SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 3 7320C + Intel Arc A350M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

87 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 13% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
81%
VS
GPU
92%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 3 7320C

14,277 Benchmark Score
Top 19% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A350M

24,647 Benchmark Score
Top 8% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

FAQ

Q: What are the core and thread counts of the AMD Ryzen 3 7320C, and what architecture does it use?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 7320C is a 4-core, 8-thread mobile processor built on the Zen 2 architecture (codenamed Mendocino), manufactured on a 6 nm process at TSMC. It belongs to the Ryzen 3 generation within AMD's 7000 series.

Q: How does the Ryzen 3 7320C compare to its nearest CPU rivals in average benchmark score?

A: The Ryzen 3 7320C has an average benchmark score of 14,277. It sits within 0.7% of its closest rivals: it is 0.3% ahead of the Intel Core 7 160UL, 0.7% ahead of the Intel Core i5-10400F, 0.3% behind the AMD Ryzen 5 3501U, and 0.4% behind the AMD Ryzen Embedded V2546.

Q: What is the memory configuration of the Ryzen 3 7320C?

A: The CPU supports dual-channel LPDDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 88.0 GB/s. It does not support ECC memory, and the memory bus is dual-channel.

Q: What is the GPU's VRAM capacity and memory bandwidth?

A: The Intel Arc A350M features 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, delivering a bandwidth of 112.0 GB/s. The memory clock is 1750 MHz, which translates to 14 Gbps effective.

Q: How does the Arc A350M's benchmark performance compare to its nearest GPU rivals?

A: The Arc A350M has an average benchmark score of 24,647. It is 0.4% behind the AMD Radeon RX 590, 0.5% behind the NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile, 0.8% ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT, and 1.5% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630.

Q: What is the combined percentile ranking of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile for this laptop build is 70, meaning it outperforms 70% of all CPU-GPU combinations in the database. The CPU alone ranks at the 69th percentile among all CPUs, and the GPU ranks at the 70th percentile among all GPUs.

Q: Are there any measured FPS figures for this specific CPU+GPU combination?

A: No. The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact pairing. All gaming performance discussions must be framed as estimates derived from the benchmark scores, not from direct frame rate measurements.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: With the Arc A350M sitting at the 70th GPU percentile and the Ryzen 3 7320C at the 69th CPU percentile, this pairing is positioned for 1080p gaming at medium settings, not high-refresh competitive play. The GPU's 3.379 TFLOPS FP32 throughput and 112.0 GB/s bandwidth suggest it can handle esports titles, but the 4 GB VRAM is a limiting factor for modern AAA games. Expect frame rates that are playable but not sufficient for 144 Hz monitors in demanding titles.

Streaming: The CPU's 8 threads and Zen 2 architecture provide adequate headroom for software encoding at modest bitrates, but the 4-core/8-thread configuration will strain under simultaneous gaming and encoding workloads. The GPU's 6 RT cores and 768 shading units can offload some encoding tasks, but the lack of dedicated tensor cores means no hardware-accelerated AI upscaling. The Passmark multithread score of 8,265 indicates limited parallel processing capacity for streaming overhead.

Video Editing: The Ryzen 3 7320C's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 7,025 places it in the lower-midrange for video rendering. The Arc A350M's 6.758 TFLOPS FP16 performance (2:1 ratio) can accelerate some effects and transitions, but 4 GB VRAM restricts timeline resolution and multi-layer compositing. The 88.0 GB/s CPU memory bandwidth and 112.0 GB/s GPU bandwidth are adequate for 1080p editing but will bottleneck 4K timelines.

3D Rendering: The CPU's Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 2,950 and single-core score of 416 indicate modest rendering capability. The GPU's 24 ROPs and 48 TMUs deliver pixel and texture rates of 52.80 GPixel/s and 105.6 GTexel/s, respectively, which are suitable for preview renders but not final-frame production. The 6 RT cores can accelerate ray-traced previews, but the 3.379 TFLOPS FP32 throughput limits complex scene rendering.

Software Development: The CPU's Passmark integer math score of 32,247 and floating-point math score of 14,071 suggest reasonable compile times for small to medium projects. The 4 MB shared L3 cache and 512 KB per-core L2 cache reduce latency for iterative compilation. The 8 threads handle parallel builds adequately, and the single-thread score of 2,439 in Passmark indicates responsive IDE performance.

Student and Office Work: The CPU's Cinebench R15 single-core score of 99 and Passmark single-thread score of 2,439 are sufficient for web browsing, document processing, and spreadsheet work. The 15 W TDP means long battery life in a laptop form factor. Data encryption performance of 5,443 in Passmark and data compression of 144,465 indicate solid performance for archiving and file management tasks. The Radeon 610M integrated graphics provide a fallback when the discrete GPU is idle, reducing power draw.

Balance and Bottleneck

The benchmark data reveals a relatively balanced pairing, with both components sitting within one percentile point of each other (CPU at 69, GPU at 70). This parity suggests neither component utterly dominates the other in typical workloads, but the nature of bottlenecks shifts by task.

In CPU-bound scenarios like software compilation or data compression (Passmark score of 144,465), the Ryzen 3 7320C's 4 cores become the limiting factor. The GPU's 70th percentile ranking cannot compensate for the CPU's modest multi-threaded throughput of 8,265 in Passmark multithread tests. Conversely, in GPU-bound workloads like 3D rendering or gaming, the Arc A350M's 4 GB VRAM and 64-bit memory bus constrain performance despite the CPU having headroom.

The FPS scaling evidence is absent since no measured FPS data exists for this combination. However, the GPU's 112.0 GB/s bandwidth versus the CPU's 88.0 GB/s memory bandwidth suggests that in gaming, the GPU will likely be the primary bottleneck at higher resolutions, while at lower resolutions the CPU's single-thread performance of 991 in Cinebench R23 could become limiting. The 6 RT cores on the GPU introduce a ray-tracing bottleneck that the CPU cannot assist with, creating a situation where hybrid workloads (gaming with RT enabled) will see the GPU stall.

The 15 W CPU TDP and 25 W GPU TDP indicate a thermally constrained system. In sustained loads, power limits will throttle both components, and the 4 MB L3 cache on the CPU may cause frequent memory stalls that the GPU cannot hide. The dual-channel memory configuration (88.0 GB/s) is shared between the CPU and GPU, creating a potential bandwidth contention point in mixed workloads.

Who Should Build It

Gamers at 1080p Medium Settings: This pairing targets gamers who prioritize portability over maximum frame rates. The GPU's 70th percentile ranking and the CPU's 69th percentile suggest it can handle esports titles at 1080p with medium-to-high settings. For AAA games at 1080p, expect reduced settings and potentially lower resolutions to maintain playable frame rates.

Content Creators on a Budget: The combination of the CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 7,025 and the GPU's 6.758 TFLOPS FP16 performance makes this suitable for photo editing and short-form video work. The 4 GB VRAM limits 4K video editing, but 1080p content creation is feasible. The Passmark integer math score of 32,247 indicates adequate performance for batch processing.

Developers Working with Moderate Codebases: The CPU's 8 threads and 4 MB L3 cache handle compilation of small-to-medium projects efficiently. The Passmark extended instructions score of 3,663 supports modern cryptographic and SIMD operations. The 15 W TDP allows for all-day development on battery power.

Students Requiring Mobility: The 15 W CPU TDP and the laptop form factor make this an ideal choice for students who need all-day battery life. The Radeon 610M integrated graphics provide a power-efficient mode for note-taking and web browsing. The Passmark single-thread score of 2,439 ensures responsive everyday use.

Small Business Workstations: For office productivity, database management, and light data processing, the CPU's data compression score of 144,465 and encryption score of 5,443 demonstrate sufficient throughput. The GPU's 70th percentile ranking supports dual-display setups and hardware-accelerated web rendering. The combined 70th percentile ranking places this build above most entry-level office laptops.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The AMD Ryzen 3 7320C uses AMD Socket FT6, which is a mobile-specific socket with no upgrade path to higher-tier desktop processors. The CPU supports PCIe Gen 3 with 4 lanes (CPU only), limiting expansion bandwidth for external GPUs or fast NVMe storage. The GPU connects via PCIe 4.0 x8, which is backward compatible with the CPU's Gen 3 lanes but will run at reduced bandwidth.

Memory support is limited to LPDDR5 in a dual-channel configuration with 88.0 GB/s bandwidth. This is soldered memory in most laptop implementations, meaning no user-upgradable RAM. The 4 MB shared L3 cache is fixed by the CPU design and cannot be expanded.

The GPU's suggested PSU is not listed, but the 25 W TDP means the total system power draw (CPU at 15 W plus GPU at 25 W) is approximately 40 W, excluding other components. This low power envelope means any standard laptop power adapter can handle the load. The GPU is marked as End-of-life production status, while the CPU remains Active.

A sensible next upgrade would be to move to a newer AMD CPU with more cores and higher memory bandwidth, paired with a modern GPU with more VRAM. The PCIe Gen 3 limitation on the CPU means future GPUs requiring PCIe 4.0 x16 will not achieve full bandwidth. The socket FT6 platform is not designed for upgrades; users should plan for a complete platform replacement rather than incremental upgrades.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact CPU+GPU combination. All gaming figures in this section are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and should be treated as approximations.

Based on the GPU's 70th percentile ranking and the CPU's 69th percentile, this pairing is estimated to deliver playable 1080p gaming performance at medium settings in most titles. The Arc A350M's 3.379 TFLOPS FP32 throughput and 112.0 GB/s bandwidth place it in the range of older desktop GPUs like the AMD Radeon RX 590 (which it trails by 0.4% in average benchmark score). This suggests 60+ FPS in esports titles like Fortnite or CS2 at 1080p medium, but 30-45 FPS in demanding AAA titles.

The 4 GB VRAM is the primary gaming limitation. At 1080p with high textures, many modern games exceed 4 GB VRAM usage, causing stuttering or texture pop-in. The 64-bit memory bus further constrains bandwidth-intensive scenes. The CPU's Cinebench R23 single-core score of 991 indicates adequate per-thread performance for game logic, but the 4-core/8-thread configuration may bottleneck in CPU-heavy titles like simulation games.

Ray-traced gaming is possible but limited by the 6 RT cores. Expect significant frame rate drops when enabling RT effects, even at 1080p. The DirectX 12 Ultimate support (12_2) ensures compatibility with modern rendering features, but the actual RT performance will be modest.

At 1440p, this pairing is not recommended. The GPU's 52.80 GPixel/s pixel rate and 4 GB VRAM will struggle to maintain consistent frame rates. At 720p, the system can run most titles at high settings with 60+ FPS, but this resolution is rarely used on modern laptop displays.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score is 14,277, placing it at the 69th percentile among all CPUs. Its closest rival is the AMD Ryzen 5 3501U with an average score of 14,320, which the Ryzen 3 7320C trails by 0.3%. It leads the Intel Core i5-10400F (14,185) by 0.7% and the Intel Core 7 160UL (14,232) by 0.3%, while trailing the AMD Ryzen Embedded V2546 (14,336) by 0.4%.

In Cinebench tests, the CPU scores 7,025 in R23 multi-core and 991 in R23 single-core. The R20 scores are 2,950 multi-core and 416 single-core. R15 scores are 708 multi-core and 99 single-core. These scores indicate a processor that is roughly 3-4x faster in multi-threaded workloads compared to single-threaded, which is typical for a 4-core/8-thread Zen 2 part.

The Passmark suite reveals strengths in integer math (32,247) and floating-point math (14,071), with data compression at 144,465 and encryption at 5,443. The find prime numbers score of 18 is notably low, indicating weak branch-heavy integer workloads. The multithread score of 8,265 and single-thread score of 2,439 align with the Cinebench results, confirming the CPU's mid-range positioning.

The GPU's average benchmark score is 24,647, placing it at the 70th percentile among all GPUs. It scores 24,546 in Geekbench OpenCL and 24,747 in Geekbench Vulkan. The closest rival is the AMD Radeon RX 590 with an average score of 24,744, which the Arc A350M trails by 0.4%. It leads the AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT (24,442) by 0.8% and the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 (24,277) by 1.5%, while trailing the NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile (24,763) by 0.5%.

The combined picture shows a system that is slightly stronger on the GPU side than the CPU side, with both components performing within 1 percentile point of each other. The combined percentile of 70 suggests this build outperforms 70% of all laptop configurations in the database.

Build Overview

This build pairs the AMD Ryzen 3 7320C mobile processor with the Intel Arc A350M discrete GPU in a laptop form factor. The CPU is a 4-core/8-thread Zen 2 part from the 7000 series, manufactured on a 6 nm process at TSMC with a 15 W TDP. The GPU is an Intel Arc A350M from the Alchemist (Arc 3 Mobile) generation, built on the Xe-HPG architecture with a 25 W TDP.

The combined percentile ranking of 70 indicates that this system outperforms 70% of all CPU+GPU combinations in the database. The CPU sits at the 69th percentile among all CPUs, and the GPU sits at the 70th percentile among all GPUs, showing a well-balanced configuration. The system is designed for mobile use, with both components optimized for low power consumption.

This is an entry-to-mid-range laptop build suited for everyday productivity, light content creation, and 1080p gaming at medium settings. The 6 nm process node for both CPU and GPU ensures efficient power usage, while the total TDP of 40 W (15 W CPU + 25 W GPU) allows for fanless or low-noise cooling in thin-and-light chassis.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 3 7320C is a 4-core, 8-thread processor based on the Zen 2 architecture, codenamed Mendocino. It is part of AMD's 7000 series and is manufactured on a 6 nm process at TSMC with a die size of 100 mm². The base clock is 2.40 GHz with a boost clock of 4.10 GHz, and the TDP is 15 W, making it suitable for fanless or low-power mobile designs.

The cache hierarchy consists of 64 KB L1 per core, 512 KB L2 per core, and 4 MB shared L3 cache. Memory support is limited to LPDDR5 in a dual-channel configuration with 88.0 GB/s bandwidth. The CPU connects via PCIe Gen 3 with 4 lanes (CPU only), which is a limitation for expansion but adequate for a mobile part.

Benchmark results show a processor that excels in multi-threaded throughput relative to its power envelope. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 7,025 and R20 score of 2,950 place it in the mid-range for mobile CPUs. The single-core scores of 991 (R23) and 416 (R20) indicate adequate per-thread performance for everyday tasks but not competitive with high-end desktop parts.

The Passmark scores reveal specific strengths: data compression at 144,465 is strong, indicating good memory subsystem performance. Integer math at 32,247 and floating-point math at 14,071 are respectable for a 4-core part. The find prime numbers score of 18 is notably weak, suggesting poor branch prediction or high memory latency in certain workloads. The extended instructions score of 3,663 supports modern SIMD and crypto operations.

The 69th percentile ranking among all CPUs means this processor outperforms 69% of CPUs in the database. Its nearest rivals include the Ryzen 5 3501U (0.3% faster), the Intel Core 7 160UL (0.3% slower), and the Intel Core i5-10400F (0.7% slower). This places the 7320C in a tight competitive cluster where the differences are within measurement noise.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A350M is a mobile GPU based on the Xe-HPG architecture, codenamed DG2-128, from the Alchemist generation. It is manufactured on a 6 nm process at TSMC with 7,200 million transistors on a 157 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 45.9M per mm². The GPU has a base clock of 1150 MHz and a boost clock of 2200 MHz, with a TDP of 25 W.

Memory configuration includes 4 GB of GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus, delivering 112.0 GB/s bandwidth. The memory clock is 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective). The GPU features 768 shading units, 48 TMUs, 24 ROPs, and 6 RT cores for ray tracing. There are no dedicated tensor cores listed, which limits AI-accelerated features.

The pixel rate is 52.80 GPixel/s and the texture rate is 105.6 GTexel/s. FP32 performance is 3.379 TFLOPS, with FP16 at 6.758 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio). The bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x8, and the slot width is IGP (integrated GPU), meaning it is soldered to the motherboard.

Benchmark results show the GPU at the 70th percentile among all GPUs, with an average score of 24,647. It scores 24,546 in Geekbench OpenCL and 24,747 in Geekbench Vulkan. The nearest rivals are the AMD Radeon RX 590 (0.4% faster), NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile (0.5% faster), AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT (0.8% slower), and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 (1.5% slower).

The 6 RT cores enable hardware-accelerated ray tracing, but the 3.379 TFLOPS FP32 throughput limits overall rendering performance. The 4 GB VRAM is a significant constraint for modern games at 1080p high settings, and the 64-bit memory bus limits bandwidth to 112.0 GB/s. The DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and Vulkan 1.4 support ensure compatibility with modern graphics APIs, and OpenGL 4.6 is supported for legacy applications. The GPU is marked as End-of-life production status, indicating it is being phased out in favor of newer architectures.