SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 3 7320C + Intel Arc A570M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

89 Score

Top 11% Ranking

89 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 11% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

81%

GPU

97%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 3 7320C

14,277 Benchmark Score

Top 19% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A570M

58,239 Benchmark Score

Top 3% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 3 7320C and Intel Arc A570M form an unusual cross-vendor pairing: a 15 W Zen 2 mobile processor from the Mendocino family mated to Intel's DG2-256 discrete GPU. It's a laptop-class combination, and the combined percentile of 79 against all catalogued CPU+GPU pairings places it firmly in the upper-mid tier — a rank driven far more by the GPU than the CPU, as the individual percentiles make strikingly clear. Before diving in, one important caveat: no measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination in the database, so all frame-rate discussion below is estimated from benchmark scores rather than measured play.

GPU Analysis

The Arc A570M is built on Intel's Xe-HPG architecture, fabbed by TSMC on a 6 nm process, with 11,500 million transistors packed into a 269 mm² die — a density of 42.8M per mm². The chip carries 2048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, and 64 render output units. Sixteen RT cores provide hardware ray tracing, and the API support list — DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), Vulkan 1.4, and OpenGL 4.6 — confirms a modern feature set. Compute throughput lands at 5.325 TFLOPS FP32, doubling to 10.65 TFLOPS FP16 at the listed 2:1 ratio. Pixel fill is 83.20 GPixel/s; texture fill is 166.4 GTexel/s.

Clocks sit at 900 MHz base and 1300 MHz boost. The memory subsystem is arguably the card's defining constraint and strength at once: 8 GB of GDDR6 across a 128-bit bus, running at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) for 224.0 GB/s of bandwidth. That buffer size matters for rendering work — 8 GB is enough to hold mid-sized 3D scenes and 1440p texture sets without spilling to system memory, and the PCIe 4.0 x8 interface would sting if it ever had to, since x8 constrains how quickly data can be shuttled from system RAM when VRAM runs out.

The benchmark picture is genuinely curious. The A570M's Geekbench OpenCL score of 58239 puts it in the 88th percentile of all GPUs in the database — and its nearest rivals are not mobile chips at all. AMD's Radeon RX 6950 XT averages 58392, just 0.3% ahead; the Radeon RX 5600 OEM averages 58085, 0.3% behind; NVIDIA's P102-100 mining card sits at 58528, 0.5% ahead; and the Radeon PRO V710 at 58657 leads by 0.7%. What the data implies is that, in OpenCL compute at least, this 75 W mobile GPU scores in the same band as a much larger desktop-class discrete card like the RX 6950 XT. Whether that translates into equivalent gaming performance is a different question — OpenCL compute favours raw shader throughput and memory bandwidth, and a 224 GB/s bus is well short of what flagship desktop cards typically bring. The score should therefore be read as an encouraging compute signal for rendering, video encode-adjacent GPU work, and OpenCL-accelerated applications, with gaming expectations framed more cautiously.

For rendering specifically, the numbers suggest competence rather than dominance. The 5.325 TFLOPS FP32 figure and 16 RT cores mean ray-traced viewport work is viable, and the 88th-percentile OpenCL placement indicates that GPU compute renderers relying on OpenCL will extract meaningful performance from this chip.

FAQ

Q: Is this a desktop or laptop build? A: It's a laptop-class pairing — the buildClass field lists it as such, and both components are mobile parts: a 15 W TDP CPU and a 75 W GPU with integrated (IGP) slot classification.

Q: How much memory does the Arc A570M have, and what type? A: 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, delivering 224.0 GB/s of bandwidth at 14 Gbps effective.

Q: What percentile does the GPU sit in? A: The 88th percentile versus all GPUs in the database, with an average benchmark score of 58239.

Q: How does the Ryzen 3 7320C compare to its rivals? A: Its average benchmark score of 14277 lands it within a fraction of a percent of the AMD Ryzen 5 3501U (−0.3%), Intel Core 7 160UL (+0.3%), AMD Ryzen Embedded V2546 (−0.4%), and Intel Core i5-10400F (+0.7%).

Q: Are there measured game FPS numbers for this combination? A: No. The database contains no measured FPS rows for this exact pairing, so any frame-rate expectations must be estimated from the benchmark scores.

Q: Does the CPU support overclocking? A: No — the multiplier is locked (multiplierUnlocked: false).

Q: Does the platform support ECC memory? A: No, ECC support is listed as false on the CPU side.

CPU Analysis

The Ryzen 3 7320C is a 4-core, 8-thread Zen 2 processor from the Mendocino codename family, manufactured on TSMC's 6 nm node with a 100 mm² die. It's a mobile-segment chip, active in production, with a release date of 2023-05-22. Base clock is 2.40 GHz with boosts to 4.10 GHz — a wide boost envelope that suggests aggressive single-core turbo behaviour within its tight 15 W envelope.

The cache hierarchy is compact: 64 KB of L1 per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and 4 MB of shared L3. That small L3 pool is worth noting — it's the kind of cache budget that handles everyday responsiveness well but can become a limiting factor in workload mixes with large working sets, such as heavy compilation or dense simulation scenes. Memory support is LPDDR5 in a dual-channel configuration with 88.0 GB/s of bandwidth, which is generous for a chip of this class and helps feed the integrated Radeon 610M as well as the CPU cores. PCIe is limited to Gen 3 with 4 CPU-exposed lanes — a genuine constraint worth examining in the bottleneck section, since the discrete Arc GPU hangs off a different, faster interface.

Benchmark results tell a coherent story. Cinebench R23 multi-core lands at 7025, with single-core at 991; R20 posts 2950 multi and 416 single; R15 posts 708 multi and 99 single. The single-core lineage is consistent — roughly 416–991 depending on test version — indicating solid per-thread throughput for the architecture. On PassMark, the multithread score is 8265 while single-thread is 2439; integer math reaches 32247, floating point 14071, data compression 144465, encryption 5443, extended instructions 3663, string sorting 16973, find-prime-numbers 18, and physics 500.

What does this mean for real workloads? A four-core/eight-thread CPU with a 15 W ceiling is an efficiency-first design. The Cinebench scores place it well below modern six- and eight-core mainstream chips in sustained multi-core rendering — a 7025 R23 multi score will complete render jobs, just not quickly. Single-thread performance is respectable relative to its own class, so snappy day-to-day responsiveness, web workloads, and lightly threaded applications are its natural habitat. The nearestRivals data confirms this positioning precisely: it trades blows within a 0.7% band against the Ryzen 5 3501U, Core 7 160UL, Ryzen Embedded V2546, and — most tellingly — the desktop Intel Core i5-10400F, which it edges by 0.7% on average score despite the far lower power draw. The 69th percentile versus all CPUs is a mid-upper placement: comfortably above the bulk of the catalogue, well below enthusiast silicon.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this specific CPU+GPU combination — the field is empty and dataIsMeasured is false — so everything in this section is an estimate derived from benchmark scores, not measurement.

With that stated plainly: what can the scores suggest? The GPU's 88th-percentile OpenCL standing, sitting statistically alongside desktop cards like the RX 6950 XT and RX 5600 OEM, implies the A570M has the shading and memory resources to drive modern titles at 1080p with high settings, and likely to stretch to 1440p in less demanding engines. The 8 GB VRAM buffer supports that. However, OpenCL compute is not a direct proxy for rasterised gaming, and the 224 GB/s bandwidth figure is a more grounded anchor: it's a mid-tier memory subsystem, so texture-heavy scenes at high resolution will be the first place performance tightens.

The CPU side is the more cautionary signal. A 4-core/8-thread chip with a PassMark multithread score of 8265 and a physics score of 500 is not a high-refresh esports engine. Modern AAA titles that lean on six or more cores will bottleneck this pairing at CPU-bound settings — lower resolutions and competitive frame rates in particular. Estimated, then: 1080p high-settings play in current AAA releases is the realistic sweet spot, with ray tracing viable courtesy of the 16 RT cores but likely requiring setting adjustments to hold smooth frames. Esports titles at 1080p should run well, though the CPU may cap frame rates before the GPU does.

Balance and Bottleneck

The individual percentiles reveal a stark imbalance: the CPU sits at the 69th percentile while the GPU sits at the 88th, producing a combined 79th percentile. The GPU is meaningfully the stronger component. In gaming terms, this is a GPU-forward pairing constrained by its processor — the classic profile where raising resolution and graphical settings shifts load toward the A570M and away from the four Zen 2 cores, which is arguably how this build should be operated.

The evidence stack: a PassMark single-thread score of 2439 and a physics score of 500 bound CPU-side frame delivery, while the A570M's compute score — statistically indistinguishable from an RX 6950 XT within 0.3% — indicates substantial headroom above. For GPU compute workloads (OpenCL rendering, GPU-accelerated encoding tools), the CPU's role is feeding the accelerator, and its 88 GB/s LPDDR5 subsystem mitigates data starvation reasonably well. For sustained CPU rendering (Cinebench-style multi-core work), the 7025 R23 score shows the CPU is the clear limiter; the GPU idles while four cores grind.

There's also an interface-level question worth flagging: the CPU exposes only PCIe Gen 3 with 4 lanes, while the A570M uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 bus interface. In an integrated laptop platform the GPU is typically wired to the platform's lanes rather than the CPU's four Gen 3 links, but the database fields raise the question of whether the link runs at full Gen 4 speed or negotiates down. With 8 GB of local VRAM, the pairing is largely insulated from interface bandwidth limits — until VRAM spills.

Who Should Build It

Given this is a laptop-class configuration, "build" here means "buy the machine that carries it." The data points to several audiences. Students and general office users get a 69th-percentile CPU with strong single-thread responsiveness and LPDDR5 bandwidth — more than enough for productivity suites, browsing, and coursework. Content creators doing light-to-mid video editing benefit from the 8 GB GPU and its modern API support, though sustained multi-core renders (7025 R23 multi) will test patience. Developers working on small-to-medium codebases will find the four cores and eight threads adequate for compilation, with the caveat that the 4 MB L3 cache and 8265 multithread score limit large parallel builds. Gamers targeting 1080p high-settings play — estimated, not measured — are the best-fit gaming audience; high-refresh 1440p esports competitors should look elsewhere because the CPU percentile and physics score cap frame delivery. Small-business workstations doing GPU compute (the 88th-percentile OpenCL standing) in quiet, power-efficient form factors are arguably the most interesting fit of all.

Benchmark Performance

The exact scores, in full. CPU: Cinebench R15 708 multi / 99 single; Cinebench R20 2950 multi / 416 single; Cinebench R23 7025 multi / 991 single. PassMark: multithread 8265, single-thread 2439, integer math 32247, floating point math 14071, data compression 144465, data encryption 5443, extended instructions 3663, find prime numbers 18, physics 500, string sorting 16973. Average benchmark score: 14277, 69th percentile versus all CPUs.

GPU: Geekbench OpenCL 58239, average benchmark score 58239, 88th percentile versus all GPUs. Rival deltas: RX 6950 XT −0.3%, RX 5600 OEM +0.3%, NVIDIA P102-100 −0.5%, Radeon PRO V710 −0.7% — the sign convention here meaning the A570M is 0.3% behind the 6950 XT and 0.3% ahead of the 5600 OEM on average score.

The combined picture is a 79th-percentile pairing whose rank is pulled up by the GPU and capped by the CPU. That is not a criticism — it's a shape. Builds with this profile excel when the workload scales with GPU compute and tolerate it when the workload scales with core count.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class combination: AMD's Ryzen 3 7320C, a 15 W Mendocino-series Zen 2 quad-core released 2023-05-22, paired with Intel's Arc A570M, a 75 W DG2-256 Alchemist GPU released 2023-07-31. Both share TSMC 6 nm fabrication. The tier is upper-mid — combined 79th percentile — with an unusual strength distribution: an 88th-percentile GPU attached to a 69th-percentile CPU. Both parts remain in active production. Neither part carries a launch MSRP figure in the database. The presence of the integrated Radeon 610M alongside the discrete Arc GPU gives the platform a hybrid graphics option, useful for power saving on battery.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The weakest fit. Estimated from the scores, the CPU's 500 physics score and 2439 single-thread figure cap frame delivery below what high-refresh 1440p play demands; the GPU has headroom the CPU cannot unlock. 1080p at moderate frame targets is the realistic envelope.

1080p AAA gaming: The best gaming fit. The A570M's 88th-percentile standing and 8 GB VRAM suggest high-settings 1080p play is comfortably within reach, with ray tracing possible via the 16 RT cores at adjusted settings. All figures are estimates — no measured FPS exists for this pairing.

Streaming: Mixed. Single-core throughput (991 R23 single) handles the encoder feed adequately, but simultaneous game-plus-encode load on four cores will produce contention. GPU-side encoding via the modern API stack may absorb some of that, but the data does not confirm dedicated encode hardware.

Video editing: Capable at 1080p timelines. The 88 GB/s memory bandwidth and 8 GB GPU buffer accelerate previews and effects, while the 7025 R23 multi-core score means final exports proceed at a modest pace.

3D rendering: Viable with caveats. OpenCL-accelerated renderers can exploit the 58239 compute score — statistically on par with an RX 6950 XT — making GPU rendering the smarter path here over CPU rendering, which the quad-core handles slowly.

Software development: Adequate for small and mid-sized projects. Four cores and eight threads compile cleanly; large parallel builds will feel the 4 MB L3 and 8265 multithread ceiling. The LPDDR5 bandwidth helps in-memory workloads like builds and container tasks.

Student and office work: Excellent fit. Strong single-thread scores, dual-channel LPDDR5, and a 15 W TDP deliver responsive productivity performance with efficiency that suits all-day battery use.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform details frame the upgrade story tightly. The CPU uses AMD Socket FT6 — a soldered mobile form factor, which means no CPU swap is possible; the upgrade path on this build is effectively a new machine, not a new chip. Memory is LPDDR5, dual-channel, which is typically board-attached in this class, so capacity is fixed at purchase. PCIe is Gen 3 with 4 CPU-exposed lanes on the CPU side, while the A570M itself connects via PCIe 4.0 x8 — a reminder that in laptop platforms the GPU link runs through the platform fabric rather than the CPU's lane budget.

Power is not a concern in the conventional desktop sense: total thermal budget is the 15 W CPU TDP plus the 75 W GPU TDP, and no suggestedPsu field exists because no external power connectors are used — the slot classification is IGP-style with power delivered by the platform. There is no PSU headroom question to answer on a laptop.

What does a sensible next upgrade look like? Given the socket is fixed, the answer is generational: a successor laptop pairing a higher-core-count Ryzen with a next-tier Arc GPU. The score data sketches the target precisely — the CPU is the binding constraint at the 69th percentile while the GPU at the 88th already matches desktop-class average scores, so the ideal successor platform keeps GPU class roughly constant and lifts the processor to six or eight cores, closing the percentile gap that currently defines this pairing.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 3 7320C + Intel Arc A570M

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 3 7320C

Intel Arc A570M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

GPU Analysis

FAQ

CPU Analysis

Gaming Performance

Balance and Bottleneck

Who Should Build It

Benchmark Performance

Build Overview

Usage Scenarios

Upgrade Path and Platform

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds