, though the 8 MB L3 cache is small for large projects.

Student and office work: The 28 W CPU TDP and 25 W GPU TDP make this an efficient system for web browsing, document editing, and spreadsheets. The PassMark data compression score of 146309 indicates fast file archiving, and the single-thread performance ensures smooth UI interactions. The 70th percentile combined ranking means it will handle most productivity tasks without issue.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 3 7335U + Intel Arc A350M

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 3 7335U

Intel Arc A350M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Gaming Performance

FAQ

Upgrade Path and Platform

Balance and Bottleneck

CPU Analysis

Who Should Build It

Benchmark Performance

Build Overview

GPU Analysis

Usage Scenarios

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds