SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 3 7320C + Intel Arc A550M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

89 Score

Top 11% Ranking

89 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 11% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

81%

GPU

96%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 3 7320C

14,277 Benchmark Score

Top 19% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A550M

49,737 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 3 7320C and Intel Arc A550M form a laptop pairing that sits in an unusual performance tier. The CPU is a low-power, efficiency-focused mobile processor, while the GPU is a high-end discrete graphics solution. Benchmark data indicates a significant performance delta between the two components, which defines the character of this build. The data shows a combined percentile of 78, placing this system ahead of a majority of tested configurations, yet the specific strengths and weaknesses of each part create a distinct profile for target users.

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The Intel Arc A550M is built on the Xe-HPG architecture, specifically the DG2-512 chip manufactured on a 6 nm process at TSMC. This is a substantial piece of silicon, with 21,700 million transistors on a 406 mm² die. The GPU operates at a base clock of 900 MHz and a boost clock of 2050 MHz, with memory running at 1750 MHz, translating to 14 Gbps effective. The memory subsystem consists of 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, yielding a bandwidth of 224.0 GB/s. This configuration provides a solid foundation for high-resolution textures and modern game assets.

In terms of compute resources, the Arc A550M features 2048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, and 64 raster output units. The pixel rate is 131.2 GPixel/s and the texture rate is 262.4 GTexel/s. Raw FP32 performance is listed at 8.397 TFLOPS, with FP16 performance at 16.79 TFLOPS (2:1). The GPU also includes 16 dedicated ray tracing cores, enabling hardware-accelerated ray tracing effects in supported titles. The presence of DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), Vulkan 1.4, and OpenGL 4.6 API support ensures compatibility with modern rendering techniques.

The benchmark scores for the GPU are strong. In Geekbench OpenCL, the Arc A550M scores 49894, and in Vulkan, it scores 49580. The average benchmark score is 49737, which places it at the 86th percentile among all GPUs. This is a high ranking, indicating that the GPU outperforms the vast majority of its peers. The nearest rivals listed include the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti, with a deltaPct of -0.4, meaning the Arc A550M is just 0.4% behind that card. It also sits 0.5% behind the AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 and 2.4% behind the AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT, while being 2.6% ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT. These comparisons show that the Arc A550M is competitive with high-end desktop GPUs from previous generations, a remarkable feat for a mobile component.

For rendering workloads, the data implies that the Arc A550M can handle demanding tasks. The combination of 8 GB VRAM and 224 GB/s bandwidth is sufficient for complex scenes and high-resolution textures. The 16 ray tracing cores provide dedicated hardware for ray-traced effects, though the overall performance in such scenarios will depend on driver optimization and game engine implementation. The FP32 throughput of 8.397 TFLOPS suggests capable performance in 3D rendering and compute tasks, though it is not a top-tier workstation GPU. The Vulkan score of 49580 is particularly encouraging, as it indicates strong performance in cross-platform graphics APIs used by many modern game engines.

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

The CPU and GPU present a striking contrast in their benchmark standings. The Intel Arc A550M achieves an average benchmark score of 49737, placing it in the 86th percentile of all GPUs. This is an elite position, putting it ahead of the vast majority of graphics cards. In contrast, the AMD Ryzen 3 7320C has an average benchmark score of 14277, which places it in the 69th percentile of all CPUs. While the CPU percentile is respectable, it is significantly lower than the GPU's percentile, creating a potential imbalance.

The combined percentile for this pairing is 78, which is a solid overall score. However, the data suggests that the GPU is the dominant component in this system. The CPU's nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen 5 3501U, which scores 14320, just 0.3% higher than the 7320C. The Intel Core 7 160UL scores 14232, which is 0.3% lower. The AMD Ryzen Embedded V2546 scores 14336, 0.4% higher, and the Intel Core i5-10400F scores 14185, 0.7% lower. These comparisons show that the Ryzen 3 7320C is a mid-pack performer, closely matched with several other mainstream processors.

The combined picture is one of a system with a very powerful GPU paired with a modest CPU. In gaming scenarios, this often means that the GPU is the limiting factor at lower resolutions, but at higher resolutions, the CPU may struggle to keep up. The benchmark scores indicate that the Arc A550M is capable of high frame rates, but the Ryzen 3 7320C's single-threaded performance may bottleneck it in CPU-intensive scenes. Specifically, the CPU scores 991 in Cinebench R23 single-core and 7025 in multi-core. These scores are nothing exceptional, and the data suggests that the GPU's 86th percentile performance is far ahead of the CPU's 69th percentile position.

The data shows that this is not a balanced system in terms of raw computational power. The GPU is clearly the star of the show, while the CPU is a capable but not outstanding partner. Users looking at this pairing should expect that the GPU will drive most of the performance in graphics-heavy applications, while the CPU will handle general computing tasks and background processes adequately.

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The AMD Ryzen 3 7320C is a 4-core, 8-thread processor based on the Zen 2 architecture, with the codename Mendocino. It is part of the 7000 series and is manufactured on TSMC's 6 nm process node, with a die size of 100 mm². The base clock is 2.40 GHz, with a boost clock of 4.10 GHz. The TDP is 15 W, indicating a highly efficient design intended for mobile devices. The processor supports LPDDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, offering a memory bandwidth of 88.0 GB/s. It has 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 512 KB of L2 cache per core, and 4 MB of shared L3 cache. The CPU is not overclockable, as the multiplier is locked.

Benchmark results for the CPU are modest across the board. In Cinebench R15, it scores 708 in multi-core and 99 in single-core. In Cinebench R20, the scores are 2950 and 416, respectively. For Cinebench R23, the multi-core score is 7025 and the single-core score is 991. These scores indicate that the CPU is suitable for everyday tasks but is not designed for heavy multi-threaded workloads. The PassMark results are more varied: multi-thread score is 8265, single-thread is 2439, data compression is 144465, data encryption is 5443, extended instructions is 3663, find prime numbers is 18, floating point math is 14071, integer math is 32247, physics is 500, and random string sorting is 16973.

The real-world implication of these scores is that the Ryzen 3 7320C is adequate for light to moderate productivity tasks. The single-thread score of 991 in Cinebench R23 suggests that it can handle web browsing, office applications, and light coding without issue. The multi-core score of 7025 indicates that it can manage some parallel workloads, but it is not a content creation powerhouse. For tasks like video editing or 3D rendering, the CPU will be a significant bottleneck, as the 4-core/8-thread configuration is limited compared to more modern processors with higher core counts.

The architecture is based on Zen 2, which is a few generations old. While it is efficient, it does not offer the same IPC (instructions per clock) improvements as newer Zen 3 or Zen 4 designs. The 15 W TDP is a key feature, as it allows for fanless or low-noise designs in thin-and-light laptops. The integrated Radeon 610M graphics provide a fallback option for basic display output when the dedicated GPU is not in use, though the discrete Arc A550M will be the primary graphics processor.

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

The upgrade path for this platform is constrained by the laptop form factor. The CPU uses AMD Socket FT6, which is a soldered, mobile-specific socket. This means that the CPU cannot be upgraded or replaced in most laptop designs. The memory support is for LPDDR5, which is also typically soldered onto the motherboard. This effectively locks the system's memory capacity and speed at the time of purchase. The PCIe interface for the CPU is Gen 3 with 4 lanes, which is sufficient for the integrated GPU and standard NVMe storage but limits the bandwidth for any external GPU or high-speed expansion.

For the GPU, the bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x16, which is a standard for dedicated graphics. However, in a laptop, the GPU is also typically soldered to the motherboard, making it non-upgradable. The Intel Arc A550M has a TDP of 60 W, which is relatively low for a discrete GPU. The CPU has a TDP of 15 W, bringing the total system power draw to a manageable level. The suggested PSU is not listed, but the combined TDP of 75 W suggests that a standard laptop power adapter in the 90-130 W range would be sufficient, though this is an educated estimate and not a fact from the pack.

Given these constraints, a sensible next upgrade for a user with this system would be to focus on peripherals or external storage. Since the internal components are fixed, the only meaningful upgrades are external. This could include a high-refresh-rate external monitor to take full advantage of the GPU's capabilities, or an external SSD for additional storage, as the PCIe Gen 3 lanes on the CPU may limit the speed of internal NVMe drives. For users looking for more performance, the only real option is to purchase a new laptop, as the platform is not designed for user-upgradable components.

Who Should Build It — target users and industries tied strictly to the measured performance

This pairing is designed for users who prioritize graphics performance over raw CPU power. The data shows that the Intel Arc A550M is in the 86th percentile of GPUs, making it a strong choice for gamers and creative professionals who rely heavily on GPU acceleration. However, the CPU is in the 69th percentile, which means it is not ideal for users who require heavy multi-threaded processing.

Gamers playing at 1080p or 1440p resolutions would benefit from this system, as the GPU can deliver high frame rates in most titles. The 8 GB VRAM is sufficient for modern games at these resolutions, and the 224 GB/s bandwidth ensures smooth texture streaming. Content creators who work with GPU-accelerated applications, such as video editing software that uses CUDA or OpenCL, would also find this system capable. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 49894 indicates strong compute performance for such tasks.

Developers and students who need a system for programming, web development, and light virtualization would find the CPU adequate. The 8 threads and 4 cores are enough for most development tasks, and the 15 W TDP means the system runs cool and quiet. Small business workstations that handle spreadsheets, document editing, and light database work would also be well-served by this pairing, as the CPU's PassMark multi-thread score of 8265 is sufficient for such tasks.

The system is not suited for users who need heavy CPU rendering, such as 3D artists using CPU-based renderers or data scientists running complex simulations. The 4-core CPU would be a severe bottleneck in these scenarios. Similarly, users who need high memory capacity for virtual machines would be limited by the LPDDR5 configuration, which is typically capped at 32 GB in most laptops.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 78, which places the system ahead of 78% of tested configurations in the benchmark database.

Q: How does the Intel Arc A550M compare to the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti?

A: The Arc A550M has an average benchmark score of 49737, while the RTX 5070 Ti scores 49957. The deltaPct is -0.4, meaning the Arc A550M is 0.4% behind the RTX 5070 Ti.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the AMD Ryzen 3 7320C?

A: The CPU supports dual-channel LPDDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 88.0 GB/s.

Q: Does the Intel Arc A550M support hardware ray tracing?

A: Yes, it includes 16 dedicated ray tracing cores, and it supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), which includes DXR (DirectX Raytracing).

Q: What is the TDP of the AMD Ryzen 3 7320C?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 15 W, indicating a low-power design suitable for thin-and-light laptops.

Q: What is the CPU socket for the AMD Ryzen 3 7320C?

A: It uses AMD Socket FT6, which is a mobile-specific socket that is typically soldered to the motherboard.

Q: What is the Cinebench R23 multi-core score for the CPU?

A: The Ryzen 3 7320C scores 7025 in Cinebench R23 multi-core, which is a modest result for a 4-core/8-thread processor.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The Arc A550M's 86th percentile GPU ranking suggests it can drive high frame rates at 1080p. The 8 GB VRAM and 224 GB/s bandwidth are adequate for modern titles, though the CPU's single-thread score of 991 in Cinebench R23 may limit performance in CPU-bound games. Expect smooth gameplay in most titles at high settings, with occasional dips in scenes that are heavily dependent on processor performance.

Streaming: The GPU can handle the encoding workload for streaming, as it has the compute power to handle both rendering and encoding. The CPU's 8 threads are sufficient for running the streaming software and a game simultaneously, though the overall performance will be tighter than a system with a stronger CPU. The 15 W TDP of the CPU is a benefit here, as it reduces the thermal load on the system.

Video editing: This is a strong scenario for this pairing. The GPU's OpenCL score of 49894 indicates excellent performance in GPU-accelerated effects and rendering. The 8 GB VRAM is sufficient for 4K timelines and complex effects. The CPU will handle the timeline and encoding, but the GPU will accelerate the heavy lifting. The 88 GB/s memory bandwidth of the CPU may be a minor bottleneck for loading large media files.

3D rendering: The GPU is capable of accelerating real-time viewports in 3D software, and the 16 ray tracing cores can accelerate ray-traced previews. However, final frame rendering is often CPU-intensive, and the 4-core Ryzen 3 7320C will be slow. Users should expect long render times for final output, as the CPU's multi-core score of 7025 in Cinebench R23 is low for rendering workloads.

Software development: The CPU is adequate for most development tasks, including compiling code, running tests, and using IDEs. The PassMark single-thread score of 2439 indicates good responsiveness for interactive tasks. The 8 threads allow for parallel builds, though larger projects will take longer than on a more powerful CPU. The GPU is not heavily utilized in most development scenarios, so its power is largely unused.

Student and office work: This system is more than sufficient for word processing, spreadsheets, web browsing, and email. The CPU's 69th percentile ranking ensures smooth performance for these tasks, and the 15 W TDP means the laptop will have excellent battery life. The GPU is overkill for this use case, but it does provide headroom for any light photo editing or casual gaming the student might do.

Build Overview

This build is a laptop-class pairing of an AMD Ryzen 3 7320C mobile processor and an Intel Arc A550M discrete GPU. The CPU is a 4-core, 8-thread Zen 2 design with a 15 W TDP, while the GPU is a high-end Xe-HPG part with 8 GB VRAM and a 60 W TDP. The combined percentile of 78 places this system in the upper tier of benchmarked configurations, but the performance distribution is uneven. The GPU is in the 86th percentile, while the CPU is in the 69th percentile, creating a system that excels in graphics-heavy tasks but is only average in CPU-bound workloads. This is a system designed for users who value GPU performance and are willing to accept a less powerful CPU.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data clearly indicates that the GPU is the dominant component in this pairing. The Intel Arc A550M's 86th percentile ranking is far above the CPU's 69th percentile, suggesting that the CPU will be the limiting factor in many scenarios. In gaming, this means that at lower resolutions (1080p), the CPU may struggle to keep up with the GPU's frame output, leading to a CPU bottleneck. At higher resolutions (1440p or 4K), the GPU becomes the limiting factor, and the system will perform more in line with the GPU's capabilities.

For productivity tasks, the bottleneck depends on the workload. In GPU-accelerated tasks like video editing or 3D viewport rendering, the GPU will be the primary driver, and the system will perform well. In CPU-intensive tasks like code compilation or multi-threaded rendering, the CPU will be the bottleneck, and the system will perform poorly relative to its GPU. The FPS scaling evidence is not directly available, but the delta between the CPU and GPU percentiles (69 vs 86) is substantial enough to infer that a CPU bottleneck is likely in many scenarios.

The balanced point of this system is likely at higher resolutions and graphics settings, where the GPU's workload is heavier and the CPU has more time to process game logic and physics. The 8 GB VRAM is a key asset here, as it allows for high-resolution textures without running out of memory, which would otherwise cause stuttering and performance drops.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU and GPU combination, so all frame rate figures are estimates based on the benchmark scores. The Intel Arc A550M's average benchmark score of 49737 and 86th percentile ranking indicate that it is a very fast GPU, capable of high frame rates in most modern games. The Geekbench Vulkan score of 49580 suggests strong performance in games that use Vulkan, while the OpenCL score of 49894 indicates good performance in games that use compute shaders.

For gaming at 1080p ultra settings, the GPU is likely to deliver frame rates well above 60 FPS in most titles, with the CPU being the limiting factor in CPU-intensive scenes. At 1440p ultra settings, the GPU will be more heavily loaded, and the system is likely to deliver playable frame rates in the 60-80 FPS range for many games. The 8 GB VRAM is sufficient for 1440p, but some games with very high-resolution textures may approach the limit.

The 16 ray tracing cores will enable ray-traced effects, but the performance impact is likely to be significant. Users should expect to use upscaling technologies or lower ray tracing settings to maintain playable frame rates. Overall, the gaming performance is estimated to be strong for a laptop, with the GPU providing the bulk of the performance. The CPU is a potential bottleneck, but for most games, the system should provide a smooth and enjoyable experience.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 3 7320C + Intel Arc A550M

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 3 7320C

Intel Arc A550M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

Who Should Build It — target users and industries tied strictly to the measured performance

FAQ

Usage Scenarios

Build Overview

Balance and Bottleneck

Gaming Performance

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds