SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 3 7330U + Intel Arc A370M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

84 Score

Top 16% Ranking

84 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 16% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

74%

GPU

93%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 3 7330U

3,958 Benchmark Score

Top 26% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A370M

29,175 Benchmark Score

Top 7% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 3 7330U and Intel Arc A370M form a laptop platform that targets the mid-range of the performance spectrum, with a combined percentile rank of 66. The CPU is a 4-core, 8-thread Zen 3 part based on the Barcelo-R refresh, while the GPU is Intel’s entry-level Alchemist discrete solution. The data shows a pairing that is balanced for its class, though the absence of measured frame rates means all gaming performance must be considered estimated rather than verified.

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The Intel Arc A370M is built on the Xe-HPG architecture, specifically the DG2-128 chip manufactured on TSMC’s 6 nm process. It packs 7,200 million transistors onto a 157 mm² die, giving it a transistor density of 45.9M per mm². The GPU operates with a base clock of 1550 MHz and a boost clock of 2050 MHz, which is a modest frequency range for a mobile discrete part. Its memory subsystem consists of 4 GB of GDDR6 across a 64-bit bus, yielding a bandwidth of 112.0 GB/s — a figure that is adequate for entry-level 1080p gaming but will constrain performance at higher resolutions or with texture-heavy assets.

The shader configuration includes 1024 shading units, 64 texture mapping units, and 32 render output units. This results in a pixel rate of 65.60 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 131.2 GTexel/s. Compute throughput is rated at 4.198 TFLOPS for FP32 and 8.397 TFLOPS for FP16, with the latter achieved via a 2:1 ratio. The GPU also features 8 dedicated ray tracing cores, which enables hardware-accelerated ray tracing in supported titles, a capability that is uncommon at this performance tier. The A370M supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with modern graphics APIs.

In benchmark terms, the A370M scores 29676 in Geekbench OpenCL and 28673 in Geekbench Vulkan, with an average benchmark score of 29175. This places it in the 74th percentile of all GPUs, which indicates it outperforms roughly three-quarters of the database. The closest rivals are the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH (average score 29197, delta -0.1%), the AMD FirePro W8000 (average score 29211, delta -0.1%), and the AMD Radeon RX 470 (average score 28996, delta 0.6%). Notably, the A370M is 1% ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 6800M (average score 28874, delta 1%), a much higher-tier mobile GPU, which suggests that the benchmark scores here favor compute workloads over gaming-specific metrics. For rendering tasks, the OpenCL score of 29676 indicates competitive performance with those rivals, but the 4 GB VRAM and 112 GB/s bandwidth will be the limiting factors for large scenes or high-resolution textures.

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

The balance between the Ryzen 3 7330U and the Arc A370M is a study in complementary limitations. The CPU sits in the 57th percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU rests in the 74th percentile, meaning the GPU is relatively stronger than the CPU in their respective pools. This disparity suggests that in CPU-bound scenarios — such as physics simulation, AI calculations, or heavily threaded strategy games — the Ryzen 3 will be the bottleneck. Conversely, in GPU-bound workloads like high-resolution rendering or demanding shader effects, the A370M will take the lead role.

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 3958, and its nearest rivals include the Intel Xeon E5-2669 v3 (average score 3959, delta 0%), the Intel Core i7-6900K (average score 3970, delta -0.3%), and the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U (average score 3971, delta -0.3%). These deltas are all within 0.5% of each other, indicating that the Ryzen 3 7330U performs nearly identically to those desktop and mobile parts from previous generations. The GPU’s average score of 29175 is roughly 7.4 times higher than the CPU’s average score, but this ratio is not directly comparable due to different benchmark scales.

For gaming, the lack of measured FPS data means we must infer balance from the scores. The CPU’s single-core Geekbench score of 1514 is modest, which will limit frame rates in titles that rely on single-threaded performance. The multi-core score of 4131 is adequate for streaming or background tasks. The GPU’s Vulkan score of 28673 suggests it can handle modern API workloads, but the 4 GB memory will cause hitches in games that exceed that capacity. The data indicates that the GPU is not the primary bottleneck in most scenarios; instead, the CPU’s 4-core/8-thread configuration will cap performance in CPU-intensive titles, while the GPU’s memory bandwidth will cap performance in texture-heavy scenes.

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The AMD Ryzen 3 7330U is a mobile processor from the 7000 series, built on the Zen 3 architecture with the Barcelo-R codename. It is fabricated on TSMC’s 7 nm process, housing 10,700 million transistors on a 180 mm² die. The processor features 4 cores and 8 threads, with a base clock of 2.30 GHz and a boost clock of 4.30 GHz. The cache hierarchy includes 64 KB of L1 per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and a shared 8 MB L3 cache. It supports dual-channel DDR4 memory with a bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s, and it includes ECC memory support, which is a notable feature for a mobile chip. The integrated graphics are Radeon Graphics with Vega 4 architecture, though the system also includes the discrete Arc A370M.

The CPU’s power envelope is rated at 15 W TDP, which is typical for an ultraportable-class processor. It connects via AMD Socket FP6 and uses PCIe Gen 3 with 16 lanes from the CPU. The benchmark scores are as follows: Cinebench R23 multicore at 6230, Geekbench multicore at 4131, and Geekbench singlecore at 1514. These scores place the CPU in the 57th percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 3958. The nearest rival is the Intel Xeon E5-2669 v3, which has an average score of 3959 and a delta of 0%, meaning the Ryzen 3 7330U is essentially tied with that older server-grade chip.

For real workloads, the Cinebench R23 score of 6230 indicates that the CPU can handle sustained multi-threaded rendering tasks, though it is not a powerhouse. The Geekbench singlecore score of 1514 suggests that day-to-day tasks like web browsing, office applications, and light coding will feel responsive. The multicore score of 4131 is sufficient for video conferencing, productivity suites, and moderate content creation, but it will struggle with heavy video editing or 3D modeling. The architecture is mature and efficient, making it suitable for thin-and-light laptops where thermal headroom is limited.

Who Should Build It — target users and industries (gamers at specific resolutions, content creators, developers, students, small business workstations) tied strictly to the measured performance

The Ryzen 3 7330U and Arc A370M combination is best suited for users who need a balance of CPU and GPU performance in a laptop chassis. Given the GPU’s 74th percentile rank and the CPU’s 57th percentile rank, this build targets gamers who play at 1080p with medium to high settings in esports titles, where the A370M’s compute capabilities and the CPU’s single-core score of 1514 can deliver playable frame rates. It is not designed for 1440p or 4K gaming, as the 4 GB VRAM and 112 GB/s bandwidth will be insufficient for those resolutions.

Content creators who work with photo editing, light video editing, or 2D animation will find the CPU’s 4 cores and 8 threads adequate, especially with the Cinebench R23 score of 6230. The GPU’s OpenCL score of 29676 can accelerate certain filters and effects in creative applications. Developers writing code, running virtual machines, or compiling small projects will benefit from the 8 MB L3 cache and dual-channel memory bandwidth. Students will appreciate the 15 W TDP for battery life, while small business workstations can leverage the ECC memory support for data integrity in financial or database tasks.

The build class is specifically a laptop, so this is not a desktop-oriented pairing. The GPU’s production status is end-of-life, which may affect long-term availability, but the CPU is still active. Users who prioritize portability over raw performance, such as field engineers or traveling consultants, will find this setup adequate for their needs.

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

The platform is built around AMD Socket FP6, which is a mobile-specific socket. The CPU supports DDR4 memory in a dual-channel configuration with a bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s, and it also supports ECC memory, which is uncommon for consumer mobile chips. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 3 with 16 lanes, while the GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 bus interface. This means the GPU has more bandwidth available to it than the CPU can fully supply, but the Gen 3 connection from the CPU will not bottleneck the x8 Gen 4 link in most workloads.

The GPU has a TDP of 35 W, and the CPU has a TDP of 15 W, totaling 50 W for the core components. No suggested PSU is provided for this mobile part, and the power connectors are listed as null, which is typical for an integrated GPU in a laptop. The slot width is listed as "IGP," indicating it is integrated into the motherboard rather than a removable MXM module. This severely limits upgradeability; users cannot swap the GPU for a more powerful model.

For a sensible next upgrade, the data suggests that the CPU is the weaker link, given its lower percentile rank. However, since both components are soldered or integrated into the laptop motherboard, a full system replacement is the only practical upgrade path. Users who want more performance should look for a laptop with a higher-tier CPU, such as the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U, which scores 3971 on average (delta -0.3% compared to the 7330U), or a GPU with more VRAM and bandwidth. The memory support for DDR4 means users can upgrade RAM capacity if the laptop has SODIMM slots, but the 51.2 GB/s bandwidth remains fixed.

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

There are no measured FPS rows for this exact combination of AMD Ryzen 3 7330U and Intel Arc A370M in the FACT PACK. The data set does not contain any measuredFps data, and the dataIsMeasured flag is false. Therefore, all gaming performance figures discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores, not from actual game tests.

Based on the GPU’s Geekbench Vulkan score of 28673 and the CPU’s single-core score of 1514, this system is estimated to handle esports titles like Counter-Strike or League of Legends at 1080p with high settings, potentially exceeding 60 FPS. For more demanding AAA games, the 4 GB VRAM and 112 GB/s bandwidth will likely cap performance at 1080p with medium settings, with frame rates dropping into the 30-50 FPS range depending on the title. The GPU’s pixel rate of 65.60 GPixel/s and texture rate of 131.2 GTexel/s suggest it can fill frames efficiently at 1080p, but the memory bandwidth will cause stuttering when assets exceed 4 GB.

Ray tracing is supported via the 8 RT cores, but the modest FP32 throughput of 4.198 TFLOPS means ray-traced effects will be limited to low or medium presets. The CPU’s 4-core/8-thread configuration will handle game logic without issue, but the single-core score of 1514 may introduce frame pacing issues in CPU-bound scenes. Overall, the estimated gaming experience is best described as "entry-level 1080p," with the exact frame rates varying by title and settings.

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

The CPU benchmarks for the AMD Ryzen 3 7330U are as follows: Cinebench R23 multicore score of 6230, Geekbench multicore score of 4131, and Geekbench singlecore score of 1514. Its average benchmark score is 3958, placing it in the 57th percentile of all CPUs. The nearest rivals are the Intel Xeon E5-2669 v3 with an average score of 3959 (delta 0%), the Intel Core i7-6900K with an average score of 3970 (delta -0.3%), the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U with an average score of 3971 (delta -0.3%), and the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G with an average score of 3977 (delta -0.5%). All rivals are within 0.5% of the 7330U’s score, indicating that the CPU is statistically tied with several older high-end parts.

The GPU benchmarks show a Geekbench OpenCL score of 29676 and a Geekbench Vulkan score of 28673, with an average benchmark score of 29175. This places the Intel Arc A370M in the 74th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals are the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH with an average score of 29197 (delta -0.1%), the AMD FirePro W8000 with an average score of 29211 (delta -0.1%), the AMD Radeon RX 470 with an average score of 28996 (delta 0.6%), and the AMD Radeon RX 6800M with an average score of 28874 (delta 1%). The GPU is effectively tied with the RX Vega M GH and FirePro W8000, while it is 1% ahead of the RX 6800M, which is a much higher-tier product in gaming contexts.

The combined picture is one of a mid-range laptop that performs better on the GPU side than the CPU side. The CPU’s 57th percentile is below the GPU’s 74th percentile, and the combined percentile is 66. This suggests that in a balanced workload, the GPU will often wait for the CPU, especially in tasks that are not heavily parallelized. The average benchmark scores (3958 for CPU, 29175 for GPU) reinforce that the GPU is the stronger component in raw compute terms.

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class (desktop/laptop from buildClass), and overall tier from the percentiles

This build pairs the AMD Ryzen 3 7330U with the Intel Arc A370M in a laptop chassis, as indicated by the buildClass field. It is a mid-range mobile configuration that targets users who need a discrete GPU for light gaming and creative work without the bulk of a gaming laptop. The CPU is a 4-core/8-thread Zen 3 part with a 15 W TDP, while the GPU is a 35 W discrete part with 4 GB of GDDR6 memory.

The overall tier is defined by the combined percentile of 66, which means this pairing performs better than 66% of all CPU+GPU combinations in the database. The CPU’s percentile of 57 places it in the lower-middle tier of processors, while the GPU’s percentile of 74 places it in the upper-middle tier of graphics cards. This asymmetry means the system is slightly GPU-heavy, which is favorable for gaming at 1080p but less so for CPU-intensive workloads like video encoding or software compilation.

The GPU is end-of-life, with a release date of March 2022, while the CPU was released in January 2023, making this a slightly mismatched generation pairing. The CPU is still active in production, but the GPU is no longer manufactured. For a laptop buyer, this means the platform is not future-proof, but the current performance is adequate for its intended use case. The 7 nm CPU and 6 nm GPU both use TSMC fabrication, which suggests efficient power consumption relative to older nodes.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 66, meaning it outperforms 66% of all CPU+GPU combinations in the database.

Q: How does the Ryzen 3 7330U compare to its nearest rival, the Intel Xeon E5-2669 v3?

A: The Ryzen 3 7330U has an average benchmark score of 3958, while the Intel Xeon E5-2669 v3 has an average score of 3959, resulting in a delta of 0% — they are statistically tied.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the Intel Arc A370M?

A: The GPU has a memory bandwidth of 112.0 GB/s, using 4 GB of GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the AMD Ryzen 3 7330U supports ECC memory, which is a feature more commonly found in server-grade parts.

Q: What is the boost clock of the GPU?

A: The Intel Arc A370M has a boost clock of 2050 MHz and a base clock of 1550 MHz.

Q: Are there any measured FPS figures for this combination?

A: No, the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact CPU+GPU pairing; all gaming performance figures are estimates based on benchmark scores.

Q: What is the process node for the CPU and GPU?

A: The CPU uses a 7 nm process from TSMC, while the GPU uses a 6 nm process, also from TSMC.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 3 7330U + Intel Arc A370M

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 3 7330U

Intel Arc A370M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

Who Should Build It — target users and industries (gamers at specific resolutions, content creators, developers, students, small business workstations) tied strictly to the measured performance

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class (desktop/laptop from buildClass), and overall tier from the percentiles

FAQ

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds