SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 3 7330U + Intel Arc A550M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

85 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 15% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
CPU Bottleneck
CPU
74%
VS
GPU
96%

Your CPU is limiting system performance. Consider upgrading to a faster processor to better utilize your GPU.

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 3 7330U

3,958 Benchmark Score
Top 26% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A550M

49,737 Benchmark Score
Top 4% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Bottleneck Detected

CPU Bottleneck - Upgrading the weaker component will improve overall performance.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# AMD Ryzen 3 7330U + Intel Arc A550M: A Laptop Duo with a Curious Performance Gap

This build pairs a 4-core, 8-thread AMD Ryzen 3 7330U mobile processor with an Intel Arc A550M discrete GPU, landing in the 72nd percentile overall among all laptop configurations. The data reveals a striking imbalance: the GPU sits in the 86th percentile for graphics performance, while the CPU sits at just the 57th percentile. This combination is engineered for scenarios where graphics muscle matters far more than processor throughput, making it a niche but potentially compelling option for certain workloads. The following analysis draws exclusively from benchmark data, with no measured FPS figures available for this exact pairing.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: The Intel Arc A550M's 86th percentile ranking among all GPUs suggests substantial headroom for demanding titles, but the Ryzen 3 7330U's modest 57th percentile CPU score could cap framerates in CPU-bound scenes. The GPU's 8.397 TFLOPS of FP32 compute and 224.0 GB/s memory bandwidth indicate it can push high frame counts, yet the processor's 4.30 GHz boost clock may struggle to feed it in esports titles where per-core performance dominates. Expect high-refresh 1080p gaming to be viable, but the CPU will likely be the limiting factor at very high frame rates.

Streaming: The combination of a capable GPU and a mid-tier CPU creates a workable but not ideal streaming setup. The Arc A550M's 16 RT cores and 2048 shading units can handle both game rendering and encoding tasks, offloading work from the CPU. However, the Ryzen 3 7330U's 8 threads and 8 MB of L3 cache may cause hiccups when simultaneously running a game, encoder, and streaming software. The 51.2 GB/s memory bandwidth on the CPU side is adequate, but the 15W TDP suggests sustained multi-tasking could thermal-throttle performance.

Video Editing: The Arc A550M's 8 GB of GDDR6 memory and 262.4 GTexel/s texture rate make it well-suited for GPU-accelerated effects and timeline scrubbing. The 86th percentile GPU score means hardware encoding and decoding will be smooth, while the CPU's 4,131 Geekbench multicore score provides enough processing power for basic editing workflows. The Ryzen 3 7330U's 6,230 Cinebench R23 multicore score suggests it can handle 1080p exports, but 4K projects with heavy effects may strain the 4-core processor.

3D Rendering: This workload heavily favors the GPU, and the data reflects that. The Arc A550M's 49,894 OpenCL score and 49,580 Vulkan score indicate strong compute potential for GPU-based renderers like Blender Cycles or Octane. The 16.79 TFLOPS of FP16 performance is particularly notable for AI-accelerated denoising. However, CPU-based rendering will be slow, with the Ryzen 3 7330U's 6,230 Cinebench R23 multicore score placing it well below workstation-class processors in the 57th percentile.

Software Development: The Ryzen 3 7330U's 1,514 Geekbench single-core score is respectable for everyday coding tasks, and the 8 threads handle parallel compilation reasonably well. The 8 MB L3 cache and dual-channel DDR4 support at 51.2 GB/s bandwidth are sufficient for most development environments. The GPU's compute capabilities could accelerate machine learning experimentation, though the 8 GB VRAM may limit larger model training. The 15W CPU TDP makes this a battery-friendly option for mobile development.

Student and Office Work: This pairing is overkill for basic productivity, but the data shows it handles such tasks with ease. The 57th percentile CPU score is more than adequate for document processing, spreadsheets, and web browsing. The integrated Radeon Graphics (Vega 4) in the CPU offers a fallback for power saving, while the Arc A550M can be engaged for graphics-intensive presentations or data visualization. The 60W GPU TDP may reduce battery life, but the overall 72nd percentile build ranking suggests a well-rounded machine for academic use.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU benchmarks place the Ryzen 3 7330U in the 57th percentile among all processors, with an average benchmark score of 3,958. Its nearest rivals include the Intel Xeon E5-2669 v3 (avg score 3,959, 0% delta), Intel Core i7-6900K (3,970, -0.3% delta), and AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U (3,971, -0.3% delta). This indicates the CPU performs essentially on par with high-end desktop processors from several generations ago, but it trails modern mid-range chips by a considerable margin. The 6,230 Cinebench R23 multicore score and 4,131 Geekbench multicore score reflect a 4-core, 8-thread design that prioritizes efficiency over raw throughput.

The GPU benchmarks tell a different story. The Intel Arc A550M ranks in the 86th percentile among all GPUs, with a 49,737 average benchmark score. Its nearest rivals are NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti (49,957, -0.4% delta), AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 (50,001, -0.5% delta), and AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT (50,951, -2.4% delta). This places the Arc A550M within striking distance of some of the most powerful GPUs ever made, particularly in compute-oriented workloads. The 49,894 OpenCL score and 49,580 Vulkan score confirm consistent performance across different API environments.

The combined picture is a system where the GPU is the clear star performer. The 86th percentile GPU versus 57th percentile CPU creates a 29-percentage-point gap that defines this build's character. In GPU-bound tasks, this system performs like a high-end gaming rig; in CPU-bound tasks, it behaves like a mainstream ultraportable. The 72nd percentile combined ranking reflects this duality, placing the overall system above average but not exceptional.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this build?

A: The build ranks in the 72nd percentile overall among all laptop configurations, indicating it outperforms roughly 72% of systems while trailing the top quarter.

Q: How does the Intel Arc A550M compare to the AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT?

A: The Arc A550M scores 49,737 on average, which is 2.6% higher than the RX 6800 XT's 48,477 average score, making it the slightly faster GPU in this comparison.

Q: What is the CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 7330U achieves a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 6,230, which places it in the 57th percentile among all CPUs.

Q: Does the GPU support hardware ray tracing?

A: Yes, the Intel Arc A550M features 16 dedicated RT cores and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), indicating full ray tracing hardware support.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the GPU?

A: The GPU has a memory bandwidth of 224.0 GB/s, delivered through 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus.

Q: How does the CPU compare to the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U?

A: The Ryzen 3 7330U has an average benchmark score of 3,958, which is 0.3% lower than the Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U's 3,971, making them nearly identical in performance.

Q: What is the GPU's FP32 compute performance?

A: The Intel Arc A550M delivers 8.397 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, with 16.79 TFLOPS of FP16 performance at a 2:1 ratio.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance data reveals a clear bottleneck structure in this build. The GPU's 86th percentile ranking versus the CPU's 57th percentile creates a situation where the processor is almost always the limiting factor in graphically intense workloads. In gaming scenarios, the Arc A550M can generate frames faster than the Ryzen 3 7330U can process game logic and physics, leading to CPU-bound framerates in many titles. The 4.30 GHz boost clock helps, but the 4-core, 8-thread configuration is simply outclassed by the GPU's capabilities.

The CPU's 51.2 GB/s memory bandwidth and 8 MB L3 cache are adequate for feeding the GPU, but the 15W TDP means the processor may not sustain peak clocks under prolonged load. This could exacerbate the bottleneck in CPU-intensive scenes. The GPU's 224.0 GB/s bandwidth, by contrast, is more than sufficient to keep its 2048 shading units busy, meaning the GPU rarely waits on data.

In compute workloads like 3D rendering or machine learning, the bottleneck shifts depending on the task. For GPU-accelerated rendering, the Arc A550M's 49,894 OpenCL score ensures it carries the load, with the CPU merely managing scene data. For CPU-based tasks, the Ryzen 3 7330U's 6,230 Cinebench R23 score becomes the ceiling, and the GPU sits idle. This asymmetry means users must choose workloads carefully to avoid leaving performance on the table.

The FPS scaling evidence, though not measured directly, can be inferred from the percentile gap. A 29-point difference suggests that in games where the GPU is the primary renderer, framerates will scale with the GPU's 86th percentile capability. However, in games with heavy simulation or AI logic, framerates will drop to match the CPU's 57th percentile. This means 1080p high-refresh gaming is achievable in GPU-light titles, but 1440p or 4K gaming may actually be smoother because the GPU becomes the bottleneck, allowing the CPU to keep pace.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU-GPU combination, so all gaming performance figures are estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The Arc A550M's 86th percentile GPU ranking suggests it should handle modern titles at 1080p with high settings, potentially reaching 60+ FPS in most games. The 8.397 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 224.0 GB/s memory bandwidth are consistent with a GPU designed for 1080p gaming, rather than 1440p or 4K.

The Ryzen 3 7330U's 57th percentile CPU score introduces uncertainty into these estimates. In GPU-bound scenarios—typically at higher resolutions or with maximum graphics settings—the CPU's limitations are masked, and the GPU's performance becomes the deciding factor. In CPU-bound scenarios, such as competitive shooters at low settings or massively multiplayer games with many players on screen, the processor's 4 cores and 8 threads may struggle to maintain high framerates.

Based on the benchmark data, the estimated gaming experience would be as follows: at 1080p ultra settings, expect playable framerates in most titles, with dips in CPU-heavy scenes. At 1440p, the GPU becomes the primary bottleneck, and the system may achieve 40-60 FPS depending on the game. At 4K, the 8 GB VRAM and 224.0 GB/s bandwidth may limit texture quality, and framerates will likely drop below 30 FPS in demanding titles. The 16 RT cores provide ray tracing capability, but the estimated performance impact could be significant, reducing framerates by potentially half in RT-enabled games.

Who Should Build It

This system targets users who prioritize GPU performance over CPU throughput. Gamers playing at 1080p with high refresh rates will benefit most from the Arc A550M's 86th percentile ranking, provided they choose titles that are not heavily CPU-bound. Content creators working with GPU-accelerated software—video editors using hardware encoding, 3D artists using GPU renderers, and AI researchers running inference tasks—will find the GPU's compute capabilities well-suited to their needs.

Software developers who work with GPU-accelerated libraries or game development engines will appreciate the combination of decent CPU performance and strong GPU compute. The 8 GB VRAM is sufficient for most development tasks, and the Vulkan 1.4 and OpenGL 4.6 support ensures compatibility with modern graphics APIs. Students in graphics-intensive fields, such as architecture or digital media, can leverage the GPU for rendering and simulation projects without needing a desktop workstation.

Small business workstations focused on data visualization, video production, or CAD software would benefit from this build's GPU-centric design. The 57th percentile CPU is adequate for office productivity, while the 86th percentile GPU handles graphics-heavy tasks. However, users who primarily run CPU-intensive workloads—such as software compilation, heavy multitasking, or scientific computing—should look elsewhere, as the Ryzen 3 7330U's modest performance would be the limiting factor.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A550M is built on the Xe-HPG architecture using TSMC's 6 nm process, packing 21,700 million transistors into a 406 mm² die. The GPU features 2048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, and 64 raster output units, with 16 dedicated ray tracing cores. This hardware configuration delivers 8.397 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 16.79 TFLOPS of FP16 performance, making it a capable compute device for both gaming and professional workloads.

The 8 GB of GDDR6 memory runs at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) across a 128-bit bus, yielding 224.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This is modest compared to high-end desktop GPUs but sufficient for 1080p gaming and most creative tasks. The pixel rate of 131.2 GPixel/s and texture rate of 262.4 GTexel/s indicate strong fill-rate capabilities for a mobile GPU. The 60W TDP is relatively high for a laptop component, but it enables the performance levels seen in the benchmark scores.

The GPU's 86th percentile ranking is remarkable for a mobile part, placing it above the AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT by 2.6% in average benchmark score. This suggests the Arc A550M delivers desktop-class performance in a laptop form factor. The 49,894 OpenCL score and 49,580 Vulkan score are nearly identical, indicating consistent performance across different compute APIs. The lack of tensor core specifications in the data means AI acceleration relies on the FP16 capabilities, which are substantial at 16.79 TFLOPS.

For rendering workloads, the 16 RT cores provide dedicated hardware for ray tracing, and the DirectX 12 Ultimate support ensures compatibility with the latest graphics features. The 2048 shading units handle traditional rasterization efficiently, and the 224.0 GB/s bandwidth prevents memory bottlenecks in most scenarios. The GPU's end-of-life production status suggests it may be a transitional product, but its benchmark performance remains competitive.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build combining the AMD Ryzen 3 7330U, a 7000-series mobile processor, with the Intel Arc A550M discrete GPU. The CPU is a 4-core, 8-thread part based on Zen 3 architecture, codenamed Barcelo-R, manufactured on TSMC's 7 nm process. It features a base clock of 2.30 GHz and a boost clock of 4.30 GHz, with a 15W TDP. The GPU is an Arc 5 Mobile part based on Xe-HPG architecture, manufactured on TSMC's 6 nm process, with a 60W TDP.

The overall system ranks in the 72nd percentile among all laptop builds, indicating above-average performance. The GPU's 86th percentile is the primary driver of this ranking, while the CPU's 57th percentile drags the overall score down. This creates a system that excels in GPU-bound tasks but is mediocre in CPU-bound workloads. The pairing is unusual—a low-power, efficiency-focused CPU with a relatively high-power, performance-focused GPU—but the data suggests it works well for graphics-intensive applications.

The 7 nm CPU and 6 nm GPU are both fabricated by TSMC, ensuring process maturity and consistent quality. The CPU's 10,700 million transistors on a 180 mm² die contrast with the GPU's 21,700 million transistors on a 406 mm² die, reflecting their different roles. The system supports DDR4 memory with dual-channel configuration and 51.2 GB/s bandwidth, which is adequate but not exceptional. The PCIe Gen 3 interface for the CPU and PCIe 4.0 x16 for the GPU ensure sufficient data transfer rates.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 3 7330U is a 4-core, 8-thread mobile processor from the 7000 series, based on the Zen 3 architecture with the codename Barcelo-R. It operates at a base clock of 2.30 GHz and can boost to 4.30 GHz, with a 15W TDP that makes it suitable for thin-and-light laptops. The CPU is manufactured on TSMC's 7 nm process, featuring 10,700 million transistors on a 180 mm² die. It supports DDR4 memory with ECC capability, dual-channel configuration, and 51.2 GB/s bandwidth.

The cache hierarchy consists of 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 512 KB of L2 cache per core, and 8 MB of shared L3 cache. This configuration is typical for a mid-range mobile processor, providing adequate data locality for most workloads. The integrated Radeon Graphics (Vega 4) offers a basic display output capability, though the discrete Arc A550M handles graphics duties in this build.

In benchmark testing, the CPU achieves a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 6,230, a Geekbench multicore score of 4,131, and a Geekbench single-core score of 1,514. These results place it in the 57th percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 3,958. The nearest rivals include the Intel Xeon E5-2669 v3 (3,959), Intel Core i7-6900K (3,970), and AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U (3,971), with performance deltas of less than 1%. This indicates the Ryzen 3 7330U performs on par with high-end processors from several generations ago, but it lacks the core count to compete with modern multi-core chips.

For real workloads, the 4-core, 8-thread configuration handles everyday tasks with ease, and the 4.30 GHz boost clock provides responsive single-threaded performance. However, in heavily threaded applications—such as video encoding, 3D rendering, or software compilation—the CPU will lag behind processors with more cores. The 8 MB L3 cache is sufficient for most tasks, but the 51.2 GB/s memory bandwidth may become a bottleneck in memory-intensive workloads. The 15W TDP ensures efficient operation, but it also limits sustained performance under load. Overall, the CPU is a competent mid-range mobile processor that serves as a solid foundation for the GPU-centric design of this build.