SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 3 7320C + Intel Arc A370M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

87 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 13% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
81%
VS
GPU
93%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 3 7320C

14,277 Benchmark Score
Top 19% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A370M

29,175 Benchmark Score
Top 7% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# AMD Ryzen 3 7320C + Intel Arc A370M: A Mobile Duo Worth Scrutiny

This laptop pairing combines a 4-core/8-thread AMD Mendocino APU with Intel's entry-level Arc 3 discrete GPU, landing at the 72nd percentile among all CPU+GPU combinations in the database. The CPU sits at the 69th percentile among all processors, while the GPU reaches the 74th percentile among all graphics cards, creating a system that is surprisingly balanced for a mobile platform. The data reveals a machine that punches above its modest core count in productivity while offering genuine 1080p gaming potential, though the measured FPS rows are absent for this exact combination, so all gaming frame rates discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The Intel Arc A370M, with its 1024 shading units and 4.198 TFLOPS FP32 throughput, is positioned near the AMD Radeon RX 470 (0.6% ahead in average benchmark score) and the AMD Radeon RX 6800M (1% ahead), suggesting it can handle esports titles at 1080p with high frame rates. The GPU's 112 GB/s memory bandwidth and 64-bit bus are modest, but for competitive shooters and MOBAs at medium settings, the 74th percentile GPU placement implies 60+ FPS is achievable in many titles.

Streaming: The CPU's PassMark multithread score of 8265 and Cinebench R23 multicore score of 7025 indicate sufficient headroom for software encoding at 720p/1080p while gaming, though the 15W TDP and 4 cores mean simultaneous gaming and encoding will strain the system. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate and Vulkan 1.4, which includes hardware-accelerated encoding features, offloading some streaming workload from the CPU.

Video editing: The 8 threads and LPDDR5 dual-channel memory with 88 GB/s bandwidth provide adequate throughput for 1080p timeline editing. The GPU's 8 RT cores and 4 GB GDDR6 VRAM accelerate effects and rendering in compatible software, while the PassMark floating point math score of 14071 suggests reasonable performance for color grading and transitions. The 74th GPU percentile indicates this is a capable entry-level editing machine for short-form content.

3D rendering: The CPU's Cinebench R20 multicore score of 2950 and R15 multicore score of 708 place it in entry-level territory for CPU-based rendering, acceptable for occasional Blender or CAD work but not for professional workloads. The GPU's 4.198 TFLOPS FP32 and 8.397 TFLOPS FP16 (2:1) performance, combined with ray tracing hardware, makes it suitable for preview renders and light GPU-accelerated final renders.

Software development: The PassMark data compression score of 144465 and integer math score of 32247 indicate solid performance for code compilation, while the single-thread score of 2439 (Cinebench R23 single: 991) means responsive IDE interactions. The 4 cores/8 threads handle modern build tools adequately, and the 15W TDP makes it ideal for all-day development on battery.

Student and office work: The CPU's 69th percentile placement and 4 MB shared L3 cache handle document processing, spreadsheets, and web browsing with ease. The PassMark single-thread score of 2439 ensures snappy UI responses, while the 15W TDP enables long battery life for campus use. The integrated Radeon 610M provides a fallback when the discrete GPU is not needed.

Benchmark Performance

The AMD Ryzen 3 7320C achieves an average benchmark score of 14277, placing it at the 69th percentile among all CPUs. It sits within 0.7% of the AMD Ryzen 5 3501U (14320, -0.3% delta), the Intel Core 7 160UL (14232, +0.3% delta), the AMD Ryzen Embedded V2546 (14336, -0.4% delta), and the Intel Core i5-10400F (14185, +0.7% delta). This is a tightly packed cluster, indicating the 7320C performs nearly identically to a mid-range Ryzen 5 from the 3000 series and a desktop Core i5-10400F in aggregate benchmarks.

The Intel Arc A370M posts an average benchmark score of 29175, placing it at the 74th percentile among all GPUs. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH (29197, -0.1% delta), AMD FirePro W8000 (29211, -0.1% delta), AMD Radeon RX 470 (28996, +0.6% delta), and AMD Radeon RX 6800M (28874, +1% delta). The 1% lead over the RX 6800M is striking given the latter's reputation as a high-end mobile GPU, though the Arc A370M's 4 GB VRAM and 64-bit bus limit its real-world advantages.

In CPU-specific tests, the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 7025 and single-core score of 991 reveal a processor that is 7x faster in multithreaded workloads but modest in single-thread tasks. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 29676 and Vulkan score of 28673 for the GPU show strong compute performance for a 35W part. The combined percentile of 72 indicates this pairing outperforms 72% of all laptop CPU+GPU combinations in the database, a respectable position for a low-power mobile platform.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The AMD Ryzen 3 7320C uses the AMD Socket FT6, a mobile-specific socket with no desktop equivalent, meaning CPU upgrades are not practical in the traditional sense. The platform supports LPDDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration with 88 GB/s bandwidth, and the CPU provides PCIe Gen 3 with 4 lanes, which is sufficient for the Arc A370M's PCIe 4.0 x8 interface (though it will run at Gen 3 speeds). ECC memory is not supported, and the CPU is not multiplier-unlocked, limiting overclocking potential.

The GPU's 35W TDP is modest for a discrete mobile GPU, and the system's total power draw (CPU 15W + GPU 35W) is approximately 50W under load, well within typical laptop power delivery capabilities. The suggested PSU field is null, indicating this is not a desktop component, so PSU headroom is not a concern for this integrated laptop solution. A sensible next upgrade for this platform would be increasing RAM capacity (the CPU supports LPDDR5 but the FACT PACK does not specify maximum capacity) or adding an external GPU via a dock if the laptop supports it, though the CPU's 4 PCIe Gen 3 lanes would bottleneck a high-end eGPU.

The production status is "Active" for the CPU and "End-of-life" for the GPU, suggesting the platform is nearing the end of its relevance. The CPU's release date of 2023-05-22 and GPU's release date of 2022-03-29 mean this is a pairing of a newer CPU with a first-generation Arc GPU. Users seeking more performance would need to move to a different laptop entirely, as the FT6 socket is not shared with higher-end Ryzen mobile processors.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data reveals a system where the CPU and GPU are unusually well-matched for a laptop. The CPU's 69th percentile and GPU's 74th percentile are within 5 points, indicating neither component dramatically outsizes the other. In CPU-bound workloads like data compression (PassMark score 144465) and integer math (32247), the 4-core/8-thread processor is the limiting factor, while in GPU-bound tasks like Vulkan rendering (28673 Geekbench score), the Arc A370M takes the lead role.

The PassMark physics score of 500 and find prime numbers score of 18 suggest the CPU is the bottleneck in physics simulations and prime number calculation, while the GPU's 65.60 GPixel/s pixel rate and 131.2 GTexel/s texture rate handle rasterization efficiently. The 88 GB/s CPU memory bandwidth versus 112 GB/s GPU memory bandwidth means the GPU has a 27% advantage in raw memory throughput, but the CPU's LPDDR5 memory is shared with the system, creating potential contention in mixed workloads.

FPS scaling would likely show the GPU as the primary limiter at 1440p and above, given its 4 GB VRAM and 64-bit bus, while at 1080p the CPU's 4 cores might bottleneck in heavily threaded titles. The combined percentile of 72 suggests that in most games, the pairing delivers consistent 1080p medium-to-high settings performance without severe stuttering from either component. The 0.7% delta between the CPU and Intel Core i5-10400F indicates that games optimized for 6-core desktop CPUs may not scale well on this 4-core mobile part.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU+GPU combination in the FACT PACK, so all gaming frame rates discussed here are estimates derived from benchmark scores. The GPU's average benchmark score of 29175 places it alongside the AMD Radeon RX 470 (28996, +0.6%) and AMD Radeon RX 6800M (28874, +1%), suggesting 1080p gaming at medium-to-high settings is achievable in most titles. The 4 GB GDDR6 VRAM with 112 GB/s bandwidth is sufficient for 1080p textures but may require reduced settings in VRAM-hungry titles.

At 1080p ultra settings, the GPU's 4.198 TFLOPS FP32 and 65.60 GPixel/s pixel rate indicate playable frame rates in esports titles (60-100+ FPS) but potentially sub-60 FPS in AAA games. The CPU's Cinebench R23 single-core score of 991 means that frame times in CPU-bound games will be acceptable but not exceptional. At 1440p, the 64-bit memory bus and 4 GB VRAM become limiting, and 30-50 FPS at medium settings is a reasonable estimate. The GPU's 8 RT cores support ray tracing, but with only 4.198 TFLOPS FP32, ray-traced effects will likely require DLSS-like upscaling (via Intel XeSS, which is supported through the DirectX 12 Ultimate API) to maintain playable frame rates.

For competitive gaming at 1080p low settings, the 1024 shading units and boost clock of 2050 MHz suggest 120+ FPS in games like Valorant or CS2, while the 8 threads on the CPU handle game logic and background tasks. The system is not suitable for 4K gaming, as the 4 GB VRAM and 64-bit bus would cause severe bandwidth bottlenecks.

Who Should Build It

This laptop pairing targets students and office workers who need a portable machine for productivity during the day and light gaming at night. The CPU's 15W TDP and 69th percentile performance handle document editing, spreadsheets, and web browsing effortlessly, while the GPU's 74th percentile placement enables 1080p gaming at medium settings. The combined 72nd percentile means this system outperforms most integrated-graphics laptops and entry-level discrete GPU machines.

Content creators working with 1080p video or light 3D modeling will find the 8 threads and 4.198 TFLOPS GPU adequate for occasional renders, though professionals requiring sustained multithreaded performance should look to higher-core-count laptops. Software developers compiling code will appreciate the PassMark integer math score of 32247, which indicates reasonable build times, and the 15W TDP allows for quiet operation in office environments.

Small business workstations that need discrete GPU acceleration for CUDA-accelerated apps (via OpenCL) or hardware-encoded video conferencing will benefit from this pairing. The GPU's production status is "End-of-life," which may concern enterprise buyers seeking long-term support, but the CPU remains "Active." Gamers at 1080p who prioritize portability over maximum settings are the primary target, as the system delivers a smooth esports experience and acceptable AAA performance at medium settings.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 3 7320C is a 4-core/8-thread processor from the 7000 series, built on the Zen 2 architecture (codename Mendocino) using TSMC's 6nm process with a 100 mm² die size. It operates at a base clock of 2.40 GHz and boosts to 4.10 GHz, with a 15W TDP that makes it suitable for fanless or low-noise laptop designs. The cache hierarchy includes 64 KB L1 per core, 512 KB L2 per core, and 4 MB shared L3, which is modest for a modern processor.

The CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 7025 and single-core score of 991 place it at the 69th percentile, with the multicore score being 7.1x higher than single-core, indicating good scaling across the 8 threads. The PassMark multithread score of 8265 and single-thread score of 2439 confirm a balanced design, though the find prime numbers score of 18 is notably low, suggesting weak integer-heavy single-thread performance. The data compression score of 144465 and random string sorting score of 16973 indicate strong memory subsystem performance for a mobile chip.

The 6nm process node and Zen 2 architecture provide efficient power delivery, with the 88 GB/s memory bandwidth from LPDDR5 dual-channel memory enabling fast data movement. The CPU's nearest rival, the Intel Core i5-10400F (a 6-core desktop part), is only 0.7% ahead in average score, highlighting that the 7320C's efficiency compensates for its lower core count. The integrated Radeon 610M graphics provide a fallback for basic display output when the discrete GPU is disabled to save power.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 7320C + Intel Arc A370M combination ranks at the 72nd percentile among all CPU+GPU pairs in the database.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its closest rival?

A: The Ryzen 3 7320C has an average benchmark score of 14277, which is 0.3% lower than the AMD Ryzen 5 3501U (14320) and 0.3% higher than the Intel Core 7 160UL (14232).

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration?

A: The Intel Arc A370M features 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus with 112.0 GB/s bandwidth and a memory clock of 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective).

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: No, the AMD Ryzen 3 7320C does not support ECC memory, and it uses LPDDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration with 88.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: What is the GPU's ray tracing capability?

A: The Intel Arc A370M has 8 RT cores and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), enabling hardware-accelerated ray tracing, though its 4.198 TFLOPS FP32 performance limits ray-traced workloads.

Q: What socket does the CPU use?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 7320C uses AMD Socket FT6, which is a mobile-specific socket with no desktop counterpart.

Q: Is the GPU still in production?

A: No, the Intel Arc A370M is marked as "End-of-life" with a release date of 2022-03-29, while the CPU remains "Active" with a release date of 2023-05-22.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A370M is built on the DG2-128 chip using TSMC's 6nm process with 7,200 million transistors on a 157 mm² die (transistor density of 45.9M per mm²). It features 1024 shading units, 64 TMUs, and 32 ROPs, with 8 RT cores for ray tracing. The GPU operates at a base clock of 1550 MHz and boosts to 2050 MHz, delivering 4.198 TFLOPS FP32 and 8.397 TFLOPS FP16 (2:1) performance.

The 4 GB GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus provides 112 GB/s bandwidth, with memory clocked at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective). The GPU's pixel rate is 65.60 GPixel/s and texture rate is 131.2 GTexel/s. It connects via PCIe 4.0 x8 and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The 35W TDP makes it efficient for a discrete mobile GPU, and the display outputs are portable device dependent.

In benchmark terms, the GPU achieves a Geekbench OpenCL score of 29676 and Vulkan score of 28673, with an average score of 29175 at the 74th percentile. Its nearest rival, the AMD Radeon RX 6800M, is 1% behind in average score, which is surprising given the RX 6800M's higher-tier positioning. The GPU's 4.198 TFLOPS FP32 is comparable to entry-level desktop GPUs, and the 8 RT cores enable feature-limited ray tracing in supported titles. The 4 GB VRAM is the primary limitation for modern games at high resolutions, but at 1080p medium settings, the card provides a smooth experience.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build pairing the AMD Ryzen 3 7320C (a 4-core/8-thread Zen 2 mobile CPU) with the Intel Arc A370M (a 35W discrete GPU from the Alchemist generation). The system ranks at the 72nd combined percentile, with the CPU at 69th and GPU at 74th, indicating a well-balanced platform where neither component significantly limits the other in most workloads. The CPU's 15W TDP and GPU's 35W TDP combine for a total of approximately 50W under full load, enabling slim laptop designs with adequate cooling.

The platform's strengths lie in its efficiency: the 6nm process for both chips, LPDDR5 memory support with 88 GB/s bandwidth, and the GPU's 112 GB/s memory bandwidth create a coherent memory subsystem. The 4 GB VRAM on the GPU is the most significant weakness, limiting texture quality and resolution scaling. The CPU's 4 MB shared L3 cache and 4 cores are adequate for everyday tasks but may struggle with heavily threaded productivity workloads.

This pairing is positioned as an entry-level discrete GPU laptop, suitable for students, office workers, and casual gamers who need a single machine for work and play. The production status is mixed (CPU active, GPU end-of-life), suggesting this is a transitional platform. The 72nd combined percentile means it outperforms most integrated-graphics laptops and entry-level discrete GPU systems, but it is not a high-performance gaming or workstation machine. For users seeking a balanced, power-efficient laptop for 1080p gaming and general productivity, this combination delivers a compelling package.