RADEON

ATI Radeon IGP 320

AMD graphics card specifications and benchmark scores

โ€”
VRAM
โ€”
MHz Boost
โ€”
TDP
โ€”
Bus Width

ATI Radeon IGP 320 Specifications

โš™๏ธ

ATI Radeon IGP 320 GPU Core

Shader units and compute resources

The ATI Radeon IGP 320 GPU core specifications define its raw processing power for graphics and compute workloads. Shading units (also called CUDA cores, stream processors, or execution units depending on manufacturer) handle the parallel calculations required for rendering. TMUs (Texture Mapping Units) process texture data, while ROPs (Render Output Units) handle final pixel output. Higher shader counts generally translate to better GPU benchmark performance, especially in demanding games and 3D applications.

TMUs
1
ROPs
1
โฑ๏ธ

ATI Radeon IGP 320 Clock Speeds

GPU and memory frequencies

Clock speeds directly impact the ATI Radeon IGP 320's performance in GPU benchmarks and real-world gaming. The base clock represents the minimum guaranteed frequency, while the boost clock indicates peak performance under optimal thermal conditions. Memory clock speed affects texture loading and frame buffer operations. The ATI Radeon IGP 320 by AMD dynamically adjusts frequencies based on workload, temperature, and power limits to maximize performance while maintaining stability.

GPU Clock
160 MHz
Memory Clock
System Shared
GDDR GDDR 6X 6X

AMD's ATI Radeon IGP 320 Memory

VRAM capacity and bandwidth

VRAM (Video RAM) is dedicated memory for storing textures, frame buffers, and shader data. The ATI Radeon IGP 320's memory capacity determines how well it handles high-resolution textures and multiple displays. Memory bandwidth, measured in GB/s, affects how quickly data moves between the GPU and VRAM. Higher bandwidth improves performance in memory-intensive scenarios like 4K gaming. The memory bus width and type (GDDR6, GDDR6X, HBM) significantly influence overall GPU benchmark scores.

Memory Size
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
VRAM Type
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
Bandwidth
System Dependent
๐Ÿ“ˆ

ATI Radeon IGP 320 Theoretical Performance

Compute and fill rates

Theoretical performance metrics provide a baseline for comparing the ATI Radeon IGP 320 against other graphics cards. FP32 (single-precision) performance, measured in TFLOPS, indicates compute capability for gaming and general GPU workloads. FP64 (double-precision) matters for scientific computing. Pixel and texture fill rates determine how quickly the GPU can render complex scenes. While real-world GPU benchmark results depend on many factors, these specifications help predict relative performance levels.

Pixel Rate
160.0 MPixel/s
Texture Rate
160.0 MTexel/s
๐Ÿ—๏ธ

Rage 6 Architecture & Process

Manufacturing and design details

The ATI Radeon IGP 320 is built on AMD's Rage 6 architecture, which defines how the GPU processes graphics and compute workloads. The manufacturing process node affects power efficiency, thermal characteristics, and maximum clock speeds. Smaller process nodes pack more transistors into the same die area, enabling higher performance per watt. Understanding the architecture helps predict how the ATI Radeon IGP 320 will perform in GPU benchmarks compared to previous generations.

Architecture
Rage 6
GPU Name
RS100
Process Node
180 nm
Transistors
30 million
Die Size
73 mmยฒ
Density
411.0K / mmยฒ
๐Ÿ”Œ

AMD's ATI Radeon IGP 320 Power & Thermal

TDP and power requirements

Power specifications for the ATI Radeon IGP 320 determine PSU requirements and thermal management needs. TDP (Thermal Design Power) indicates the heat output under typical loads, guiding cooler selection. Power connector requirements ensure adequate power delivery for stable operation during demanding GPU benchmarks. The suggested PSU wattage accounts for the entire system, not just the graphics card. Efficient power delivery enables the ATI Radeon IGP 320 to maintain boost clocks without throttling.

Power Connectors
None
๐Ÿ“

ATI Radeon IGP 320 by AMD Physical & Connectivity

Dimensions and outputs

Physical dimensions of the ATI Radeon IGP 320 are critical for case compatibility. Card length, height, and slot width determine whether it fits in your chassis. The PCIe interface version affects bandwidth for communication with the CPU. Display outputs define monitor connectivity options, with modern cards supporting multiple high-resolution displays simultaneously. Verify these specifications against your case and motherboard before purchasing to ensure a proper fit.

Slot Width
IGP
Bus Interface
AGP 4x
Display Outputs
Motherboard Dependent
Display Outputs
Motherboard Dependent
๐ŸŽฎ

AMD API Support

Graphics and compute APIs

API support determines which games and applications can fully utilize the ATI Radeon IGP 320. DirectX 12 Ultimate enables advanced features like ray tracing and variable rate shading. Vulkan provides cross-platform graphics capabilities with low-level hardware access. OpenGL remains important for professional applications and older games. CUDA (NVIDIA) and OpenCL enable GPU compute for video editing, 3D rendering, and scientific applications. Higher API versions unlock newer graphical features in GPU benchmarks and games.

DirectX
7.0
DirectX
7.0
OpenGL
1.4
OpenGL
1.4
๐Ÿ“ฆ

ATI Radeon IGP 320 Product Information

Release and pricing details

The ATI Radeon IGP 320 is manufactured by AMD as part of their graphics card lineup. Release date and launch pricing provide context for comparing GPU benchmark results with competing products from the same era. Understanding the product lifecycle helps evaluate whether the ATI Radeon IGP 320 by AMD represents good value at current market prices. Predecessor and successor information aids in tracking generational improvements and planning future upgrades.

Manufacturer
AMD
Release Date
Oct 2002
Production
End-of-life
Successor
TeraScale IGP

ATI Radeon IGP 320 Benchmark Scores

๐Ÿ“Š

No benchmark data available for this GPU.

About ATI Radeon IGP 320

The ATI Radeon IGP 320 emerged during a pivotal shift in integrated graphics solutions, offering a budget-conscious alternative for mainstream desktop systems in 2002. With its reliance on system shared memory and built on the 180 nm Rage 6 architecture, the ATI Radeon IGP 320 prioritized cost-efficiency over raw performance, making it an attractive option for OEMs building entry-level PCs. Its integration into the chipset eliminated the need for a discrete GPU, significantly reducing overall system cost while still delivering basic 3D acceleration and DVD playback capabilities. This tight cost control allowed manufacturers to position systems with the ATI Radeon IGP 320 as affordable multimedia machines for home and office use. At a time when discrete graphics cards were becoming increasingly powerful but also more expensive, the ATI Radeon IGP 320 filled a crucial niche by balancing functionality and affordability. While lacking dedicated VRAM limited its gaming and graphics-intensive potential, its value lay in enabling functional Windows XP experiences without inflating system prices. The decision to use AGP 4x ensured compatibility with contemporary motherboards without pushing production costs higher. Ultimately, the ATI Radeon IGP 320 succeeded not through performance leaps but through strategic market positioning as a reliable, low-cost solution for average computing needs.

From an investment standpoint, the ATI Radeon IGP 320 was never intended as a long-term gaming or workstation solution, but rather as a smart allocation of resources in cost-sensitive builds. Its value proposition becomes clear when considering the total system economics by integrating graphics directly onto the motherboard, manufacturers could reallocate funds to better storage, memory, or CPUs. For users with modest graphical demands, such as web browsing, office applications, and media playback, the ATI Radeon IGP 320 provided a functional and future-proof-enough platform for its era. Enthusiasts looking to build or upgrade systems on a tight budget would find the ATI Radeon IGP 320 a sensible choice if discrete graphics werenโ€™t a priority. Given its 2002 release date and process technology, longevity was limited by evolving software demands, but within its intended lifespan, it delivered consistent performance for everyday tasks. Build recommendations for the ATI Radeon IGP 320 center on balanced, low-cost systems where graphical fidelity wasnโ€™t the focus. While benchmark data is unavailable, real-world usage indicated it outperformed older integrated solutions, reinforcing its role as a transitional step in GPU integration. In retrospect, the ATI Radeon IGP 320 stands as a pragmatic solution that maximized value through integration, not innovation.

The NVIDIA Equivalent of ATI Radeon IGP 320

Looking for a similar graphics card from NVIDIA? The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 offers comparable performance and features in the NVIDIA lineup.

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080

NVIDIA โ€ข 8 GB VRAM

View Specs Compare

Popular ATI Radeon IGP 320 Comparisons

See how the ATI Radeon IGP 320 stacks up against similar graphics cards from the same generation and competing brands.

Compare ATI Radeon IGP 320 with Other GPUs

Select another GPU to compare specifications and benchmarks side-by-side.

Browse GPUs